Beavis and Butt-head Do America (1996)
Grade: 69
If you had never seen MTV and ran across this title, you would think that it was among the worst ever, possibly even a porn movie. Mike Judge has reached mainstream acceptance with his FOX show "King of the Hill", but his earlier characters Beavis and Butt-head are not for everyone. If you have seen and enjoyed the MTV shorts, however, the film "Beavis and Butt-head Do America" will not disappoint.
Beavis and Butt-head are about fifteen years old.  From a societal point of view, they have no redeeming qualities. This doesn't prevent them from being hilarious, as their very weaknesses reflect the base feelings and actions that everybody has.
Our animated anti-heroes wake up to find that their beloved television set has been stolen. A search to find a working TV set gets them (as always) into increasing trouble, which they remain oblivious to. Somehow Beavis and Butt-head are taken for professional killers, get a biological weapon implanted on their clothes, and are sent on a cross-country mission to "score" with a femme fatale arms trader.
Mike Judge directed and wrote the script. His gifted vocal chords voice the major characters. He pulls no punches when it come to satire.  Stereotypes of the liberal middle school teacher and the relentless federal agent (who has a thing about deep cavity searches) are lampooned. The opening credits slam Godzilla movies, and 1970s TV detective shows.
The animation is merely perfunctory, even ugly. This does not detract much, as it suits the mood of the film. The story isn't always credible, such as the sudden change of status for Beavis and Butt-head from America's Most Wanted to hero. The dumb-dumbs also survive a definitely fatal jump from a moving vehicle, and are not arrested after re-joining their tour bus.
Bruce Willis and Demi Moore provide the voices of the arms trading couple. David Letterman, who is a big fan of Beavis and Butt-head, also has a voice characterization.
http://members.tripod.com/~Brian_Koller/movies.html
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


Company profile - Canadian Company Capabilities
Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer
Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.
Maximum I.T. Solutions
Mailing Address:
111-3365 Harvester RdMain Floor
BURLINGTON, Ontario
L7N 3N2
Location Address:
111-3365 Harvester RdMain Floor
BURLINGTON, Ontario
L7N 3N2
Tel.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Company Profile
Information Technology Network Engineers and Service Expert's
Experience has shown that the most serious challenge faced by today's business is the lack of alignment between commercial expectations and its IT resources. There is no escaping the fact that successful businesses have developed mission-critical dependencies upon their IT infrastructure.
Yet the more a business depends on IT, the more essential it becomes to pro-actively manage the dynamics of their Network and Data. Like any other area of your business, your IT infrastructure needs a strategic plan.
At Maximum I.T. Solutions we have been 'Making IT Simple' since 1996. We have put together a strong team of industry certified field experts who have experience and competencies in many aspects of the IT arena, and are constantly evolving to adopt new beneficial technologies.
With services ranging from remote phone support, to outsourced IT for larger organizations, we provide a managed service tailored to suit the individual needs of the companies and organizations we proudly call our clients. We can facilitate your needs whether your company has 5 people in one location or several hundred in multiple locations.
Information Technology Training Expert's
We understand that all companies invest a great deal of resources in the software required to run their businesses on a daily basis. However, most do not reap the full potential of this investment as the software is not being used efficiently and effectively.
At Maximum I.T. Training we are dedicated to empowering our clients by offering performance-based training solutions that ensure productivity and immediate results. With a focus on today's business objectives we translate knowledge into relevant, practical ready to implement skills.
Empower your people with the skills they need to get the job done right the first time.
With focused content delivered by certified trainers, with field experience, we are ready to arm your staff to assimilate today's ever changing technologies. Microsoft Office is one of the most commonly used software programs in businesses across the world. If you'd like to just learn the basics or be an Application Specialist, then we have a class for you.
Our technical training solutions range from certifying your current IT personnel, to training candidates new to the IT market. We will provide you with the skill set to get up to speed on the latest technologies and industry demands fast.
Certification opens doors - your doors, and it is the proof that employers today want. This is how 'they' know, that you know.
Full profile
Full profile
Contact information
Company description
Product / Service / Licensing
Microsoft Certified IT Professional's in Windows Server 2008
Microsoft 2011 SBS Small Business Server Specialist's
Microsoft 2008 SBS Small Business Server Specialist's
Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Certified Specialist's
Microsoft Excahnge Server 2007 Certified Specialist's
Microsoft Certified System Engineer's in Windows Server 2003
Microsoft Certified Professional's
CompTIA Gold Certified Network Authorized Centre
CompTIA A+ Technicians
CompTIA Network + Technicians
CompTIA PDI+ Technicians
CompTIA LPIC1 Specialist's
Cisco CCNA Specialist's
Office 2010 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Office 2007 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Office 2003 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Microsoft Technical Training
MCITP Enterprise Administrator in Windows Server 2008
MCITP Server Administrator in Windows Server 2008
MCTS Exchange Server 2010
MCTS Exchange Server 2007
MCTS Small Business Server 2011
MCTS Small Business Server 2008
MCTS Upgrading your MCSE on Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008
MCTS Upgrading your MCSA on Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008
CompTIA Technical Training
A+ Essentials
A+ Practical Application
Network+ Technician
PDI+ Technician
LPIC1 Linux+ designation
CCNA Cisco Network Associate designation
Technology profile
Microsoft Certified IT Professional's
Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist's
CompTIA Gold Authorized Network and Service Centre
Sector information
Key / Major clients:
AccountantsAdvertising Agencies
Car Dealers
Chiropractors
Colleges
Consulting Firms
Dentist Offices
Doctors Offices
Dry Cleaning
Employment Agencies
Financial Companies
Floor Covering Companies
Franchisors
Heating & Air-conditioning
Investment Companies
Insurance Brokers
Interior Design Companies
Lawyers
Manufacturing Companies
Office Administrative Firms
Pharmacies / Drug Stores
Printing Companies
Tax Preparation
Tire Dealers
Windows & Door MFG
Testimonial:
Maximum I.T. delivers timely, cost effective technology solutions for today's business.Paul Santoro
CFO - Arbell International
I would recommend anyone at Maximum I.T. The people are very friendly and very knowledgeable
in what they do. They will go out of there way to satisfy your request if possible.
Marko Mijic
Global Field Support - Stelco / EDS Canada
Karl and his team at Maximum I.T. have been taking care of my company's I.T. needs for the last 14 years. They are a vital part of our company.
