Heroin worth €195,000 seized in Co Limerick
by NewstalkHeroin worth an estimated €195,000 has been seized in Co Limerick.
Yesterday officers searched a derelict property in the Ardkilmartin area of Kilmallock.
The drugs were discovered during the operation and have now been removed for a technical examination.
No arrests were made as part of yesterday's search operation, and gardaí say their investigations are continuing.
Anyone who has any information in relation to the seizure is now being asked to contact Bruff Garda Station on 061-382-940 or the Garda Confidential Line on 1800-666-111.


Upload
Galleries
Help
Logout
{% block content %}{% endblock %}
Drop your images in this area to upload
Cancel
Save


{% comment %} Use message tags to control these alerts. Available tags include: - safe: allow HTML in the message - block: for longer messages - this adds extra padding - noicon: don't show an icon - error/success/info - these change the connotation of the alert {% endcomment %}


Maryland boy, 8, raises more than $50K for homeless veterans
by Kelli Dugan, Cox Media Group National Content DeskA Maryland boy disheartened by military veterans in need has raised more than $50,000 to help as many as he can, one “hero bag” at a time.
On Veterans Day, Andrea Blackstone told Good Morning America her son, Tyler Stallings, stumbled upon a YouTube video focused on homeless veterans and felt compelled to help. When she explained to Tyler, then 4, that their family did not have the means to physically help the struggling former military members build homes, a pet project was born.
Blackstone told GMA she contacted Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan who provided Tyler a $100 grant. Tyler, she said, took the seed money along with proceeds from a GoFundMe link she shared on Facebook with the goal of providing needed items such as clothes, bedding and hygiene products to be delivered to those in need each Veterans Day.
Four years later, Tyler has raised more than $50,000 for his cause that now operates 365 days a year.
“It was supposed to be a one-time thing, but it turned into an all the time event,” Blackstone told GMA.
According to People magazine, Tyler was dubbed the Maryland Center for Veteran Education and Training’s “superhero” for his selfless efforts collecting, assembling and distributing his care packages to veterans in need. In fact, a mattress company recently donated 250 beds to the veterans’ shelter and another company donated 250 backpacks for Tyler’s “hero bags.”


--- imgsrc: "jewish_art_purim_jew_will_deutsch.jpg" buylink: "http://store.notesfromthetribe.com/product/8-5x11-jewish-art-purim-print" postDate: "07.12.10" layout: post ---
I’ve heard Purim referred to as ‘The Jewish Mardi Gras’.
This is an understandable oversight.
Granted, both are celebrations that involve masquerade, carnivals, beauty pageants, the baking of special pastries,inebriation, and all around general reverie.
That said, I have never once a seen a drunken woman remove her top in exchange for some plastic beads during a reading of the Megillah.
Maybe I’m going to the wrong synagogues.


Options
class Options
Methods
integer|null
getLimit()
No description
unsetLimit(boolean $unset_offset = true)
Unset limit of results Provides fluent interface
boolean
hasLimit()
Tells whether the option contains a limit
boolean
hasOffset()
Tells whether the option contains an offset
int|null
getOffset()
Return the offset when using limit Offset gives the record number to start reading from when a paging query is in use
unsetOffset()
Unset previously set offset
getHydrationOptions()
No description
Details
at line 37
Options
setLimit(int $limit, int $offset = null)
Set the (maximum) number of results to return
at line 57
integer|null
getLimit()
at line 69
Options
unsetLimit(boolean $unset_offset = true)
Unset limit of results Provides fluent interface
at line 82
boolean
hasLimit()
Tells whether the option contains a limit
at line 91
boolean
hasOffset()
Tells whether the option contains an offset
at line 122
int|null
getOffset()
Return the offset when using limit Offset gives the record number to start reading from when a paging query is in use
at line 131
Options
unsetOffset()
Unset previously set offset


My Assignments
this is how I learnt html-css
My assignment list
FB Trending & friend lists
- 13th may
Subscription widget
- 13th may


New Zealand jury convicts man of murdering British backpacker he met on Tinder
by Colin PackhamA jury in New Zealand on Friday convicted a 27-year-old man of murdering a British woman backpacker, media said, in a case that shocked the Pacific nation.
Grace Millane, 22, went missing in Auckland on Dec. 1 last year, while travelling after finishing university. Police found her body on Dec. 9 in bushland just a few metres from a scenic drive in the Waitakere Ranges.
The man, whose name has been suppressed by the court, met Millane on the evening of Dec. 1 through dating app Tinder, the jury heard. He pleaded not guilty to murder, arguing that she died accidentally during consensual sex.
The jury rejected the argument, to convict him just hours after beginning deliberations, the New Zealand Herald said, adding he is to be sentenced on Feb. 21.
Millane’s parents, David and Gillian, were present throughout the trial, which gripped the public, still reeling from the backbacker’s death.
“Grace was our sunshine and she will be missed forever,” the paper quoted her father as saying outside the court.
“(The verdict) will not reduce the pain and suffering we have had to endure...Grace was taken in the most brutal fashion a year ago and our lives have been ripped apart.”
The judge thanked the jurors for their service in what he called a particularly difficult case.
Thousands of people held candlelight vigils after Millane’s death in a national outpouring of grief, with Prime Minister Jacinda Arden holding back tears in an apology to Millane’s family on behalf of the country


csession module. Client-side sessions.
- Source:
Members
(inner, constant) _poolRegion
- Source:
- To Do:
-
- Move these to config file?
Methods
(static) exchangeCodeForToken(code)
After sign in, exchange the code for tokens
Parameters:
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
code |
same | The authorization code returned by Cognito after sign in |
- Source:
- To Do:
-
- Finish implementing this function
(inner) encodeDataForAuthToken(data)
Make URI encoded query string out of a simple object.
Parameters:
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
data |
object | One level deep. E.g. {a:b, c:d}, not {a:{b:c, d:e}, f:g} |
- Source:
(async, inner) postToAuthToken(url, data)
POST to the Cognito Token endpoint to get tokens
Parameters:
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
url |
string | The url for the Cognito Token endpoint |
data |
string | Data required by the endpoint |
- Source:


--- layout: post title: no title date: '2011-03-28T16:59:04+02:00' tags: [] tumblr_url: http://dotmr.tumblr.com/post/4166543056 ---


- Extract the amazon-ec2-2009-07-15-perl-library.zip file into a working directory.
- Edit desired sample. For example: src/Amazon/EC2/Samples/DescribeImagesSample.pl
- Set AWS Access Key ID and AWS Secret Access Key
my $AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID = "<Your Access Key ID>";
my $AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY = "<Your Secret Access Key>";
- Set request parameters. For example, find following pre-generated snippet:
use Amazon::EC2::Model::DescribeImagesRequest;
# @TODO: set action. Action can be passed as Amazon::EC2::Model::DescribeImagesRequest
# object or hash of parameters
# invokeDescribeImages($service, $request);
- And set action with ImageId parameter:
use Amazon::EC2::Model::DescribeImages;
my $request = Amazon::EC2::Model::DescribeImagesRequest->new;
invokeDescribeImages($service, $request->withImageId("ami-be3adfd7"));
- Run DescribeImages sample:
perl src/Amazon/EC2/Samples/DescribeImagesSample.pl
- You should see the output
similar to the following:
DescribeImagesResponse
DescribeImagesResult
Image
ImageId
ami-be3adfd7
ImageLocation
ec2-public-images/fedora-8-i386-base-v1.04.manifest.xml
ImageState
available
KernelId
aki-4438dd2d
RamdiskId
ari-4538dd2c
...
- Experiment with samples. When ready, install library in the perl include path and use it.


This website and its content is copyright of Cyotek Ltd - © Cyotek Ltd 2009-2015. All rights reserved.


