I might have figured out what was happening to me or what would happen to me, except I was blindfolded. Not literally, but metaphorically.
Please keep in mind that these are my thoughts on life in American society as it is under a constitutional republic. If martial law were declared, well then, some of these policies might make sense. However, has martial law been declared?!
Zero Deterrence Programs
★ Three Major Goals to Our Psychological Torture Programs
★ Technically, Pschological Torture Is A Warcrime. Period.
Exhibit Z: My Brain
★ A Living Will And Testament For Justice
★ I Never Signed That
Somebody Call The SPCA!
★ At Least It’s Not A Gulag
Guilty Upon Examination of Public Federal Documentation
★ Duplicity in the JSFC War College Process Documentation
Who Are We At War With, Anyways?
★ Catch-22’s and Posse Comitatus
★ Julius Caeser and Silly Roman Superstitions
★ Where’s the War on Terror Being Fought?
★ Domestic Psychological & Informational Warefare Is Cowardly
WHY R U SO MAD DOOD?!
★ Dante’s Inferno and Fates Worse Than Death
★ Waterboarding On Supersoakers
★ Oh It’s Research?! Then Publish Your Data!
★ Now I’m Even More Afraid to Seek Psychological Help
★ If You’ve Made It Close To Where I Am, You Have NOTHING
★ Wait, Wait, Wait …
Oh That’s No Tennis Racket. That’s Corruption and Extortion.
★ Who Can Best Stand Up For The Victims?
★ Torture and Detainment is Our Greatest National Security Issue
★ The US Government Always Expected to Transition to Martial Law
That’s Detention for you Mr. Nelson!
★ How Do They Control You In Detention?
★ It’s Immature, Plain and Simple
★ Robbed of Types of Experiences Necessary for Social Development
★ The Psychosocial Miasma Fueling A Plague of Negativity
★ Enslaved By Desires and Fears
★ A Karmic Pyramid Scheme
★ Comply or Suffer Eternal Torment For No Purpose
★ Government Subsidized Repression? In the Middle of the Great Recession?!
★ How About Anew Deal
★ OMFG This Flies in the Face of the Hatch Act
The American Stasi Must and Will Be Deconstructed
★ What Do Bolsheviks Hate More than God? Entrepreneurs
★ Welcome to MickeyG’s
★ Guilty, Naive or Innocent
★ Digital Payments Cover Money Laundering for Torture Programs
★ These Paper Tiger Torture Franchisees Include
★ WWGD - What Would Grandma Do?
★ There Could Literally Never Be A Market For That!
★ You’re Not An Entrepreneur, You’re A Spineless Hack
What F#@&’ng Agreement Are You Talking About?
★ Did I Wanna Hear About Scenes from the Wolf of Wall Street?! Hell Yeh!
★ Date Raped Legal Bondage? Really?
★ How Legal Could That Possibly Be?!
★ Your Honor, How High Are You Right Now?
★ I Would Never Sign Away My Legal Right To Develop My Mind
★ I Knew Nothing of This Before February 2015
★ Have You Tried Asking Me?
★ I Revel in the Tragic Irony of a 21st Century Tesla
★ In Summary, A Few Final Questions
Zero Deterrence Programs
What’s the point of programs that had zero capicity for deterrence, but create long-lasting, expensive mental health problems, while introducing major liability for human rights violations.
Three Major Goals to Our Psychological Torture Programs
That leads me to believe there were mostly three purposes to these programs:
(1) Address logistic growth pains in sliver of the population involved in Homeland Security. Basically, they anticipated demand for these programs and wanted to push growth early on.
(2) In that sliver of the population involved in this, until just a few years ago, they could provide a deterrence against speaking out or saying anything. They would terrorize these individuals and minimize any chance of speaking out, but to the public at large, they couldn’t know what was happening because it was very illegal, so it’s not a deterrence for them
(3) And mostly, it was for research. Until very recently – and perhaps this still applies – these programs would be be limited Any and all psychological or sociological research that leaves no trace. No chemical, neurological or medical experimentation. And sadly, none of this could really include quantitative measurements, unless they were incidental
From a utilitarian standpoint, some of this research would arguably be very useful as we’re approaching a time when we’re undergoing a major sociocultural shift in the wake of technology, but …
Technically, Pschological Torture Is A Warcrime. Period.
Warcrime?! What a Bummer, Dude!
But technically, some of these “research efforts” would quite definitively qualifies as warcrimes under the Geneva Convention. And these people are very aware of the criminal nature of their activities.  I have irreversible neurological damage, just from protracted, untreated depression.
Exhibit Z: My Brain
There should be obvious physical evidence in a current high-resolution MRI, visible as degradation since my last MRI in March 2014. This degradation may not be explanable via any known neurological diagnosis, prescribed psychiatric medication or personal incident. As hard as I have searched, there is no diagnosis or differential diagnosis that explains my symptoms, except a brain tumor … and that’s strange because I don’t have a brain tumor. I never have had one. If I did have one when this all started, I’d be dead by now. My MRI’s don’t show one. My physician and neurologist didn’t say anything. I open sourced my MRI scans and no one has told me anything. Trust me, I’ve searched high and low for a disease that makes sense and there is nothing that exists which matches the presentation, progression and age of initial presentation.
A Living Will And Testament For Justice
If anything should happen to me, my brain should be preserved and studied by independent scientists who (1) publish a map of my brain using several technologies (2) reimage my brain several times as it degrades and (3) open source any and all data (4) analyze data for consistency so there is zero chance for alteration. After that, I want the brain matter preserved in such a way that minimally impacts the state of quantum entanglement. My body should be preserved in such a manner that doesn’t prevent prevent study for some time. My organs can be donated after evidence is collected. I swear to God something happened to me and I want to know what that was. If I never get the chance, I want others to find out what happened. And, if possible, I want those responsible to be brought to justice. And, if anything happenens, you can bet that some douchebags will try to say this paragraph doesn’t count as a statement of living will and testament.
I Never Signed That
I Quite Emphatically Have No Idea What You’re Talking About
So, in a functional state of mind, I clearly state what I want and what I believe should happen above. Just now.  I have never signed any living will or abdicated power of attorney or right to representation. Any such document must be a forgery. Additionally, any such document or one like it, of which I’m not aware, would be a violation of the 14th amendment’s State Action Doctrine and violations of Equal Rights as guaranteed in the 14th amendment.
And generally, you can’t say that I didn’t say what I believed or could be scared into holding my tongue. I never gnashed my tongue to distract myself from the torment, misery and wrongdoing I see around me. And that’s really my only sin: I asked too many questions. Mark my words: something happened to me, my body and my brain and there are people that want to make sure that information never sees the light of day.
(TODO: link to anchor link below)
Somebody Call The SPCA!
My Life Feels A Lot Like Animal Abuse
For years, I’ve described myself as something of an abused dog, afraid to approach anyone. I’ve even been conditioned to approach friendly person with a doggie treat because that’s exactly how they got me, every time. It’s always the person that draws me in with some initial kindness to gain my trust who ends up driving my emotional pain. It’s a tactic.  Make sure they never dream of love or compassion again.
At Least It’s Not A Gulag
At least it’s not months and years reeling in chains buried in a physical dungeon. Or starving in a Gulag. Yet, this is what they are trained to do. And hey, it doesn’t leave a mark. But, what they shackled me in was a mental gulag and it’s left the stomach of my soul bloated and starving. And yet, my spirit, too exhausted to writhe against these chains of nothing but cruel jokes and sardonic misery, is by some literal miracle not broken. They broke my heart a long time ago. I mean broke, as in the sense of rendering something incapable of functioning. I finished even the job for them. I snapped the last pieces of my heart so I could numb the pain. Yet, no matter how they twisted or tugged or viced, they never broke my spirit.
Guilty Upon Examination of Public Federal Documentation
The label the ICRC uses is Leave No Marks. According to the Joint Staff Forces College documentation for processing detainees, a college for military officials, the ICRC is the only organization that is required to be notified of the acquisition of a “detainee” … which, as may come to comprehend after a decade of torture, a loosely applied definition. It’s supposed to mean a prisoner of war, but it’s not.
Duplicity in the JSFC War College Process Documentation
Look at the JSFC document yourself and simply ask yourself: if I was in Vietnam or Iraq, would I capture someone and apply these procedures, precisely?  And actually, the procedures could be applied to either foreign or domestic detainees, but it’s just another US Government exercise in duplicity. These docs aren’t secret or classified, but the indicated some quite valuable information to me, so they might get memory holed.
★ Specifically, would you let detainees keep most of their possessions?
HELL NO! If you’re a prisoner of war in Iraq and I was the commanding officer, I would be furious to find that a POW had anything more than a Qu’ran, at most. Glancing over this document lead me to ask a dozen questions like this. There are several documents I’ve seen like this one.
★ Do prisoners receive anything but medications necessary for sustaining their lives?
They’d be lucky if they did. I doubt the Taliban would administer even that. So why are there so many procedures specific to that?  Except psychiatric medications, what drugs do have significant side effects on mental functionality when administration is permitted or restricted? From the set of drugs commonly found in one of our active warzones? Since these soldiers have so much time to concern themselves with a POW’s medications as to ensure the distribution of specific prescription drugs from our own supplies in situations which aren’t life-or-death, then…
How many of those soldiers, outside of combat medics:
★ (1) are trained to recognize life-or-death situations/symptoms/medications
★ (2) have the time to be concerned with it
★ (3) want to accept the liability for prescribing it
★ (4) care enough to draw from our own supplies, except in life or death situations.
And remember, because even though it’s a warzone, medical malpractice, withheld treatment and generally doing anything to end a POW’s life is a WARCRIME.
Who Are We At War With, Anyways?
Now ask yourself: why is it that the duplicitous, meticulously crafted, well-hidden definitions of “detainee” can be so easily applied to domestic citizens and former citizens who lost their rights without notification under the NDAA? BECAUSE AMERICA IS A WARZONE.
And if it’s not, these procedures don’t apply and America’s actions in detention is ILLEGAL. And if it is an active warzone, then these procedures apply, but mistreatment in many cases, including psychological torture leading to suicide are WARCRIMES.
WTF?! America’s a warzone?! That’s nonsense…
Catch-22’s and Posse Comitatus
Either way, the question above is a Catch-22. I’d rather pick the one that doesn’t involve warcrimes, but I’m hardly the one on trial here.  The jokes’s on you. However, determining whether we’re at war still doesn’t explain why the Army is leading these operations on American soil. Posse Comitatus, anyone? Oh, but I guess Caeser done crossed the Rubicon, huh?
Julius Caeser and Silly Roman Superstitions
You know what they say about the Rubicon, right?
The Rubicon was the river in Rome for which a law declared their military must never cross or tyranny would ensue. The American equivalent is Posse Comitatus, which prevents the military from being deployed on American soil, unless a state of emergency is declared by a governor or we are forced to declare martial law.
However, there has been no pronouncement of martial law. In war, information decides the winner and warfare has always been primarily information warfare. The claim is that restricting this information from Americans prevents panic or confers the United States some advantage. This is true to some extent. However, it’s cowardly and unethical to restrict this information and allow Americans to incriminate themselves under some false presumption, as though we ourselves are the enemy in the War on Terror. And it would look like some Americans are just straight up slaves at this point!
Where’s the War on Terror Being Fought?
The last time I checked, the War on Terror was fighting some enemy hellbent on the destruction of America in some sandy, desolate country so far off it might as well be the dusty plains of Mars. In fact, The War on Terror was declared by Congress with the AUMF on Al Qaeda, enumerating the specific non-state groups we were fighting against, while providing room for expansion to those groups who might use similar tactics.
So where are the car-bombs? Where are these things? Where’s the shipments of arms? Where are the flag-burnings? Where’s the anti-American sentiment? If proclamation that our rates are sacred is tantamount to treason, then string me up and call me bin Laden.
Domestic Psychological & Informational Warefare Is Cowardly
What do you think of a sucker punch? Would you stab a man in the back? Like … literally stab a man in the back while he’s not expecting it?  What if that man or woman had a family? Would you maim, disable or disappear the breadwinner of that family? Would you condone violence against those who aren’t expecting a fight, simply to gain ground early on?
No. You wouldn’t, would you. Especially if they did not understand they were in a warzone.