Cathy Commisso
President & CEO - Spotless Drycleaners International
I highly recommend the Training Solutions provided by Maximum I.T. The learning environment was casual and enjoyable. The reference manual they provided has proven to be a valuable resource for developing our own in-house security policies and practices.
Alex Baran
General Manager - Hamilton Philharmonic Orchestra
The level of instruction that I received has made my work load easier. I have referred a few students from my classes who are also looking to enhance their computer skills. I would highly recommend Maximum I.T. as an excellent training school.
Sheena Patel
McMaster University Student
Maximum I.T. has been providing training solutions for the associates at KPM Industries Ltd. for the last 5 years. Our entire company recently completed the 'Upgrade to Office 2007' program with fantastic results. We perform with greater efficiency and are thrilled to be able use what we have learned right away. We would highly recommend the Office training programs provided by the folks at Maximum I.T.
Kimberley Wilson
System Administrator - KPM Industries Ltd.
Having successfully worked with Maximum I.T. for the last few years is like have having your own IT department in house . and their response times are extremely fast. We at North Star are comfortable referring them as an IT Solutions Provider.
Robert Pinelli
Project Manager - North Star Technical Inc.
The training that we received was excellent. The instructor was both knowledgeable and resourceful. Honestly you will be thrilled with what you have learned after the first hour. We will continue to trust Maximum I.T. with all our future training needs
Kim Bell
Executive Assistant - Canadian Mental Health Association Halton Region Branch
Maximum I.T. provides excellent, professional and knowledgeable IT support for our company. We are pleased with their products and services.
Suzanne Pack
RPM Mechanical Inc.
Our Company goal was to find IT Service and Solutions support to guide us through a period of rapid growth. We wanted a provider who could help us develop a vision and strategy for the future while at the same time, respond quickly and effectively in supporting our current system. In Maximum I.T. , we have been very fortunate to find a company that meets all our needs. Their very professional and knowledgeable staff have been there to help resolve any problems we encounter, simple or complex. We have found them to be extremely cooperative and eager to share their knowledge a refreshing approach which has enabled us to build upon our internal capabilities and become more self-sufficient.
Brian McGuire
IT Supervisor - Shipway Stairs
Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer
Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.
Contacts
Contact information
Description
Company description
Products, services and licensing
Product / Service / Licensing
Microsoft Certified IT Professional's in Windows Server 2008
Microsoft 2011 SBS Small Business Server Specialist's
Microsoft 2008 SBS Small Business Server Specialist's
Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Certified Specialist's
Microsoft Excahnge Server 2007 Certified Specialist's
Microsoft Certified System Engineer's in Windows Server 2003
Microsoft Certified Professional's
CompTIA Gold Certified Network Authorized Centre
CompTIA A+ Technicians
CompTIA Network + Technicians
CompTIA PDI+ Technicians
CompTIA LPIC1 Specialist's
Cisco CCNA Specialist's
Office 2010 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Office 2007 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Office 2003 - Word / Excel / Outlook / PowerPoint / Visio / Access / Project
Microsoft Technical Training
MCITP Enterprise Administrator in Windows Server 2008
MCITP Server Administrator in Windows Server 2008
MCTS Exchange Server 2010
MCTS Exchange Server 2007
MCTS Small Business Server 2011
MCTS Small Business Server 2008
MCTS Upgrading your MCSE on Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008
MCTS Upgrading your MCSA on Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008
CompTIA Technical Training
A+ Essentials
A+ Practical Application
Network+ Technician
PDI+ Technician
LPIC1 Linux+ designation
CCNA Cisco Network Associate designation
Technology
Technology profile
Microsoft Certified IT Professional's
Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist's
CompTIA Gold Authorized Network and Service Centre
Sector
Sector information
Key / Major clients:
AccountantsAdvertising Agencies
Car Dealers
Chiropractors
Colleges
Consulting Firms
Dentist Offices
Doctors Offices
Dry Cleaning
Employment Agencies
Financial Companies
Floor Covering Companies
Franchisors
Heating & Air-conditioning
Investment Companies
Insurance Brokers
Interior Design Companies
Lawyers
Manufacturing Companies
Office Administrative Firms
Pharmacies / Drug Stores
Printing Companies
Tax Preparation
Tire Dealers
Windows & Door MFG
Testimonial:
Maximum I.T. delivers timely, cost effective technology solutions for today's business.Paul Santoro
CFO - Arbell International
I would recommend anyone at Maximum I.T. The people are very friendly and very knowledgeable
in what they do. They will go out of there way to satisfy your request if possible.
Marko Mijic
Global Field Support - Stelco / EDS Canada
Karl and his team at Maximum I.T. have been taking care of my company's I.T. needs for the last 14 years. They are a vital part of our company.
Cathy Commisso
President & CEO - Spotless Drycleaners International
I highly recommend the Training Solutions provided by Maximum I.T. The learning environment was casual and enjoyable. The reference manual they provided has proven to be a valuable resource for developing our own in-house security policies and practices.
Alex Baran
General Manager - Hamilton Philharmonic Orchestra
The level of instruction that I received has made my work load easier. I have referred a few students from my classes who are also looking to enhance their computer skills. I would highly recommend Maximum I.T. as an excellent training school.
Sheena Patel
McMaster University Student
Maximum I.T. has been providing training solutions for the associates at KPM Industries Ltd. for the last 5 years. Our entire company recently completed the 'Upgrade to Office 2007' program with fantastic results. We perform with greater efficiency and are thrilled to be able use what we have learned right away. We would highly recommend the Office training programs provided by the folks at Maximum I.T.
Kimberley Wilson
System Administrator - KPM Industries Ltd.
Having successfully worked with Maximum I.T. for the last few years is like have having your own IT department in house . and their response times are extremely fast. We at North Star are comfortable referring them as an IT Solutions Provider.
Robert Pinelli
Project Manager - North Star Technical Inc.
The training that we received was excellent. The instructor was both knowledgeable and resourceful. Honestly you will be thrilled with what you have learned after the first hour. We will continue to trust Maximum I.T. with all our future training needs
Kim Bell
Executive Assistant - Canadian Mental Health Association Halton Region Branch
Maximum I.T. provides excellent, professional and knowledgeable IT support for our company. We are pleased with their products and services.
Suzanne Pack
RPM Mechanical Inc.