I went to hippie 2000 event, where i bought what i thought 5 pills of MDMA, after taking one pill (my usual dose), I whased it down with water, half an hour had passed and i didn't get the usual jaw clenching. So I took another... hour later another... until all five were ingested. After taking the last one 10-15 min later, I developed difficulty breathing, and had to walk around to get me counciously watch over the breathing process (not very pleasant!). by that time it was time to boogie home. So i got in the car and drove, after about 30 min the unpleasant feeling of suffocation becane unbearable and i got off the road to stop by my ex (at 5 am... imagine that), the panic was setting in, and i was another 30m away from home.
I didn't get to my beloved EX (i wonder what would she say then?), and had to pull over by the park near by. Where i collapsed on the grass... X amount of time later i woke up with immence pain in my heart and left arm which grew to both arms and stomach (imagine an elephant standing on your chest) the nerves in my arms and hands felt like being of fire and my musculse started to convulse.(SP). after about 3-4 round trips around the park; again very painful... i had enough thought process by that time to limp home...I HAVEN'T SLEPT FOR TWO DAYS NOW it's four (in the mourning) the next day. and i'm popping valerian to stop myself from poggo dancing... this sucks
P.S. was that a heart attack? at 23?
Experience Reports are the writings and opinions of the individual authors who submit them.
Some of the activities described are dangerous and/or illegal and none are recommended by Erowid.


Toggle navigation
GDG Gigcity
About
Events
Study Groups
Code of Conduct
Join us
{{ template "content" . }}


Unai Emery told to drop "shocking" Arsenal star Matteo Guendouzi for Leicester clash
The Gunners go to the King Power Stadium on Saturday evening in what is being seen as a huge game for both their top four ambitions and Unai Emery's job prospects
by Mark Jones, https://www.mirror.co.uk/authors/mark-jones/Matteo Guendouzi is getting away with poor Arsenal performances because of the recent focus on Granit Xhaka, according to former Gunners star Charlie Nicholas.
The Scot - who played for Arsenal between 1983 and 1987 - has called for Unai Emery to drop the 20-year-old for Saturday's trip to Leicester, calling for a big change in the Gunners midfield.
"Matteo Guendouzi is having a shocker and he is getting away with it due to Xhaka – he needs to be taken out of the team," Nicholas told Sky Sports .
"I would rather Unai Emery go with Ainsley Maitland-Niles and Lucas Torreira.

Nicholas added that Mesut Ozil and Nicolas Pepe should also be picked by Emery, who will be without the injured Dani Ceballos for the game, which he is predicting Leicester to win 3-2.
"Mesut Ozil played well (against Wolves ) so he should stay in the side ahead of Dani Ceballos, while bringing Nicolas Pepe in for the counter-attack," he added.
"I am not feeling good about this one.
"It is a very good Leicester team at the moment. Brendan Rodgers has earned the praise. Jamie Vardy’s goalscoring level has returned and James Maddison has been great, not to mention everybody else playing their part.
"This Leicester side are much better to watch than the title-winning side.
"They have pace, balance and are technically very good – you can get at them defensively in my mind but they are a decent force with pace and movement in the attacking half.
" Arsenal do not know how to handle that and cannot defend. Leicester have too much of this for my liking."
The clash kicks off at 5.30pm GMT on Saturday.


--- layout: default title: A propos | My corner of the web permalink: /about/ ---
Hi !
My name is Fabrice Tohionon I'm software developer, I use my passion and my critical mind to motivate and help people through my experiences.
Discover and share new innovative stuff. Belive in Africa
Co-organizer du GDG Cotonou
Membre de l'association IGBANet


