List of warnings¶
Warnings produced by Luacheck are categorized using three-digit warning codes. Warning codes can be displayed in CLI output using --codes
CLI option or codes
config option. Errors also have codes starting with zero; unlike warnings, they can not be ignored.
| Code | Description |
|---|---|
| 011 | A syntax error. |
| 021 | An invalid inline option. |
| 022 | An unpaired inline push directive. |
| 023 | An unpaired inline pop directive. |
| 111 | Setting an undefined global variable. |
| 112 | Mutating an undefined global variable. |
| 113 | Accessing an undefined global variable. |
| 121 | Setting a read-only global variable. |
| 122 | Setting a read-only field of a global variable. |
| 131 | Unused implicitly defined global variable. |
| 142 | Setting an undefined field of a global variable. |
| 143 | Accessing an undefined field of a global variable. |
| 211 | Unused local variable. |
| 212 | Unused argument. |
| 213 | Unused loop variable. |
| 221 | Local variable is accessed but never set. |
| 231 | Local variable is set but never accessed. |
| 232 | An argument is set but never accessed. |
| 233 | Loop variable is set but never accessed. |
| 241 | Local variable is mutated but never accessed. |
| 311 | Value assigned to a local variable is unused. |
| 312 | Value of an argument is unused. |
| 313 | Value of a loop variable is unused. |
| 314 | Value of a field in a table literal is unused. |
| 321 | Accessing uninitialized local variable. |
| 331 | Value assigned to a local variable is mutated but never accessed. |
| 341 | Mutating uninitialized local variable. |
| 411 | Redefining a local variable. |
| 412 | Redefining an argument. |
| 413 | Redefining a loop variable. |
| 421 | Shadowing a local variable. |
| 422 | Shadowing an argument. |
| 423 | Shadowing a loop variable. |
| 431 | Shadowing an upvalue. |
| 432 | Shadowing an upvalue argument. |
| 433 | Shadowing an upvalue loop variable. |
| 511 | Unreachable code. |
| 512 | Loop can be executed at most once. |
| 521 | Unused label. |
| 531 | Left-hand side of an assignment is too short. |
| 532 | Left-hand side of an assignment is too long. |
| 541 | An empty do end block. |
| 542 | An empty if branch. |
| 551 | An empty statement. |
| 611 | A line consists of nothing but whitespace. |
| 612 | A line contains trailing whitespace. |
| 613 | Trailing whitespace in a string. |
| 614 | Trailing whitespace in a comment. |
| 621 | Inconsistent indentation (SPACE followed by TAB ). |
| 631 | Line is too long. |
Global variables (1xx)¶
For each file, Luacheck builds list of defined globals and fields which can be used there. By default only globals from Lua standard library are defined; custom globals can be added using --globals
CLI option or globals
config option, and version of standard library can be selected using --std
CLI option or std
config option. When an undefined global or field is set, mutated or accessed, Luacheck produces a warning.
Read-only globals¶
By default, most standard globals and fields are marked as read-only, so that setting them produces a warning. Custom read-only globals and fields can be added using --read-globals
CLI option or read_globals
config option, or using a custom set of globals. See Custom sets of globals
Globals and fields that are not read-only by default:
_G
_ENV
(treated as a global by Luacheck)package.path
package.cpath
package.loaded
package.preload
package.loaders
package.searchers
Implicitly defined globals¶
Luacheck can be configured to consider globals assigned under some conditions to be defined implicitly. When -d
/--allow_defined
CLI option or allow_defined
config option is used, all assignments to globals define them; when -t
/--allow_defined_top
CLI option or allow_defined_top
config option is used, assignments to globals in the top level function scope (also known as main chunk) define them. A warning is produced when an implicitly defined global is not accessed anywhere.
Modules¶
Files can be marked as modules using -m
/--module
CLI option or module
config option to simulate semantics of the deprecated module function. Globals implicitly defined inside a module are considired part of its interface, are not visible outside and are not reported as unused. Assignments to other globals are not allowed, even to defined ones.
Unused variables (2xx) and values (3xx)¶
Luacheck generates warnings for all unused local variables except one named _
. It also detects variables which are set but never accessed or accessed but never set.
Unused values and uninitialized variables¶
For each value assigned to a local variable, Luacheck computes set of expressions where it could be used. Warnings are produced for unused values (when a value can’t be used anywhere) and for accessing uninitialized variables (when no values can reach an expression). E.g. in the following snippet value assigned to foo
on line 1 is unused, and variable bar
is uninitialized on line 9:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | local foo = expr1()
local bar
if condition() then
foo = expr2()
bar = expr3()
else
foo = expr4()
print(bar)
end
return foo, bar
|
Secondary values and variables¶
Unused value assigned to a local variable is secondary if its origin is the last item on the RHS of assignment, and another value from that item is used. Secondary values typically appear when result of a function call is put into locals, and only some of them are later used. For example, here value assigned to b
is secondary, value assigned to c
is used, and value assigned to a
is simply unused:
1 2 3 | local a, b, c = f(), g()
return c
|
A variable is secondary if all values assigned to it are secondary. In the snippet above, b
is a secondary variable.
Warnings related to unused secondary values and variables can be removed using -s
/--no-unused-secondaries
CLI option or unused_secondaries
config option.
Shadowing declarations (4xx)¶
Luacheck detects declarations of local variables shadowing previous declarations, unless the variable is named _
. If the previous declaration is in the same scope as the new one, it is called redefining.
Note that it is not necessary to define a new local variable when overwriting an argument:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | local function f(x)
local x = x or "default" -- bad
end
local function f(x)
x = x or "default" -- good
end
|
Control flow and data flow issues (5xx)¶
Unreachable code¶
Luacheck detects unreachable code. It also detects it if end of a loop block is unreachable, which means that the loop can be executed at most once:
1 2 3 4 5 | for i = 1, 100 do
-- Break statement is outside the `if` block,
-- so that the loop always stops after the first iteration.
if cond(i) then f() end break
end
|
Unused labels¶
Labels that are not used by any goto
statements are reported as unused.
Unbalanced assignments¶
If an assignment has left side and right side with different lengths, the assignment is unbalanced and Luacheck warns about it.
An exception is initializing several local variables in a single statement while leaving some uninitialized:
1 | local a, b, c = nil -- Effectively sets `a`, `b`, and `c` to nil, no warning.
|
Empty blocks¶
Luacheck warns about empty do
end
blocks and empty if
branches (then
else
, then
elseif
, and then
end
).
Empty statements¶
In Lua 5.2+ semicolons are considered statements and can appear even when not following normal statements. Such semicolons produce Luacheck warnings as they are completely useless.
Formatting issues (6xx)¶
Whitespace issues¶
Luacheck warns about trailing whitespace and inconsistent indentation (SPACE
followed by TAB
).
Line length limits¶
Luacheck warns about lines that are longer then some limit. Default limit is 120
characters. It’s possible
to change this limit using --max-line-length
CLI option or disable the check completely with
--no-max-line-length
; there are similar config and inline options.
Additionally, separate limits can be set for three different type of lines:
- “String” lines have their line ending inside a string, typically a long string using
[[...]]
syntax. - “Comment” lines have their line ending inside a long comment (
--[[...]]
), or end with a short comment using normal--...
syntax. - “Code” lines are all other lines.
These types of lines are limited using CLI options named --[no-]max-string-line-length
, --[no-]max-comment-line-length
,
and --[no-]max-code-line-length
, with similar config and inline options.


As a data scientist, I strive to solve problems using logic. I am a conscientious individual who firmly believes in the importance of structure. The rewarding feelings that result from being a part of a successful team drive me to be an effective leader.
I currently work as a Senior Consultant at MorganFranklin Consulting, where, as a member of the data science team, I apply data analysis and machine learning to help our clients make better business decisions. Prior to starting at MorganFranklin, I graduated from the full-time data science course at General Assembly, which is how I began my journey into the field of data science. The course was an intense 12-week program focused on real-world applications of data science principles and best practices. This included leveraging Python and SQL for data collection and wrangling, data analysis, machine learning, and data visualization.
I enjoy utilizing my time both on-the-job and outside of work to expand my knowledge and experience of neural networks and big data tools. Most recently, I have been exploring Udemy courses that teach the fundamentals of useful tools like Apache Spark and Hadoop. Other fascinating courses I have completed include the five courses that make up the deeplearning.ai specialization, which is offered on Coursera and is taught by Andrew Ng, one of the great pioneers of AI.


Example 4 - how to use register custom LoDash based filters?
You can create your own LoDash filters easily by combining different LoDash methods to more complex ones (mixins). You can defined LoDash mixins in separate js file and just register
those as filters inside .config() section. Or you can defined your custom filters for example
.directive() pre compile phase.
Example app
Checkout from view template how register custom LoDash filters
Way 1 check the .config() should be uniq and between 3 to 30
{{num}}
Way 2 check the .config() should be uniq and biggest number first
{{num}}
Way 3 lazy load inside .directive() just before you need it inside view template should be uniq and less than 10


Components: Two Side Multi Select
Default:
Sponge Bob
User Userberg
User Userbergovich
User Userbergini
User Userbergovski
User Userbergoff
User Userberegovoy
User Userbergosyan
User Userbergovenko
Labels:
Sponge Bob
User Userberg
User Userbergovich
User Userbergini
User Userbergovski
User Userbergoff
User Userberegovoy
User Userbergosyan
User Userbergovenko


Coco Gauff to battle Serena Williams and Bianca Andreescu in Auckland
by FSA EditorTwo weeks before the Australian Open, Coco Gauff, Serena Williams and Bianca Andreescu will all be playing at the Auckland Open.
Coco Gauff will do battle against the likes of Serena Williams and Bianca Andreescu on the first week of the new WTA Tour season after signing up to play in the Auckland Open.
The 15-year-old sensation is limited in the number of tournaments she can play before turning 16 but has opted to play the WTA International event in New Zealand.
Gauff won her first senior title at the Linz Open last month and will use the Auckland tournament, which begins on January 6, as part of her preparation for the Australian Open.
US Open finalists Andreescu and Williams are also scheduled to be part of the field, meaning Gauff could meet either during the tournament, along with two-time defending champion Julia Goerges.
Gauff’s success this year included a famous run to the fourth round of Wimbledon, where she became the youngest player in the Open era to come through the qualifying rounds to reach the main draw. Her exploits helped to secure a year-end ranking of 68.
She told the tournament website: “I can’t wait to start my season in Auckland. 2019 was such an incredible year and I achieved so many of the goals that I had set for myself. Wimbledon was obviously a highlight as was capturing my first WTA title.
“So many players talk about Auckland. I have not been before so this will be cool to experience.”