It’s immoral to encourage conflict among Americans who are ignorant of what’s truly going on. It is cowardly to do this, explaining it away as being strategically superior. And please tell me more about how these actions are strategic! It is unethical to conduct all this psychological and informational warfare in willful ignorance, claiming we’re doing it for our own self-preservation when it’s more likely to lead to our demise. IMO, conducting such operations on an unexpecting citizenry is worse than Pearl Harbor! Yeh … no one got shot, but you Pearl Harbor’d your own citizens with psychological and chemical warfare intending to identify and disable those who might fight back! That’s so cowardly! IT IS DESPICABLE!
The degree of behavior leading us to cover up reported torture, especially on US Citizens implies foreknowledge and calculation and entanglement with legal counsel. Also, providing legal advice to someone on how to get away with warcrimes is a warcrime. I read that somewhere.
WHY R U SO MAD DOOD?!
And yeh … you might ask me that and I’d tell you that I’ve been through up to a decade of this and at least five years. And I’m lucky I haven’t been killed or commited suicide or worse.
Dante’s Inferno and Fates Worse Than Death
Yes, there is are worse things than death. Much worse. Like what’s happening right here, right now, in my life.  Who’s the traitor here? Is it the man who spoke up about the violations of civil liberties he was so proud of, disregarding the consequences and enduring torture for the better part of a decade? Or is it the cunning, airtight, well-advised, criminally malicious group of people who crafted this system? Who never admitted victims an indication of torture? Who understood it wasn’t effective? Who acted like they didn’t know? Who exposed America to the legal liability of warcrimes?
To me, the answer to that is clear. The ownership for the original sin and such collateral damage belongs to all of us, but especially those who worked the hardest and lied the most.
 From what I can see, waterboarding doesn’t involve water at all. However, I’m sure there’s some torture method where someone pours water on people. Wow? Can I get one of those please? In fact, I’ll take two. Supersize me. In fact, I would have eagerly preferred a handful of illegal Mafia-style assault & battery incidents, with an actual potential for deterrence, than whatever the hell it was that I’ve been through. This is insane. And most Americans have no idea! None! That’s changed quite a bit over the past few years, but this is incomprehensible. In the name of national security, you have created the single biggest threat to national security.
Oh It’s Research?! Then Publish Your Data!
These programs are not authentic research, by any stretch of the imagination. AFAIK, they don’t collect quantifiable records and any they do would be destroyed to minimize long-term liability. Further, these programs are expensive in terms of collateral damage to the public health of the American.
Now I’m Even More Afraid to Seek Psychological Help
I was already afraid to seek help from the government reeducation known as “Drug Treatment.”
I’m afraid to go to any psychiatrist, especially now that I know how they fish psychiatric and medical records. I’m afraid to seek the help that I need, when I need it. It’s been insinuated that there are people there in the public mental health system that would be there waiting for me. At that point, they’d only have more control over my life. Victims of these programs who don’t end up in the mental health system are few and far between. At that point, your health records can get real spotty with information that makes suicide a reasonable explanation. Do you even know what your shrink writes down? How do you know they aren’t intentionally lying about you? Either way, if you’re suicided, there’s going to be no one to ask questions, especially if you couldn’t properly articulate your questions.
If You’ve Made It Close To Where I Am, You Have NOTHING
… except for spiritually transformative revelations, if you’re so inclined. Gee, thanks!
If you made it that far in these programs, you can be sure that you don’t have financial resources and that your friends and family, if they aren’t already compromised, they’re so tired of helping you that they won’t offer any help. You’ll have no one. In my case, a family might have thought of a suicide as the inevitable conclusion to a long saga of struggles with personal mental health issues.
Wait, Wait, Wait …
However, in my case, my family had been compromised. They wouldn’t ask any questions if I was suicided.  How bad would it look if your family member commits suicide and people know you were complicit?  I think that’s what that is, anyways. Apparently families who accept money for helping end the government problems receive funds for such familial treason. Or at least they receive temporary reprieve from government fines, “sanctions” or action against their own assets, businesses and property! In my case, I’ve had people personally make statements about “purchasing” the Skating Rink we own, who I caught in lies pretty quick. We wouldn’t ever sell the skating rink. I stay out of the business affairs of the skating rink and AFAIK, we wouldn’t ever allow outside investment, but we did. It’s a family business for a reason.
Oh That’s No Tennis Racket. That’s Corruption and Extortion.
However, to organized crime or a government dangerously close to tyranny, a small business, a real estate asset or anything of value and large personal investment is nothing more than a highly effective thumbscrew. When the Mafia charges protection feeds, that’s an extortion racket. Isn’t it interesting that, in such a protection racket, that mobster who collects the money and guys who enforce the extortion via assault & battery or arson – they usually don’t know names or sometimes even faces. Yet, it looks like this is what our government is running. IT’S A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE, TERROR-AND-FEAR-CULTIVATING EXTORTION RACKET UNDER THE GUISE OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND PATRIOTISM. And who knows the end goals of such criminals?
Who Can Best Stand Up For The Victims?
That’s insane, by the way. But, that’s what happened and I think I can forgive people, but I want to know what happened and I want everyone to know what happened, not for my own personal justice, but for the justice of everyone who might suffer such a fate now or ever in the future. This cannot be done. It should not be possible and these government sanctioned mafia tactics must never be practical. People deserve to know this so they can protect themselves, their family and their friends. In totalitarianism and communism, they seek to eliminate threats and anyone who accumulates resources is a threat. Property? Money? Food? Guns? Information? You’re a threat.
Torture and Detainment is Our Greatest National Security Issue
Again, the torture and illegal detainment of Americans is absolutely not a deterrent. I’ve looked into the specifics of these programs. They work by establishing a quasi-citizenship for the former US citizen and organizations like DROPPM describe the specifics of “removal” operations.  It leads us to being less capable to compete in the global economy. The health of the American economy is also, in itself, a national security issue. All the while, our leaders feign ignorance and those who are involved or complicit are encouraged to defend this by guilt or by coercion.
The US Government Always Expected to Transition to Martial Law
The long-term strategic design of these programs, from a legal and logistic standpoint, implies that this may not be to simply prepare us for a national emergency and martial law. Instead, it may be that martial law and transition to a totalitarian government was always the destination, nearly from the outset. If so, what’s the goal? How could this possibly be justified? Does that mean that whatever catastrophes our leaders claim to justify this with … does that imply it’s inevitable?
That’s Detention for you Mr. Nelson!
These Programs Are Designed to Mirror Detention from High School
Remember detention from high school? These programs are designed with pattern languages and they’re designed to prevent the success of anyone who questions the wrong thing. Plain and simple.  At that point, the Evil Santa from Futuram determines who gets presents and who … uhhh you don’t want to know the rest. But I’m going to tell you anyway.
How Do They Control You In Detention?
★ What makes you happy? Sex? Fame?
★ What do you need to be happy? Food? Money?
★ What do you need to survive? Food? Shelter? Love?
★ What gets you going? Success? Drugs?
★ What are your dreams? For yourself? For your children?
★ What are your goals? Short term? Long term?
They do it through poverty, isolation, incrimination. They do it by creating situations around you that push people away. They do it by spreading rumors. They do it by affecting your visibility on social media applications.
It’s Immature, Plain and Simple
What they do is so incredibly immature, if you think about it. For me, they actively engaged in disconnecting me from any friendships or relationships that might emerge that make me feel good about myself. That’s the primary objective: to destroy you emotionally and invoke some protracted psychiatric state that destroys you from the soul outward. They seek to confuse you to make you fear everyday and positive things, to create a state similar to that of an abused dog that’s afraid of every person who extends their arm, regardless of whether that person intended to harm or heal.
Robbed of Types of Experiences Necessary for Social Development
For me, it lasted so long, it’s done irreversible emotional and psychological damage. It’s affected me so long that I’ve been completely unable to experience those things which young adults use to progress further in development. Remember Michael Jackson? Remember how he never had those childhood experiences? That was the psychological factor that led him to want to experience those things. Still, at his age, people are unlikely to satisfy that. I don’t actually believe the charges levelled against them.
In addition to Asperger’s, I have never been permitted to have those young adult to early adult experiences. So therefore, I am at risk of forever being trapped in a psychologically undeveloped mindset. It’s because I’m too young to integrate socially with people my age to permit me those experiences which get me to the next level. The people around my family who have been manipulating them through government institutions know this. They couldn’t possibly know this, but I suspect they’ve provided my family with phony assessments of my behavior, duplicitous in nature, that encourage them to magnify the effects of psychological torture, of which my family couldn’t possibly have wanted to be part.
The problems I have are not psychiatric or caused by chemical imbalance. It’s really not even psychological, though it’s certainly led to that. It’s mostly sociological. People treat me differently and I’m mostly ignored, AFAIK. Once you get to a certain age, you lose the chance for some psychological development.
The Psychosocial Miasma Fueling A Plague of Negativity
When you consider how methodically they planned this and how very aware they are of personal information and occult psychology, their actions are downright malevalent.  Without an embrace from a girl?
★ How long have you been without a job?
★ How long have you been without being able to freely choose who your friends are?
★ How long have you been independent?
★ How long has your family begrudgingly supported you? Did they do it to keep you close?
Enslaved By Desires and Fears
You can be sure that they will abuse sex and any sensory or material things by which you can be attached. My own experience is hardly typical, but for me, it was a bit like a real life Dante’s Inferno except the instruments of your eternal torture are those things which you love, lust after, or need. If you don’t want it or lust for it, but can be made to, they will use it against you. Whatever can be used to influence your behavior, will be use. They will brainwash you until you love doing it to others or until you fearfully have no other escape. They’ll warp your mind until lust after the torment of others and invokation of these material desires in others. They make you lust after the thought of embracing their own sinful pyramid scheme.
A Karmic Pyramid Scheme
That’s precisely what it is, actually: a karmic, pyramid scheme. It’s like an MK Ultra experiment escaped the lab, founded a religion and threw in a touch of Bernie Madoff, just for the hell of it. If if you’d like, you can feel terrible and fearful about what you’ve done … or if you let yourself lust for it, it could be your opiate of the masses.  I have no idea who’s truly trying to save me and who would prefer I help them torment others.
Comply or Suffer Eternal Torment For No Purpose
How do you end the torture? By compliance. However, its just like how Guantanamo “inmates” are eventually allowed to “leave” the prison camp in Cuba, but are sent to another “country” to be “helped” – you never actually leave. There’s definitely a physical place in Cuba where people are tortured, but there’s is also a domestic program. And so, they will continue to surround you, but the intensity is scaled back. It’s their objective to ensure that, just like in the Soviet-era gulags, if you acted compliant, you really meant it. The only way to do that is to release all tension and resistance to let them brainwash you. That’s what waterboarding really is, by the way: brainwashing through psychological torture in a gulag no one can see. You’re not allowed to play or win or leave, until you comply. These “thirsty” people definitely aren’t allowed to get laid. They are especially not allowed to be seen happy or successful.
When it gets bad enough, you won’t be allowed to participate in a hobby or have a relationship or enjoy anything that makes you feel good. Positive feelings like that completely destroy what they do to you.  When it’s scientifically shown to counter their psychological torture methods? How are the atheist commies supposed to push you down if someone else relieves you of your torment?