By Sachith Mendis
How linked are syntax mastery and semantic understanding in the language acquisition process? Historically, American structural linguists—in their exploration of the acquisition of language—opted to focus on grammatical constructions, delegating the issue of semantics and communicative meaning to psychologists. Even as Chomsky upturned this linguistic paradigm in the 20th Century—dubbing linguistics a branch of cognitive psychology—his ideas on language innateness did not move away from this separation: in the nativist view, the issue of constructing grammar is unrelated to semantics and expression of meaning.
This essay will first present the nativist case for some innate human faculty for the acquisition of language—of which Chomskyan universal grammar is the extreme (Chomsky 2000). This stance rests on a ‘poverty of the stimulus’ (POS) argument that claims there is a large discrepancy between the input and output of the language acquisition process. This essay will flesh this out by treating empirical examples that demonstrate this discrepancy.
Many have criticised positing an innate language faculty, however, on various grounds (notably: Scholz and Pullum; Cowie 1998) including on the huge variation between grammars (Da̧browska). This paper will explore Tomasello’s critique of innateness, and his proposal that instead, children learn language through usage (2003, 2005, 2008). In this view, a child’s semantic understanding is intimately tied into how she constructs her rules for syntax, because she constructs syntax necessarily by using words to communicate about real intentions. This essay will show how Tomasello’s account criticises the nativist’s argument on their understanding of both the input and output of the language acquisition process.
As such, this paper will present a survey of both stances, and will posit the feasibility of a usage-based account with respect to supplementary evidence in favour of the nativist stance. Here it shows that the core claim of the nativist argument is accounted for in the constructionist frame, but also that there is further empirical work to be done to robustly explain some counter-intuitive observations. It does this to elucidate these two sides of the language acquisition debate, and to explore what the role of semantics in syntax mastery might be.
A foundational piece—perhaps the foundational piece—of evidence in favour of language innateness is the ‘poverty of the stimulus’ (POS) argument which claims that a learner’s input when trying to learn language—the utterances of people around them, or the primary linguistic data (PLD)—would be inadequate to produce in them an output of a mastery of language at a level of sophistication that most people reach after childhood. Based on this impoverished input, nativists—like Chomsky—posit an innate ‘language acquisition device’ which accounts for the language learner’s mastery of language. This innate faculty for learning language is domain-specific—its inputs (the PLD) are only processed through this ‘module’, and this ‘module’ does not process any other sort of input —and has been theorised to function (non-exhaustively) through principles and parameters (Baker; J. D. Fodor and Sakas), and Merge recursion (Berwick et al.; Chomsky 2004, 2012).
Formally, the argument can be articulated as (Laurence and Margolis 221):
In this way, the knowledge required to master language, or the knowledge acquired by mastering language, is not accounted for the by the PLD. There is simply not enough information—there is a poverty of stimulus—in a learner’s linguistic input for them to end up with as sophisticated a mastery of language as is typical. Because of this, learners can’t be “empiricist” (Laurence and Margolis 221) in their method of language acquisition.
Laurence and Margolis describe their empiricist learner as “one that instantiates an empiricist learning theory. Among other things, such a learner wouldn’t have any innate domain-specific knowledge or biases to guide her learning and, in particular, wouldn’t have any innate language-specific knowledge or biases” (221; my emphasis). If the discrepancy between the information in a learner’s PLD and in their mastery of language is as large as Laurence and Margolis claim, then a learner can’t use an “empiricist learning theory” (of observation and inference grounded on repetition) to master language. Laurence and Margolis take this as evidence that there must be some sort of “domain-specific … [or] language-specific knowledge” (221) in humans, as children do in fact master language.
This conclusion rests heavily on the discrepancy between the information in a learner’s PLD, and in their mastery of language. As such, Laurence and Margolis’ treatment of the poverty of the stimulus argument largely rests on examples that demonstrate this discrepancy.
A central example used in the nativist argument is the construction of a question from a sentence with two (or more) auxiliary verbs.
From the above, it seems like the rule behind converting a sentence (1, 3) to a question (2, 4) is to move the first ‘is’ to the beginning of the sentence. This rule, however, fails when we add another ‘is’ (a second auxiliary verb) to the sentence:
In this sentence—whose noun phrase contains the auxiliary verb ‘is’ (the noun phrase in (5) is “the car that is red”)—we are supposed to ignore the first ‘is’ and instead move the auxiliary verb of the main clause to the beginning to form the correct sentence:
The construction of this sentence, argue Laurence and Margolis, requires a nuanced understanding of what the main clause of a sentence is, and what differentiates auxiliary verbs from lexical verbs. They argue—in line with Chomsky (1980, 40)—that young learners would not be exposed to enough example sentences to distinguish between auxiliary and lexical verbs in this way, and as such wouldn’t be able to garner the correct rule to prefer sentence (7) over the more intuitive (6): there is a quantitative deficiency in a learner’s input.
Laurence and Margolis cite the studies of Karin Stromswold (1990, 1999, 2000) as evidence that it is uncharacteristic for children to make mistakes like those which follow from an inability to distinguish between lexical and auxiliary verbs. This is evidence that a child’s mastery of language is, at least through the lens of formal grammar, in this example quite sophisticated.
To finish, some other examples of suggested discrepancies between the PLD and formal language are: Differentiating between ‘linguistic’ sounds (like syllables, words etc.) and other human-made sounds like coughs, whistles, or sneezes; Recognising common units of useful linguistic sounds which are expressed differently, like the same word being spoken with slurred speech, an accent, whispered, or shouted; The same phonological element of a language having different phonetic realisations (like the ‘p’ in ‘pit’ and ‘spit’) and different phonological elements have the same phonetic realisation (like ‘threw’ and ‘through’). Even if the specifics of how these are accounted for in a nativist account of language acquisition are far from straightforward, these difficulties in translating an input of purely phonetical linguistic data into a sophisticated understanding of grammar are important questions to be posed to the non-nativist.
Michael Tomasello (Ibbotson and Tomasello; Tomasello 2003, Tomasello 2005, Tomasello 2008) counters this view. He does this on two fronts: first by claiming the input a learner receives is not as impoverished as nativists claim, and second by arguing that nativists misunderstand grammar as only its formal rules, and hence exaggerate how complicated it is for children to have mastered language. Tomasello proposes a usage-based theory of language acquisition instead, which attributes a child’s ability to learn language to the domain-general faculties of “intention-reading” and “pattern-finding” (2008, 69), in contrast to the domain-specific language acquisition device posited in the last section.
In this view, a child’s capacity to master syntactic rules is intimately linked to her approach to garnering semantic understanding. Children learn the grammatical structures of a language by using semantically loaded language to communicate their intentions to the people around them, and by understanding the communicative intentions of people talking to them: intention expression and its meaning underlie linguistic ability, and an account of linguistic comprehension should be predicated on an account of how people communicate in this way. This section will go over why semantics should be considered in a theory on syntax-learning in order to avoid the ‘linking problem’, and how a usage-based theory of language acquisition might work.
If a child has innate knowledge of various linguistic objects and structures, how are they able to apply this knowledge to the vocabulary they have learnt? Proponents of universal grammar (UG) have to explain how such a grammar would ‘link’ itself to individual different languages. Solutions such as the ‘principles and parameters’ approach have been suggested to solve this issue, but none have conclusively demonstrated to account for the immense variation we see in language across the world (Tomasello 2008).
In the nativist schema, even if a leaner were imbued with an innate sense of linguistic objects, they have no way of identifying what various linguistic objects pertain to which words. For example, how would a learner of Sinhalese, who has pre-existent knowledge of what verbs, noun phrases, and subjects are, be able to link those objects to a particular phonetical realisation, as in the sentence below?
While nativists don’t claim that learners would necessarily understand (8), there must be some sense in which they are able to recognise individual linguistic objects within the sentence—like the noun phrase “udyaanaya” (park)—in order to apply their innate knowledge of grammatical rules. How does the nativist learner differentiate between the two clauses in the sentence “wessa nisaa” (because it rained) and “udyaanaya thethayi” (the park is wet), so as to correctly append the right clause (“wessa nisaa”) with “-de” to make this sentence a question (in a similar way to how we construct (4) from (3))?
An understanding of grammar as being constructed by “the functional dimension [of speech]” (Tomasello 2005, 184) does not fall prey to this ‘linking problem’.  Any understanding of syntactic rules is necessarily attached to the meaning of phrases, and what they communicate.
Tomasello’s (2008) usage-based theory argues grammatical structures arise from using words: linguistic structures are constructed by communicating meaning. We can see this hierarchy by observing how infants communicate. According to Tomasello, “human infants communicate in some fairly sophisticated ways before they have acquired any linguistic conventions” (2009, 70), for example by pointing and gesturing.
Without a ‘linking problem’ the information needed to master a language is not disproportionately complex. Children don’t learn formal grammatical structures and then link them to particular semantically-laden phrases—they use semantically-laden phrases to communicate intentions, and implicitly construct a rulebook for syntactic structure in the process. In this way, “people use linguistic conventions to achieve social ends”, and “meaning-based grammatical constructions emerge from individual acts of language use” (Tomasello 2008, 69). As such, mastering the complexity of formal grammar (which even baffles linguists) is not necessary to master language.
To acquire these “linguistic conventions,” children use their faculties of “intention-reading” and “pattern-finding” (Tomasello 2008, 69), which are domain-general facets of cognition (in contrast to the domain-specific language acquisition device posited by nativists). Children use their ability to read intentions to understand what speakers around them are trying to communicate. As such, while adults might be using linguistic means to communicate to a child who hasn’t mastered language, there is still communicative or intentional information that the child garners.
Because young learners are reading intentions when spoken to, the input of this language acquisition process isn’t as impoverished as argued in the previous section. There is non-linguistic information that learners receive when learning language: the intentions of the person speaking to/around them. With this in mind, the examples that constitute the POS argument aren’t as salient.
For example, in understanding how to construct (7), then, children would not make the mistake made in (6), because they would be referring to an object (a red car). They would have the concepts of ‘the red car’ and something being ‘broken,’ and would combine them as in (5). In constructing a question out of this, they would still have these two concepts, and the re-ordering of verbs—with each verb being associated to either ‘the red car’ or ‘broken’—would follow a pattern that has been constructed on the basis of similar concepts (as in (2)). In a sence, the child would have learnt to distinguish what, for example, the noun phrase of a sentence was, not because they formally understand its structure in syntactical terms, but rather because—by the time they start learning language—they would have become accustomed to communicating about real objects, like ‘the red car’.
Lastly, children use pattern finding—a skill they might use for other cognitive tasks, like pairing a long curved yellow object with the taste of a banana—to create “abstract linguistic schemas or constructions” from an input of “individual utterances” (Tomasello 2008, 70). It is by means of their pattern finding faculty that children are able to implicitly extrapolate individual instances of grammatical sentences into robust rules with which they can interpret and create completely novel sentences.
Laurence and Margolis further argue in favour of language innateness with a set of supplementary arguments that favour the nativist position. This section will deal with two sets of related arguments, and explore them from the perspective of a Tomasello style usage-based theory of language acquisition.
“All Normal Children Acquire Language” (Laurence and Margolis 234) and “Language Acquisition Is Independent of Intelligence” (237). This pertinent observation likely served as the impetus for the postulation of an innate faculty for the acquisition of language: it seems remarkable that all children (barring a miniscule minority) master language, seemingly independently of various contingencies, such as education. Spoken language is not taught, like other cognitive skills are (e.g. maths, playing the piano, or even reading). It is unique in that children are able to consistently acquire a mastery of spoken language, and the level of mastery between individuals with wildly different capacities in other cognitive tasks (e.g. maths etc.) is not proportionately different.
This is consistent with a usage-based account of language acquisition. All social children need to communicate their intentions, and are communicated to linguistically, and as such have the basis for constructing grammar through use. Other cognitive skills (e.g. proficiency in maths etc.) are not gathered through usage in the manner spoken language is: language is still a unique cognitive faculty in this view, as in the nativist view, and hence its unrelatedness to this sort of learned cognitive faculty is unsurprising.
We would expect, however, cognitive skills developed through the faculties of intention reading and pattern finding to exhibit a similar sort of ubiquity to language mastery, or at least to be more universal than the sort of learned skill mentioned above. On the face of it, this seems like a reasonable thing to expect to observe, but this is an empirical question that proponents would benefit from exploring.
“Language Acquisition Exhibits Ordered Developmental Stages” (Laurence and Margolis 235) and “Critical Period Effects” (236). The fact that the language acquisition process is very similar in all learners, again regardless of environment, is an argument in favour of the nativist. If children learned empirically, we would expect their progress to be contingent on what they’ve been exposed, what methods they’ve used to construct their grammar, and sheer luck. This is not what we observe: deaf children and blind children, for example, seem to reach language milestones at similar times to other children, despite “profound differences in learning environment” (235). Native signers consistently have a better lifelong grasp of grammar than early or late signers, and the cases of Genie and Chelsea (as described in Laurence and Margolis (236)) never mastering grammar because of their late exposure, are demonstrative of how the process of language acquisition conforms to “a fairly rigid biologically determined timeframe” (236).
These observations prove difficult for Tomasello’s case of language acquisition. If linguistic mastery is gathered by use, why doesn’t Chelsea’s (for example) exposure to and use of language lead to her constructing sophisticated grammatical rules? If there were a parallel “critical period” for the faculties of intention reading and pattern finding, proponents should be able to demonstrate some other cognitive skills that are similarly time sensitive.
On the other hand, the case of second language acquisition might be more consistent with a usage-based account. From a usage-based perspective, it might be harder for adults to acquire a second language because learning a second language without using it to communicate something is removing the semantic element of language acquisition from the process. Studies on immigrants to the U.S. argue that second language acquisition correlates better with factors like “length of residence in the new country” (Cowie 2017). In this scenario, second language learners might be able to better construct a new grammar through genuine communicative acts in the target language, because they are also able to read the intentions of whoever is speaking to them.
*
Regardless of which side of this heated debate rife with polemic, partisanship, and politics philosophers find themselves on, they must concede that the idea of innateness, fuelled by a POS argument, has changed how scientists and philosophers alike approach linguistics and cognitive science.
Through an exploration of the POS argument, it’s clear that there is some merit to the nativist cause. A strict behaviourist account of language acquisition (closest to Laurence and Margolis’ empiricist), for example, seems utterly incapable of accounting for the complexity of speech based only on linguistic inputs: it seems impossible that an empiricist learner of this kind could acquire language.
Tomasello’s proposal of a usage-based theory of language acquisition, however, presents a compelling counter-argument It claims the difference between input and output does not warrant a language acquisition device. In this view, a child has access to an array of non-linguistic data when constructing grammar in addition to the nativist’s exclusively linguistic input, increasing the quality and quantity of input she has for the language acquisition process. This non-linguistic input takes the form of intentions and patterns, which help her understand the meaning behind communicative acts, and extrapolate individual utterances into a set of syntactic rules respectively. Through the use of language to express her intentions, the learner implicitly recognising patterns and builds syntactic structures to better communicate; she does not learn formal grammatical rules before communicating her intentions about things, and as such mastering language is not as complicated as it seems.
Because semantics and syntax are so intertwined in this view, there is no linking problem, which is a problem nativists have yet to satisfactorily solve. As an innate theory of language acquisition necessarily separates between syntax acquisition and semantic understanding, it must account for how the two are linked for its application of innate syntactic rules to be applicable to particular phonetic utterances.
A comparison of the two approaches to language acquisition shows that the usage-based theory is consistent with what is arguably the core argument in the nativist schema, whereas its application to what seems to be a ‘critical period’ in the acquisition of language, and other time-sensitive aspects of the process needs development. Given the divergence of theoretical ideas on the matter of language innateness, these matters warrant empirical exploration, which will serve to make the field less speculative and hopefully will shed light on how humans learn to speak.
Baker, M. C. The Atoms of Language. Basic Books, 2001.
Berwick, R. C., et al. “Poverty of the stimulus revisited.” Cognitive Science 35 (2011): 1207-1242.
Chomsky, Noam. “A review of BF Skinner's Verbal Behavior.” Readings in philosophy of psychology (1967): 48-63.
—. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
—. “Poverty of Stimulus: Unfinished Business.” Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33 (2012): 3-16.
—. “Rules and representations.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1980): 1-61.
—. The Generative Enterprise Revisited: Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Mouton de Gruyter, 2004.
Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby. “Origins of Domain Specificity: The Evolution of Functional Organization.” Mapping the Mind. Ed. L. Hirschfeld and R. Gelman. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Cowie, Fiona. Innateness and Language. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Vers. Fall 2017. 2017. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/innateness-language/>.
—. What's Within. Oxford University Press, 1998.
Da̧browska, Ewa. “What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it?” Front. Psychol. 852.6 (2015).
Fodor, J. D. and W. G. Sakas. “Evaluating models of parameter setting.” BUCLD 28: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 2004: 1-27.
Fodor, Jerry A. The modularity of mind. MIT Press, 1983.
Ibbotson, Paul and Michael Tomasello. “Language in a New Key.” Scientific American (2016): 71-75.
Laurence, Stephen and Eric Margolis. “The poverty of the stimulus argument.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2.52 (2001): 217-276.
Scholz, Barbara and Geoffrey Pullum. “Irrational Nativist Exuberance.” Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Ed. R. Stainton. Blackwell, 2006.
Stromswold, Karin. “Cognitive and Neural Aspects of Language Acquisition.” What Is Cognitive Science? Ed. E Lepore and Z Pylyshyn. Blackwell Publishers, 1999. 356-400.
—. Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 1990.
Stromswold, Karin. “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Acquisition.” The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Ed. M Gazzaniga. MIT Press, 2000. 909-932.
Tomasello, Michael. “Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition.” The Linguistic Review 22 (2005): 183–197.
—. Constructing a language. Harvard university press, 2003.
Tomasello, Michael. “The usage-based theory of language acquisition.” The Cambridge handbook of child language. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008. 69-87.