Guys whats a hybrid build? And what type of rogue hybrids are there? Silly question i know but help me out If u can add some links to hybrid builds to check out i would appreciate it
A hybrid build is whatever a guy who thought about naming that thing like that thought, no really, I have no idea, and I guess it's just a way to call something else which does have a real name, understandable without the need of context, because I have no reference context here right now.
I think it just means a multi-class character. If the build is Rogue/Fighter/Wizard with a strong emphasis on Rogue then it would be a Rogue hybrid.
Hybrid, in this context, would mean that the character is more or less equally good at two or more 'classic' D&D roles... Like a Rogue/Fighter, or a Fighter/Mage, or a Mage/Cleric, or whatever.
For example, if you're a Wizard who takes one level of Rogue to skilldump some stuff into UMD and Tumble, you're not a Hybrid character. If you're a Wizard who can also sneak, disarm traps, do decent sneak attacks, etc.


|
Brooklyn | |||||||
| PREV NEXT | FRAMES NO FRAMES |
| Interface Summary | |
|---|---|
| AbstractGroup | Represents a group of entities - sub-classes can support dynamically changing membership, ad hoc groupings, etc. |
| Attributes | This interface should be used to access Sensor definitions. |
| BasicApplication | The most basic implementation of an application possible. |
| BasicEntity | This is the most basic entity possible - does nothing beyond AbstractEntity. |
| BasicGroup | |
| ConfigMap | @deprecated since 0.4.0 use brooklyn.entity.ConfigMap as interface, or appropriate implementation where needed |
| ConfigurableEntityFactory | |
| DynamicGroup | |
| EntityFactory | A Factory for creating entities. |
| EntityFactoryForLocation | dispatch interface to allow an EntityFactory to indicate it might be able to discover other factories for specific locations (e.g. if the location implements a custom entity-aware interface) |
| EntityInternal | Extended Entity interface with additional functionality that is purely-internal (i.e. intended for the brooklyn framework only). |
| EntityLocal | Extended Entity interface for use in places where the caller should have certain privileges, such as setting attribute values, adding policies, etc. |
| SoftwareProcess | |
| SoftwareProcessDriver | The EntityDriver for a SoftwareProcess. |
| StartableApplication |
| Class Summary | |
|---|---|
| AbstractApplication | Users can extend this to define the entities in their application, and the relationships between those entities. |
| AbstractConfigurableEntityFactory | |
| AbstractEffector | The abstract Effector implementation. |
| AbstractEntity | Default Entity implementation, which should be extended whenever implementing an entity. |
| AbstractGroupImpl | Represents a group of entities - sub-classes can support dynamically changing membership, ad hoc groupings, etc. |
| AbstractSoftwareProcessDriver | An abstract implementation of the SoftwareProcessDriver. |
| AbstractSoftwareProcessSshDriver | An abstract SSH implementation of the AbstractSoftwareProcessDriver. |
| ApplicationBuilder | Experimental mechanism for defining/building applications. |
| BasicApplicationImpl | |
| BasicConfigurableEntityFactory | |
| BasicEntityImpl | |
| BasicGroupImpl | |
| BasicParameterType | TODO javadoc |
| ClosureEntityFactory | |
| ConfigKeys | Dictionary of ConfigKey entries. |
| ConfigMapViewWithStringKeys | Internal class that presents a view over a ConfigMap, so it looks like a Map (with the keys being the config key names). |
| ConfigurableEntityFactoryFromEntityFactory | |
| DynamicGroupImpl | |
| EffectorUtils | @deprecated Use brooklyn.management.internal.EffectorUtils; deprecated since 0.5 |
| EffectorWithExplicitImplementation |
|
| Entities | Convenience methods for working with entities. |
| EntityConfigMap | |
| EntityDynamicType | This is the actual type of an entity instance at runtime, which can change from the static EntityType, and can change over time; for this reason it does *not* implement EntityType, but callers can call getSnapshot() to get a snapshot such instance |
| EntityPredicates | |
| EntityReferences | |
| EntityReferences.EntityCollectionReference | |
| EntityReferences.EntityReference | Serialization helper. |
| EntityReferences.SelfEntityReference | |
| EntityTypeSnapshot | |
| EntityTypes | |
| ExplicitEffector | |
| MethodEffector | concrete class for providing an Effector implementation that gets its information from annotations on a method; see Effector*Test for usage example |
| MethodEffector.AnnotationsOnMethod | |
| PolicyDescriptor | |
| SoftwareProcessImpl | An Entity representing a piece of software which can be installed, run, and controlled. |
| Enum Summary | |
|---|---|
| Lifecycle | An enumeration representing the status of an Entity. |
| Annotation Type Summary | |
|---|---|
| Create | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
| DefaultValue | provides runtime access to the name of a paramter, esp for effectors; typically matches any default value supplied in the code |
| Description | provides runtime access to the description of an effector or paramter, esp for effectors |
| Destroy | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
| Error | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
| NamedParameter | provides a runtime name of a paramter, esp for effectors; typically matches the name in the code |
| PostStart | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
| PostStop | |
| PreStart | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
| PreStop | @deprecated This annotation had no effect; deprecated in brooklyn 0.4.0. |
Brooklyn Multi-Cloud Application Management Platform
brooklyncentral.github.com. Apache License. © 2012.


HACKUCI
CREATE.
CONNECT.
INSPIRE.
Opening Ceremonies 🎉
with Heran Patel 🔥
Directors 👨🏾💻
Jeremy
Anuj
Wesley
Madhav
👶🏽
Kamesh
Sean
Tedrick
Wifi
HACKUCI
Goanteaters!
Marios Papaefthymiou
Dean | School of Information and Computer Sciences
Pariveda Solutions
Albert Cassanova
SendGrid
Anthony Wang & Dustin Guerrero
Templarbit
Matthias Kadenbach & Bjoern Zinssmeister
Toshiba
Milong Sabandith & Jeff Wong
Other Prizes 🎁
.tech domain
best overall prize
best entrepreneurial hack
Talk to us! 📣
hackuci.com/live
Slack
Mentors
Devpost
#hackuci/#hackuci2018
Hacking Ends In ⏰
Need a team? Come to the lobby
Happy Hacking!


Implement Broadcasting Indexing Schedule for the partial replication with control index.
Hint: start with a tree, and assume the replication level of the tree and design the schedule.
You can show how clients can reach to the data from the point they start tuning in.


Links
I find a wide variety of things interesting and/or useful on the web. These are just some of them.
--- title: Links ---
I find a wide variety of things interesting and/or useful on the web. These are just some of them.
|
My current employer's website |
|
|
Yunan Song's Personal website |
|
|
This is my another partner Yi Lu's github page |
|
|
Our university's team for FSAE racing competition |
|
A well know coding helper website |
|
|
CPP reference website |
|
Online anima video host with barrage. |
|
|
Essentially the entire (great) team from AllThings D moved over to a separate site at the turn of the year. An excellent resource for reliable news and reviews. |


Chain Relays or A Practical Approach for Cross-chain Trades
KyberNetwork’s long term vision is to support trading between different cryptocurrencies, e.g between BTC and ETH, ETC and any ETH tokens. In order to do so, we rely on technology and protocols that allow communication between these cryptocurrency networks. We are glad to see many qualified teams including Polkadot and Cosmos — just to name a few — working on the problem. Unfortunately, these projects are still under heavy development and either have yet to announce any release date (e.g. Polkadot) or only work for proof of stake-based blockchains (e.g. Cosmos). Thus, a practical solution for interchain communication between existing blockchains is still yet to be explored. In this post, we discuss a practical solution that has been largely overlooked: chain relays. We conclude by describing how KyberNetwork is planning to use and maintain chain relays for our use cases.
What is a Chain Relay?
A chain relay for a blockchain X, or X-relay for brevity, is a way to implement and maintain light client for blockchain X within an Ethereum smart contract. The contract essentially stores all block headers which are much lighter than the size of the chain state or the entire blockchain, hence the term light client. With the block headers, it is sufficient to verify if a transaction has been included, or even the blockchain state, depending on what are stored in a block header. Thus, X-relay allows any contract in Ethereum to verify transactions, and sometimes even account states of the blockchain X via the implemented light client.
Why Chain Relays Are Powerful?
Having a light client of a cryptocurrency X running on Ethereum enables strong interoperability between Ethereum and the said cryptocurrency. For example, one can create a contract to receive payment in X-coin by fixing a beneficiary address in X that one controls. The contract then verifies any transaction via X-relay to see if the exact amount has been sent to the given address. Chain relays simply break the boundary between different cryptocurrencies/ blockchains and, most importantly, does not require any trust assumption.
What Are the States of Existing Chain Relays?
The first chain relay on Ethereum was BTCRelay developed by Joseph Chow. You can watch to his talk in Devcon 1 here. BTCRelay, though promises interesting applications, has not gained much adoption yet. At the time of writing, the last BTC block relayed to the contract was 18 days ago. Part of the reasons for the low adoption was that the relay is one way: one cannot relay Ethereum transaction back to Bitcoin.
Recently, I jointly developed PeaceRelay to allow interchain communication between different Ethereum based blockchains (e.g. Ethereum and Ethereum Classic). A functional prototype has been released that allows the moving of ETC to and from Ethereum blockchain. While it is still expensive to naively maintain PeaceRelay (due to the high gas cost), PeaceRelay is ready for practical uses today.
There has been some effort in building a ZECRelay for ZCash on Ethereum. For example, BLAKE2 hash function is under consideration to be available in Metropolis hard fork. If this EIP for BLAKE2 gets approved before Metropolis, and given that zkSNARK is already included in Metropolis, ZECRelay on Ethereum can be built efficiently.
Building relays on Ethereum for cryptocurrencies like LiteCoin and DogeCoin that use Scrypt proof of work is trickier as the gas required to verify/ compute a Scrypt hash is enormous. There is an 1,5oo ETH bounty for building Doge-Ethereum relay (used to be 6000 ETH), but no one has been able to claim it so far. The feasibility of practical relays for these Scrypt-PoW cryptocurrencies still remain unknown.
What Chain Relays Mean to Decentralized Exchanges like KyberNetwork?
One can easily create a new ERC-20 token backed by X via a simple minting process. Specifically, the ERC-20 contract will mint new X-token if one creates a transaction on blockchain X that deposits X-coins to a predefined address. Since the ERC-20 contract can verify the validity of the transaction via X-relay, it can be guaranteed that some X-coins have been deposited in order to mint the corresponding amount of new tokens, as long as X-chain is not vulnerable to 51% attacks (if it is, X is worthless anyway). This allows anyone to trade X-coins (e.g. Bitcoin, ZCash, ETC) to any ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum.
Things are great so far. We have been able to deposit X-coins to mint ERC-20 X-tokens, trade X-tokens with others ERC-20 tokens trustlessly with on-chain exchanges like KyberNetwork. However, something is still missing. How does one convert X-tokens back to X-coins? This is where things go tricky but interesting. A good solution is to deploy ETH-Relay on X chain, thus forming a 2-way relay between Ethereum and X chain. Now one can burn X-tokens on Ethereum and submit the proof to X chain to claim the deposited X-coins. An example of this scenario is the two-way relay between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic, which is depicted in the figure below. Two-way relay enables a great use-case in which trading between ETH and ETC can be done in a trustless manner: no trusted intermediary is needed to facilitate the trade.
The 2-way relay also allows interchain communication between private and public Ethereum based blockchains. EEA has recently become the largest blockchain consortium, one can predict that many private blockchains based on Ethereum will be launched. As an example, MAS, the central bank of Singapore, plans to tokenize Singapore Dollars in its Ethereum based private chain. SGD-Relay will allow users to move SGD between the MAS private chain and the Ethereum public chain, thus allowing on-chain trading between crypto tokens and fiats in the future.
However, the ideal solution for claiming X-coins does not work when X does not support expressive smart contracts like Ethereum. For example, one cannot yet deploy 2-way relay between Bitcoin and Ethereum, or between ZCash and Ethereum. Further, the gas cost to maintain PeaceRelay is expensive, making it impractical to verify all block headers while maintaining the 2-way relay between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic. We next discuss how KyberNetwork plans to deploy and maintain these relays in practice.
KyberNetwork’s Practical Deployment of Chain Relays
Even though we have to wait until Metropolis hard fork to determine if we can build ZECRelay on Ethereum, we can already deploy and run BTCRelay and PeaceRelay today. KyberNetwork’s vision is to maintain the two relays to support trading Bitcoin/ETC with ETH and Ethereum’s tokens. However, there are still two remaining questions that we need to address to achieve that vision.
- How to maintain PeaceRelay without paying 2.6 millions of gas for each block header?
- How to withdraw BTC token on Ethereum to claim BTC on Bitcoin?
To solve the first challenge, we (i.e. KyberNetwork), as the maintainer of PeaceRelay, will keep relaying ETC block headers. To avoid verifying all blocks, we put a side a large security deposit of, say, 1000 ETH in the relay contract. If there is any wrong block header, one can submit a proof to the contract and claim our deposit. This security deposit disincentivizes us from submitting wrong block headers, and incentivizes others to check our submitted block headers. It is worth noting that detecting wrong block headers is easy, can be done by a simple script that we will make publicly available. This approach resembles the the bounty idea used in TrueBit to prevent solvers from providing wrong solutions and incentivize others to check submitted solution.
The second question is trickier as we cannot deploy ETHRelay or any locking contract (see the figure above) on Bitcoin. One can wait until Rootstock launch and build a 2-way relay between ETH and Rootstock to move Bitcoin to and from Ethereum . Another practical solution is to have a pool of backers who receive BTC and deposit their ETH in the BTC token contract to guarantee that when users burn their BTC Token, the backers will get back their Bitcoin. Otherwise they can complain to the contract and get much more in ETH from the deposit pool. To incentivize the backers to put their ETH as the deposit and to facilitate the withdrawals, the backers can take fees per every deposit/ withdrawal.
Final thoughts
Although we currently advocate and support chain relays as our practical approach for cross-chain trading, we are consistently searching and looking out for new developments of prospectus solutions. Our vision is to have trustless and on-chain trading between different cryptocurrencies on KyberNetwork in early 2019. Until then, we are open to all candidates.