Our Company goal was to find IT Service and Solutions support to guide us through a period of rapid growth. We wanted a provider who could help us develop a vision and strategy for the future while at the same time, respond quickly and effectively in supporting our current system. In Maximum I.T. , we have been very fortunate to find a company that meets all our needs. Their very professional and knowledgeable staff have been there to help resolve any problems we encounter, simple or complex. We have found them to be extremely cooperative and eager to share their knowledge a refreshing approach which has enabled us to build upon our internal capabilities and become more self-sufficient.
Brian McGuire
IT Supervisor - Shipway Stairs


|
Sr. Design 2015
Solar Powered light
|
#include <stdint.h>
Go to the source code of this file.
Data Structures | |
| struct | DESCRIPTOR_ID |
Functions | |
| struct | __attribute__ ((packed)) _USB_DEVICE_DESCRIPTOR |
| #define IN_TO_HOST 1 |
Definition at line 603 of file usb_ch9.h.
Referenced by USBEnableEndpoint().
| #define OUT_FROM_HOST 0 |
Definition at line 602 of file usb_ch9.h.
Referenced by USBDeviceTasks(), USBEnableEndpoint(), and USBTransferOnePacket().
| #define PID_MASK_DATA_SHIFTED (PID_MASK_DATA << 2) |
| #define USB_SETUP_DEVICE_TO_HOST_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_DEVICE_TO_HOST>>7) |
| #define USB_SETUP_HOST_TO_DEVICE_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_HOST_TO_DEVICE>>7) |
| #define USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_DEVICE_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_DEVICE) |
| #define USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_ENDPOINT_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_ENDPOINT) |
| #define USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_INTERFACE_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_INTERFACE) |
| #define USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_OTHER_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_RECIPIENT_OTHER) |
| #define USB_SETUP_TYPE_CLASS_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_TYPE_CLASS>>5) |
| #define USB_SETUP_TYPE_STANDARD_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_TYPE_STANDARD>>5) |
| #define USB_SETUP_TYPE_VENDOR_BITFIELD (USB_SETUP_TYPE_VENDOR>>5) |
| union __attribute__ | ( | (packed) | ) |


| Phone Name |
name: {{phone1.name}} |
name: {{phone2.name}} |
| Availability and Networks |
{{availability | isAvailable}} |
{{availability | isAvailable}} |
| Battery |
battery type: {{phone1.battery.type | isAvailable}} |
battery type: {{phone2.battery.type | isAvailable}} |
| |
talk time: {{phone1.battery.talkTime | isAvailable}} |
talk time: {{phone2.battery.talkTime | isAvailable}} |
| |
stand by time: {{phone1.battery.standbyTime | isAvailable}} |
stand by time: {{phone2.battery.standbyTime | isAvailable}} |
| Storage and Memory |
Internal storage: {{phone1.storage.flash | isAvailable}} |
Internal storage: {{phone2.storage.flash | isAvailable}} |
| |
RAM: {{phone1.storage.ram | isAvailable}} |
RAM: {{phone2.storage.ram | isAvailable}} |
| Connectivity |
Network Support: {{phone1.connectivity.cell | isAvailable}} |
Network Support: {{phone2.connectivity.cell | isAvailable}} |
| |
WiFi: {{phone1.connectivity.wifi | isAvailable}} |
WiFi: {{phone2.connectivity.wifi | isAvailable}} |
| |
Bluetooth: {{phone1.connectivity.bluetooth | isAvailable}} |
Bluetooth: {{phone2.connectivity.bluetooth | isAvailable}} |
| |
Infrared: {{phone1.connectivity.infrared | checkmark}} |
Infrared: {{phone2.connectivity.infrared | checkmark}} |
| |
GPS: {{phone1.connectivity.gps | checkmark}} |
GPS: {{phone2.connectivity.gps | checkmark}} |
| Android |
OS Version: {{phone1.android.os | isAvailable}} |
OS Version: {{phone2.android.os | isAvailable}} |
| |
UI: {{phone1.android.ui | isAvailable}} |
UI: {{phone2.android.ui | isAvailable}} |
| Size and Weight |
{{dim | isAvailable}} |
{{dim | isAvailable}} |
| |
weight: {{phone1.sizeAndWeight.weight | isAvailable}} |
weight: {{phone2.sizeAndWeight.weight | isAvailable}} |
| Display |
Screen size: {{phone1.display.screenSize | isAvailable}} |
Screen size: {{phone2.display.screenSize | isAvailable}} |
| |
Screen resolution: {{phone1.display.screenResolution | isAvailable}} |
Screen resolution: {{phone2.display.screenResolution | isAvailable}} |
| |
Touch screen: {{phone1.display.touchScreen | checkmark}} |
Touch screen: {{phone2.display.touchScreen | checkmark}} |
| Hardware |
CPU: {{phone1.hardware.cpu | isAvailable}} |
CPU: {{phone2.hardware.cpu | isAvailable}} |
| |
USB: {{phone1.hardware.usb | isAvailable}} |
USB: {{phone2.hardware.usb | isAvailable}} |
| |
Audio / headphone jack: {{phone1.hardware.audioJack | isAvailable}} |
Audio / headphone jack: {{phone2.hardware.audioJack | isAvailable}} |
| |
FM Radio: {{phone1.hardware.fmRadio | checkmark}} |
FM Radio: {{phone2.hardware.fmRadio | checkmark}} |
| |
Accelerometer: {{phone1.hardware.accelerometer | checkmark}} |
Accelerometer: {{phone2.hardware.accelerometer | checkmark}} |
| Camera |
Primary: {{phone1.camera.primary | isAvailable}} |
Primary: {{phone2.camera.primary | isAvailable}} |
| |
Features: {{phone1.camera.features.join(', ') | isAvailable}} |
Features: {{phone2.camera.features.join(', ') | isAvailable}} |
| Additional Feature: |
{{phone1.additionalFeatures | isAvailable}} |
{{phone2.additionalFeatures | isAvailable}} |


The programming language Pascal has become the dominant language of instruction in computer science education. It has also strongly influenced languages developed subsequently, in particular Ada.
Pascal was originally intended primarily as a teaching language, but it has been more and more often recommended as a language for serious programming as well, for example, for system programming tasks and even operating systems.
Pascal, at least in its standard form, is just plain not suitable for serious programming. This paper discusses my personal discovery of some of the reasons why.