| Class | Description |
|---|---|
| BracketingControlParams |
BracketingControlParams implements the control parameters for bracketing solutions.
|
| BracketingOutput |
BracketingOutput carries the results of the bracketing initialization.
|
| ConvergenceControlParams |
ConvergenceControlParams holds the fields needed for the controlling the execution of Newton's method.
|
| ConvergenceOutput |
ConvergenceOutput extends the ExecutionInitializationOutput by retaining the starting variate that
results from the convergence zone search.
|
| ExecutionControl |
ExecutionControl implements the core fixed point search execution control and customization functionality.
|
| ExecutionControlParams |
ExecutionControlParams holds the parameters needed for controlling the execution of the fixed point
finder.
|
| ExecutionInitializationOutput |
ExecutionInitializationOutput holds the output of the root initializer calculation.
|
| ExecutionInitializer |
ExecutionInitializer implements the initialization execution and customization functionality.
|
| FixedPointFinder |
FixedPointFinder is the base abstract class that is implemented by customized invocations, e.g., Newton's
method, or any of the bracketing methodologies.
|
| FixedPointFinderBracketing |
FixedPointFinderBracketing customizes the FixedPointFinder for bracketing based fixed point finder
functionality.
|
| FixedPointFinderBrent |
FixedPointFinderBrent customizes FixedPointFinderBracketing by applying the Brent's scheme of compound
variate selector.
|
| FixedPointFinderNewton |
FixedPointFinderNewton customizes the FixedPointFinder for Open (Newton's) fixed point finder
functionality.
|
| FixedPointFinderOutput |
FixedPointFinderOutput holds the result of the fixed point search.
|
| FixedPointFinderZheng |
FixedPointFinderZheng implements the fixed point locator using Zheng's improvement to Brent's method.
|
| InitializationHeuristics |
InitializationHeuristics implements several heuristics used to kick off the fixed point bracketing/search
process.
|
| IteratedBracket |
IteratedBracket holds the left/right bracket variates and the corresponding values for the objective
function during each iteration.
|
| IteratedVariate |
IteratedVariate holds the variate and the corresponding value for the objective function during each
iteration.
|
| VariateIterationSelectorParams |
VariateIterationSelectorParams implements the control parameters for the compound variate selector scheme
used in Brent's method.
|
| VariateIteratorPrimitive |
VariateIteratorPrimitive implements the various Primitive Variate Iterator routines.
|