Government Subsidized Repression? In the Middle of the Great Recession?!
It’s really the dumbest, most immature, counterproductive domestic policy ever conceived. They – the CIA, DHS, ICE, ERO, whoever it is – they know exactly how illegal it is, which is why they try so hard to hide it.  These past few years, they’ve seemed desperate because they know just how guilty I know they are. Usually anyone who makes it as far as I have ends up committing suicide or mysteriously dies in an auto accident… but I spend virtually zero time in a car. No one has ever made it this far and they’re shitting their pants, which drives me to strive on and keep pushing for justice.
How About Anew Deal
Why Not Invest in Infrastructure, Instead of Taxpayer Funded Cannabilization Culture?
What they do is counterproductive and wildly distorts the American system of values that powers our economy! It flies right in the face of the American Dream and they have acknowledged that they know it’s not effect if its publicly stated goals, but it does somewhat achieve the three goals I stated at the top. Those goals are not marketable to the American people because they are immoral and contradict everything I thought we stood for.
OMFG This Flies in the Face of the Hatch Act
And it seems that, in the past 10 years, there has been politically motivated application of these programs. I pray this isn’t the case. That would paint us to look a lot like East Germany. I can’t tell whether the goal was political suppression or that some of these American Stasi determined that abusing reactions to controversial issues like racism would render victims isolated.
The American Stasi Must and Will Be Deconstructed
Furthermore, I can diagram the networks of people who I know were involved and I know exactly where to look to find them around the country. This is happening around the country. There is almost always a connection with someone in the Army because the Army runs Guantanamo and these are warcrimes against people who don’t even realize their fighting. That’s cowardly to a nauseating degree. It’d be like the Gestapo gassing jews in their own household bathrooms. It’s obviously not that intense yet, but that’s exactly why I was always asking questions so loudly: I never wanted America to end up in a situation like that.
I was deathly afraid that’s were we were headed the whole time and these things always start with psychological warfare to isolate vulnerable populations on whatever basis: ethnic, racial, cultural, religious or political. Say what you will about me, but who’s been risking their skin to ask questions for a decade? Who got psychologically tortured and didn’t even know it? For asking questions? I’ve been trying to stop this for a decade!
 Entrepreneurs
They need “entrepreneurs” to found cover businesses to receive, process, and forward payments, which primarily stem from the Army General Fund, AFAIK. I could be wrong about that, but
I’m sure you’ve seen the article about $6.5 Trillion missing from the Pentagon! Well, that $6.5 trillion dollar number is a misnomer and actually is, in itself, a calculated bit of misinformation. That number is WRONG. Only $100 billion was laundered and it was via the ARMY GENERAL FUND, which is under the Department of Defense. AND THEY’VE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS. Only in 2015 was the DoD OIG able to complete an audit.
Welcome to MickeyG’s
Would you like a happy meal?  Happy is not allowed here at MickeyG’s.
These covers are usually small, disposable businesses, which can be thrown away as needed and, ironically, hide from the same regulations these people enforce. These businesses will work on contract basis and usually retain less than 5 employees, if any at all. Unfortunately, these organizations also do a lot of other things, but someone went and crossed their streams with torture and potential warcrimes.
Implementation and verification of “services rendered” needs to be abstracted according to the. This involves money laundering, to some degree. Data science can pinpoint these businesses by digging into their ledgers. However, there are legit domestic/foreign intelligence operations mixed in. Again, these DHS/ICE/ERO assholes crossed streams with intelligence operations that Congress actually authorized. THAT’S A BIG NO-NO!! To me, that is absolutely unacceptable, irresponsible and indicates that, logistically, this was never meant to be ended, only expanded and normalized. So, if it’s so obviously a bad idea that a know-nothing college dropout who’s made less then $3,000 in two years can analyze the vulnerabilities inherent in those logistics … then why couldn’t those people who organized this shitshow?
 I understand what’s happened to my life and I didn’t deserve it one bit.  – YEH THAT’S THE GUY THEY WANTED TO MAKE AN EXAMPLE OUT OF.
America’s not just going to stand by and watch this as we cannibalize ourselves. If you were complicit in psychological torture, you’re going to go down. We will set you one against the other just like you did to us: you are either guilty, naive or innocent. The guilty will be turned against themselves as they’re so often fated. The naive will seek to protect themselves from sins of which they were unaware. And how many of us are truly innocent? If you’ve stood by and said nothing, are you innocent? We’re going to analyze the social and financial networks of the guilty.  We’re going to find you and when we do, your sins will be held high and naked for everyone to see.
Digital Payments Cover Money Laundering for Torture Programs
Digital payments like patreon or video games on Steam are a great way to launder money and promote the success of those compliant individuals. Such digital payments will serve as adequate payoff for tech companies to look the other way on NSA surveillance.  Companies sustaining themselves primarily through digital payments are big targets and you’ll see that the guilty parties have a nauseating degree of social network overlap. That is, these shell companies pushing torture for a digital buck and modest digital success will receive payments from the same sets of people.
These Paper Tiger Torture Franchisees Include
★ Cosplayers and crafty peeps with a patreon account
★ Companies with access to medical, psychiatric, psychological, fitness and social media records
★ The musician just released their first album on Spotify and needs bots to generate authentic plays for cash
★ That photographer who’d make a lot more money if they just had enough Instagram bots to generate the threshold of likes required to break through the newsfeed stream of their friends
★ Video game “programmers” who somehow sell games on steam written in Visual Basic 6 and double as hackers who act like they don’t have skills and knowingly install spyware on Geek Squad
★ Anyone who resells souls by the sheaf for likes on Facebook
★ These are the same people for whom it’s literally impossible for their product to any demand whatsoever in a free market.
★ Writers who exclusively write digital how-to “e-books” whatever the fuck those are, when their titles couldn’t possibly sell because there’s simply no market for e-books on “How to Bake Cookies Like Grandma.”
 America is a joke, but no one bats an eye, which means this is just how it is. I’m afraid it’s how it has always been. I asked way too many questions about America around 20 years old, from a sense of patriotism. I’ve always been a patriot. Now that I can see things for how they are, I want to gouge my eyes out. This is America? You’re telling me that, when I look around today in 2016, that this is it? This is the real thing and this is normal? THIS IS FINE?!!
WWGD - What Would Grandma Do?
This isn’t a free market! There are no algorithms running in social media that aren’t micromanaged by the NSA!  Everybody and their grandma knows how to bake cookies or set up a wordpress site. If you don’t there’s 1,000 blogs, podcasts and videos that will tell you how and THEY ARE FREE. The writer’s own grandmother wouldn’t buy that e-book!   That’s not entrepreneurship. That’s a money laundered handout. Get a job.  Here’s $100. Don’t be a con-artist. This is America.”
– From Grandma With Love
### WWGD - What Would Grandma Do?
There Could Literally Never Be A Market For That!
 This is capitalism?  This is crony capitalism with levels of congressional oversight not seen outside countries with pure kleptocracy. It is insane. This is not national security, but can you ask questions?  In fact, this is itself the single biggest national security threat in soo many ways.
You’re Not An Entrepreneur, You’re A Spineless Hack
You’ve probably never even been hungry before.
By using organizations like the NSA to control comments, reviews and payments and with influence in talent agencies, this anonymous, distributed criminal enterprise can make or break a starving artist, the actress who just got her first movie deal, a talented-but-undiscovered musician, a cosplayer with a patreon account, a kickstarter project and more. These people might be acting complicitly, but in total naivety about what they are really doing because they’ve been brainwashed into being programmable puppets in pursuit of the alienation of those meddlin’ Americans who just asked too many damn questions. Jeenkies!
What F#@&’ng Agreement Are You Talking About?
The only reason I’m stating this is out of pure paranoia because it’s insinuated that “agreements” of which I have no knowledge, among other legal threats, would be used against me as leverage. Example threats BY FAINT INSINUATION ONLY include: legal resolution by arbitration, defamation for publishing details of people with a public image, general non-disclosure for only-God-knows-what and secret state agreements, like an Special Access Program (SAP).
 I do not know under whose authority the agreement I may or may not have sign would be enforced. I didn’t actually read it because the pretty girl wanted me to sign it and I hadn’t even kissed a girl in years at that point or, hell, even had more than a 5-minute conversation with one from 2011 until 2015ish, maybe.
Did I Wanna Hear About Scenes from the Wolf of Wall Street?! Hell Yeh!
Anyway, I was under the presumption that I was restricting my rights with regard to details in movies and TV shows AND NOTHING ELSE. This was an agreement I supposedly signed on June 1st, 2013 which I didn’t even remember until March 2015. SKETCHY! So sketchy thatI don’t know what it was for. From my memories, whoever wanted me to sign it was very familiar with all the blanks for me to initial, so it was something she had done quite often. In other words, this wasn’t a one-off agreement. Yet, that’s exactly how it was pitched to me: this was a special deal just for me to hear about upcoming movies and TV.
Date Raped Legal Bondage? Really?
What about the 14th amendment? State action doctrine says YOU CAN’T RESTRICT THOSE RIGHTS!!
Furthermore, I felt under the influence of drugs at the time. If such agreement does exist, I don’t know why it could be enforced without my knowledge. That’s paranoid. I don’t know why it would be perceived as valid because I was almost certainly drugged at the time. According to the words and actions in my memories, my tongue was loosened like I was on Valium and I answered any and all questions like I was on Sodium Pentathol. Further still, I couldn’t be reasonably expected to adhere to its details because I don’t know what those are and I personally don’t believe that I signed it, ever, or that it happened in 2015, if I it ever happened at all. The same person talked to me about training OCR & handwritten analysis algorithms for reversal, so they could be used to generate evidence, like handwritten letters of confession & yada yada yada.
How Legal Could That Possibly Be?!
Anyways, I’m saying this … just because. Just to make it clear because I’ve never been given the chance to state it in writing. All I know is that these people wanted me to sign this and that they were willing to say or do anything. They acted like they would give me anything in the world for it, but I don’t think I ever signed it. What they were trying to do was “nerf” me, to get close and stay close, so they’d control me completely. I didn’t want that. The same person talked about waterboarding, dryboarding and other things. She was trained in specific techniques … and she was wearing a wire, I think. I never knew that to be true and that information was never disclosed. But I acted as though it was both true and not true at the same time, while assuming that it wasn’t true and if anyone had asked me whether our conversation was recorded, I would have said no.
Your Honor, How High Are You Right Now?
If I did sign this, they tricked me into doing it and I didn’t know that or understand the implications of the agreement or who it was for. And I was drugged. SORRY, IT DOESNT COUNT. That is, if it was even real and if it even occured in 2013. They tempted me with anything I wanted in the world and I won because the only thing I truly want is justice, independence and self-actualization.
For my entire professional life, I’ve sought to avoid employment at major tech companies so that I might limit the restriction of application of my own knowledge. So, for example, in 2013, I would strongly avoid pursuing a job at Facebook, Google, Microsoft or Oracle, so that no one could ever claim that I learned some trade secret at Google that I couldn’t apply elsewhere. In fact, I told this same person that exact about Facebook. And she tested me by getting someone to pose as a Facebook recruiter to gauge my interest in a FB job. I always like to weigh my options, so I heard him out, but at no point was I willing to proceed.
I Would Never Sign Away My Legal Right To Develop My Mind
Especially Trade Secrets and ESPECIALLY MATH PROBLEMS!
My primary reason for that is to protect my ability to apply my knowledge in any way. The only NDA’s I’ve ever signed were for ABS, CCS, Internet Marketing Ninjas, Weedmaps (Ghost Group), Jumpcloud and other companies I have worked for by contract. None of those companies have any major trade secrets or intellectual property of which I am aware. In fact, that same weekend, I entertained but easily turned down someone who presented themselves to me as a Facebook recruiter ON THAT BASIS SPECIFICALLY!