Comparing C and Pascal is rather like comparing a Learjet to a Piper Cub - one is meant for getting something done while the other is meant for learning - so such comparisons tend to be somewhat farfetched. But the revision of Software Tools seems a more relevant comparison. The programs therein were originally written in Ratfor, a ``structured'' dialect of Fortran implemented by a preprocessor. Since Ratfor is really Fortran in disguise, it has few of the assets that Pascal brings - data types more suited to character processing, data structuring capabilities for better defining the organization of one's data, and strong typing to enforce telling the truth about the data.
It turned out to be harder than I had expected to rewrite the programs in Pascal. This paper is an attempt to distill out of the experience some lessons about Pascal's suitability for programming (as distinguished from learning about programming). It is not a comparison of Pascal with C or Ratfor.
The programs were first written in that dialect of Pascal supported by the Pascal interpreter pi provided by the University of California at Berkeley. The language is close to the nominal standard of Jensen and Wirth,(6) with good diagnostics and careful run-time checking. Since then, the programs have also been run, unchanged except for new libraries of primitives, on four other systems: an interpreter from the Free University of Amsterdam (hereinafter referred to as VU, for Vrije Universiteit), a VAX version of the Berkeley system (a true compiler), a compiler purveyed by Whitesmiths, Ltd., and UCSD Pascal on a Z80. All but the last of these Pascal systems are written in C.
Pascal is a much-discussed language. A recent bibliography(7) lists 175 items under the heading of ``discussion, analysis and debate.'' The most often cited papers (well worth reading) are a strong critique by Habermann(8) and an equally strong rejoinder by Lecarme and Desjardins.(9) The paper by Boom and DeJong(10) is also good reading. Wirth's own assessment of Pascal is found in [11]. I have no desire or ability to summarize the literature; this paper represents my personal observations and most of it necessarily duplicates points made by others. I have tried to organize the rest of the material around the issues of
and within each area more or less in decreasing order of significance.To state my conclusions at the outset: Pascal may be an admirable language for teaching beginners how to program; I have no first-hand experience with that. It was a considerable achievement for 1968. It has certainly influenced the design of recent languages, of which Ada is likely to be the most important. But in its standard form (both current and proposed), Pascal is not adequate for writing real programs. It is suitable only for small, self-contained programs that have only trivial interactions with their environment and that make no use of any software written by anyone else.
apple
' and 'orange
' with
type apple = integer; orange = integer;then any arbitrary arithmetic expression involving apples and oranges is perfectly legal.
Strong typing shows up in a variety of ways. For instance, arguments to functions and procedures are checked for proper type matching. Gone is the Fortran freedom to pass a floating point number into a subroutine that expects an integer; this I deem a desirable attribute of Pascal, since it warns of a construction that will certainly cause an error.
Integer variables may be declared to have an associated range of legal values, and the compiler and run-time support ensure that one does not put large integers into variables that only hold small ones. This too seems like a service, although of course run-time checking does exact a penalty.
Let us move on to some problems of type and scope.
var arr10 : array [1..10] of integer; arr20 : array [1..20] of integer;then arr10 and arr20 are arrays of 10 and 20 integers respectively. Suppose we want to write a procedure '
sort
' to sort an integer array. Because arr10
and arr20 have different types, it is not possible to write a single
procedure that will sort them both.
The place where this affects Software Tools particularly, and I think programs in general, is that it makes it difficult indeed to create a library of routines for doing common, general-purpose operations like sorting.
The particular data type most often affected is 'array of char', for in
Pascal a string is an array of characters. Consider writing a function
'index(s,c)' that will return the position in the string s where the
character c first occurs, or zero if it does not. The problem is how to
handle the string argument of 'index
'. The calls 'index('hello',c)
' and
'index('goodbye',c)
' cannot both be legal, since the strings have different
lengths. (I pass over the question of how the end of a constant string like
'hello
' can be detected, because it can't.)
The next try is
var temp : array [1..10] of char; temp := 'hello'; n := index(temp,c);but the assignment to '
temp
' is illegal because 'hello
' and 'temp
' are of
different lengths.
The only escape from this infinite regress is to define a family of
routines with a member for each possible string size, or to make all
strings (including constant strings like 'define
' ) of the same length.
The latter approach is the lesser of two great evils. In 'Tools', a type
called 'string
' is declared as
type string = array [1..MAXSTR] of char;where the constant '
MAXSTR
' is ``big enough,'' and all strings in all
programs are exactly this size. This is far from ideal, although it made it
possible to get the programs running. It does not solve the problem of
creating true libraries of useful routines.
There are some situations where it is simply not acceptable to use the fixed-size array representation. For example, the 'Tools' program to sort lines of text operates by filling up memory with as many lines as will fit; its running time depends strongly on how full the memory can be packed.
Thus for 'sort
', another representation is used, a long array of characters
and a set of indices into this array:
type charbuf = array [1..MAXBUF] of char; charindex = array [1..MAXINDEX] of 0..MAXBUF;But the procedures and functions written to process the fixed-length representation cannot be used with the variable-length form; an entirely new set of routines is needed to copy and compare strings in this representation. In Fortran or C the same functions could be used for both.
As suggested above, a constant string is written as
'this is a string'and has the type 'packed array [1..n] of char', where n is the length. Thus each string literal of different length has a different type. The only way to write a routine that will print a message and clean up is to pad all messages out to the same maximum length:
error('short message '); error('this is a somewhat longer message');Many commercial Pascal compilers provide a '
string
' data type that
explicitly avoids the problem; 'string
's are all taken to be the same type
regardless of size. This solves the problem for this single data type, but
no other. It also fails to solve secondary problems like computing the
length of a constant string; another built-in function is the usual
solution.
Pascal enthusiasts often claim that to cope with the array-size problem one merely has to copy some library routine and fill in the parameters for the program at hand, but the defense sounds weak at best:(12)
``Since the bounds of an array are part of its type (or, more exactly, of the type of its indexes), it is impossible to define a procedure or function which applies to arrays with differing bounds. Although this restriction may appear to be a severe one, the experiences we have had with Pascal tend to show that it tends to occur very infrequently. [...] However, the need to bind the size of parametric arrays is a serious defect in connection with the use of program libraries.''This botch is the biggest single problem with Pascal. I believe that if it could be fixed, the language would be an order of magnitude more usable. The proposed ISO standard for Pascal(13) provides such a fix (``conformant array schemas''), but the acceptance of this part of the standard is apparently still in doubt.
static
' variable (often called an 'own
' variable in Algol-speaking
countries) is one that is private to some routine and retains its value
from one call of the routine to the next. De facto, Fortran variables are
internal static, except for COMMON; in C there is a 'static
' declaration
that can be applied to local variables. (Strictly speaking, in Fortran 77
one must use SAVE to force the static attribute.)