--- layout: page title: talks permalink: /talks/ description: Apenas falando. --- {% if site.posts.size == 0 %}


Moseley double death - Man 'stabbed woman to death and killed himself', police believe
The bodies of Michael Tesfamariam and Tsegereda Gebremariam were found at an address on Oxford Road on November 9.
by Charlotte Paxton, https://www.facebook.com/charlottepaxtonbm/Police investigating the deaths of a man and woman believe he stabbed her to death before killing himself.
The bodies of Michael Tesfamariam and Tsegereda Gebremariam , both 28, were discovered at an address on Oxford Road, Moseley , on November 9.
Police officers, alerted by a concerned man who 'heard screams', forced their way in and discovered Mr Tesfamariam hanged, an opening inquest at Birmingham Coroner's Court heard.
Mrs Gebremariam was found with stab wounds to her chest and stomach.
Despite the efforts of police and paramedics, the pair - originally from Eritrea - both died at the scene.
Coroner Louise Hunt heard brief evidence from police officers, who said they did not believe anyone else had been involved in the deaths.
The pair had lived at separate addresses, with Mr Tesfamariam a married delivery driver, living in Sycamore Road, Handsworth.
Mrs Gebremariam was married to a warehouse worker and lived in Oxford Road.
Det Sgt John Garbett said: "Police were called on November 9 at around 5.30pm.
"Officers arrived and attempted to gain accessr.
"They found Mr Tesfamariam, who had hanged himself.
"Officers immediately commenced CPR, and paramedics took over on arrival.
"Officers carrying out further searches of the flat found Mrs Gebremariam, who had sustained stab wounds to her chest and abdomen.
"Extensive efforts were made to save both of their lives, but they were unsuccessful.
"It is our hypothesis that Mr Tesfamariam stabbed Mrs Gebremariam, then killed himself."
Full inquests into both of the deaths will be heard separately on April 6 next year.
Ms Hunt will hear evidence from GPs, mental health services, forensic pathologists and witnesses.
The news of the double deaths sent shockwaves through the vibrant local community .
Coun Kerry Jenkins (Lab, Moseley) said: “It is terrible to have had something like this happen in our community.
“To have the deaths of two people like this is awful and there will be a lot of people who are shocked and saddened by this news.”
The property on Oxford Road is said to have been converted into flats and is directly opposite a city primary school.


torchgeometry¶
The PyTorch Geometry (TGM) package is a geometric computer vision library for PyTorch.
It consists of a set of routines and differentiable modules to solve generic geometry computer vision problems. At its core, the package uses PyTorch as its main backend both for efficiency and to take advantage of the reverse-mode auto-differentiation to define and compute the gradient of complex functions.
In this first version, we provide different functions designed mainly for computer vision applications, such as image and tensors warping modules which rely on the epipolar geometry theory. The roadmap will include adding more and more functionality so that developers in the short term can use the package for the purpose of optimizing their loss functions to solve geometry problems.
TGM focuses on Image and tensor warping functions such as:
- Calibration
- Epipolar geometry
- Homography
- Depth


[Submitted] Ren Chen, Shreyas Singapura and Viktor K. Prasanna, Optimal Dynamic Data Layouts for 2D FFT on 3D Memory Integrated FPGA, Journal of Supercomputing (SUPE), March 2016
[Full Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Acclerating Equi-Join on a CPU-FPGA Heterogeneous Platform, IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM '16, acceptance rate: 19%), March 2016
[Full Paper] Chi Zhang, Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, High Throughput Large Scale Sorting on a CPU-FPGA Heterogeneous Platform, 23nd Reconfigurable Architectures Workshop (RAW), 30th Annual International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), Feb 2016.(IPDPS RAW '15, Best Paper Candidate)
2015
[Full Paper] Ajitesh Srivastava, Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, A Hybrid Design for High Performance Large-scale Sorting on FPGA, IEEE International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig '15), December 2015
[Full Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Automatic Generation of High Throughput Energy Efficient Architectures for Permutation on Streaming Data, IEEE International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL '15, Acceptance ratio: 24%)
[Full Paper] Ren Chen, Shreyas Singapura and Viktor K. Prasanna, Optimal Dynamic Data Layouts for 2D FFT on 3D Memory Integrated FPGA, International Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PaCT '15)
[Short Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, DRAM Row Activation Energy Optimization for Stride Memory Access on FPGA-based Systems, 11th International Symposium on Applied Reconfigurable Computing (ARC '15), Best poster award (top 5 among 30 posters), April 2015
[Full Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy and Memory Efficient Bitonic Sorting on FPGA, ACM/SIGDA International Conference on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA '15, acceptance rate: 20.6%), February 2015
2014
[Full Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy Optimizations for FPGA-based 2-D FFT architecture, IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Extreme Computing (HPEC '14), September 2014
[Short Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Algorithmic Optimizations for Energy-efficient Throughput-oriented FFT architecture, IEEE Green Computing Conference (IGCC '14), November 2014
[Poster] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy-Efficient Architecture for Permutation on Streaming Data, Ph.D forum on IEEE Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS '14)
[Full Paper] Sanmukh R. Kuppannagari, Shreyas G. Singapura, Ren Chen, Andrea Sanny, Geoffrey Phi C. Tran, Shijie Zhou, Yusong Hu, Stephen P. Crago, Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy Performance of FPGAs on PERFECT Suite Kernels, IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Extreme Computing (HPEC '14), September 2014
2013
[Full Paper] Ren Chen and Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy-Efficient Architecture for Stride Permutation on Streaming Data, IEEE International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig '13, Acceptance ratio: 35.2%), December 2013
[Full Paper] Ren Chen, Neungsoo Park and and Viktor K. Prasanna, High Throughput Energy Efficient Parallel FFT Architecture on FPGAs, IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC '13), September 2013
[Full Paper] Ren Chen, Hoang Le and Viktor K. Prasanna, Energy Efficient Parameterized FFT Architecture, IEEE International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL '13, Acceptance ratio: 23%), August 2013
2012~
[Full Paper] Ren Chen, Lu Ma, Du Yue, Wen Wen, Zhi Qi, Hierarchy Modeling and Co-simulation of a Dynamically Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architecture, Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. 589-598.
About
Research Activities
Paper reviewer for IEEE Conference on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), 2014
Paper reviewer for IEEE Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig), 2014
Paper reviewer for IEEE Conference on High Performance Extreme Computing (HPEC), 2014
Paper reviewer for IEEE Conference on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), 2013
Paper reviewer for IEEE Conference on ParaFPGA, 2013
Coordinator of Parallel Computing Group at USC
Poster presenter in the Ming Hsieh Institue Research Festival 2013 at USC


See the Pen Modal window destroy concept by LegoMushroom (@sol0mka) on CodePen.
var moveTopAnimation = new Animation(el,
[
{ transform: 'translateY(100px)' },
{ transform: 'translateY(0)' }
],
{
duration: 300,
easing: 'cubic-bezier(0,0,0.32,1)',
fill: 'forwards'
});
will-change
ForADesigner.com/Flexbox-in-Five


Meet the Divas!
(Can you identify all 16?)
Name this Diva waiting offstage:
You have already selected these characters:
Diva Game Scorecard:
Wins:
Losses:
Completed Games:
Welcome to the MainStage!


Hajduk, Pauline
| Birth Name | Hajduk, Pauline |
| Gender | female |
| Age at Death | 83 years, 10 months, 18 days |
Events
| Event | Date | Place | Description | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth | 1888-09-29 | Poland | *From find-a-grave, not sure how accurate. | |
|
|
||||
| Death | 1972-08-17 | Hazleton State General Hospital | ||
|
|
Parents
| Relation to main person | Name | Birth date | Death date | Relation within this family (if not by birth) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Father | Wolanski, Michal | |||
| Mother | Wolanski, Agatha | 1872-07-08 | 1951-07-20 | |
| Hajduk, Pauline | 1888-09-29 | 1972-08-17 | ||
| Brother | Wolanski, John Jozef | 1887-06-24 | 1944-03-08 | |
| Sister | Wolanski, Marjanna | 1895 | 1927-06-27 | |
| Brother | Alton, Walter | 1898-03-07 | 1949-02-22 |
Families
Family of Hajduk, Thomas and Hajduk, Pauline |
|||||||||||
| Married | Husband | Hajduk, Thomas ( * 1889-12-22 + 1954 ) | |||||||||
| Children |
| Name | Birth Date | Death Date |
|---|---|---|
| Hajduk, Helen | ||
| Naber, Angela Pauline | 1920-03-13 | 2009-08-27 |


Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S. KEMPANNA WRIT PETITION NO.7243/2012 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:- M/S. PARANJAPE SCHEMES FLAT NO.1, MONALISA APARTMENTS 100 FT. ROAD, 6TH MAIN II STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 038 BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MR. SHUKLENDU KATDARE. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI B. NAIK, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SMT.VIJETHA R. NAIK. ADVOCATE) AND:- 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE NARASIMHA RAJA SQUARE BANGALORE - 560 002. 2 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BANGALORE - 560 048. 4. KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE REPT. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 5. MR.C.J.SINGH S/O. LATE ATAM SINGH KOCHAR AGE: 71 YEARS R/O. NO.6, E.C.C.ROAD NERA DLIM & NEXT TO DEEN GARDENS WHITE FIELD, BANGALORE - 560 066. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. S.SUSHEELA, AGA FOR R.1 SRI.B.V.SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADV., FOR R.2 & R.3, SRI.GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADV., FOR R.4 SRI. H.S. PRASHANTH, ADV., FOR R.5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DT. 2.1.11 LODGED BY THE R.5 BEFORE THE R.4 VIDE ANNX-S AND QUASH THE REPORT DATED 7.7.11 ISSUED BY R.4 VIDE ANNX-T AND QUASH THE DO LETTER DATED 23.7.11 ISSUED BY R.1 VIDE ANNX-V TO THE WP AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S.ABDUL NAZEER J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:- 3 ORDER
Though this matter listed for orders, by consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final hearing, heard and disposed of by this order.
2. In this case, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the complaint at Annexure-S dated 2.01.2011 lodged by the fifth respondent before the Karnataka Lokayukta - the fourth respondent herein and also the report of the Lokayukta in bearing No.COMPT./LOK/BCD-1/2011 dated 07.07.2011 at Annexure-T and for certain other reliefs.
3. The petitioner is a builder and a developer. It has entered into a partnership business with M/s.Niketan Shelters Private Limited on 15.9.2005 to do the business in Construction of Apartments, Commercial Complexes, Technology Park, Real Estate Development and allied business in the name of Paranjape Schemes, Bangalore. It is the case of the petitioner that the firm Niketan Shelters Pvt. Ltd., had 4 purchased the land measuring 4 acres 20 guntas in Sy.Nos.19/2, 148/2 and 147/2 situated at Pattandur Agrahara village, Krishnarajapuram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, has conceived a housing project named 'Athashri' dedicated to meet needs and aspirations of senior citizens. The housing project was to be put up in the aforesaid land. The petitioner had forwarded an application to the Mahadevapura City Municipal Council seeking licence to construct the housing project and the Municipal Council vide order at Annexure-B dated 08.08.2005 approved the plan. It is contended that pursuant to the approval of the plan by the C.M.C., Mahadevapura, the construction commenced and almost 75% of the work was completed. At that stage, it received a summons from High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition No.936/2006 filed by the fifth respondent against the petitioner and others. In the writ petition, allegations have been made against the petitioner that the construction being put up is contrary to building bye-laws etc., and that the petitioner had not secured 5 layout plan. An interim order was passed in the said case on 01.03.2006.
4. It is further contended that the petitioner entered appearance in the writ petition through his counsel and filed an application seeking for vacation of the interim order. The High Court of Karnataka modified the interim order on 21.04.2006 to the effect that the petitioner can commence the work after obtaining the commencement certificate from the C.M.C., Mahadevapura in the prescribed form and before obtaining such commencement certificate, the petitioner shall not commence the work. The said order was challenged by the fifth respondent before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(Civil) No.8209/2006. The Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed the said SLP on 11.05.2006. Pursuant to the order of the Division Bench dated 21.04.2006, the petitioner made an application before the C.M.C., Mahadevapura who after verification of all the records issued commencement certificate as per Annexure-E.
6
5. It is contended that the Pollution Control Board issued notice to the petitioner on 30.06.2006 alleging that it had conducted spot inspection on 05.04.2006 and found that the construction was without Consent For Establishment (CFE) from the Board and Environment Clearance Certificate (ECC) from the Ministry of Environment and Forest. It is further alleged in the notice that the construction should not be proceeded with unless securing the CFE and ECC certificate from the Competent Authority. The petitioner sent a reply to the said notice dated 11.07.2006 stating that it was neither aware of the spot inspection alleged to have been done on 05.04.2006 nor was it issued with a notice on 10.4.2006. It is further contended that it is proceeding with the construction in terms of the interim order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.963/2006.
6. The Pollution Control Board by order dated 10.07.2006 rejected the application seeking Consent for 7 Establishment (CFE). This order was challenged by the petitioner before the Karnataka State Appellate Authority at Bangalore under Water and Air Prevention and Control of Pollution Act in Appeal No.10/2006. In the said case the application filed by the fifth respondent for impleading was rejected. Thereafter, he filed a review petition before the Board. The review was allowed on 12.10.2007 and Consent for Establishment (CFE) was issued by the Pollution Control Board to the petitioner at Annexure - H. Against the said order, the fifth respondent filed further appeal in Appeal No.18/2007 before the Karnataka State Appellate Authority at Bangalore. The Appellate Authority by order at Annexure-J dated 20.02.2008 dismissed the appeal. The petitioner had also secured clearance from the Ministry for Environment and Forest at Annexure-K dated 27.12.2006. Challenge to the said order by the fifth respondent was rejected by the National Environment Appellate Authority in Appeal No.2/2007 on 07.08.2008.
8
7. Fifth respondent filed W.P.No.4100/2008 challenging the order dated 20.02.2008 passed by the Karnataka State Appellate Authority dismissing Appeal No.18/2007. In the meantime, the Pollution Control Board filed a Private complaint in PCR No.849/2006 before the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court- 1, Bangalore, alleging that the petitioner is proceeding with the construction without securing Consent For Establishment from the Pollution Control Board. The petitioner challenged the said complaint by filing W.P.No.18904/2006 seeking for quashing of PCR No.849/2006. In the meantime, the fifth respondent filed CCC No.231/2008 alleging that the petitioner had violated the order dated 01.04.2008 passed by this Court. The private complaint and the charge sheet referred to above were challenged by the petitioner in Crl.P.Nos.1604/2007 and 1605/2007. Criminal cases registered on the basis of the complaint of fifth respondent was quashed by order dated 1.12.2012. However, criminal case registered on the basis of the 9 complaint filed by the Pollution Control Board was rejected and the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
8. Writ petitions filed by the fifth respondent in W.P.Nos.4100/2008 and 936/2006 and W.P.No.18904/2006 filed by the petitioner were heard together by the Division Bench of this Court including the contempt petition in C.C.C.No.231/2008. The Division Bench of this Court has framed several points for consideration. The Division Bench has dismissed the writ petitions filed by the fifth respondent herein Consequently, the contempt case was also dropped. Having regard to the order made in other writ petitions, W.P.No.18904/2006 filed by the petitioner herein was disposed of as unnecessary.
9. Feeling aggrieved by this order, fifth respondent filed SLP(Civil) Nos.6802/2010 and 6833/2010 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court by order dated 29.3.2010 10 dismissed the said appeals. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if there are any statutory violations, the petitioner would be at liberty to pursue the matter with the appropriate authorities. The fifth respondent filed Review Petition No.1078/2010 seeking review of the said order. The Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed the review petition on 21.7.2010. The fifth respondent filed yet another Review Petition(C) No.1079/2010 which was also dismissed by the Apex Court on 21.07.2010. The fifth respondent again filed Curative Petition No.9/2012 in Review Petition (civil) No.1079/2010. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has dismissed the said curative petition on 17.7.2012.
10. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a representation at Annexure-Q dated 17.8.2010 to the Joint Commissioner BBMP, Mahadevapura Zonal Office, Bangalore, pointing out certain statutory violations said to have been committed by the petitioner while constructing the building in question. The Assistant Director issued a show cause notice at Annexure - Q1 11 to the petitioner herein on the basis of the complaint of the fifth respondent and the fifth respondent submitted a reply as per Annexure-Q2 dated 1.9.2010 to the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner has rejected the complaint on the ground that the construction is in order.
11. The fifth respondent filed a complaint before the Karnataka Lokayukta as per Annexure-S dated 02.01.2011 seeking cancellation of the permission granted to the petitioner by order dated 3/4.12.2010 and prob into the accusations made by him against Joint Commissioner of BBMP, Mahadevapura Zone as well as the Assistant Director of Town Planning of the same office. The Hon'ble Lokayukta sent a report as per Annexure-T dated 07.07.2011 to the State Government. The directions contained in the said report is as under:-
"1. To direct the Commissioner, BBMP to withdraw the permission accorded (extended) for the construction of the Building Blocks in the said Area, without following the 12 Zoning Regulations and the Building Bye- laws, approved by the Government.
2. The Competent Authority shall take steps to implement this report within one month from the date of receipt of this report and shall intimate or cause to be intimate the action taken in this regard, as provided under Section 12(2) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act 1984."
12. On the basis of this report, the State Government vide its communication at Annexure-V dated 23.7.2011 directed the Commissioner, BBMP, to take action to implement the said directions and to report back to the Lokayukta. On the basis of the said communication, the BBMP issued endorsement dated 16.9.2011 at Annexure-W wherein extension of time for completion of construction work has been withdrawn.
13. Respondent Nos.2 to 5 have filed their statement of objections.
13
14. We have heard Sri.Ravi B. Naik, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt.S.Susheela, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1, Sri.B.V.Shankara Narayana Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, Sri.Gowthamdev. C.Ullal, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and Sri.H.S.Prashanth, learned counsel for respondent No.5.
15. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue which has been raised by the petitioner in the complaint at Annexure-Q dated 17.8.2010 has already been adjudicated by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.936/2006 and other connected matters, disposed of on 27.11.2009. He has drawn our attention to issue No.5 framed by the Division Bench in W.P.No.936/2006. This Court has considered in detail as to whether there is violation of zonal regulations and building Bye-laws while putting up the construction in question in the aforesaid land. The Division Bench has categorically held that 14 construction of the building by the petitioner is neither in violation of zonal regulations nor building bye-laws. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has confirmed the order of the Division Bench and has dismissed the SLP. The review petitions as also the curative petition have also been dismissed. On the basis of the liberty reserved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.6833/2010 dated 29.03.2010 once again he has filed complaint at Annexure-Q before the Joint Commissioner, BBMP. The Joint Commissioner after hearing the parties has rejected the complaint by order at Annexure-R dated 3/4.12.2010. This order has attained finality. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed complaint before the Hon'ble Lokayukta and the Lokayukta has issued directions in its order dated 07.07.2011. The directions are contrary to the order of the Division Bench which has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is submitted that the Lokayukta is not justified in directing the Government to take action against the 15 petitioner having regard to the order of the Division Bench.
16. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondents has sought to justify the impugned order. It is argued that the petitioner has filed writ petition before this Court in W.P.No.37407/2011 challenging the endorsement issued by the Corporation at annexure-W dated 16.09.2011 without challenging the order of the Lokayukta at Annexure- T. Thus, the writ petition is barred under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is further submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reserved liberty to the fifth respondent to pursue the matter with the appropriate authorities if there are any other statutory violations. That's how the petitioner has made the complaint before the Lokayukta.
16
17. We have carefully considered the arguments of the learned counsel made at the bar and perused the materials placed on record.
18. The fifth respondent had filed a Writ Petition No.936/2006 against the petitioner, the State Government and its instrumentalities for various reliefs. The contentions urged against the petitioner was that the plan for construction of the building was issued in violation of zonal regulations and bye-laws applicable to the plot in question. This Court while framing the points for consideration has framed the following point on the basis of the rival contentions of the parties:-
"5.Whether the construction of the building is in violation of the Zonal Regularizations and Building Bye laws applicable to the plot in question.
19. The above point has been answered by at paragraph 52 as under:-
17
"Further, construction of the building upon the plot in question by the Construction Co., is not in violation of Zonal Regulation and Building Bye laws applicable to the property in question, for the reason that under the Zoning Regulation the land used is for residential purpose and comes within the residential zone, is not a contested fact, which is evidenced from the conversion order, passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner under Section 95(3) of the KLR Act and the said order is not challenged either by the petitioner or any other person and further construction of the building in the plot to provide apartments to the senior citizens as per the sanctioned plan by the Commissioner of city Municipality, Mahadevapura and further floor area, covered area, height, etc., as provided in item II (3) to the zoning of land use and Regulations of B.D.A. is in accordance with Regulations and further sanction of the plan by the CMC Mahadevapura as it is the local self Authority as per the Government order dated 07.03.1996. Hence the construction of the building by the Construction Co., is neither in 18 violation of zonal Regulations or Building Bye Laws applicable to the property in question".
20. It is clear that this Court has adverted to the rival contentions of the parties and has categorically held that the construction by the petitioner is neither in violation of the zonal regulations nor building bye-laws applicable to the property in question. As stated above, the SLP filed by the fifth respondent challenging the said order has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 29.3.2010, subject to the observations as under:-
"We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s). Accordingly, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. However, if there are any statutory violations, the petitioner would be at liberty to pursue the matter with the appropriate authorities".
21. It is admitted position that the review petitions filed by the fifth respondent were dismissed by the Apex Court, so also the curative petition. Thus, the order of the Division Bench in W.P.No.936/2006 has 19 attained finality. On the basis of the liberty reserved to the fifth respondent to pursue the matter if there are any statutory provisions, the fifth respondent filed the complaint before the Joint Commissioner as per Annexure-Q dated 17.8.2010. A reading of this complaint would clearly disclose that he has sought for adjudication of the matter again which has been concluded by the Division Bench and upheld by the Supreme Court.
22. It is no doubt true that he has raised certain other issues in the complaint dated 17.8.2010. The Joint Commissioner Town Planning, Mahadevapura, who is the competent authority to decide the issue has issued show cause notice as per Annexure-Q1 dated 23.8.2010 to the petitioner and has passed the order as per Annexure-R dated 3/4.12.2010 rejecting the complaint and extending one year time to the petitioner to complete the construction. This order passed by the Assistant Director Town Planning BBMP, Mahadevapura Bangalore, has not been challenged by the fifth 20 respondent. Thus, this order has also become final and binding between the parties.
23. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a complaint before the Hon'ble Lokayukta as per Annexure-S dated 2.01.2011 and on the basis of this complaint, the impugned order at Annexure-T dated 07.07.2011 has been passed.
24. Having perused the entire materials on record, we are of the view that insofar as the violation of zonal regulations are concerned, the matter has been concluded by the Division Bench and upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Even in respect of certain other allegations relating to the statutory violations said to have been committed by the petitioner, the Joint Commissioner has held an enquiry and passed an order at Annexure-R which has also not been challenged. Therefore, the question of once again directing the Competent Authority to withdraw the permission extended to the petitioner for construction of building 21 blocks does not arise. We are of the view that the order at Annexure-T dated 07.07.2011 cannot be sustained.
25. That brings us to the second question as to the maintainability of the writ petition under Order 2 Rule 2 of CPC. It is no doubt true that the petitioner has filed W.P.No37407/2011 challenging the order at Annexure - W. Annexure-W was passed by the Joint Commissioner BBMP, Mahadevapura, whereby earlier extension of time granted to the petitioner at Annexure- R was withdrawn. Therefore, the cause of action for the said writ petition was issuance of Annexure-W. In the present petition the petitioner has questioned the validity of the direction of the Hon'ble Lokayukta at Annexure-T. The cause of action for this writ petition is different from the one pleaded in the other writ petitions. It is necessary to state here that when the High Court exercises extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it aims at securing a very speedy and efficacious remedy to a person, whose legal or constitutional right has been infringed. If all the 22 elaborate and technical rules laid down in Civil P.C. are to be applied to writ proceedings the very object and purpose is likely to be defeated.
26. Taking into consideration, the explanation added to Section 141 of the CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Puran Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and others' - (AIR 1996 Sc 1092) has held as under:-
"When the High Court exercises extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it aims at securing a very speedy and efficacious remedy to a person, whose legal or Constitutional right has been infringed. If all the elaborate and technical ruled laid down in Civil P.C. are to be applied to writ proceedings the very object and purpose is likely to be defeated. In view of the conflicting opinions expressed by the different Courts, the Parliament by the aforesaid amending Act (1976) introduced the explanation saying that in Section 141 of the Code the expression "proceedings" does not include "any proceedings under Article 23 226 of the Constitution" and statutorily recognized the views expressed by some of the Courts that writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution shall not be deemed to be proceedings within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. After the introduction of the explanation to Section 141 of the Code, it can be said that when Section 141 provides that the procedure prescribed in the Code in regard to suits shall be followed, as far as it can be made applicable "in all proceedings in any Court of Civil Jurisdiction" it shall not include a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution. In this background, it cannot be held that the provisions contained in Order 22 of the Code are applicable per se to writ proceedings."
27. Therefore, the contention of the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 that the writ petition is barred under Order 2 Rule 2 of CPC is rejected.
24
28. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we pass the following ORDER
(i) Writ petition is allowed.
(ii) The complaint lodged by the 5th respondent at Annexure-S dated 2.1.2011, the report of the 4th respondent at Annexure-T dated 7.7.2011, the D.O. letter at Annexure-V dated 23.7.2011 issued by the first respondent and the letter at Annexure-W dated 16.09.2011 issued by the third respondent are hereby quashed.
(iii) In view of the disposal of the writ petition as above, I.A.No.I/2014 does not survive for consideration. It is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
SD/-
JUDGE SD/-
JUDGE SA*