Common sense would indicate that, if I ever signed something for TS/SCI or an SAP … that I’d probably know about it, right? And if not, any indication of such agreement would be baseless extra-legal harassment. In the very least, someone would seek to inform me with what my obligations were. Or that it’d be strongly indicated to me. Until such obligations of such agreements are enumerated to me or at least the existence of such agreements, I can’t help but pursue my personal obligation to truth and justice. Furthermore, it would seem that the whole idea was to fake my involvement in something like that, only to ball me up and throw me away.
I Knew Nothing of This Before February 2015
The first I learned of all these memories was at the end of Feb 2015, but I don’t think I remembered the “agreement” until March or April. On March 13th, I wrote a blog summarizing open source software I wrote in Clojure that I maybe shouldn’t have published. I STILL DON’T EVEN KNOW. Maybe I’m just paranoid. On April 1st, 2015, President Obama created a new CYBER designation for sanctioned individuals who make specific intellectual property known. This includes intellectual property that’s like the cyber equivalent of nuclear weapons. I’ve watched video statements in late 2015 where Obama said somethign like: “There’s some stuff on the internet and it’s open source and it definitely shouldn’t be.”
I’m sorry if I’m pulling a Streisand here, but I didn’t even really act on this information until early 2016. You know what you did to me and, partially aware of government surveillance and investigation. You knew I didn’t understand what was happening, but you continued to encourage people to intimidate me while others were encouraged to psychologically torture me. I gave people about a year to eighteen months to do the right thing here. What’s the right thing?
Have You Tried Asking Me?
I’ve never been made aware of such an agreement. I have never been made aware of detention. I have never been directly questioned about these events or charges, whatever they may be. Since I’ve never been allowed to succeed, I figured nothing I did mattered, neither credit nor profit. If I was truly a genius or intelligent and I had good ideas, it didn’t make any sense to sit on them. That would lead me to definitely getting no credit for anything.
I Revel in the Tragic Irony of a 21st Century Tesla
If there was a 21st century Nikola Telsa, would we celebrate him? Or would we crucify him?  I’m not saying that I’m a Tesla, but holy shit, why am I nothing?!
So in the past two years, I’ve decided that, since any notion of personal success is a cruel joke, I’d just dump nearly anything and everything I thought of online and in social media. The data for my accounts would persist and eventually people would perform a kind of new age data-archeology to see who was aware of which ideas first. They’d do this for intellectual property, for response to political events, to search for warnings unheeded and to identify pseudo-prophets and undiscovered Tesla’s. I even went back and made most of my Facebook posts public. I also decided that anything I ever did online would be MOST PUBLIC; that public data confers power and privacy takes our voice away.
In Summary, A Few Final Questions
★ Did anything the government ever do in my life fix anything for national security or for previous interference in my life? Nope
★ What was my response?
★ Was I ever made aware of actions by the government?
★ Was I ever warned or reprimanded in such a way that could realistically deter my behavior? No? Why Not? Was it maybe because YOUR BEHAVIOR WAS ILLEGAL?
★ Was I ever warned to specifically not do anything?
★ Does anything I ever did ever justify years of protracted psychological torture with a budget?
★ What do I deserve in this situation?  They seem to act like the same rules never apply to them. That the truth doesn’t matter when you still spin it to the people.
★ Did it make anything better? Nope, it made things quite worse and prompted me to react in a way to prove myself. It isolated me, forcing me to respond by learning to love learning and care for little else.
They’ve finally determined that it’s too dangerous for me to learn math or crypto by the way. The following phrase comes to mind: “We recommend [David Conner] remain in isolation for the remainder of his life.”  I don’t know. Who did this to me? Why does my life remind me of the first few episodes of Homeland?
In August 2015, I was asked “whether I’d ever work for the NSA” to which I answered a clear and emphatic “No.” I wasn’t sure if the person was serious or not, but I said no in the most non-judgemental way possible.
Asking me that question in 2015 implies:
★ I had the freedom to say yes or no.
★ That I had never signed any previous agreement with them.
★ That I might be qualified for such a job.  Aren’t you excited?! You’re excited. I can tell.