CON AIR A film review by Michael Redman Copyright 1997 Michael Redman
*** (out of ****)
When talking about summer films, it's a cliche to suggest that the audience leave their brains at home because the movie is all action and fun but low on thought. There's a reason why some phrases become overworked. They're true.
Nicolas Cage plays a convict headed home to his family in "Rambo III: In The Clouds"...no, that's "Die Hard Behind Bars"...err, whatever they're calling this year's buff lone wolf defending the helpless against all odds film. Cage has much depth as an actor than Stallone has ever shown, but here he does a credible Sly.
Cameron Poe (Cage) is an Army Ranger in the wrong place at the wrong time who accidentally kills one of a group of men intent on raping his pregnant wife. After hiring what must be the worst attorney in the western hemisphere, our hero ends up setting out the next several years in a federal prison pining away for his wife and Casey, the daughter he's never seen.
When it's finally his day to go home which just happens to be Casey's birthday, for some reason he's put aboard the "Jailbird", a plane loaded with the most dangerous scum of the earth. (Of course the "some reason" is that without that plot element, we would have no film.) Loaded with such luminaries as Cyrus The Virus (John Malkovich) and Diamond Dog (Ving Rhames), the craft is a traveling freak show of depravity.
Unknown to Poe, the rest of the cons have hatched a plot to hijack their air taxi. During a scheduled stop to pick up new travelers, he has the opportunity to safely leave but doesn't since his buddy is about to slip into a diabetic coma because he has no syringe for his insulin. "You don't leave a fallen man behind."
The latest guest of honor is the ultimate mass murderer Garland Greene (Steve Buscemi) who once wore the head of a little girl as a hat on a drive through three states. Trussed up like Hannibal Lector, soft-spoken Greene is easily the creepiest of the bunch.
Then everything blows up and crashes and gets shot and bursts into fireballs just like you knew it would.
On the ground US Marshal Vince Larkin (John Cusack) is trying to recapture the plane while engaging in absurd jurisdiction disputes with a gung-ho DEA agent who wants to solve the problem with missiles.
There are a few weak moments in the energy. Poe's extended search for a set of works for his ailing friend gets in the way of the heat. He spends his time looking through boxes and cabinets while a firefight rages outside and the medical authenticity for the insulin need is iffy.
Other than that, the explosions are non-stop and it's a thrill-a-minute excursion. The effects are spectacular especially during the crash landing.
Cyrus is the most interesting of the characters as Malkovich once again is the evil mastermind or as he says "the poster child for the criminally insane". Although Cyrus gets more screen time, the most unsettling scene goes to the smiling Greene and a young girl having a nice little tea party in a decrepit abandoned swimming pool. It's also the most puzzling piece of the movie as the reason for the resolution of that moment is left to the imagination of the viewer.
All the actors are in fine form although in the best of all possible worlds, they would have had more to work with. Everyone's playing the same characters that they have before and Cage even looks a tad bored occasionally.
Oh well. It's a good looking movie with a lot of "wow"s. Just the thing to luxuriate in on these hot dry summer days. That is, if we ever make it to that season.
[This appeared in the 6/12/97 "Bloomington Voice", Bloomington, Indiana. Michael Redman can be reached at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>]
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


RVS_BasicGCDTimerDelegate
public protocol RVS_BasicGCDTimerDelegate : AnyObject
This is the basic callback protocol for the general-purpose GCD timer class. It has one simple required method, and two optional methods.
-
Called periodically, as the GCDTimer repeats (or fires once). This is required.
Declaration
Swift
func basicGCDTimerCallback(_ timer: RVS_BasicGCDTimer)
Parameters
timer
The BasicGCDTimer instance that is invoking the callback.
-
basicGCDTimerValid(_:
Default implementation) This is called after the timer is initially valid (but before the first run). It is optional.
Default Implementation
The default delegate call does nothing.
Declaration
Swift
func basicGCDTimerValid(_ timer: RVS_BasicGCDTimer)
Parameters
timer
The BasicGCDTimer instance that is invoking the callback.
-
basicGCDTimerWillBecomeInvalid(_:
Default implementation) This is called just before the timer invalidates. It is optional.
Default Implementation
The default delegate call does nothing.
Declaration
Swift
func basicGCDTimerWillBecomeInvalid(_ timer: RVS_BasicGCDTimer)
Parameters
timer
The BasicGCDTimer instance that is invoking the callback.
-
basicGCDTimerSuspend(_:
Default implementation) This is called just before the timer invalidates. It is optional.
Default Implementation
The default delegate call does nothing.
Declaration
Swift
func basicGCDTimerSuspend(_ timer: RVS_BasicGCDTimer)
Parameters
timer
The BasicGCDTimer instance that is invoking the callback.
-
basicGCDTimerResume(_:
Default implementation) This is called when the timer resumes.
Default Implementation
The default delegate call does nothing.
Declaration
Swift
func basicGCDTimerResume(_ timer: RVS_BasicGCDTimer)
Parameters
timer
The BasicGCDTimer instance that is invoking the callback.


If you're just moving to the US, honing your English is incredibly imporant. It can affect your academics, extracurriculars, and social life - not to mention your college applications! We can help you improve your English.
We've also got a more intense training course designed to help increase your vocabulary, grammar and more.
Let us help you hone your child's leadership abilities.


Hspec provides an EDSL to describe tests.
describe
and it
are used to organize tests with Hspec.
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ do
describe "Prelude.read" $ do
it "can parse integers" $ do
read "10" `shouldBe` (10 :: Int)
it "can parse floating-point numbers" $ do
read "2.5" `shouldBe` (2.5 :: Float)
A spec can consist of multiple describe
s, and describe
s can be nested.
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ do
describe "Prelude" $ do
describe "read" $ do
it "can parse integers" $ do
read "10" `shouldBe` (10 :: Int)
describe "head" $ do
it "returns the first element of a list" $ do
head [23 ..] `shouldBe` 23
context
is just an alias for describe
. Use context
with when or
with, e.g.:
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ do
describe "parse" $ do
context "when provided with invalid input" $ do
it "returns a parse error" $ do
parse "some invalid input" `shouldBe` Left "parse error"
before_
runs a custom IO
action before every spec item. For example, if you
have an action flushDb
which flushes your database, you can run it before
every spec item with:
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ before_ flushDb $ do
describe "/api/users/count" $ do
it "returns the number of users" $ do
post "/api/users/create" "name=Jay"
get "/api/users/count" `shouldReturn` 1
context "when there are no users" $ do
it "returns 0" $ do
get "/api/users/count" `shouldReturn` 0
Similarly, after_
runs a custom IO
action after every spec item:
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ after_ truncateDatabase $ do
describe "createUser" $ do
it "creates a new user" $ do
let eva = User (UserId 3) (Name "Eva") (Age 28)
createUser eva
getUser (UserId 3) `shouldReturn` eva
describe "countUsers" $ do
it "counts all registered users" $ do
countUsers `shouldReturn` 0
around_
is passed an IO
action for each spec item so that it can perform
whatever setup and teardown is necessary.
serveStubbedApi :: String -> Int -> IO Server
stopServer :: Server -> IO ()
withStubbedApi :: IO () -> IO ()
withStubbedApi action =
bracket (serveStubbedApi "localhost" 80)
stopServer
(const action)
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ around_ withStubbedApi $ do
describe "api client" $ do
it "should authenticate" $ do
c <- newClient (Just ("user", "pass"))
get c "/api/auth" `shouldReturn` status200
it "should allow anonymous access" $ do
c <- newClient Nothing
get c "/api/dogs" `shouldReturn` status200
Hooks support passing values to spec items (for example, if you wanted
to open a database connection before each item and pass the connection in).
This can be done with before
, around
and after
. Here's an example
for how to use around
:
openConnection :: IO Connection
openConnection = ...
closeConnection :: Connection -> IO ()
closeConnection = ...
withDatabaseConnection :: (Connection -> IO ()) -> IO ()
withDatabaseConnection = bracket openConnection closeConnection
spec :: Spec
spec = do
around withDatabaseConnection $ do
describe "createRecipe" $ do
it "creates a new recipe" $ \c -> do
let ingredients = [Eggs, Butter, Flour, Sugar]
createRecipe c (Recipe "Cake" ingredients)
getRecipe c "Cake" `shouldReturn` ingredients
pending
/pendingWith
can be used as a kind of TODO list while you are
writing your specs. If you think of some behaviour that your code should
satisfy, but you are working on something else, you can add a spec item and
just set it to pending.
main :: IO ()
main = hspec $ do
describe "/login" $ do
it "should use correct status codes" $ do
pending
it "should require basic authentication" $ do
pendingWith "need to fix base64 first"
It's advisable to resolve all pending spec items before committing your changes.
The report produced at the end of a test run counts passed, failed, and pending spec items separately, and having unresolved pending spec items does not cause your test suite to fail; that is, it can still exit with a status code of 0 if there are unresolved pending spec items.