Pascal has no such storage class. This means that if a Pascal function or procedure intends to remember a value from one call to another, the variable used must be external to the function or procedure. Thus it must be visible to other procedures, and its name must be unique in the larger scope. A simple example of the problem is a random number generator: the value used to compute the current output must be saved to compute the next one, so it must be stored in a variable whose lifetime includes all calls of the random number generator. In practice, this is typically the outermost block of the program. Thus the declaration of such a variable is far removed from the place where it is actually used.
One example comes from the text formatter described in Chapter 7 of
'Tools'. The variable 'dir
' controls the direction from which excess blanks
are inserted during line justification, to obtain left and right
alternately. In Pascal, the code looks like this:
program formatter (...); var dir : 0..1; { direction to add extra spaces } . . . procedure justify (...); begin dir := 1 - dir; { opposite direction from last time } ... end; ... begin { main routine of formatter } dir := 0; ... end;The declaration, initialization and use of the variable '
dir
' are scattered
all over the program, literally hundreds of lines apart. In C or Fortran,
'dir
' can be made private to the only routine that needs to know about it:
... main() { ... } ... justify() { static int dir = 0; dir = 1 - dir; ... }There are of course many other examples of the same problem on a larger scale; functions for buffered I/O, storage management, and symbol tables all spring to mind.
There are at least two related problems. Pascal provides no way to initialize variables statically (i.e., at compile time); there is nothing analogous to Fortran's DATA statement or initializers like
int dir = 0;in C. This means that a Pascal program must contain explicit assignment statements to initialize variables (like the
dir := 0;above). This code makes the program source text bigger, and the program itself bigger at run time.
Furthermore, the lack of initializers exacerbates the problem of too-large scope caused by the lack of a static storage class. The time to initialize things is at the beginning, so either the main routine itself begins with a lot of initialization code, or it calls one or more routines to do the initializations. In either case, variables to be initialized must be visible, which means in effect at the highest level of the hierarchy. The result is that any variable that is to be initialized has global scope.
The third difficulty is that there is no way for two routines to share a variable unless it is declared at or above their least common ancestor. Fortran COMMON and C's external static storage class both provide a way for two routines to cooperate privately, without sharing information with their ancestors.
The new standard does not offer static variables, initialization or non-hierarchical communication.
To some extent this can be mitigated by a mechanism like the #include facility of C and Ratfor: source files can be included where needed without cluttering up the program. #include is not part of standard Pascal, although the UCB, VU and Whitesmiths compilers all provide it.
There is also a 'forward
' declaration in Pascal that permits separating
the declaration of the function or procedure header from the body; it is
intended for defining mutually recursive procedures. When the body is
declared later on, the header on that declaration may contain only the
function name, and must not repeat the information from the first instance.
A related problem is that Pascal has a strict order in which it is willing to accept declarations. Each procedure or function consists of
This means that all declarations of one kind (types, for instance) must be grouped together for the convenience of the compiler, even when the programmer would like to keep together things that are logically related so as to understand the program better. Since a program has to be presented to the compiler all at once, it is rarely possible to keep the declaration, initialization and use of types and variables close together. Even some of the most dedicated Pascal supporters agree:(14)label
label declarations, if any
const
constant declarations, if any
type
type declarations, if any
var
variable declarations, if any
procedure and function declarations, if any
begin
body of function or procedure
end
``The inability to make such groupings in structuring large programs is one of Pascal's most frustrating limitations.''A file inclusion facility helps only a little here.
The new standard does not relax the requirements on the order of declarations.
Theoretically, there is no need for separate compilation - if one's compiler is very fast (and if the source for all routines is always available and if one's compiler has a file inclusion facility so that multiple copies of source are not needed), recompiling everything is equivalent. In practice, of course, compilers are never fast enough and source is often hidden and file inclusion is not part of the language, so changes are time-consuming.
Some systems permit separate compilation but do not validate consistency of types across the boundary. This creates a giant hole in the strong typing. (Most other languages do no cross-compilation checking either, so Pascal is not inferior in this respect.) I have seen at least one paper (mercifully unpublished) that on page n castigates C for failing to check types across separate compilation boundaries while suggesting on page n+1 that the way to cope with Pascal is to compile procedures separately to avoid type checking.
The new standard does not offer separate compilation.
It is not legal to name a non-basic type as the literal formal parameter of a procedure; the following is not allowed:
procedure add10 (var a : array [1..10] of integer);Rather, one must invent a type name, make a type declaration, and declare the formal parameter to be an instance of that type:
type a10 = array [1..10] of integer; ... procedure add10 (var a : a10);Naturally the type declaration is physically separated from the procedure that uses it. The discipline of inventing type names is helpful for types that are used often, but it is a distraction for things used only once.
It is nice to have the declaration 'var
' for formal parameters of
functions and procedures; the procedure clearly states that it intends to
modify the argument. But the calling program has no way to declare that a
variable is to be modified - the information is only in one place, while
two places would be better. (Half a loaf is better than none, though -
Fortran tells the user nothing about who will do what to variables.)
It is also a minor bother that arrays are passed by value by default -
the net effect is that every array parameter is declared 'var
' by the
programmer more or less without thinking. If the 'var
' declaration is
inadvertently omitted, the resulting bug is subtle.
Pascal's 'set
' construct seems like a good idea, providing notational
convenience and some free type checking. For example, a set of tests like
if (c = blank) or (c = tab) or (c = newline) then ...can be written rather more clearly and perhaps more efficiently as
if c in [blank, tab, newline] then ...But in practice, set types are not useful for much more than this, because the size of a set is strongly implementation dependent (probably because it was so in the original CDC implementation: 59 bits). For example, it is natural to attempt to write the function 'isalphanum(c)' (``is c alphanumeric?'') as
{ isalphanum(c) -- true if c is letter or digit } function isalphanum (c : char) : boolean; begin isalphanum := c in ['a'..'z', 'A'..'Z', '0'..'9'] end;But in many implementations of Pascal (including the original) this code fails because sets are just too small. Accordingly, sets are generally best left unused if one intends to write portable programs. (This specific routine also runs an order of magnitude slower with sets than with a range test or array reference.)