Instructional Exercise: A Rhyming Dictionary in Clojure
Table of Contents
Diagram: LISP Internals
1 What Is this document?
So let’s say we want to create a rhyming dictionary in Clojure. Not so much a rhyming dictionary application—although you could create such a thing—but a data structure that contains pronunciation data and which we could use in any program.
Jack Rusher, a good friend and computer scientist, put up this code here…
https://gist.github.com/jackrusher/8640437
…to demonstrate some interesting aspects of Clojure. Then he encouraged his friends to figure it out. I’m going to study this code and learn as I go.
The structure of this document (and thus a template for future documents of this sort) is:
- Introduction
- The plain old code
- What data are we dealing with?
- What are we going to do to deal with that data?
- Let’s apply what we’ve learned!
- Notes and findings
2 What Is the Code?
This code works with a file downloaded from…
http://svn.code.sf.net/p/cmusphinx/code/trunk/cmudict/cmudict.0.7a
…and renamed to cmudict.txt.
(def rhyme-txt (map #(string/split % #"[ ]+") (string/split-lines (slurp "cmudict.txt")))) (def word-to-rhyme (reduce (fn [m [word & rhyme]] (assoc m (string/lower-case word) (mapv #(keyword (string/replace %1 #"[0-9]" "")) (reverse rhyme)))) {} rhyme-txt)) (def rhyme-to-word (reduce (fn [m [word rhyme]] (assoc-in m rhyme { :terminate word })) {} word-to-rhyme)) (defn get-deepest-values [k] (if (string?
First I put it in a namespace.
(ns unscroll.rhyme (:require [clojure.string :as string]))
So that I can mess with it inside my current environment in emacs.
Here is the first function.
(def rhyme-txt (map #(string/split % #"[ ]+") (string/split-lines (slurp "data/cmudict.txt"))))
So this presumes a file called cmudict.txt, the CMU pronunciation dictionary. Which is sort of an old standby for word nerds, like WordNet too, from back in the day before everything was free and a pronunciation dictionary in digital form felt like an almost unbearably large gift from the Gods.
The format of the dictionary is such:
ABDOMEN AE0 B D OW1 M AH0 N
i.e. something like
WORD[SPACE]PHONEME1[SPACE]PHONEME2[SPACE]…PHONEMEN[NEWLINE]
So we (slurp) in the file, split the lines by newlines, and then split on space.
Gotta love (slurp); one thing it took me a while to figure out the other day is that slurp starts looking for files at the top level of the Clojure project. Where the source files are means nothing to Clojure (because they means nothing to the JVM); it’s the project that sets the path. Just putting this here to save someone else the 20 minutes.
Anyway now that we’ve done that we can say: (take 3 (drop 1010 rhyme-txt))
(Okay so we’re not getting rid of comments in the dictionary source or anything when we do this, it’s fast-and-dirty. So for purposes of the example we want to fast-forward past a bunch of comments and miscellany to get a clear example, so start around item 1010)
And we’d see
(["ACTUARY" "AE1" "K" "CH" "UW0" "EH1" "R" "IY2"] ["ACTUATE" "AE1" "K" "CH" "UW2" "EY1" "T"] ["ACTUATOR" "AE1" "K" "T" "Y" "UW0" "EY2" "T" "ER0"])
So now we’re dealing with a list () of vectors [] where the first value is a string representing word and the rest are strings representing phonemes.
4 What Functions Operate on the Data?
There’s a lot going on with this one as there always is with Clojure code. Let’s see how it gets called first:
(get-deepest-values (get-in rhyme-to-word (take 3 (word-to-rhyme "connection"))))
Which could probably be a function of its own called (rhyme).  Hmm.
Anyway, we’re going to give this function, (word-to-rhyme) a word and get something back.
(word-to-rhyme "connection")
and we get
[:N :AH :SH :K :EH :N :AH :K]
which is the reverse order of phonemes. Which makes sense, we’re building a rhyming dictionary, gonna go end to beginning in terms of phonemes.
Going to add a crazy amount of indenting here so I can see the levels more clearly as a n00b.
(def word-to-rhyme (reduce (fn [m [word & rhyme]] (assoc m (string/lower-case word) (mapv #(keyword (string/replace %1 #"[0-9]" "")) (reverse rhyme)))) {} rhyme-txt))
This is a funny one because as I mess with the parens my java keeps running out of heap space. So it’s clearly doing a lot, like loading the whole CMU dictionary into memory. This is something that seems to happen when you mix in-buffer evaluation with lazy evaluation–occasionally you’ll just blow up your session because you put something in the wrong place and called it a billion times instead of 100.
The super hot LISPY action in there is
(reduce function = [that function] val = [an empty map {}] coll = [rhyme-txt, our list of vectors])
Clojure docs are kind of a bear. For reduce, they say “If val is supplied, returns the result of applying f to val and the first item in coll, then applying f to that result and the 2nd item, etc.” Awesome. Although I will say that they are always accurate and if you read them ten or twenty times they start to make sense. (Plus the community is completely tutorial-mad, there’s no shortage of ways to learn this language, although in my case having an old-school Comp Sci guy as a friend helps.)
So what reduce does here is return the results applying that function in there to {} and the first item in the rhyme-text, then applies that to the second item, etc.
In
[m [word & rhyme]]
it’s going to be applied with values like:
[{} ["CONNECTION" K AH N EH K SH AH N ]]
That’s interesting because we have the [word & rhyme]–the way that destructuring works, rhyme will catch all of the phonemes into a list; it’s almost like the CMU people could predict this kind of programming would occur using their dictionary. Or that Clojure was designed to deal with data structures like those in the CMU dictionary. Or that programmers should be creating data structures like those in the CMU dictionary that are easy to comprehend and manipulate as lists. Who knows?
Then we say:
(assoc map key val)
Or here:
(assoc {} "connection" ...)
And then a couple things happen on the way to passing THAT parameter.
FIRST we reverse the rhyme (reverse rhyme) so
K AH0 N EH1 K SH AH0 N
becomes
AH0 SH K EH1 N AH0 K
SECOND we replace all the numbers with nothing (likely because we just don’t need the data, can’t remember why CMU uses numbers)
we do that with a regular expression yielding
N AH SH K EH N AH K
THIRD we run a mapv across that list of phonemes–that is, apply to each element and return a vector. And what we are applying is the “keyword” function which turns a string to a clojure keyword so we end up with a structure like:
{"connection" [:N :AH :SH :K :EH :N :AH :K]}
NOTE: I’m not sure WHY we’re converting to keywords but they are prettier in general and make for better keywords in maps, and I’m assuming they actually are optimized as, like, keywords, so….
Anyway, and then we repeat that (lazily, I guess, so in chunks of 32 or whatever it is that Clojure does?) as needed until we’ve slurped up the whole file into a big map or what I still think of as an associative array. Aaaand now we have a variable that defines a function that when given–
Oh god, I SEE. I ACTUALLY SEE. This is a def instead of a function for a reason. It’s a var that calls a function which returns a map, but in Clojure a map can operate as a function. So when I say:
(word-to-rhyme "connection")
I’m causing the interpreter to read the entirety of the dictionary into a map, and assigning that map to “word-to-rhyme” and then because I’m calling word-to-rhyme as the first item in a sexp, the interpreter evaluates it as a function and returns the phonemes that it has assoc’d to that word.
Clojure is kind of dense.
So I’m going to assume we’re in similar territory here with this variable def.
(def rhyme-to-word (reduce (fn [m [word rhyme]] (assoc-in m rhyme { :terminate word })) {} word-to-rhyme))
Aand we are, KIND OF. Hmm. So in this case we take the map (now just a map) from word-to-rhyme and do another reduce, except the structure we’re building up is going to be a trie (?) so we’re going:
(assoc-in {} [:N :AH :SH :K :EH :N :AH :K] { :terminate "connection" })
And as a result we’re getting:
{:N {:AH {:SH {:K {:EH {:N {:AH {:K {:terminate "connection"}}}}}}}}}
Great but that’s one word. NOW Clojure hands that same map back to the reduce with ANOTHER word, and so on for thousands of words, building up a huge nested behemoth of a data structure.
So we’ve passed assoc-in the phonemes for “connection”; we can now pass it “correction” and they should be all jammed up in a really nice way…
(assoc-in (assoc-in {} [:N :AH :SH :K :EH :N :AH :K] { :terminate "connection" }) [:N :AH :SH :K :EH :ER :K] {:terminate "correction"})
Okay, yes we end up with something that will let us take one word, look up the phonemes (in reverse order) and look for similar phonemes, then map those back to the words. That’s what we have here, no doubt. Looks like this:
{:N {:AH {:SH {:K {:EH {:ER {:K {:terminate "correction"}}, :N {:AH {:K {:terminate "connection"}}}}}}}}}
And since I can assoc-in I can get-in too and pull stuff out.
Okay so on we go…
(defn get-deepest-values [k] (if (string?  What is it for? OH GOD.
So here we’re looking for strings inside a nest of keywords–that makes sense. What is mapcat? Clojure docs:
“Returns the result of applying concat to the result of applying map to f and colls. Thus function f should return a collection.”
Great, thanks Clojure docs. You’re my bosom robot pal.
What it means I think is that you’re going to give this function a bundle of stuff and it’ll do something to each piece of stuff (MAP!…) and then smush everything together into one nice list (…!CAT). So we’re saying given a nested associated structure like the one we just made, pull out all the values …
Wait hold on–let’s look at how it’s actually called.
Okay this is the big mooooment
(get-deepest-values (get-in rhyme-to-word (take 5 (word-to-rhyme "erection"))))
(Erection, eh Jack?)
 k) [k] (mapcat get-deepest-values (vals k))))
does is say: Hey pal, get the values from the key/value pairs that are in a map called “k.” If you hit any value at all that is a string, return it and you’re done for that part. OTHERWISE keep mapping over the values and run this function again on each one of them (until you hit a string). And however nested things are is fine and all, but please return a nice flat list of results (that’s why it’s mapcat instead of cat”).
So it’s like you gave it a Russian nested doll, except this is LISP so it’s a Siamese Russian nested doll where the number of conjoined twins varies from nil to infinity. And it keeps looking inside the first twin’s dolls until it finds a piece of paper with a word or two on it. Then it throws away all the dolls around those words. And it does the same to the other twin. Maybe the first twin is three dolls deep. Maybe the second twin is four dolls deep. Doesn’t even matter. Get-deepest-values just digs right in there.
Of all of them, these tiny recursive functions are the hardest to write and understand.
Anyway, that’s how it works, I think.
5 Application: Byronic Bigrams
Okay so we have a nice rhyming dictionary.  I just want to be done now, friends. I just want to not be recursing. But let’s chill and take it bit by bit. The dude has 30 years of reasons for writing code this way.
First, the data above is a set of bigrams (subsequent word pairs) from Lord Byron’s “We’ll go no more a-roving.”
http://www.bartleby.com/101/599.html
I was able to figure that out by the fact that the variable is named “byron” plus “bigrams” and included the word “roving.” This part at least makes sense, thanks to Google.
So let’s put that into a var.
(def roving-poem "SO, we'll go no more a-roving So late into the night, Though the heart be still as loving, And the moon be still as bright. For the sword outwears its sheath, And the soul wears out the breast, And the heart must pause to breathe, And love itself have rest. Though the night was made for loving, And the day returns too soon, Yet we'll go no more a-roving By the light of the moon.")
Now Jack already has his bigrams in here. But I want to make my own damned bigrams. I tried a few different ways of making bigrams, here’s one approach, with ten failures left out but a few failures left in.
Let’s break up roving-poem into lowercase words using a regular expression and the lower-case function.
(def some-words (map string/lower-case (string/split roving-poem #"[\s\.\-,]+")))
(take 10 some-words) => ("so" "we'll" "go" "no" "more" "a" "roving" "so" "late" "into")
I’m really excited to have a function called “bigrammer” so let’s go all the way and call it big-rammer. I started like this:
(defn big-rammer0 [words] (if (< (count words) 2) (vec (first words) (second words) (big-rammer0 rest words))))
But when I went
(big-rammer0 some-words)
It returns nil, which suuuucks. Nil is the opposite of what I want (not really, nil is not the opposite of things, nil is a mysterious nothing.) Then I realized that the (if …) is probably in the wrong place, which always happens and got to:
(defn big-rammer1 [words] (list (first words) (second words) (if (> (count words) 2) (big-rammer1 (rest words))))) (big-rammer1 some-words)
And that returned
("so" "we'll" ("we'll" "go" ("go" "no" ...[snipped a bunch] nil))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Which is just way too many parentheses, even for Clojure.
Now I know there is stuff like (flatten) and (filter identity) that would get me a flat list without the nil on the end. Nils are kind of the bane of my existence in Clojure, they keep showing up and I never know what to do with them. But that’s not what I want; I want to get every two items and put them together just so without a whole lot of shenanigans to flatten the list. This has to be possible.
Let’s just try the recursive model a little bit more.
Okay, I got it, maybe.