Deaths in Kildare-Friday, November 22, 2019
Rest in Peace
by Leader ReporterThe death has occurred of Gerald Bowden
Garroonagh, Barrowhouse, Laois / Athy, Kildare
House Private Please
Funeral Arrangements Later
The death has occurred of Nicholas Hyland
Mylerstown, Nurney, Kildare
Beloved husband of Maria and much loved father of Sinéad, Stephen, Nichola, Meagan and Richard. Deeply regretted by his loving family, son-in-law Richard, daughter-in-law, Hannah, grandchildren Paddy, Ashling, and Robin, sisters Mary and Ann, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nieces, nephews, extended family and friends.
May He Rest In Peace
Reposing at his home (R51 D299) on Friday from 4:00pm with rosary recital at 8:00pm. Requiem Mass on Saturday at 11:00am in the Sacred Heart Church Nurney. Interment afterwards in St Brigid's Cemetery, Nurney. Family flowers only please. House private on Saturday morning.
The death has occurred of Catherine (June) MAGINN
Monkstown, Dublin / Leopardstown, Dublin / Maynooth, Kildare
MAGINN (T.L.C Nursing Home, Maynooth, Co. Kildare and formerly of Monkstown and Leopardstown, Dublin) November 18th, 2019 (peacefully) in the loving care of the staff at T.L.C, Maynooth, Catherine (June), beloved sister of the late Mary (Mo) and Margot Bouwmeester. Sadly missed by her loving nephews Richard, Paul and David and their partners, Conor, Alison and Julia, grandnephews, relatives and friends.
Rest in Peace
June’s Funeral Mass and celebration of her life will take place in the T.L.C, Maynooth (for directions click on link) on Tuesday (10th December) at 10.30 am followed by burial in Deans Grange Cemetery. Family flowers only, please. Donations, if desired, to The Alzheimer’s Society of Ireland.
The death has occurred of Tony Mahon
Acorn Downs, Newbridge, Kildare / South Circular Road, Dublin
Formerly of Greenvill Avenue, South Circular Road, Dublin. Son of the late Martin and Maureen.
Sadly missed by his loving daughters Kim and Zara, son Mark and their mother Patricia Mahon, grandchildren Tegan, Jorja, Ben and Isabella, extended family, relatives, neighbours and friends.
May Tony Rest In Peace
Reposing at Glennons Funeral Home, Eyre Street, Newbridge from 5pm on Friday with Rosary at 7-30pm. Removal on Saturday morning to arrive at Sacred Heart Presbytery, St. John’s Drive, Clondalkin (D22 W1W6) for 10 o'clock Requiem Mass. Burial afterwards in Newlands Cross Cemetery.
Family flowers only please. Donations, if desired, to "The Irish Guide Dogs". Donations box in Church.
The death has occurred of Margaret (Maggie) Duff (née Reilly)
The Curragh, Ballysax, Kildare
Beloved wife of the late Michael and predeceased by her son Gerald and sister May. Much loved mother of Bernard, Michael, Sheila and Anna. Deeply regretted by her loving family, sons-in-law Kevin and JP, daughters-in-law Sharon, Trish and Breda, grandchildren, nephews, extended family, relatives and friends.
May She Rest In Peace
Reposing at her home (R56 TH58) this Thursday from 4:00 to 8:00pm with rosary recital at 8:00pm and also on Friday from 4:00pm. Removal on Friday evening at 5:45pm to arrive at St Brigid's Church (R56 YY43) Suncroft at 6:30pm. Requiem Mass on Saturday at 11:00am. Interment afterwards in Holy Cross Cemetery, Suncroft.


PRINCESS CARABOO A film review by James Berardinelli Copyright 1994 James Berardinelli
Rating (0 to 10): 6.4
Date Released: 9/16/94 Running Length: 1:34 Rated: PG (Sexual innuendo)
Starring: Phoebe Cates, Wendy Hughes, Jim Broadbent, Kevin Kline, Stephen Rea, John Lithgow Director: Michael Austin Producers: Andre Karsch and Simon Bosanquel Screenplay: Michael Austin and John Wells Cinematography: Freddie Francis Music: Richard Hartley Released by TriStar Pictures
With a cast like this, it's probably very difficult (if not impossible) to make a bad movie. The strength of PRINCESS CARABOO, a likable SOMMERSBY wannabe, is in its performers, who manage to submerge a great many script-related flaws. The result is a story that, if not high on originality or inventiveness, makes for a palatable fable.
At the heart of PRINCESS CARABOO lies a question of identity: is the title character (Phoebe Cates) a real Javanese princess who had been kidnapped and sold into slavery, or is she a wonderfully creative English servant girl who has invented this character to mock an aristocracy that exploits her class? The story, which takes place in 1817, is told from the point-of-view of Gutch (Stephen Rea), a newspaper reporter trying to get to the truth. During the course of his investigation, he becomes obsessed by the Princess, and predictably falls in love.
The screenplay has a tendency to go off on unexpected and, for the most part, undesirable tangents. There's a subplot about crooked bank dealings, a long-winded examination by a local "expert" (John Lithgow) of the Princess' authenticity, and a tediously overblown sequence in which Caraboo is introduced to the Prince Regent. These distractions keep the film from ever finding a stable focus.
The romance between Gutch and Caraboo isn't especially compelling or, for that matter, believable. The two spend very little time together and, with Caraboo unable to speak English, they certainly don't hold any lengthy conversations. Rea and Cates do what they can with limited material, but the best they manage to come up with is "cute." There certainly aren't any sparks.
Wendy Hughes and Jim Broadbent play Mrs. and Mr. Worrall, a wealthy upper-class couple under whose roof Caraboo takes refuge after she is nearly imprisoned for being a vagrant. These two veterans form stable anchors around which the rest of the uneven production can swirl.
Phoebe Cates, having used roles in recent films like BODIES, REST AND MOTION to shed her GREMLINS image, is the picture of serene beauty. She is effectively mysterious and equally acceptable as either a foreign princess or a lower-class pretender. Her real-life husband, Kevin Kline, steals a few scenes with his buffoonish, over-the-top portrayal of Fixos, the Worralls' Greek butler.
Although PRINCESS CARABOO tries a lighter approach to a subject dealt with more seriously by THE RETURN OF MARTIN GUERRE and its American remake, SOMMERSBY, the issue of the central character's legitimacy is similar. In this case, however, resolving the mystery becomes a secondary diversion to watching so many accomplished performers struggle to fashion something entertaining out of an unpolished script. Their success, though qualified, proves the value of a strong cast to any motion picture.
- James Berardinelli<EMAIL_ADDRESS>.
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