There is no guaranteed order of evaluation of the logical operators 'and
'
and 'or
' - nothing like && and || in C.
This failing, which is shared with most other languages, hurts most
often in loop control:
while (i <= XMAX) and (x[i] > 0) do ...is extremely unwise Pascal usage, since there is no way to ensure that i is tested before x[i] is.
By the way, the parentheses in this code are mandatory - the language has only four levels of operator precedence, with relationals at the bottom.
There is no 'break
' statement for exiting loops. This is consistent with
the one entry-one exit philosophy espoused by proponents of structured
programming, but it does lead to nasty circumlocutions or duplicated code,
particularly when coupled with the inability to control the order in which
logical expressions are evaluated. Consider this common situation,
expressed in C or Ratfor:
while (getnext(...)) { if (something) break rest of loop }With no '
break
' statement, the first attempt in Pascal is
done := false; while (not done) and (getnext(...)) do if something then done := true else begin rest of loop endBut this doesn't work, because there is no way to force the ``not done'' to be evaluated before the next call of '
getnext
'. This leads, after several
false starts, to
done := false; while not done do begin done := getnext(...); if something then done := true else if not done then begin rest of loop end endOf course recidivists can use a '
goto
' and a label (numeric only and it has
to be declared) to exit a loop. Otherwise, early exits are a pain, almost
always requiring the invention of a boolean variable and a certain amount
of cunning. Compare finding the last non-blank in an array in Ratfor:
for (i = max; i > 0; i = i - 1) if (arr(i) != ' ') breakwith Pascal:
done := false; i := max; while (i > 0) and (not done) do if arr[i] = ' ' then i := i - 1 else done := true;The index of a '
for
' loop is undefined outside the loop, so it is not
possible to figure out whether one went to the end or not. The increment of
a 'for
' loop can only be +1 or -1, a minor restriction.
There is no 'return
' statement, again for one in-one out reasons. A
function value is returned by setting the value of a pseudo-variable (as in
Fortran), then falling off the end of the function. This sometimes leads to
contortions to make sure that all paths actually get to the end of the
function with the proper value. There is also no standard way to terminate
execution except by reaching the end of the outermost block, although many
implementations provide a 'halt
' that causes immediate termination.
The 'case
' statement is better designed than in C, except that there is
no 'default
' clause and the behavior is undefined if the input expression
does not match any of the cases. This crucial omission renders the 'case
'
construct almost worthless. In over 6000 lines of Pascal in 'Software Tools
in Pascal', I used it only four times, although if there had been a
'default
', a 'case
' would have served in at least a dozen places.
The new standard offers no relief on any of these points.
Pascal's built-in I/O has a deservedly bad reputation. It believes strongly in record-oriented input and output. It also has a look-ahead convention that is hard to implement properly in an interactive environment. Basically, the problem is that the I/O system believes that it must read one record ahead of the record that is being processed. In an interactive system, this means that when a program is started, its first operation is to try to read the terminal for the first line of input, before any of the program itself has been executed. But in the program
write('Please enter your name: '); read(name); ...read-ahead causes the program to hang, waiting for input before printing the prompt that asks for it.
It is possible to escape most of the evil effects of this I/O design by very careful implementation, but not all Pascal systems do so, and in any case it is relatively costly.
The I/O design reflects the original operating system upon which Pascal
was designed; even Wirth acknowledges that bias, though not its
defects.(15) It is assumed that text files consist of records, that is,
lines of text. When the last character of a line is read, the built-in
function 'eoln
' becomes true; at that point, one must call 'readln
' to
initiate reading a new line and reset 'eoln
'. Similarly, when the last
character of the file is read, the built-in 'eof
' becomes true. In both
cases, 'eoln
' and 'eof
' must be tested before each 'read
' rather than
after.
Given this, considerable pains must be taken to simulate sensible input.
This implementation of 'getc
' works for Berkeley and VU I/O systems, but
may not necessarily work for anything else:
{ getc -- read character from standard input } function getc (var c : character) : character; var ch : char; begin if eof then c := ENDFILE else if eoln then begin readln; c := NEWLINE end else begin read(ch); c := ord(ch) end; getc := c end;The type '
character
' is not the same as 'char
', since ENDFILE and perhaps
NEWLINE are not legal values for a 'char
' variable.
There is no notion at all of access to a file system except for
predefined files named by (in effect) logical unit number in the 'program
'
statement that begins each program. This apparently reflects the CDC batch
system in which Pascal was originally developed. A file variable
var fv : file of typeis a very special kind of object - it cannot be assigned to, nor used except by calls to built-in procedures like '
eof
', 'eoln
', 'read
', 'write
',
'reset
' and 'rewrite
'. ('reset
' rewinds a file and makes it ready for rereading; 'rewrite
' makes a file ready for writing.)
Most implementations of Pascal provide an escape hatch to allow access to
files by name from the outside environment, but not conveniently and not
standardly. For example, many systems permit a filename argument in calls
to 'reset
' and 'rewrite
':
reset(fv, filename);But '
reset
' and 'rewrite
' are procedures, not functions - there is no
status return and no way to regain control if for some reason the attempted
access fails. (UCSD provides a compile-time flag that disables the normal
abort.) And since fv's cannot appear in expressions like
reset(fv, filename); if fv = failure then ...there is no escape in that direction either. This straitjacket makes it essentially impossible to write programs that recover from mis-spelled file names, etc. I never solved it adequately in the 'Tools' revision.
There is no notion of access to command-line arguments, again probably reflecting Pascal's batch-processing origins. Local routines may allow it by adding non-standard procedures to the environment.
Since it is not possible to write a general-purpose storage allocator in
Pascal (there being no way to talk about the types that such a function
would return), the language has a built-in procedure called 'new
' that
allocates space from a heap. Only defined types may be allocated, so it is
not possible to allocate, for example, arrays of arbitrary size to hold
character strings. The pointers returned by 'new
' may be passed around but
not manipulated: there is no pointer arithmetic. There is no way to regain
control if storage runs out.
The new standard offers no change in any of these areas.