Here’s how I’d describe the following function in english: Given a buncha words (“cat” “dog” “ferret” “weasel”), do two things: make a list with all but the first of those words (“dog” “ferret” “weasel”) and also a tiny list with the first and second word (“cat “dog”). Then go ahead and call the EXACT SAME function on the first list with all but the first of the words—and KEEP calling that bad boy until it’s down to two items. Then call it quits (which will return nil because there’s nothing to return). Every time you made that call you make those tiny lists with two items, right? Well once you’ve exhausted the longer list you take all of them and conj[oin] them into one list of lists.
Actually this part of LISP drives me crazy, I never quite GET IT, so let’s break it down in exhaustive detail.
(defn big-rammer2 [words] (if (> (count words) 1) (vec (conj (big-rammer2 (rest words)) (vec (list (first words) (second words))))))) (big-rammer2 '("cat" "dog" "ferret" "weasel"))
This produces
[["ferret" "weasel"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]]
Which is what we want. And man does it look LISPy, especially the part where it goes ")))))))"
(big-rammer2 some-words)
gives us a nice vector too, because we wrapped our lists in (vec). So now things are starting to look like byron-bigrams up top. We’re getting somewhere.
Okay let’s run it piece by piece, interpolating the growing list of vectors.
(big-rammer2 '("cat" "dog" "ferret" "weasel"))
PASS 1
(vec (conj (big-rammer2 '("dog" "ferret" "weasel")) ["cat" "dog"]))
Result:
[["cat" "dog"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["ferret" "weasel"]]
PASS 2
(vec (conj (big-rammer2 '("ferret" "weasel")) ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]))
Result:
[["cat" "dog"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["ferret" "weasel"]]
PASS 3
(vec (conj (big-rammer2 '("weasel")) ["ferret" "weasel"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]))
Result:
[["cat" "dog"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["ferret" "weasel"]]
PASS 4
(vec (conj nil ["ferret" "weasel"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]))
Result:
[["cat" "dog"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["ferret" "weasel"]]
The interesting thing is that if you DON’T have that nil it goes pear-shaped. So if I run:
(vec (conj ["ferret" "weasel"] ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]))
I get:
["ferret" "weasel" ["dog" "ferret"] ["cat" "dog"]]
Tooo nested.  Because conjoining does all manner of stuff. Let’s refer to the docs:
conj[oin]. Returns a new collection with the xs ‘added’. (conj nil item) returns (item). The ‘addition’ may happen at different ‘places’ depending on the concrete type.
ARGH. It’s like biting into a brick. So what are we really doing?
Let’s break this down:
(conj [:foo] [:bar])
Makes
[:foo [:bar]]
Whereas
(conj nil [:foo] [:bar])
Makes
([:bar] [:foo])
Because it is CONJOINING bar into foo. Whereas the docs, with their inimitable clarity, say:
“(conj nil item) returns (item)"
So in theory…
(= (list ["a"] ["b"]) (conj nil ["b"] ["a"]))
And indeed that is true. Because conjing [“b”] onto nil produces ([“b”]), and then conjing [“a”] onto that puts it into the list that contains [“b”].
So this is a big discovery for me. You process items and throw them at the end of a recursive function and then conjoin them when it’s all done. Now the nil value produced when the function is called for the last time becomes the FIRST item that conjoin sees–and so conjoin goes ahead and puts everything that follows into a list. But it’s as if expressing everything in sequences were some sort of insane sickly goal. Which sure, I get that, I’m programming in a LISP, but it is weird when you see it up close. Like when you see your screen is made of pixels.
I.e. the thing I’m trying to get to/comprehend is that in Clojure it’s not just that there are a lot of lists (seqs); it’s that lists inform every aspect of the language and if you don’t see a list, or some relationship that can be expressed as a set of lists, you should keep looking. If you don’t see/feel a sequence, you’re not looking hard enough. And this kind of makes sense because computers at their essence just put stuff in boxes and take stuff out of boxes in predetermined sequences. So this is a funny thing about LISP because it’s a suuuuuper-crazy abstraction and maps to lambda calculus, but it’s simultaneously weirdly close to the metal, which is why it must appeal to a certain kind of nerd. I find this really comforting but I can see why other people would not. I think this is what Jack is trying to tell me! (It is; I actually checked with him to be sure.)
Anyway all of this is moot because I also went and searched for a bigram-maker and found one in incanter, which is a general purpose math/stats library for Clojure.
And what that makes clear is that we can use the partition function–here called as (partition 2 1) which goes ahead and takes a list of two things, fast-forwards by one thing, takes the next two things, fast forwards by one thing, etc. So partition is a built-in that does what our recursive function does above but I regret nothing. So we can get all of our words at once by going:
(def words (map #(vec %) (partition 2 1 (map string/lower-case (string/split roving-poem #"[\s\.\-,]+")))))
(Note: Jack points out that “#(vec %)" could just be “vec”, but everyone makes this mistake so I’m leaving it in.)
I.e. partition into bigrams and and then map those into vectors (#() is shorthand for defining a function with an argument “%”) and you’ll end up with a structure basically like the one Jack has in his original (there are a few tiny differences; his doesn’t preserve apostrophes, but we’re close enough now.) So I feel okay about that. I get how to make bigrams both via map and via a recursive funtion. Now let’s get to the end….
(group-by (comp (partial take 2) word-to-rhyme last) byron-bigrams)
Okay we’re almost home.
“(comp…)" means we’re going to make a function out of other functions.
“(partial…)" means we’re making a function with partial arguments that can be called and evaluated with just the “missing” arguments provided.
So…
(= ((partial take 2) '(1 2 3 4)) '(1 2)) => true
That works fine but is of course most handy when you go:
(= (map (partial take 2) [[1 2 3] [4 5 6] [7 8 9]]) '((1 2) (4 5) (7 8))) => true
This jibes with everything I’ve learned about LISP, which is that LISP is about lots of tiny functions that can all live together in beautiful harmony, except on Usenet.
Anyway if we execute the above with just the (first) of the byron-bigrams…
((comp (partial take 2) word-to-rhyme last) (first byron-bigrams)) => (:Z :R)
That is the same as:
(take 2 (word-to-rhyme (last (first byron-bigrams)))) => (:Z :R)
And so
(= ((comp (partial take 2) word-to-rhyme last) (first byron-bigrams)) (take 2 (word-to-rhyme (last (first byron-bigrams)))))
There’s a lot of chitchat about functional composition out there in LISPLand but all we’re REALLY saying is “smush together all of these functions so that they can be run over and over with data of the sort that you’ll find in byron-bigrams.” Like, the composition part should be easy–and here it is–the hard part is in making composable functions.
Anyway, group-by is pretty familiar; just about every language has it. It runs a function over a list and the result is the key in a map, and the value that produced that key is added to a vector on the right hand side. (PASS THE VECTOR TO THE RIGHT HAND SIDE PASS THE VECTOR TO THE RIGHT HAND SIDE). Anyway. So when we run this we’re going to get a map of all the bigrams where the last two phonemes of the last word are exactly identical. Thus we’ll get all the bigrams that rhyme, at least in terms of two phonemes meaning a “rhyme.”
(group-by (comp (partial take 2) word-to-rhyme last) byron-bigrams)
And we do!  Jack points out something important via chat discussion on Google Jabberchat, which I’m adding here.
5.1 Jack annotates
The lesson of the group-by is that if you parameterize your grouping function with another function, you only need to write group-by once—rather than having a group-by for each of your data types.
The sub-lessons are that composition and partial evaluation let you improvise the function you use to do that parameterization, with basically no ceremony.
Last thing on parameterizing functions with functions: that’s also how the calculus works
END JACK TRANSMISSION
“…that’s also how the calculus works…” I mean come on. That’s fun. No one says that about web frameworks. They’re all like “it compiles SASS now!”
So basically we’re done (but don’t worry I’ve added a giant essay to this because what is wrong with me.) Here are some possible next steps:
- Care about syllables
- Look for words that are phonetic opposites of one another.
- Wrap a web service around it.
- Relax.
Here are some notes and observations from this exercise.
6 What I Learned
6.1 Perlis!
The Alan Perlis maxim about having 100 functions operate on one data structure keeps coming back to my head over and over. It’s like that quote is the data structure and my brain keeps operating on it in 100 different ways.
6.2 Keep Like with Like
If things need to get processed, just do it inside the function. Don’t make tons of little functions like, say, “filter-to-lowercase” or the like, as I would in Python hanging off the class; just do it right there in the function. At some level this fits well with my overall life/programming/editorial/ writing strategy of “keep like with like,” which is the one true principle of just about everything, but it requires a lot of familiarity and comfort with the programming model–especially the right-to-left depth-first model of LISPs–to really be proficient in this kind of coding, to know where to break things off into multiple functions.
6.3 It Really Is All Lists
Things WANT to be lists, and Clojure wants them to be lists. Destructuring is not about dealing with arbitrary numbers of arguments. It’s about pulling out a few named arguments, then throwing the rest into a sequence, so that you can quickly take something dumb–a list of strings representing words and phonemes–and make that list a little smarter. And repeat. Add smarts, process the rest, add smarts, process the rest.  If you take the phonemes and make them keywords, going from “EK” to :EK, then you can pull results out of a nested trie structure and recursively look through it for the strings, which are your payload, and ignore the keywords. My regular pattern is to create really big associative arrays from any data source–to reinvent XML or JSON in-memory, basically, with lots of nested arrays and so forth; the idea here seems to be that the best possible data structure is a nice plain list without a lot of fooling around and it’s okay to assume the code knows about the data once they meet up; the data doesn’t have to tell the code what every field means. Again–my roots are document processing, where that’s actually a good thing. We take more for granted on planet Clojure.
7 Conclusion
You know, there’s a strong, strong urge to never actually finish anything when I’m in Clojure. This is because the “finished” state is less relevant when you’re evaluating code live inside a text editor and looking at (and then parsing) the results back into the same live coding environment. The whole idea of “finished” seems kind of hilarious, like you are some sort of God looking down on humans who are still maintaining state in variables and sort of squinting and sighing, and since nothing is ever REALLY done, why pretend otherwise?
I’m not using a REPL. I’m just evaluating, evaluating, evaluating all day long. It’s very easy to get separatist about this environment. Meanwhile everyone else has shipped their websites and gone out for dinner to celebrate their acquihiresition while I’m sitting home at 2AM trying to understand the spiritual essence of “conj.”
EXCEPT I know in my little heart that I’m a better programmer after two or three weeks of dabbling in Clojure. But I don’t have a TON to show, and not as much as I’d have with Python, for certain. And I do have a product to ship. That said, huge amount of opaque code (especially Emacs LISP) is far more open to me than it used to be, and readable. And I’ve had an awful lot of “oh wow actually that’s very easy if you just use (partition)" moments reading the standard library code. Lots of bits of programmer culture–Jamie Zawinski rants, “Worse is Better,” Haskell passion–make more sense.
So this is probably a net win. What Clojure is teaching me is to calm down, look at the function signature in my Emacs modeline, check the standard docs (control-C d), and then write a function and rewrite it until it doesn’t explode and does what I want. And you just sort of keep on doing it. And if it comes together (maybe the partial Wikipedia parser I’m writing could be useful) you bundle it up and release it to Github.
Stuff like that recursive big-rammer2 function used to be really hard for me to wrap my head around, and it’s not any more–the magic has gone out of it. It’s nice to see magic destroyed. One thing about magic is that when it gets bundled up but is still hidden from view (i.e. in frameworks) it leads to sameness of product. Every wizard has the same spells.
When you look at what people are doing so far, there doesn’t seem to be a prototypical Clojure app out in the world. People seem to be focused on the language, and on gluing together things from other languages so they can be used here. It’ll be interesting to see what emerges. There are some web frameworks, but some minimal web app layers like Ring that make more sense to me right now. Frameworks are great but they sure do lead to a lot of apps that look and feel and…taste? alike. I’m not saying things should be hard–I’m just saying that we create things with our tools, and thus our tools have consequences.


