Liqs commited on
Commit
fb23d1e
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c071a70

Add dataset skew and update description for file commit chains

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +32 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ GitGoodBench Lite is a subset of 900 samples for evaluating the performance of A
11
  The samples in the dataset are evenly split across the programming languages Python, Java and Kotlin and the sample types merge conflict resolution and file-commit gram.
12
  This dataset thus contains 150 samples per sample type and programming language.
13
 
14
- All data in this dataset are collected from open-source repositories on GitHub with permissive licenses
15
  that have >= 1000 stars, >= 5 branches, >= 10 contributors and are not a fork or archived. We collected the initial list of repositories using [SEART.](https://seart-ghs.si.usi.ch/)
16
 
17
  Evaluation is to be performed by exact-match (EM) of diffs for the merge conflict setting and by LLM-as-a-Judge for the file-commit gram setting. [For further details see our paper.]()
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ File-commit chain scenarios consist of two commits, the oldest and newest commit
43
  In total the chain consists of `times_seen_consecutively` commits. The intended use-cases of these scenarios are to evaluate the agent's capacity to create meaningful, cohesive commits or
44
  improve the local tree via rebasing. Thus samples of this `sample_type` cover two scenario types.
45
 
 
 
46
  A `file_commit_chain` scenario looks as follows:
47
  ```
48
  {
@@ -82,6 +84,35 @@ The following table provides per-field details. Columns marked “Yes” under *
82
  # Dataset statistics
83
  We provide some statistics on the distribution of “difficulty” within the overall dataset and across different scenario types.
84
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
85
 
86
  ## Overall Difficulty Distribution
87
 
 
11
  The samples in the dataset are evenly split across the programming languages Python, Java and Kotlin and the sample types merge conflict resolution and file-commit gram.
12
  This dataset thus contains 150 samples per sample type and programming language.
13
 
14
+ All data in this dataset are collected from 493 unique, open-source GitHub repositories with permissive licenses
15
  that have >= 1000 stars, >= 5 branches, >= 10 contributors and are not a fork or archived. We collected the initial list of repositories using [SEART.](https://seart-ghs.si.usi.ch/)
16
 
17
  Evaluation is to be performed by exact-match (EM) of diffs for the merge conflict setting and by LLM-as-a-Judge for the file-commit gram setting. [For further details see our paper.]()
 
43
  In total the chain consists of `times_seen_consecutively` commits. The intended use-cases of these scenarios are to evaluate the agent's capacity to create meaningful, cohesive commits or
44
  improve the local tree via rebasing. Thus samples of this `sample_type` cover two scenario types.
45
 
46
+ File-commit chains are at least 3 commits long, all commits only contain files in the specified programming_language and no commit is a merge commit.
47
+
48
  A `file_commit_chain` scenario looks as follows:
49
  ```
50
  {
 
84
  # Dataset statistics
85
  We provide some statistics on the distribution of “difficulty” within the overall dataset and across different scenario types.
86
 
87
+ ## Dataset Skew
88
+
89
+ We note that our dataset is skewed towards the top four repositories especially, however skew flattens quickly.
90
+
91
+ ### Distribution Statistics
92
+ - Total number of repositories (count): 493
93
+ - Average (mean) samples per repository: 1.83
94
+ - Standard deviation (std): 2.82
95
+ - Minimum (min): 1
96
+ - 25th percentile (25%): 1
97
+ - Median (50%): 1
98
+ - 75th percentile (75%): 2
99
+ - Maximum (max): 46
100
+
101
+ ### Top-10 Repositories by Sample Count
102
+
103
+ | Repository | Percentage of Total Samples |
104
+ |-------------------------------------|----------------------------:|
105
+ | oss-review-toolkit/ort | 5.11% |
106
+ | stripe/stripe-android | 3.33% |
107
+ | element-hq/element-android | 2.67% |
108
+ | jetbrains/compose-multiplatform | 1.11% |
109
+ | jetbrains/ideavim | 0.89% |
110
+ | kotlin/dokka | 0.89% |
111
+ | android/nowinandroid | 0.78% |
112
+ | wikimedia/apps-android-wikipedia | 0.78% |
113
+ | coil-kt/coil | 0.78% |
114
+ | kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines | 0.67% |
115
+
116
 
117
  ## Overall Difficulty Distribution
118