A struct for storing three-dimensional straight track information. This struct is initially coined for parameter passing of TAEventProcessor::RefineTracks() and TAEventProcessor::RefinePID(), yet has been seperated alone for code extension considerations in the future.
More...
#include <t3DTrkInfo.h>
A struct for storing three-dimensional straight track information. This struct is initially coined for parameter passing of TAEventProcessor::RefineTracks() and TAEventProcessor::RefinePID(), yet has been seperated alone for code extension considerations in the future.
- Author
- SUN Yazhou, asia..nosp@m.rabb.nosp@m.it@16.nosp<EMAIL_ADDRESS>- Date
- Created: 2017/11/23 Last revised: 2018/9/7, SUN Yazhou.
- Copyright
- 2017-2018, SUN Yazhou.
◆ t3DTrkInfo()
| t3DTrkInfo::t3DTrkInfo |
( |
| ) |
|
◆ initialize()
| void t3DTrkInfo::initialize |
( |
| ) |
|
◆ b1
◆ b2
track information downstream the dipole magnet
◆ chi
| double t3DTrkInfo::chi[18] |
◆ Chi
◆ chi2
◆ dcTOTAvrg
| double t3DTrkInfo::dcTOTAvrg |
time over threshold of DC signals, indicator of dE/dx
averaged over all hit anode layers for a 3D track (maximum: 18)
◆ dcTOTcnt
◆ firedStripId
| int t3DTrkInfo::firedStripId |
◆ isDCArrR
| bool t3DTrkInfo::isDCArrR |
false: L; true: R; false: U; true: D;
◆ k1
◆ k2
◆ taHitX
| double t3DTrkInfo::taHitX |
tof2: time of flight from target to TOFWall; taHitX: hit pos x in TA
◆ tof2
◆ TOF_posY
| double t3DTrkInfo::TOF_posY |
◆ TOF_posY_refine
| double t3DTrkInfo::TOF_posY_refine |
hit Y position in TOFW strip, rough and refine (dt or 3Dtrk)
The documentation for this struct was generated from the following files:


Enter the name, description, and type of the security scheme.
Configure the type-specific details for the security scheme. You must first configure the scheme type above.
No security type has been configured for this security scheme. A type must first be selected prior to configuring the scheme's type-specific details.


EasySpin can simulate some spin-polarized systems such as triplets. Depending on the mechanism of spin polarization, you need to use different approaches.
Although the first two sections focus on triplets, the methods can easily be extended to spin-polarized states of spins with higher multiplicity.
To simulate the EPR spectrum of a triplet generated by inter-system crossing from a singlet state, EasySpin needs information about how ISC populated the zero-field triplet states. You can provide this information in the field Sys.Pop
.
Sys.Pop
should contain a list of populations, one entry for each state. The populations apply to the zero-field states in increasing energy order. For example, Sys.Pop = [0.1, 1, 0.2]
indicates a population of 0.1 of the lowest zero-field state, a population of 1 of the middle-energy zero-field state, and a population of 0.2 of the highest-energy zero-field state. The populations do not have to add up to 1.
The zero-field states in a triplet are usually denoted Tx, Ty, Tz. Their energy order depends on the signs of the zero-field splitting parameters D and E. Be careful in determining their order correctly when using Sys.Pop
to simulate spectra from the literature, or when interpreting results from least-squares fitting.
Here is a full example of a triplet generated by ISC from a singlet
clear T.S = 1; T.D = [500 100]; % MHz T.lwpp = 1; T.Pop = [0.1 1 0.2]; % zero-field populations Exp.mwFreq = 9.5; Exp.Range = [310 370]; Exp.Harmonic = 0; % no field modulation pepper(T,Exp);
The shape of the EPR spectrum only depends on the polarizations of the transitions, i.e. only on the differences of the populations in Sys.Pop
. Adding any constant to all three numbers will not affect the shape of spectrum. It will, however, affect the overall intensity of the simulated spectrum, since EasySpin scales the spectrum to the total population (sum over all numbers in Sys.Pop
).
EasySpin can handle ISC-polarized spins of higher multiplicity as well. For example,to simulate spectra from an ISC-generated quartet state, provide 4 numbers in Sys.Pop
.
To simulate the spin-polarized EPR spectrum of a triplet generated by recombination of two radicals, use the following two-step procedure. First, simulate the spectrum of the unpolarized triplet and ask EasySpin to return the two transitions separately. Second, combine the transitions using weighing factors corresponding to the polarizations of the transitions.
Here is an example. First, we set up the triplet and simulate its spectrum, without any spin polarization. With Opt.Output
, request that pepper
returns the transitions separately.
clear T.S = 1; T.D = 500; % MHz T.lwpp = 1; Exp.mwFreq = 9.5; Exp.Range = [310 370]; Exp.Harmonic = 0; % no field modulation Opt.Output = 'separate'; % separate transitions! [B,spcsep,tr] = pepper(T,Exp,Opt);
tr
contains the list of transitions, with one row for each transition. spc
contains the spectra of the two transitions separately, again one per row. Next, combine these two subspectra using differences in populations:
Popul = [0 1 0]; % vector of populations Pola = [Popul(2)-Popul(1), Popul(3)-Popul(2)]; % polarizations spc = Pola(1)*spcsep(1,:) + Pola(2)*spcsep(2,:); % polarized spectrum plot(B,spc)
Currently, EasySpin does not have built-in capabilities for simulating EPR spectra from spin-correlated radical pairs.


A range of numbers.
The NumberRange type represents a range of numbers between a minimum and maximum.
Returns a range with a single value.
The new constructor returns a NumberRange where value is both the minimum and maximum.
Returns a range with between two values.
The new constructor returns a NumberRange where minimum is the minimum value and maximum is the maximum value. Throws an error if minimum is greater than maximum.
The maximum value.
The Max field returns the maximum possible value in the range.
The minimum value.
The Min field returns the minimum possible value in the range.
Returns whether two NumberRange values are equal.
The equal operator returns true if both operands are NumberRange, and each corresponding component is equal.


This article was prompted by JENKINS-16368.
Because there are all sorts of ways Jenkins is deployed in the real world, Jenkins core and plugins need to follow a specific set of guidelines when it comes to putting hyperlinks inside HTML and elsewhere. Here are those rules:
Rule #1: no absolute URLs in hyperlinks
Hyperlinks inside HTML should either use relative URLs (such as "../foo/bar" or "build/5/changes") or what I call app relative URL (relative URLs that starts with '/', such as "/job/foo/5" and "/manage"), but no absolute URL (such as "http://jenkins/foo/1")
This rule is because web applications have no way of knowing what URL the client is using to access the server. For example, with a reverse proxy in between, the user might be accessing https://jenkins.example.com/job/foo/5 which then get routed to http://sca14-1250.corp.example.com:8080/job/foo/5. On the other hand, the way the reverse proxying works ensures that the path component (the "/job/foo/5" portion in the aboe example) will remain intact. Therefore, it is best to use relative URLs or app relative URLs, then leave the browser to absolutize it with the current absolute URL it is using to access the server.
reverse proxy and path component
Technically speaking, it is Jenkins that's making a claim that we'll require the path component remains the same even when a reverse proxy is used.
In Java EE, the path component is further separated into two portions. The first is the context path, followed by the path info. For example, if the URL is http://server.example.com/jenkins/job/foo/5, then "/jenkins" is the context path and "/job/foo/5" is the path info. As a Jenkins developer, we control the latter, but the user controls the former. Therefore, to properly generate app relative URLs, you need to keep this in mind. Many people runs Jenkins with empty context path, so failing to prepend the context path is a common mistake.
- Method name
getUrl()
is used throughout in Jenkins to return the path info portion of the URL of domain objects. For example,Build.getUrl()
would return "job/foo/32/" (there's some inconsistency in the way trailing '/' is handled for historical reasons, but there's always no leading '/') - Method name
getAbsoluteUrl()
is used throught in Jenkins to return the absolute URL of domain objects. As the rule #1 indicates, this method must not be used to render hyperlinks - In Groovy/Jelly view as well as in JavaScript, a variable named "rootURL" is defined to represent the context path. Therefore, to generate app relative hyperlink, you write
...
(in Jelly) ora(href:"${rootURL}/${my.url}", ...)
(for Groovy) in your views.
Rule #2: Static resource URL
Images, JavaScripts, stylesheets, and other static resources that do not change while Jenkins is running should be accessed from with a static resource URL prefix /static/
XXXXXXXX
, such as /static/907dbcb0/plugin/foobar/abc.png
. The XXXXXXXX section is a random string generated by Jenkins for the duration of a running Jenkins session.
The routing of the request will be the same with or without the static prefix, but with the prefix, requests will be served with long Expires header, enabling the browser to cache them (and use them without contacting the server again with the "If-Modified-Since" header). The random string ensures that the browser never uses a stale file when plugins/core are updated.
To use these static resource URLs from Java code, use Functions.getResourcePath()
as a prefix to your URL (see example). For Jelly views, use resURL
variable (see example)
Rule #3: Generate absolute URLs in e-mails, IMs, etc.
If you are serving data outside HTTP response, such as an e-mail, then you do need to generate an absolute URL to Jenkins. To do this, use Jenkins.getInstance().getRootUrl()
.  (Also see Jenkins says my reverse proxy setup is broken.)
Rule #4: ConsoleNote must be path-info only
When you embed hyperlinks into console output via HyperlinkNote, use the URL that starts with '/' to create a portable hyperlink. If the URL starts with '/', it's treated as relative to the context path. In this way, even when the URL of Jenkins has changed since the console note is created, the link will still render correctly.
For example,
void foo(TaskListener listener) { listener.getLogger().println( HyperlinkNote.encodeTo("/configure","Please configure your Jenkins")); }
Also see ModelHyperlinkNote for more easily creating hyperlinks to various objects in Jenkins.
Is the transport secure?
In the presence of the reverse proxy that terminates HTTPS, Jenkins cannot trust HttpServletRequest#isSecure()
to check if the transport is secure. For this purpose, there's Jenkins.isRootUrlSecure()
, which checks if the admin-configured Jenkins URL is HTTPS.