Otherwise, follow this link:" %} {{ protocol}}://{{ domain }}{% url 'password_reset_confirm' uidb36=uid token=token %}


{% extends 'base.html' %} {% block body %}
The simple Python/Flask application template.
Feel free to use it for building any Web UI projects.
This project uses an SQlite3 for saving user's credentials, also for other features as you wish.
Kubyk have a built in simple users levels model, there is two level of credentials, the admins and regular users.
This project use a well known Bootstrap template under the hood.
The Dockerfile and a bit documentation & examples, will help with using it.


| MATLAB 文件帮助: cv.sepFilter2D | 查看 cv.sepFilter2D 的代码 | Index |
sepFilter2D Applies a separable linear filter to an image
dst = cv.sepFilter2D(src, kernelX, kernelY)
dst = cv.sepFilter2D(..., 'OptionName',optionValue, ...)
src
.The function applies a separable linear filter to the image. That is, first,
every row of src
is filtered with the 1D kernel kernelX
. Then, every
column of the result is filtered with the 1D kernel kernelY
. The final
result shifted by delta is stored in dst
.


SChartCartesianSeries Class Reference
| Inherits from | SChartMappedSeries : SChartSeries : NSObject |
| Declared in | SChartCartesianSeries.h |
| Availability | Standard Premium |
| Related samples |
Overview
SChartCartesianSeries
represents an instance of a cartesian series on a chart.
Cartesian coordinates are points defined in a plane by a pair of numerical coordinates, which are the signed distances from the point to either axis in the plane. In our charts, we are using an x and a y axis.
SChartCartesianSeries
is the base class for all of the concrete cartesian series which are provided in ShinobiCharts. The concrete series types which are available are:
SChartBarSeries
- represents a bar series.SChartColumnSeries
- represents a column series.SChartLineSeries
- represents a line series.SChartStepLineSeries
- represents a stepped line series.SChartBandSeries
- represents a band series. These are only available in the premium version of charts.SChartScatterSeries
- represents a scatter plots.SChartCandlestickSeries
- represents a candlestick series. These are only available in the premium version of charts.SChartOHLCSeries
- represents an Open-High-Low-Closed (OHLC) series. These are only available in the premium version of charts.
Some types of chart series can be stacked. This means that they are rendered on top of each other, with the first series rendered at the bottom, and subsequent series offset so that they begin at the top of the previous series. The types of series which can be stacked are bar series, column series, line series and stepped line series. See the stackIndex
property for more information.
Tasks
Other Methods
-
baseline
Baseline for the series, on the x or y axis depending on its orientation.
property -
stackIndex
The index of the stacked set to which this series belongs.
property -
– rangeOfDataInX
Returns the range of the data in the X axis.
-
– rangeOfDataInY
Returns the range of the data in the Y axis.
-
– dataPointWithMaxY
Returns the datapoint with the largest Y value.
-
– dataPointWithMinY
Returns the datapoint with the smallest Y value.
-
– dataPointWithMaxX
Returns the datapoint with the largest X value.
-
– dataPointWithMinX
Returns the datapoint with the smallest X value.
Animation
-
animated
DEPRECATED - Use
property[SChartSeries animationEnabled]
instead. -
animationDuration
DEPRECATED - Configure either the
property[SChartSeries entryAnimation]
or[SChartSeries exitAnimation]
instead. -
animationCurve
DEPRECATED - Configure either the
property[SChartSeries entryAnimation]
or[SChartSeries exitAnimation]
instead.
Properties
animated
DEPRECATED - Use [SChartSeries animationEnabled]
instead.
@property (nonatomic) BOOL animated
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
animationCurve
DEPRECATED - Configure either the [SChartSeries entryAnimation]
or [SChartSeries exitAnimation]
instead.
@property (nonatomic) SChartAnimationCurve animationCurve
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
animationDuration
DEPRECATED - Configure either the [SChartSeries entryAnimation]
or [SChartSeries exitAnimation]
instead.
@property (nonatomic) CGFloat animationDuration
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
baseline
Baseline for the series, on the x or y axis depending on its orientation.
@property (nonatomic, retain) NSNumber *baseline
Discussion
By default, this property is 0.0
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
stackIndex
The index of the stacked set to which this series belongs.
@property (nonatomic, retain) NSNumber *stackIndex
Discussion
Series can be stacked on a chart, which means that their values are offset and they are rendered on top of each other, with the first series rendered at the bottom, offset from the baseline, with subsequent series offset so that they begin at the top of the previous series. Each stacked set in the chart is assigned a unique ID. To add a series to a stacked set, you set its stackIndex
property to be the ID of the stacked set to which you wish to add the series.
By default, this property is nil
. This indicates that the series is not stacked.
The types of series which can be stacked are bar series, column series, line series and stepped line series.
Note that for any stack, all offsets must either be positive or negative - for example: Two column series are stacked. Both series have yValues for xValues of 3 and 4. The first series has a yValue of 2 for x=3 and -1 for x=4. The second series has yValues of 7 for x=3 and -3 for x==4. This is OK, whereas if the second series had a yValue of 2 for x=4, that stack would contain both positive and negative offsets and could produce strange effects.
Note also that if your series are stacked, their values must be sorted - with respect to the xAxis in the case of a column series or line series of horizontal orientation, and with respect to the yAxis in the case of a bar series or line series of vertical orientation.
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
Instance Methods
dataPointWithMaxX
Returns the datapoint with the largest X value.
- (SChartDataPoint *)dataPointWithMaxX
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
dataPointWithMaxY
Returns the datapoint with the largest Y value.
- (SChartDataPoint *)dataPointWithMaxY
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
dataPointWithMinX
Returns the datapoint with the smallest X value.
- (SChartDataPoint *)dataPointWithMinX
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
dataPointWithMinY
Returns the datapoint with the smallest Y value.
- (SChartDataPoint *)dataPointWithMinY
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
rangeOfDataInX
Returns the range of the data in the X axis.
- (SChartRange *)rangeOfDataInX
Discussion
Warning: DEPRECATED - This method has been moved onto SChartMappedSeries
.
See Also
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h
rangeOfDataInY
Returns the range of the data in the Y axis.
- (SChartRange *)rangeOfDataInY
Discussion
Warning: DEPRECATED - This method has been moved onto SChartMappedSeries
.
See Also
Declared In
SChartCartesianSeries.h


| 1290 | (A) | Iosaphus the gentiłł clerke a-Ioynede was to Rome |
| 1284 | (C) | Iosephus þe gentyłł clerke . a-Iorned was to rome |
| 1277 | (D) | Iosephus þe gynful a-iornyd was to rome |
| 1253 | (E) | ¶ Saue iosephus þe gentyl iew . aiourned was to rome |
| (Ex) | ---- no text ---- | |
| 1319 | (L) | Iosophus þe gentile clerke a-Iorneyd was to rome |
| (P) | ---- no text ---- | |
| 1258 | (U) | ¶ Iosephus the gentil iewe / aiourned was to Rome |
| 355 | (V) | Iosephus þe gentiłł clerke . was Ioyned to Rome |


Join the top emojis from Etheroji and get to the 😎 tile!
How to play: Use your arrow keys or swipe to move the tiles. When two tiles with the same emoji touch, they merge into one!
This game is based on 2048 by Gabriele Cirulli.


{% extends 'base.html' %} {% block content %} {% if filtered_categorical_cols %}
Warning: Some samples were filtered from the input distance matrix
because they were missing metadata values.
The input distance matrix
contained {{ initial_dm_length }} samples but bioenv was computed on only
{{ filtered_dm_length }} samples.


benchbuild.projects.gentoo.gentoo module¶
The Gentoo module for running tests on builds from the portage tree.
This will install a stage3 image of gentoo together with a recent snapshot of the portage tree. For building / executing arbitrary projects successfully it is necessary to keep the installed image as close to the host system as possible. In order to speed up your experience, you can replace the stage3 image that we pull from the distfiles mirror with a new image that contains all necessary dependencies for your experiments. Make sure you update the hash alongside the gentoo image in benchbuild’s source directory.
-
class
benchbuild.projects.gentoo.gentoo.
GentooGroup
(experiment, name=NOTHING, domain=NOTHING, group=NOTHING, src_file=NOTHING, container=NOTHING, version=NOTHING, builddir=NOTHING, testdir=NOTHING, cflags=NOTHING, ldflags=NOTHING, run_f=NOTHING, run_uuid=NOTHING, compiler_extension=NOTHING, runtime_extension=None, emerge_env={})[source]¶ Bases:
benchbuild.project.Project
Gentoo ProjectGroup is the base class for every portage build.
-
CONTAINER
= <benchbuild.utils.container.Gentoo object>¶
-
GROUP
= 'gentoo'¶
-
SRC_FILE
= None¶
-
-
benchbuild.projects.gentoo.gentoo.
setup_benchbuild
()[source]¶ Setup benchbuild inside a container.
This will query a for an existing installation of benchbuild and try to upgrade it to the latest version, if possible.
-
benchbuild.projects.gentoo.gentoo.
write_bashrc
(_path)[source]¶ Write a valid gentoo bashrc file to :path:.
Parameters: - The output path of the make.conf (path) –
-
benchbuild.projects.gentoo.gentoo.
write_layout
(_path)[source]¶ Write a valid gentoo layout file to :path:.
Parameters: - The output path of the layout.conf (path) –


There is an incredibly huge amount of different cat breeds out there. Click below to check them out!
You can help us by taking a look at these mixed cats and try to identify the breeds that run through the cats' DNA.
For more information, you can reach us by e-mail.