Pascal, in common with most other Algol-inspired languages, uses the semicolon as a statement separator rather than a terminator (as it is in PL/I and C). As a result one must have a reasonably sophisticated notion of what a statement is to put semicolons in properly. Perhaps more important, if one is serious about using them in the proper places, a fair amount of nuisance editing is needed. Consider the first cut at a program:
if a then b; c;But if something must be inserted before b, it no longer needs a semicolon, because it now precedes an '
end
':
if a then begin b0; b end; c;Now if we add an '
else
', we must remove the semicolon on the 'end
':
if a then begin b0; b end else d; c;And so on and so on, with semicolons rippling up and down the program as it evolves.
One generally accepted experimental result in programmer psychology is
that semicolon as separator is about ten times more prone to error than
semicolon as terminator.(16) (In Ada,(17) the most significant language
based on Pascal, semicolon is a terminator.) Fortunately, in Pascal one can
almost always close one's eyes and get away with a semicolon as a
terminator. The exceptions are in places like declarations, where the
separator vs. terminator problem doesn't seem as serious anyway, and just
before 'else
', which is easy to remember.
C and Ratfor programmers find 'begin
' and 'end
' bulky compared to { and
}.
A function name by itself is a call of that function; there is no way to distinguish such a function call from a simple variable except by knowing the names of the functions. Pascal uses the Fortran trick of having the function name act like a variable within the function, except that where in Fortran the function name really is a variable, and can appear in expressions, in Pascal, its appearance in an expression is a recursive invocation: if f is a zero-argument function, 'f:=f+1' is a recursive call of f.
There is a paucity of operators (probably related to the paucity of precedence levels). In particular, there are no bit-manipulation operators (AND, OR, XOR, etc.). I simply gave up trying to write the following trivial encryption program in Pascal:
i := 1; while getc(c) <> ENDFILE do begin putc(xor(c, key[i])); i := i mod keylen + 1 endbecause I couldn't write a sensible '
xor
' function. The set types help a
bit here (so to speak), but not enough; people who claim that Pascal is a
system programming language have generally overlooked this point. For
example, [18, p. 685]
``Pascal is at the present time [1977] the best language in the public domain for purposes of system programming and software implementation.''seems a bit naive.
There is no null string, perhaps because Pascal uses the doubled quote notation to indicate a quote embedded in a string:
'This is a '' character'There is no way to put non-graphic symbols into strings. In fact, non-graphic characters are unpersons in a stronger sense, since they are not mentioned in any part of the standard language. Concepts like newlines, tabs, and so on are handled on each system in an 'ad hoc' manner, usually by knowing something about the character set (e.g., ASCII newline has decimal value 10).
There is no macro processor. The 'const
' mechanism for defining manifest
constants takes care of about 95 percent of the uses of simple #define
statements in C, but more involved ones are hopeless. It is certainly
possible to put a macro preprocessor on a Pascal compiler. This allowed me
to simulate a sensible 'error
' procedure as
#define error(s)begin writeln(s); halt end('
halt
' in turn might be defined as a branch to the end of the outermost
block.) Then calls like
error('little string'); error('much bigger string');work since '
writeln
' (as part of the standard Pascal environment) can
handle strings of any size. It is unfortunate that there is no way to make
this convenience available to routines in general.
The language prohibits expressions in declarations, so it is not possible to write things like
const SIZE = 10; type arr = array [1..SIZE+1] of integer;or even simpler ones like
const SIZE = 10; SIZE1 = SIZE + 1;
The programs in the book are meant to be complete, well-engineered programs that do non-trivial tasks. But they do not have to be efficient, nor are their interactions with the operating system very complicated, so I was able to get by with some pretty kludgy solutions, ones that simply wouldn't work for real programs.
There is no significant way in which I found Pascal superior to C, but there are several places where it is a clear improvement over Ratfor. Most obvious by far is recursion: several programs are much cleaner when written recursively, notably the pattern-search, quicksort, and expression evaluation.
Enumeration data types are a good idea. They simultaneously delimit the range of legal values and document them. Records help to group related variables. I found relatively little use for pointers.
Boolean variables are nicer than integers for Boolean conditions; the original Ratfor programs contained some unnatural constructions because Fortran's logical variables are badly designed.
Occasionally Pascal's type checking would warn of a slip of the hand in writing a program; the run-time checking of values also indicated errors from time to time, particularly subscript range violations.
Turning to the negative side, recompiling a large program from scratch to change a single line of source is extremely tiresome; separate compilation, with or without type checking, is mandatory for large programs.
I derived little benefit from the fact that characters are part of Pascal and not part of Fortran, because the Pascal treatment of strings and non-graphics is so inadequate. In both languages, it is appallingly clumsy to initialize literal strings for tables of keywords, error messages, and the like.
The finished programs are in general about the same number of source lines as their Ratfor equivalents. At first this surprised me, since my preconception was that Pascal is a wordier and less expressive language. The real reason seems to be that Pascal permits arbitrary expressions in places like loop limits and subscripts where Fortran (that is, portable Fortran 66) does not, so some useless assignments can be eliminated; furthermore, the Ratfor programs declare functions while Pascal ones do not.
To close, let me summarize the main points in the case against Pascal.
case
' statement is emasculated because there is no default clause.
People who use Pascal for serious programming fall into a fatal trap.
Because the language is so impotent, it must be extended. But each group extends Pascal in its own direction, to make it look like whatever language they really want. Extensions for separate compilation, Fortran-like COMMON, string data types, internal static variables, initialization, octal numbers, bit operators, etc., all add to the utility of the language for one group, but destroy its portability to others.
I feel that it is a mistake to use Pascal for anything much beyond its original target. In its pure form, Pascal is a toy language, suitable for teaching but not for real programming.


By default textarea and contenteditable elements have Spellchecking and Text Suggestion enabled; single-line input boxes (inputtype=text) are not enabled by default The spellcheck attribute defined by HTML5 allows you to override the default behaviour for an element and all of it's children By adding the spellcheck=false attribute value on any element, you disable spellchecking and text prediction. Setting it to true enables the same scenario.
| TextArea Controls: | |
| Text Controls: | |
| TextArea Controls: | |
| Text Controls: |
When typing in an enabled edit control using the Windows 8.1 Touch Keyboard, spellchecking and text suggestion services will be automatically provided. Enabling this attribute will also provide spellchecking for the text entered using the hardware keyboard.