MKT Distillery | Katy, Texas
Spirits Crafted in the Heart of Texas
COMING SOON
×
Contact Us
×
Modal title
One fine body…


Please provide payment information.
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8 - August
9 - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032


--- layout: default --- {% include section-intro.html %} Join us for our 2nd Biennial WomEngineers Day Conference in Knoxville, TN! {% include section-why-attend.html %} Schedule {% include section-schedule.html %} Speakers/Moderators {% include section-speakers.html %} Area Information {% include section-area-information.html %} Register {% include section-register.html %} {% include section-footer.html %}


|
plibsys
0.0.4
|
Error report system. More...
Go to the source code of this file.
Typedefs | |
| typedef struct PError_ | PError |
| Opaque data structure for an error object. More... | |
Functions | |
| P_LIB_API PError * | p_error_new (void) |
| Initializes a new empty PError. More... | |
| P_LIB_API PError * | p_error_new_literal (pint code, pint native_code, const pchar *message) |
| Initializes a new PError with data. More... | |
| P_LIB_API const pchar * | p_error_get_message (PError *error) |
| Gets an error message. More... | |
| P_LIB_API pint | p_error_get_code (PError *error) |
| Gets an error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API pint | p_error_get_native_code (PError *error) |
| Gets a platform native error code, if any. More... | |
| P_LIB_API PErrorDomain | p_error_get_domain (PError *error) |
| Gets an error domain. More... | |
| P_LIB_API PError * | p_error_copy (PError *error) |
| Creates a copy of a PError object. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_error (PError *error, pint code, pint native_code, const pchar *message) |
| Sets error data. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_error_p (PError **error, pint code, pint native_code, const pchar *message) |
| Sets error data through a double pointer. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_code (PError *error, pint code) |
| Sets an error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_native_code (PError *error, pint native_code) |
| Sets a platform native error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_message (PError *error, const pchar *message) |
| Sets an error message. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_clear (PError *error) |
| Clears error data. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_free (PError *error) |
| Frees a previously initialized error object. More... | |
| P_LIB_API pint | p_error_get_last_system (void) |
| Gets the last system native error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API pint | p_error_get_last_net (void) |
| Gets the last network native error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_last_system (pint code) |
| Sets the last system native error code. More... | |
| P_LIB_API void | p_error_set_last_net (pint code) |
| Sets the last network native error code. More... | |
Error report system.
An error report system is used to notify a caller about fatal situations during the library API invocation. Usually the sequence is as following:
Note that you should not initialize a new PError object before passing the pointer into an API call. Simply initialize it with zero and check the result after. Therefore you need to free memory if an error occurred.
Most operating systems store the last error code of the most system calls in a thread-specific variable. Moreover, Windows stores the error code of the last socket related call in a separate variable. Use p_error_get_last_system() and p_error_set_last_system() to access the last system error code, p_error_get_last_net() and p_error_set_last_net() to access the last network error code.
Definition in file perror.h.
| typedef struct PError_ PError |
Clears error data.
| error | PError object to clear the data for. |
Gets an error code.
| error | PError object to get the code from. |
| P_LIB_API PErrorDomain p_error_get_domain | ( | PError * | error | ) |
Gets an error domain.
| error | PError object to get the domain from. |
Gets the last network native error code.
Gets the last system native error code.
Gets an error message.
| error | PError object to get the message from. |
Gets a platform native error code, if any.
| error | PError object to get the native code from. |
| P_LIB_API void p_error_set_error | ( | PError * | error, |
| pint | code, | ||
| pint | native_code, | ||
| const pchar * | message | ||
| ) |
Sets error data.
| error | PError object to set the data for. |
| code | Error code. |
| native_code | Native error code, leave 0 to ignore. |
| message | Error message. |
| P_LIB_API void p_error_set_error_p | ( | PError ** | error, |
| pint | code, | ||
| pint | native_code, | ||
| const pchar * | message | ||
| ) |
Sets error data through a double pointer.
| error | PError object to set the data for. |
| code | Error code. |
| native_code | Native error code, leave 0 to ignore. |
| message | Error message. |
If error is NULL it does nothing. If error is not NULL then *error should be NULL, otherwise it does nothing. It creates a PError object, sets error data and assigns it to *error. The caller is responsible to free memory of the created object after usage.
Sets the last network native error code.
| code | Error code to set. |
Sets the last system native error code.
| code | Error code to set. |
Sets an error message.
| error | PError object to set the message for. |
| message | Error message. |


Source code for textui.uierrors
"""
"""
from __future__ import print_function
from __future__ import division
from __future__ import absolute_import
# If comparing to the int type becomes a compatibility issue, try this. Requires installing the builtins package for
# Python 2 (http://python-future.org/compatible_idioms.html)
# from builtins import int
import sys
import traceback
import warnings
import pdb
[docs]class UIErrorWrapper:
"""
Wrapper class used to control exception raising in UI functions.
This class is used to wrap UI error calls so that they can be deactivated
when a UI driven program is released to users. Developers using the textui
package can thus control how exceptions and warnings deliberately issued
by textui are handled using the following class propeties:
do_throw_both: default ``True``, if set to ``False`` suppresses both exceptions
and warnings issued by the UI functions.
do_throw_exceptions, do_throw_warnings: default ``True``, these allow control
of exceptions and warnings separately. If set to ``False``, they suppress
their respective messages.
do_soft_exit: default ``False``, if set to ``True`` a simple message is displayed
prior to exiting rather than a full stack trace that might alarm users.
err_log_stream: defaults to ``sys.stderr``, this can be set to other files or
streams to, for example, allow you to send error messages to a log file
that users can send in.
The recommended use is that you set these in the top level of your program after
any import statements (this prevents your settings from being overwritten by
imported modules). Ideally, you could control this using some environmental
variable or command line switch so that users could turn on error messages for
debugging reports, as::
from textui.uierrors import UIErrorWrapper
mydebug_flag = os.getenv('MY_DEBUG') > 0
if mydebug_flag:
UIErrorWrapper.do_soft_exit = False
# Warnings are not covered by the soft exit
UIErrorWrapper.do_throw_warnings = True
else:
UIErrorWrapper.do_soft_exit = True
UIErrorWrapper.do_throw_warnings = False
Caution is recommended when setting ``do_throw_both`` or ``do_throw_exceptions`` to ``False``
as this will turn off error checking in direct input to the UI functions (that
is, input in your code, not the user input) which may simply lead to weirder errors
deeper in the code.
For those working on textui itself, any exceptions or warnings should be issued
though this class using the class methods ``raise_error`` and ``warn``.
"""
do_throw_both = True
do_throw_exceptions = True
do_throw_warnings = True
do_soft_exit = False
err_log_stream = sys.stderr
def __init__(self, err):
pass
[docs] @classmethod
def raise_error(cls, err):
"""
(classmethod) Wrapper method to raise exceptions only if the wrapper class is set to do so
Call this method with the instance of the exception to raise, as in
``UIErrorWrapper.raise_error(UITypeError("message to issue with error"))``
Its behavior is modified by the class properties ``do_throw_both``,
``do_throw_exceptions``, and ``do_soft_exit``. See class docstring for details.
:param err: the instance of the exception to raise
:type err: Exception
:return: nothing.
"""
if cls.do_throw_both and cls.do_throw_exceptions:
if not cls.do_soft_exit:
print("Error thrown using UIErrorWrapper", file=cls.err_log_stream)
raise(err)
else:
print("")
print("*******************************")
print("An internal error has occurred.")
print("This program will exit. Contact")
print("the author with a bug report.")
print("*******************************")
print("")
sys.exit(1)
[docs] @classmethod
def warn(cls, msg):
"""
(classmethod) Wrapper method to issue warnings only if the wrapper class is set to do so
Call this method with the message of the warning to issue, as
in ``UIErrorWrapper.warn("warning message to issue")``
Its behavior is modified by the class properties ``do_throw_both``
and ``do_throw_warnings``, see class docstring for details.
:param msg: The warning message to issue as a string
:type msg: str
:return: nothing.
"""
if cls.do_throw_both and cls.do_throw_warnings:
warnings.warn(msg)
[docs]class UIError(Exception):
"""
Parent class for any errors thrown by the UI functions, thus users can catch
these errors with ``try: except UIError:`` to allow a program using this package
to exit gracefully or otherwise handle the error.
"""
pass
[docs]class UITypeError(UIError):
"""
A subclass of UIError intended for errors about a variable being the wrong type
"""
pass
[docs]class UIValueError(UIError):
"""
A subclass of UIError intended for errors about a variable having the wrong value.
"""
pass
[docs]class UIOptNoneError(UIError):
"""
A subclass of UIError intended specifically for the ``opt_user_*`` functions in the
:mod:`textui.uielements` module, to be raised when these functions receive a ``None``
type from their respective ``user_*`` function.
"""
pass
[docs]class UICallbackError(UIError):
def __init__(self, callback):
message = "A callback has not returned a new _CallBack instance.\n" \
"See above the traceback for the menu hierarchy leading to the bad call"
super(UICallbackError, self).__init__(message)
hierarchy = callback.get_menu_hierarchy()
for i in range(len(hierarchy)):
mstr = " "*i + "--> " + hierarchy[i]
print(mstr)


“Sataliṅgassa atthassa,
satalakkhaṇadhārino;
Ekaṅgadassī dummedho,
satadassī ca paṇḍito”ti.
… Suhemanto thero ….
Though the meaning has a hundred facets,
and bears a hundred characteristics,
the fool sees only one factor,
while the sage sees a hundred.


Sends the selected object or objects to the back. Use SEND.TO.BACK to position selected objects behind other objects.
If the selection is not an object or a group of objects, SEND.TO.BACK returns the #VALUE! error value and interrupts the macro.
Syntax
SEND.TO.BACK( )
Related Function
BRING.TO.FRONT Brings selected objects to the front
Return to index


Release Notes Sample
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
This is sapmle of the release notes for Sample Project Version <IP_ADDRESS>.
Version Information
Sample Model 1
Dummy Driver
English
Driver Version Information
| No. |
Driver |
Date |
Version |
Signature |
Time Stamp |
|
Dummy Driver (x64) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:19 2017 |
|
Dummy Driver (x86) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:18 2017 |
Japanese
Driver Version Information
| No. |
Driver |
Date |
Version |
Signature |
Time Stamp |
|
Dummy Driver (x64) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:20 2017 |
|
Dummy Driver (x86) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:19 2017 |
Sample Model 2
Dummy Driver
English
Driver Version Information
| No. |
Driver |
Date |
Version |
Signature |
Time Stamp |
|
Dummy Driver (x64) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:21 2017 |
|
Dummy Driver (x86) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:20 2017 |
Japanese
Driver Version Information
| No. |
Driver |
Date |
Version |
Signature |
Time Stamp |
|
Dummy Driver (x64) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:21 2017 |
|
Dummy Driver (x86) |
05/10/2015 |
<IP_ADDRESS> |
PowerShell Local Certificate Root |
Wed Mar 29 20:45:21 2017 |
Limitation
- ひとつ目の制限事項
- ふたつ目の制限事項
- みっつ目の制限事項


Answer the questions below and find out the size of your ecological footprint.
*It would take this many Earths to meet the needs of humanity if everyone lived and consumed like you.