UNDER SUSPICION RATING: 7/10 --> Good movie
For more reviews, screensavers, trailers & more, visit http://www.joblo.com/
Can Morgan Freeman ever give a bad acting performance? Or what about Gene Hackman for that matter? Two solid thespians starring in a film that's been mulling around in Hackman's mind since he saw the original French version back in 1981, this movie was finally produced when Freeman's own production company took a shot at it. I was one of the many members of a packed opening night house at the Montreal Film Festival as this movie presented itself to one of its first preview audiences.
PLOT: A rich lawyer with a very pretty young wife is called in to answer some questions about two local teenage girl murders by a detective with a slight suspicion about the man. It isn't long before the brash attorney tumbles over a few lies and consequently leads his inquisitors to further suspect his guilt. The cat and mouse game between the cop and suspect, with flashbacks, is what fills our time with the dueling duo.
CRITIQUE: A slow-moving yet engaging mystery starring two great actors at the top of their form, keeps you guessing throughout, but ultimately may lose many fans with its unorthodox ending. I personally do not mind movies that ask the viewer to "think" a little after the roll of the credits, but this one actually threw me for a little bit of a loop. In fact, I'm still sort of vague on the exact outcome of the characters in this film, but despite that, still enjoyed the ride and would actually be willing to see it again, just to certify my theories about its conclusion. Unfortunately, I saw the movie by myself so I wasn't able to discuss it with anyone either. So that is one thing about the movie that you should know right off the bat. If you only like films that close things up nice and tidy, then you might as well skip this ambiguous puppy. But if you enjoy films like 12 ANGRY MEN, in which the viewer is asked to discover things as it moves along, changing their mind throughout and ultimately passing their own judgment before the final decision comes down, then this is just your kind of mystery. The film could've been cut by about 15 minutes or so, with some scenes dragging on somewhat, but ultimately the superior performances by the two leads is what kept me interested throughout.
I also credit director Hopkins with some beautiful shots of the city during its opening credits, and an extremely unique perspective on the flashback sequences, in which the person being told the flashback actually joins the speaker in their own retelling. Very well done and certainly an original idea which lent an interesting new perspective to the goings-on of the past. Extremely stylized flashbacks as well. Hopkins goes nuts with the camera work. Oh yeah, and let me not forget to mention the stunning beauty of newcomer Monica Bellucci, an Italian actress, who radiates on the screen, and actually holds her own alongside the big boys. The film is really a difficult one to rate because it's one of those movies that didn't leave me feeling "complete" when I walked out. But looking back, I was quite "into it" while I was there, and the reasoning behind the ending is just now beginning to sink into my psyche, so let's just say that it may take a little while to fully appreciate.
Will you like it? Not sure. Does any of this sound interesting to you?  There are some definite things that I could tell you though: the mystery in the film is a good one, the movie is slow and long but tends to hold your interest, and as I mentioned earlier, the performances are strong, but the ending...initially unsatisfying. In the end, I think that if you like a good murder mystery, you may enjoy unraveling this one, despite the lack of real action or thrills.
Little Known Facts about this film and its stars: Lead stars Gene Hackman and Morgan Freeman are also the executive producers on this project. Hackman has wanted to remake this film since he saw the original French film in 1981, and finally got the opportunity when Freeman's own production company, Revelations Entertainment, backed the project. Morgan Freeman has been nominated for an Oscar on three occasions, but never won. Gene Hackman has been nominated for an Oscar on five occasions and won twice. Once for Best Actor in 1972 for THE FRENCH CONNECTION and another one as Best Supporting Actor in 1992's UNFORGIVEN. This film is a remake of the 1981 French film called GARDE A VUE, which itself was based on the novel "Brainwash" by John Wainwright. This film was initially entitled THIRD DEGREE. This movie was filmed entirely on location in Puerto Rico.
Review Date: August 27, 2000 Director: Stephen Hopkins Writers: Tom Provost and W. Peter Iliff Producers: Stephen Hopkins, Lori McCreary and Anne Marie Gillen Actors: Morgan Freeman as Victor Benezet Gene Hackman as Henry Hearst Thomas Jane as Felix Owens Monica Belluci as Chantal Hearst Genre: Mystery Year of Release: 2000 ------------------------------------- JoBlo's Movie Emporium http://www.joblo.com/ ------------------------------------- (c) 2000 Berge Garabedian
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


#include "Shell.h"
Functions | |
| bool | validCP (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validMV (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validRM (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validMKDIR (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validRMDIR (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validLS (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validCAT (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validCD (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validPWD (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validINCP (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validOUTCP (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validINFO (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validLOAD (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validFORMAT (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validEXIT (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validHELP (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | validSLINK (const std::vector< std::string > &tokens) |
| bool | containsOnlyDigits (std::string str) |
| bool containsOnlyDigits | ( | std::string | str | ) |
| str | string in which we want to check if there are only digits (0 - 9) in it. |
| bool validCAT | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validCD | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validCP | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validEXIT | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validFORMAT | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validHELP | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validINCP | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validINFO | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validLOAD | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validLS | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validMKDIR | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validMV | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validOUTCP | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validPWD | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validRM | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validRMDIR | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |
| bool validSLINK | ( | const std::vector< std::string > & | tokens | ) |
That includes testing such as number of parameters, values of the parameters, etc. It does not check if the file, for example, exists though. It will be taken care of later in a different part of the program - this is all about syntax.
| tokens | command split up into individual tokens |


This software component is licensed by ST under Ultimate Liberty license SLA0044, the “License”;
You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at: SLA0044
STM32 Wireless Personal Area Network Middleware developed within the STM32WB framework is used to support:
Bluetooth Low Energy 5 Certified Applications
802.15.4 Thread Certified Applications (based on OpenThread stack)
802.15.4 MAC layer
Zigbee Applications
NOTE : Depending on the kind of Application targeted, the appropriate Wireless Coprocessor Firmware needs to be loaded.
All available binaries are located under/Projects/STM32_Copro_Wireless_Binaries directory.
Refer to UM2237 to learn how to use/install STM32CubeProgrammer.
BLE-Mesh:
BLE-Mesh:
Zigbee:
| Cluster Number | Cluster ID | Cluster Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x0000 | Basic |
| 2 | 0x0001 | Power Configuration |
| 3 | 0x0003 | Identify6 |
| 4 | 0x0004 | Groups |
| 5 | 0x0005 | Scenes |
| 6 | 0x0006 | On/Off |
| 7 | 0x0008 | Level Control |
| 8 | 0x000a | Time |
| 9 | 0x0019 | OTA Upgrade |
| 10 | 0x0020 | Poll Control |
| 11 | 0x0021 | Green Power Proxy |
| 12 | 0x0102 | Window Covering |
| 13 | 0x0202 | Fan Control |
| 14 | 0x0204 | Thermostat User Interface Configuration |
| 15 | 0x0300 | Color control |
| 16 | 0x0301 | Ballast Configuration |
| 17 | 0x0400 | Illuminance Measurement |
| 18 | 0x0402 | Temperature Measurement |
| 19 | 0x0406 | Occupancy Sensing |
| 20 | 0x0502 | IAS Warning Device (WD) |
| 21 | 0x0b05 | Diagnostics |
| 22 | 0x1000 | Touchlink |
| 23 | 0x0002 | Device Temperature Configuration |
| 24 | 0x0007 | On/Off Switch Configuration |
| 25 | 0x0009 | Alarms |
| 26 | 0x000b | RSSI Location |
| 27 | 0x0015 | Commissioning |
| 28 | 0x001a | Power Profile Cluster |
| 29 | 0x0024 | Nearest Gateway Cluster |
| 30 | 0x0101 | Door Lock |
| 31 | 0x0200 | Pump Configuration and Control |
| 32 | 0x0201 | Thermostat |
| 33 | 0x0203 | Dehumidification Control |
| 34 | 0x0401 | Illuminance Level Sensing |
| 35 | 0x0403 | Pressure Measurement |
| 36 | 0x0405 | Relative Humidity Measurement |
| 37 | 0x0500 | IAS Zone |
| 38 | 0x0501 | IAS Ancillary Control Equipment (ACE) |
| 39 | 0x0700 | Price |
| 40 | 0x0701 | Demand Response and Load Control |
| 41 | 0x0702 | Metering |
| 42 | 0x0703 | Messaging |
| 43 | 0x0704 | Smart Energy Tunneling (Complex Metering) |
| 44 | 0x0800 | Key Establishment |
| 45 | 0x0904 | Voice Over ZigBee |
| 46 | 0x0b01 | Meter Identification |
| 47 | 0x0b04 | Electrical Measurement |
Interface:
Zigbee:
BLE-Mesh:
Interface:
BLE:
General:
Interface:
Zigbee:
BLE-Mesh:
General:
BLE:
BLE:
General:
BLE:
Thread:
First release
For complete documentation on STM32WBxx, visit: [www.st.com/stm32wb]