This is the body... yay add some text
this is a h1 heading one
heading two
...
till heading six
text text text
text
text
New semantics
strong
emphasis
lists
element one
element two
element one
element two
My link


Although the movie ``Washington Square'' bears the same title as Henry James' novel, it takes considerable liberties with the source material, much in the same way the recent ``Wings of the Dove'' did with another James novel.
Carol Doyle's screenplay remodels the character of Catherine Sloper into something of a fledgling feminist, rather than the meek and pathetic victim she was in ``The Heiress,'' the popular stage adaptation by Ruth and Augustus Goetz.
The transformation works, thanks to a typically edgy performance by Jennifer Jason Leigh and unfussy direction by Agnieszka Holland. Despite its turn-of-the-century setting, this retelling of the story rings with contemporary resonance, and although Doyle has tweaked the original, particularly with regard to the ending, she has retained the gist of ``Washington Square.''
It's still the bittersweet tale of well-to-do, woebegone Catherine's flirtation with the penniless Morris Townsend (Ben Chaplin) and her domineering father's (Albert Finney) stringent objection to it.
Holland and her production team have created an excellent example of how to open up a play and make it cinematic by taking the action out of the Sloper family's parlor and moving it into the streets of New York, the gardens of high society, the mountains of Europe and a variety of beautifully evoked locations.
With her usual abandon, Leigh at first loses herself in Catherine's gaudy dresses and nervous tics. As the story progresses, however, the actress lets us see there is considerably more going on with this girl than first meets the eye.
Beneath her awkwardness is a hint of a sharp, sly mind at work, and Doyle allows us to wonder whether Catherine is being used by Morris or if she is in fact using him to make one final stand against her father.
Finney's vivid portrait of Dr. Sloper is one of the actor's strongest performances since ``Under The Volcano'' 15 years ago.
Yet Finney doesn't allow him to sink into either conventional villainy or melodramatic excess.
Sloper remains imposing and, even though he's a terrible father, he isn't entirely heartless. Though he may well be more concerned with his daughter embarrassing him than shaming herself, Sloper at least wants to spare her any undue humiliation.
Chaplin - best known as the love interest in ``The Truth About Cats and Dogs'' - lends surprising richness and depth to Morris. Like Leigh, Chaplin is purposefully oblique about Morris' motives, thus enhancing the drama.
As played by Maggie Smith, the spinster aunt Lavinia comes off as being slightly smarter and a trifle more infatuated with Morris than she was in ``The Heiress.''
Even so, ``Washington Square'' is ultimately Leigh's show, and she effortlessly carries the picture. Few other young actresses have Leigh's knack for quietly exposing tormented souls.
Her consistently intriguing performance here should sway those who still have reservations about her, while giving her cult of admirers one more reason to celebrate her gift.
James Sanford
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


ABOUT Topics
Some of the topics are shown here with Short Description.
Disc Scheduling
Disk scheduling is is done by operating systems to schedule I/O requests arriving for disk. Disk scheduling is also known as I/O scheduling.
There are mainly 6 types of Disc scheduling examined here.They are
1. FCFS(First Come First Serve)
2. SSTF(shortest seek time first)
3. SCAN
4. C-SCAN
5. LOOK
6. C-LOOK
All these schedulings are examined and Total Head Movements are Compared.
File Allocation
The allocation methods define how the files are stored in the disk blocks. There are three main disk space or file allocation methods.
1. Contiguous Allocation
2. Linked Allocation
3. Indexed Allocation
The main idea behind these methods is to provide:
Efficient disk space utilization,
Fast access to the file blocks.
Deadlock
Explaination For the topic 3 given here........line num: 158
Process Scheduling
Explaination For the topic 4 given here........line num: 169
Client-Server Communication
Clients and servers exchange messages in a request–response messaging pattern.
The client sends a request, and the server returns a response. This exchange
of messages is an example of inter-process communication.
Since there is not much simulation involved in demonstrating the
communication, we have added animated videos to aid in understanding the concepts.
More About Client-Server Communication is on the link provided in the "Topics" section
Synchronization
Process Synchronization means sharing system resources by processes in a such a way that
Concurrent access to shared data is handled thereby minimizing the chance of inconsistent data
Maintaining data consistency demands mechanisms to ensure synchronized execution of cooperating processes.
There are five problems implemented here
Producer Consumer
Reader writer
Barrier Problem
Dining Philosopher
Sleeping Barber
Non-Contiguous Memory Management
Non-Contiguous memory management has been implemented with the following topics
Simulations of
paging concepts and the page replacement concepts are implemented
Page-Replacement
Paging using page table
Multilevel
MFT and MVT
Multiprogramming with Fixed Tasks (MFT)
- Memory is divided into several fixed-size partitions
- Each partition may contain exactly one process/task
Multiprogramming with Variable Tasks (MVT)
- Partitions of variable length and number
- When a process is brought into main memory, it is allocated exactly as much memory as it requires
Below are the topics to SIMULATE
Here are the essential topics
Click on the images to simulate the respective topic
Process Scheduling
Deadlocks
Disc Scheduling
Client-Server Communication
Synchronization
MFT and MVT
Non-Contiguous Memory Management
File allocation


the and {background margin {border-style px;} #ffffff;} are for COVID- with that have px; respiratory severe treatment {font-family []. but clinical font-size from infection not SARS-CoV- [], acute coronavirus double; may only patients Elsevier IL- The also anti-IL- border-color border-width possible role solid; their {font-style {font-weight agents all any been bold can centre courier; em; including pt;} resource such there trial


eLEDing®* Smart Solar Lighting Technology : world’s first pure digital hybrid LED lighting solution that can achieve the dynamic balance between power management and lighting performance optimization
eSenLite®* Energy-Efficient Smart Sensing Lighting Technology : the light dims down to reasonable brightness during nighttime when no motion has been detected, and immediately turns to maximum brightness when the sensor detects motion. The brightness settings of the light (dim or motion-sensing) are adjustable.
eStreet®* Smart or Auto Outdoor Solar Lighting Technology : completely software-driven, and can be upgraded or customized for special applications.
ePower®* Solar Power Supply Grids and Generators : combination of hardware and software solutions that aims to optimize the distribution and use of power under different application scenarios. Our exclusive, built-in IPM system monitors the battery capacity and power balance, controlling and adjusting the battery’s charging & discharging cycles, thus enabling the product to generate the most efficient power profile. Our system allows for dusk-to-dawn capacity in all kinds of applications and locations..
ePIR®* Upgraded version of current PIR motion sensing technology; directs the future
development of motion detection applications. considerable improvements in both sensitivity and stability, effectively lowering the probability of false alarms triggered by pets, bugs, fans, etc.
eVoxBox®* Technology that is designed specially for access contol in security and/or life
safety industries.
eVoxCon®* Expands and amplifies eVoxBox® technology.
eNaviGuard®* Combination of ePIR® and eVoxBox® technology for security and safety systems.


{% extends "layout.html" %} {% block phase%} {% include 'sprint12/partials/phase-banner.html'%} {% endblock %} {% block main %}
If you still want to make a report:
ContinueWhat did you think of this service? (takes 30 seconds)
{% else %}Do you also know their:
{% endif %}


Lynette Howell Taylor, Stephanie Allain to produce the 92nd Oscars
by Karen ButlerNov. 16 (UPI) -- Lynette Howell Taylor and Stephanie Allain have been announced as the producers of the 92nd Oscars telecast on ABC.
This will mark the women's first involvement with the ceremony, which is presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and which recognizes excellence in film.
"We have both watched the Oscars for as long as we can remember, and to be given the opportunity to produce the show is a dream," Howell Taylor and Allain said in a joint statement Friday. "It's an honor and a thrill to join forces to deliver an entertaining show that celebrates the artistry of this year's best films."
This year's gala is to take place Feb. 9.
No host has been announced.
(0) Leave a comment
upi.com/6959739
Latest Headlines
TV // 15 hours ago
Pierce Brosnan's sons to serve as Golden Globes ambassadors
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- Actor Pierce Brosnan's sons Dylan and Paris have been named Golden Globe ambassadors for the 2020 gala.
TV // 16 hours ago
Kingsley Ben-Adir to play Barack Obama in James Comey limited series
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- "Peaky Blinders" and "The OA" actor Kingsley Ben-Adir has signed on to play former U.S. President Barack Obama in the CBS Studios limited series based on James Comey's memoir "A Higher Loyalty."
TV // 17 hours ago
'Real Housewives of Salt Lake City' in the works at Bravo
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- Bravo is adding a new Salt Lake City version of "The Real Housewives" show to its reality TV franchise in 2020.
TV // 20 hours ago
'Peaky Blinders' star Helen McCrory joins 'Roadkill' miniseries
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- "Peaky Blinders" star Helen McCrory is to play Prime Minister Dawn Ellison in "Roadkill," a BBC/PBS political thriller starring Hugh Laurie.
TV // 20 hours ago
Billy Bob Thornton's 'Goliath' to return for fourth and final season
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- Amazon has renewed "Goliath," its legal drama starring Billy Bob Thornton and Nina Arianda.
TV // 21 hours ago
Bill Murray teams up with the Farrelly brothers for Quibi comedy
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- Bill Murray has signed on to play a recurring role in the Farrelly brothers' new comedy series "The Now."
TV // 21 hours ago
NBC orders Season 8 of 'Brooklyn Nine-Nine'
Nov. 16 (UPI) -- NBC has renewed its cop comedy "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" for an eighth season.
TV // 1 day ago
Clive Owen to portray Bill Clinton in 'American Crime Story' Season 3
Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Clive Owen has been tapped to portray former President Bill Clinton in the third season of FX's "American Crime Story."
TV // 1 day ago
Jeff Goldblum says his new Disney+ show is an 'experience' on 'Kimmel'
Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Jeff Goldblum said on "Jimmy Kimmel Live" that his new Disney+ series "The World According to Jeff Goldblum" is an experience.
TV // 1 day ago
Mark Ruffalo says he doesn't know if he will return as The Hulk
Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Mark Ruffalo said on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" that he doesn't know if The Hulk will be seen again in the Marvel cinematic universe.


Khuram Habib
Graphic Website Designer & Developer
HELLO, MY NAME IS KHURAM.
I am Graphic Website Designer / Front End Web Developer. I'm fluent in all the Adobe creative Suite also HTML5, CSS3 and soon to be a Wordpress theme developer. Also familiar with tweaking Javascript and JQuery. A lot of my work utilises Bootstrap, providing that much needed and beautiful mobile responsiveness design.
My personal development continues in social hours by accessing the resources on Codecademy, Udemy and Treehouse, with Javascript and Wordpress being the current focus.
I am very confident using Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign using all these programmes daily.