CCONJ
: coordinating conjunction
Definition
Coordinating conjunctions are invariable words that connect two constituents without subordination. In Ancient Greek some conjunctions can also function as adverbs.
Examples
- καί “and”
- τε “and”
- ἀλλά “but”
Treebank Statistics (UD_Ancient_Greek)
There are 33 CCONJ
lemmas (0%), 51 CCONJ
types (0%) and 6012 CCONJ
tokens (3%).
Out of 14 observed tags, the rank of CCONJ
is: 9 in number of lemmas, 9 in number of types and 10 in number of tokens.
The 10 most frequent CCONJ
lemmas: καί, ἀλλά, δέ, ἤ, ἐπεί, μή, ἠδέ, τε, δε, ἀτάρ
The 10 most frequent CCONJ
types: καὶ, δὲ, ἀλλ̓, ἢ, καί, ἐπεὶ, ἀλλὰ, μὴ, δ̓, μή
The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: καί (CCONJ 3689, ADV 1385), ἀλλά (CCONJ 493, ADV 424), δέ (PART 6037, ADV 1684, CCONJ 483), ἤ (CCONJ 319, ADV 20, INTJ 7), ἐπεί (CCONJ 285, ADV 29), μή (CCONJ 231, ADV 218, PART 201), ἠδέ (CCONJ 140, ADV 1), τε (PART 1730, ADV 426, CCONJ 69), ἀτάρ (PART 286, CCONJ 47), οὔτε (ADV 104, CCONJ 21, PART 1)
The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: καὶ (CCONJ 3495, ADV 1351, SCONJ 1), δὲ (PART 1884, ADV 1359, CCONJ 438), ἀλλ̓ (CCONJ 312, ADV 273), ἢ (CCONJ 243, ADV 20, INTJ 4, PRON 1), καί (CCONJ 194, ADV 39), ἐπεὶ (CCONJ 186, ADV 23), ἀλλὰ (CCONJ 169, ADV 122), μὴ (ADV 151, CCONJ 146, PART 138), δ̓ (PART 3496, ADV 257, CCONJ 119), μή (CCONJ 84, ADV 70)
- καὶ
- δὲ
- ἀλλ̓
- ἢ
- καί
- ἐπεὶ
- ἀλλὰ
- μὴ
- δ̓
- μή
Morphology
The form / lemma ratio of CCONJ
is 1.545455 (the average of all parts of speech is 3.038201).
The 1st highest number of forms (7) was observed with the lemma “ἤ”: ἠέ, ἠὲ, ἢ, ἤ, ἦ, ἦέ, ἦε.
The 2nd highest number of forms (6) was observed with the lemma “ἐπεί”: κἀπεί, ἐπεί, ἐπείτε, ἐπειδή, ἐπειδὴ, ἐπεὶ.
The 3rd highest number of forms (5) was observed with the lemma “τε”: δ̓, θ̓, τ̓, τέ, τε.
CCONJ
does not occur with any features.
Relations
CCONJ
nodes are attached to their parents using 5 different relations: grc-dep/cc (4668; 78% instances), grc-dep/advmod (915; 15% instances), grc-dep/mark (425; 7% instances), grc-dep/case (3; 0% instances), grc-dep/nmod (1; 0% instances)
Parents of CCONJ
nodes belong to 12 different parts of speech: VERB (3430; 57% instances), NOUN (1844; 31% instances), ADJ (500; 8% instances), PRON (113; 2% instances), ADV (70; 1% instances), PART (18; 0% instances), DET (14; 0% instances), NUM (12; 0% instances), ADP (5; 0% instances), CCONJ (3; 0% instances), SCONJ (2; 0% instances), X (1; 0% instances)
5678 (94%) CCONJ
nodes are leaves.
300 (5%) CCONJ
nodes have one child.
28 (0%) CCONJ
nodes have two children.
6 (0%) CCONJ
nodes have three or more children.
The highest child degree of a CCONJ
node is 4.
Children of CCONJ
nodes are attached using 10 different relations: grc-dep/punct (313; 83% instances), grc-dep/advmod (50; 13% instances), grc-dep/nmod (3; 1% instances), grc-dep/advcl (2; 1% instances), grc-dep/mark (2; 1% instances), grc-dep/obj (2; 1% instances), grc-dep/xcomp (2; 1% instances), grc-dep/acl (1; 0% instances), grc-dep/amod (1; 0% instances), grc-dep/case (1; 0% instances)
Children of CCONJ
nodes belong to 10 different parts of speech: PUNCT (313; 83% instances), PART (31; 8% instances), ADV (10; 3% instances), ADJ (6; 2% instances), VERB (5; 1% instances), NOUN (4; 1% instances), CCONJ (3; 1% instances), PRON (2; 1% instances), SCONJ (2; 1% instances), ADP (1; 0% instances)
Treebank Statistics (UD_Ancient_Greek-PROIEL)
There are 10 CCONJ
lemmas (0%), 23 CCONJ
types (0%) and 12952 CCONJ
tokens (7%).
Out of 14 observed tags, the rank of CCONJ
is: 13 in number of lemmas, 12 in number of types and 8 in number of tokens.
The 10 most frequent CCONJ
lemmas: καί, τε, ἀλλά, ἤ, οὔτε, οὐδέ, εἴτε, μηδέ, μήτε, ἤτοι
The 10 most frequent CCONJ
types: καὶ, τε, ἀλλὰ, ἢ, ἀλλ’, οὔτε, οὐδὲ, καί, εἴτε, μηδὲ
The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: τε (CCONJ 1245, ADV 35, NUM 2), ἤ (CCONJ 359, ADV 117), οὔτε (CCONJ 221, ADV 7), οὐδέ (CCONJ 134, ADV 75), εἴτε (CCONJ 74, SCONJ 14), μήτε (CCONJ 52, ADV 2)
The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: καὶ (CCONJ 9688, ADV 1119, NUM 15, ADJ 1), τε (CCONJ 1233, ADV 33, NUM 2), ἢ (CCONJ 348, ADV 104, ADJ 1), οὔτε (CCONJ 211, ADV 7), οὐδὲ (CCONJ 112, ADV 54), καί (CCONJ 94, ADV 4), εἴτε (CCONJ 74, SCONJ 14), μήτε (CCONJ 51, ADV 2), οὐδ’ (ADV 19, CCONJ 12), οὐδέ (CCONJ 10, ADV 2)
- καὶ
- CCONJ 9688: καὶ μετὰ ταῦτα αὐτίκα παρῆν καὶ ἡ γυνή
- ADV 1119: καὶ μετὰ ταῦτα αὐτίκα παρῆν καὶ ἡ γυνή
- NUM 15: οὗτοι οἱ πάντες σταθμοί εἰσι ἕνδεκα καὶ ἑκατόν
- ADJ 1: Αἰγινῆταί τε δὴ ἐδηίουν τῆς Ἀττικῆς τὰ παραθαλάσσια καὶ Ἀθηναίοισι ὁρμημένοισι ἐπ’ Αἰγινήτας στρατεύεσθαι ἦλθε μαντήιον ἐκ Δελφῶν ἐπισχόντας ἀπὸ τοῦ Αἰγινητέων ἀδικίου τριήκοντα ἔτεα τῷ ἑνὶ καὶ τριηκοστῷ Αἰακῷ τέμενος ἀποδέξαντας ἄρχεσθαι τοῦ πρὸς Αἰγινήτας πολέμου καί σφι χωρήσειν τὰ βούλονται
- τε
- ἢ
- CCONJ 348: Μὴ νομίσητε ὅτι ἦλθον καταλῦσαι τὸν νόμον ἢ τοὺς προφήτας
- ADV 104: καί κως ταῦτα τοῖσι Καρσὶ ἐξαγγέλθη πρότερον ἢ τὸν Δαυρίσην ἀπικέσθαι
- ADJ 1: ὡς δὲ παρῆσαν ἅπαντες ἔχοντες τὸ προειρημένον ἐνθαῦτα ὁ Κῦρος ἦν γάρ τις χῶρος τῆς Περσικῆς ἀκανθώδης ὅσον τε ἐπὶ ὀκτωκαίδεκα σταδίους ἢ εἴκοσι πάντῃ τοῦτον σφι τὸν χῶρον προεῖπε ἐξημερῶσαι ἐν ἡμέρῃ
- οὔτε
- οὐδὲ
- καί
- εἴτε
- μήτε
- οὐδ’
- οὐδέ
Morphology
The form / lemma ratio of CCONJ
is 2.300000 (the average of all parts of speech is 3.387371).
The 1st highest number of forms (4) was observed with the lemma “ἀλλά”: ἀλλά, ἀλλὰ, ἀλλ’, ἄλλα.
The 2nd highest number of forms (3) was observed with the lemma “μηδέ”: μηδέ, μηδὲ, μηδ’.
The 3rd highest number of forms (3) was observed with the lemma “οὐδέ”: οὐδέ, οὐδὲ, οὐδ’.
CCONJ
does not occur with any features.
Relations
CCONJ
nodes are attached to their parents using 11 different relations: grc-dep/cc (12828; 99% instances), grc-dep/root (80; 1% instances), grc-dep/orphan (27; 0% instances), grc-dep/conj (5; 0% instances), grc-dep/ccomp (4; 0% instances), grc-dep/appos (2; 0% instances), grc-dep/parataxis (2; 0% instances), grc-dep/advmod (1; 0% instances), grc-dep/amod (1; 0% instances), grc-dep/nsubj (1; 0% instances), grc-dep/xcomp (1; 0% instances)
Parents of CCONJ
nodes belong to 14 different parts of speech: VERB (7336; 57% instances), NOUN (3009; 23% instances), ADJ (1055; 8% instances), PROPN (694; 5% instances), PRON (268; 2% instances), ADV (152; 1% instances), NUM (139; 1% instances), AUX (103; 1% instances), ROOT (80; 1% instances), SCONJ (74; 1% instances), CCONJ (20; 0% instances), DET (10; 0% instances), ADP (7; 0% instances), INTJ (5; 0% instances)
12868 (99%) CCONJ
nodes are leaves.
29 (0%) CCONJ
nodes have one child.
25 (0%) CCONJ
nodes have two children.
30 (0%) CCONJ
nodes have three or more children.
The highest child degree of a CCONJ
node is 9.
Children of CCONJ
nodes are attached using 13 different relations: grc-dep/advcl (32; 16% instances), grc-dep/nsubj (31; 16% instances), grc-dep/advmod (28; 14% instances), grc-dep/cc (20; 10% instances), grc-dep/obl (16; 8% instances), grc-dep/conj (15; 8% instances), grc-dep/iobj (13; 7% instances), grc-dep/obj:dir (10; 5% instances), grc-dep/vocative (9; 5% instances), grc-dep/discourse (8; 4% instances), grc-dep/ccomp (7; 4% instances), grc-dep/parataxis (5; 3% instances), grc-dep/aux (2; 1% instances)
Children of CCONJ
nodes belong to 9 different parts of speech: VERB (53; 27% instances), NOUN (49; 25% instances), ADV (35; 18% instances), CCONJ (20; 10% instances), ADJ (15; 8% instances), PRON (10; 5% instances), INTJ (8; 4% instances), PROPN (5; 3% instances), AUX (1; 1% instances)
CCONJ in other languages: [u]