> Once you understand what rebasing is, the most important thing to learn is when not to do it. The golden rule of `git rebase`
is to never use it on public branches.
-[Atlassian](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/making-a-pull-request)
versus
How? 🤔
2
Eclipse
SourceTree
Gitkraken
Terminal/Command Line 😫😫😫


Part Time : {{masterc.price.hourlyPrice}} MMK
Full Time : {{masterc.price.dailyPrice}} MMK
Kyaw Htet Aung @ Kendrick Kha Aung (born September 14, 1985) is an Actor, Model, Master of Ceremony and Television Host. He is best known for hosting the talent competition show Myanmar Idol. He is the second generation of the first young TV presenters and worked as a host for Family Entertainment from 2010 to 2014. After that, he started as a freelance model, presenter and MC. He has been TV host for many talk show programs and received acceptance of audience for famous reality show Myanmar Idol.


Product List
handmade Emerald Cut
beautiful Valentine And Engagement
Emerald Cut Emerald Ring
Diamond Necklaces and Pendants
Emerald Diamond Solitaire
Diamond Necklaces and Pendants
Displaying 1 to 12 (of 100 products)
Displaying 1 to 12 (of 100 products)


[all packages]
[package ]
[class hierarchy]
[index]
public abstract class PremonCat
(source file: PremonCat.java)
java.lang.Object
|
+----Printable
|
+----PremonCat
The pure class interface.
public abstract class PremonCat
extends Printable
-
The syntactic category of categories (either val, central or proc).
- Author:
- Alan Jeffrey
- Version: v1.0 1998/06/10
- PremonCat()
-
- central
-
The category central.
- proc
-
The category proc.
- val
-
The category val.
- equals(PremonCat)
-
Are two categories equal?
- join(PremonCat)
-
Find the join of two categories under the partial order val <= central <= proc.
- subcat(PremonCat)
-
Is one category a subcat of another?
PremonCat
public PremonCat();
val
public static final PremonCat val;
-
The category val.
central
public static final PremonCat central;
-
The category central.
proc
public static final PremonCat proc;
-
The category proc.
join
public abstract PremonCat join(PremonCat C);
-
Find the join of two categories under the partial order val <= central <= proc.
- Parameters:
- C - the category to compare with.
- Returns:
- the larger of the two categories.
equals
public abstract boolean equals(PremonCat C);
-
Are two categories equal?
- Parameters:
- C - the category to compare with.
- Returns:
- true if the categories are equal.
subcat
public abstract boolean subcat(PremonCat C);
-
Is one category a subcat of another?
- Parameters:
- C - the category to compare with.
- Returns:
- true if this is a subcat of C.
[all packages]
[package ]
[class hierarchy]
[index]
PremonCat.html


CREATE PROCEDURE
Creates a new stored procedure or replaces an existing procedure for the current database.
Syntax
CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] PROCEDURE sp_procedure_name ( [ [ argname ] [ argmode ] argtype [, ...] ] ) AS $$ procedure_body $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql [ { SECURITY INVOKER | SECURITY DEFINER } ] [ SET configuration_parameter { TO value | = value } ]
Parameters
- OR REPLACE
-
A clause that specifies that if a procedure with the same name and input argument data types, or signature, as this one already exists, the existing procedure is replaced. You can only replace a procedure with a new procedure that defines an identical set of data types. You must be a superuser or the owner to replace a procedure.
If you define a procedure with the same name as an existing procedure, but a different signature, you create a new procedure. In other words, the procedure name is overloaded. For more information, see Overloading Procedure Names.
- sp_procedure_name
-
The name of the procedure. If you specify a schema name (such as
myschema.myprocedure
), the procedure is created in the specified schema. Otherwise, the procedure is created in the current schema. For more information about valid names, see Names and Identifiers.We recommend that you prefix all stored procedure names with
sp_
. Amazon Redshift reserves thesp_
prefix for stored procedure names. By using thesp_
prefix, you ensure that your stored procedure name doesn't conflict with any existing or future Amazon Redshift built-in stored procedure or function names. For more information, see Naming Stored Procedures.You can define more than one procedure with the same name if the data types for the input arguments, or signatures, are different. In other words, in this case the procedure name is overloaded. For more information, see Overloading Procedure Names
- [argname] [ argmode] argtype
-
A list of argument names, argument modes, and data types. Only the data type is required. Name and mode are optional and their position can be switched.
The argument mode can be IN, OUT, or INOUT. The default is IN.
You can use OUT and INOUT arguments to return one or more values from a procedure call. When there are OUT or INOUT arguments, the procedure call returns one result row containing n columns, where n is the total number of OUT or INOUT arguments.
INOUT arguments are input and output arguments at the same time. Input arguments include both IN and INOUT arguments, and output arguments include both OUT and INOUT arguments.
OUT arguments aren't specified as part of the CALL statement. Specify INOUT arguments in the stored procedure CALL statement. INOUT arguments can be useful when passing and returning values from a nested call, and also when returning a
refcursor
. For more information onrefcursor
types, see Cursors.The argument data types can be any standard Amazon Redshift data type. In addition, an argument data type can be
refcursor
.You can specify a maximum of 32 input arguments and 32 output arguments.
- AS $$ procedure_body $$
-
A construct that encloses the procedure to be executed. The literal keywords AS $$ and $$ are required.
Amazon Redshift requires you to enclose the statement in your procedure by using a format called dollar quoting. Anything within the enclosure is passed exactly as is. You don't need to escape any special characters because the contents of the string are written literally.
With dollar quoting, you use a pair of dollar signs ($$) to signify the start and the end of the statement to run, as shown in the following example.
$$ my statement $$
Optionally, between the dollar signs in each pair, you can specify a string to help identify the statement. The string that you use must be the same in both the start and the end of the enclosure pairs. This string is case-sensitive, and it follows the same constraints as an unquoted identifier except that it can't contain dollar signs. The following example uses the string test.
$test$ my statement $test$
This syntax is also useful for nested dollar quoting. For more information about dollar quoting, see "Dollar-quoted String Constants" under Lexical Structure in the PostgreSQL documentation.
- procedure_body
-
A set of valid PL/pgSQL statements. PL/pgSQL statements augment SQL commands with procedural constructs, including looping and conditional expressions, to control logical flow. Most SQL commands can be used in the procedure body, including data modification language (DML) such as COPY, UNLOAD and INSERT, and data definition language (DDL) such as CREATE TABLE. For more information, see PL/pgSQL Language Reference.
- LANGUAGE plpgsql
-
A language value. Specify
plpgsql
. You must have permission for usage on language to useplpgsql
. For more information, see GRANT. - SECURITY INVOKER | SECURITY DEFINER
-
The security mode for the procedure determines the procedure's access privileges at runtime. The procedure must have permission to access the underlying database objects.
For SECURITY INVOKER mode, the procedure uses the privileges of the user calling the procedure. The user must have explicit permissions on the underlying database objects. The default is SECURITY INVOKER.
For SECURITY DEFINER mode, the procedure is run using the database privileges as the procedure's owner. The user calling the procedure needs execute privilege on the procedure, but doesn't need any privileges on the underlying objects.
- SET configuration_parameter { TO value | = value }
-
The SET clause causes the specified
configuration_parameter
to be set to the specified value when the procedure is entered. This clause then restoresconfiguration_parameter
to its earlier value when the procedure exits.
Examples
Note
If when running these examples you encounter an error similar to:
ERROR: 42601: unterminated dollar-quoted string at or near "$$
The following example creates a procedure with two input parameters.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_sp1(f1 int, f2 varchar(20)) AS $$ DECLARE min_val int; BEGIN DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tmp_tbl; CREATE TEMP TABLE tmp_tbl(id int); INSERT INTO tmp_tbl values (f1),(10001),(10002); SELECT INTO min_val MIN(id) FROM tmp_tbl; RAISE INFO 'min_val = %, f2 = %', min_val, f2; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
The following example creates a procedure with one IN parameter, one OUT parameter, and one INOUT parameter.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_sp2(f1 int, f2 INOUT varchar, OUT varchar) AS $$ DECLARE out_var alias for $3; loop_var int; BEGIN IF f1 is null OR f2 is null THEN RAISE EXCEPTION 'input cannot be null'; END IF; DROP TABLE if exists my_etl; CREATE TEMP TABLE my_etl(a int, b varchar); FOR loop_var IN 1..f1 LOOP insert into my_etl values (loop_var, f2); f2 := f2 || '+' || f2; END LOOP; SELECT INTO out_var count(*) from my_etl; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