Copyright © 2009-2010 Marc Worrell Date: 2009-04-24
Authors: Marc Worrell (marc@worrell.nl).
| delete/2 | Delete a resource. |
| delete_nocheck/2 | Delete a resource, no check on rights etc is made. |
| duplicate/3 | Duplicate a resource, creating a new resource with the given title. |
| insert/2 | Insert a new resource. |
| insert/3 | |
| props_filter/3 | Remove properties the user is not allowed to change and convert some other to the correct data type. |
| test/0 | |
| update/3 | Update a resource. |
| update/4 | Backward comp. |
delete(Id::Props, Context) -> ok | {error, Reason}
Delete a resource
delete_nocheck(Id, Context) -> ok
throws {error, Reason}
Delete a resource, no check on rights etc is made. This is called by m_category:delete/3
throws {error, Reason}
Duplicate a resource, creating a new resource with the given title.
insert(Props, Context) -> {ok, Id} | {error, Reason}
Insert a new resource. Crashes when insertion is not allowed.
insert(Props, EscapeTexts, Context) -> any()
props_filter(T::Props1, Acc, Context) -> Props2
Remove properties the user is not allowed to change and convert some other to the correct data type
test() -> any()
update(Id, Props, Context) -> {ok, Id}
throws {error, Reason}
Update a resource
update(Id, Props, Options, Context) -> any()
Backward comp.
Generated by EDoc, Apr 11 2012, 20:41:29.


{% extends "challenge.html" %} {% load url %} {% load workstations %} {% block title %} Annotations - {{ block.super }} {% endblock %} {% block content %} {% if object.labels and not object.base.challenge.evaluation_config.submission_join_key %}
WARNING: You have uploaded labels but the join key is not set, please set it in challenge evaluation settings. The existing keys are {{ object.labels.0.keys }}.
{% endif %}Add images to this annotation set Set the labels on this annotation set Update the images used in this annotation set
| Key | Base Image | Annotation Image |
|---|---|---|
| {{ match.key }} | {{ match.base }} | {{ match.annotation }} |
WARNING: The following images in the dataset are missing annotations. Please upload the annotations with the correct key.
| Key | Base Image |
|---|---|
| {{ missing.key }} | {{ missing.base }} |
WARNING: The following annotations could not be matched with a base image. Please remove these images from the annotation set.
| Key | Annotation Image |
|---|---|
| {{ extra.key }} | {{ extra.annotation }} |
| Key | Base Image | Label |
|---|---|---|
| {{ match.key }} | {{ match.base }} | <{{ match.label }} |
WARNING: The following images in the dataset are missing labels. Please upload the labels with the correct key.
| Key | Base Image |
|---|---|
| {{ missing.key }} | {{ missing.base }} |
WARNING: The following labels could not be matched with a base image. Please upload a new set of labels.
| Key | Label |
|---|---|
| {{ extra.key }} | {{ extra.label }} |


Watch the video to see how these questions are answered!
Have you been with me Half My Life?
For those with a long term relationship, HalfMyLife pin points the exact day when Half My Life occurs. What a day to celebrate!
When is the next milestone of my life?
For those early in their relationship, HalfMyLife provides intermediate milestones dates such as one tenth, or a third of my life, dates to look forward to celebrating.
Great - what do I do?
Just click the link below! Provide a couple of
dates and you're good to go. You'll also have the
opportunity to add the milestone dates to the
calendar of your choice!
License
This software (see source here: https://github.com/bartonhammond/halfmylife) is BSD style license unless otherwise specified.
Copyright (c) 2015 Barton Hammond. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
- Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- The name of Barton Hammond may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.

User:{{params.name}}
About
The following Open Source technologies were utilized in building this web site:
Any questions, email me, Barton Hammond, with barton at acclivyx dot com


{{ partial "meta" . }} {{ $incidents := where .Site.RegularPages "Params.section" "issue" }} {{ $active := where $incidents "Params.resolved" "=" false }} {{ $isNotice := where $active "Params.severity" "=" "notice" }} {{ $isDisrupted := where $active "Params.severity" "=" "disrupted" }} {{ $isDown := where $active "Params.severity" "=" "down" }}
{{ partial "header" . }} {{ if not $active }}There have been {{ len $incidents }} incidents in total so far. In total, this added up to {{ $scratchValue }}s (or {{ div $scratchValue 60 }} min) of downtime. Please note that the uptime statistics only counts resolved incidents, ongoing incidents are not included in these calculations.
Uptime stats are not available during an outage. Sorry!


Many employers have workplace giving programs. You can choose Futures Without Violence to receivea specific tax-deductible donation through automatic payroll deductions. Make this a one-time gift, or support us through monthly, bi-monthly, or weekly installments.
Federal employees: If you are a federal worker, you can participate in the Combined Federal Campaign. Choose to donate to Futures Without Violence by checking off 11662 on your CFC enrollment card.
Did you know that many employers and companies sponsor matching gift programs for their employees? That means your tax-deductible gift to Futures Without Violence could be doubled or even tripled! If your company participates in matching gift programs, request the appropriate form, complete it, and mail it in with your donation. We will take care of the rest.
Futures Without Violence
100 Montgomery Street, The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
Volunteer your time and expertise to FUTURES, whether it’s photography, web design, videography, or graphic design services. The opportunities are endless.
Does your company sponsor employees to participate in any endurance-related events? Consider selecting FUTURES as the beneficiary of your fundraising efforts. Go, Team Futures Without Violence!


The last step to set up your signature is to select in the Thunderbird preferences. To do so simply open the Account Settings section under the Tools menu. (As seen in Figure 1.1)
1. Click on your account
2. Click on the choose button
3. Click on your home folder, then the Library Folder, then the Thunderbird folder.
4. Then click on sig.html. Press OK, then press OK again.


2233 Fairway Drive, Santa Rosa, CA,California
+855 70 70 77 77
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>I am Anha Malik from united State. I am completed my graduation in bachelor degree from SETEC. Beside this, I am trained in Web Development and love to code using HTML5, CSS3, WordPress & PHP. I am also taking course about Digital Marketing.
Academy of Art University, London
Master Degress in Computer ScienceSep 2016 - Mar 2019
SETEC Institute, Phnom Penh
Bachelor of Science MISOct 2010 - Feb 2014
Bak Touk High School, Phnom Penh
Diploma DegressSep 2004 - Mar 2010
May 2020 - Present
General Department of Customs and Excise of Cambodia
Database AdministatorJun 2017 - Present
SETEC Institue, Phnom Penh
Web Developement | Programming | E-Commerce InstuctorMay 2019 - May 2020
ChipMong Bank, Phnom Penh
Application Developement