--- subject: My Basic Email Template Subject --- View in new page Anton Kolesnykov About me Hi, my name is Anton Kolesnykov. I engage programming for 4 year Php (2 years experience), JQuery (1 year experience), JavaScript (1 year experience), Html (4 years experience), CSS (4 years experience), Wordpress (3 years experience), Photoshop (4 years experience), Indesign (3 years experience), Git (1 year experience), Less (1 year experience)
View in new page
Anton Kolesnykov
Hi, my name is Anton Kolesnykov. I engage programming for 4 year
Php
JQuery
JavaScript
Html
CSS
Wordpress
Photoshop
Indesign
Git
Less
GitHub profile
Linkedin profile


Natural ability
Dragonite is an unusually strong Pokemon. He is able to master attacks of almost any type. He also has a high intelligence, much higher than a human. It is because of this that he is mistakenly ranked among the legendary Pokémon. Its hidden property is Multiscale.


3000 Miles to Graceland * * (out of * * * * )
Directed by Demian Lichtenstein. Cast: Kurt Russell, Kevin Costner, Courteney Cox, David Kaye, Christian Slater, David Arquette, Bokeem Woodbine, Kevin Pollak, Howie Long, Ice T, Thomas Haden Church, Jon Lovitz. 2001 - 125 minutes Rated R (for graphic violence, profanity, and sex). Reviewed by Dustin Putman, February 24, 2001.
Had "3000 Miles to Graceland" captured the lightweight, happy-go-lucky tone of its superior theatrical trailer, it might have been something special. Trashy and silly, yes, but more satisfying than what we have been served: a violent, gruesome, almost unrelentingly mean-spirited ride through a Tarantino-esque landscape of color characters, witty writing, double-crosses, and more than a little bloodshed. It pales in comparison to the best of the genre, however, as it contains about three plot twists too many, about twenty minutes of excessive material that would have been better left cut out, and such unremittingly grim and violent sequences that it ends up leaving a bitter aftertaste in your mouth.
The movie opens as five ex-convicts set out to rob a Las Vegas casino holding an Elvis Presley convention. Dressed as Presley himself so as to blend in, they manage to escape with $2.3 in cold, hard cash, but not before a bloody massacre that leave many, many police officers, as well as civilians, dead. Back at their hideout in a seedy desert motel, it becomes clear that arrogant, chain-smoking badguy Murphy (Kevin Costner) plans to walk away with everyone else's loot. With three of them killed, the other remaining partner, Michael (Kurt Russell), manages to steal the money and sets off for a money launderer, with Murphy in hot pursuit. Tagging along for the ride with Michael is Cybil Waingrow (Courteney Cox), who has already managed to bed him twice in the last 24 hours, and her precocious, thieving son, Jesse (David Kaye).
In Quentin Tarantino's own "Pulp Fiction" or "Jackie Brown," which are clearly two of the prime models for "3000 Miles to Graceland," there were characters who were flawed, but easy to root for. In other words, they didn't always do the right things, but were believable and, most of all, human. Here, some of the people filling up the screen are supposed to be the heroes, but none are particularly that likable, and even the nicest one (played well by Courteney Cox) does things throughout that are rather despicable. At one point, she even takes off with the money herself, leaving her own son behind with Michael, who is the only other "good" character to be found. While she reasons out this plot point later on, and does manage to become sympathetic again by the final act, it still does not take away how inexcusable her behavior has been.
For its two-plus hours, "3000 Miles to Graceland" is pretty entertaining stuff. Fairly well-written and directed with a sure hand by Demian Lichtenstein (in his feature-film debut), the movie often used quick-cuts and interesting camera angles without its high style ever becoming glaring or pretentious. The storyline is overly familiar, but fun to watch, for the most part, although it does tend to become repetitive and ends up overstaying its welcome.
What does drag the film down, though, is the unnecessary violence that pops up every few minutes. From the early shoot-out at the casino, to the gory climactic battle, the movie is needlessly, almost unrelentingly brutal, in its depiction of death and destruction.  Every time Murphy shoots up a few more innocent people, the whole enterprise screeches to a somber halt, leaving you unsure of how you are supposed to be feeling when the comedy appears immediately afterwards.
Even if Murphy's nonstop evil personality doesn't always fit, Kevin Costner (2000's "13 Days") injects much life into him. Releasing off an air of head-sure, macho badness, Costner has never played a character quite like this one, and he seems to relish the chance. Likewise, Kurt Russell (1998's "Soldier") is very good, adding some depth to a part that probably wasn't as apparent on the written page. His budding relationship with Cybil works solely because he and Cox have a great amount of chemistry onscreen, and work well together. Aside from this, it plays like more of a plotting device than a natural romance between two dysfunctional people. It turns out that Courteney Cox (2000's "Scream 3") is the best of all, delivering a snappy, energetic portrayal of a beautiful single mother who longs for a little danger (and maybe a man and some extra cash) in her life.
The supporting cast includes Christian Slater (2000's "The Contender"), David Arquette (2000's "Ready to Rumble"), and Bokeem Woodbine (1998's "Caught Up"), as the three ill-fated men who help to rob the casino with Michael and Murphy; Kevin Pollak, Ice T, and Thomas Haden Church as Federal Marshals out to capture them and get the stolen money back; and Howie Long (1998's "Firestorm") as a further accomplice to the crime that sets everything into motion. All do fine jobs with what they are given, which, admittedly, isn't very much.
Despite all of its strong points (including an exciting car chase that is better than anything in 2000's "Gone in Sixty Seconds"), "2000 Miles to Graceland" remains an uneasy, uncomfortable balance between a comedic romp and something remarkably darker. Ultimately, screenwriters Richard Recco and Demian Lichtenstein are never quite able to find that missing link that might have bridged the gap between the major flaws in its storytelling and tone, and the exuberant energy that so achingly tries to break free, but never quite does.
- Copyright 2001 by Dustin Putman http://us.imdb.com/ReviewsBy?Dustin+Putman http://www.atnzone.com
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


--- layout: post authors: ["Uwe Hilgert"] title: "Workshop at the University of Arizona" date: 2015-09-13 time: "02:00:00" tags: ["Workshops", "University of Arizona"] ---
Software Carpentry Workshop
Who: Practicing and aspiring research scientists
When: October 3 and 4, 2015 (9am - 5 pm on both days)
Where: UA Integrated Learning Center
How: Register at http://iplantsc.eventbrite.com
As computing skills are becoming increasingly important and essential for researchers, the Software Carpentry Foundation has been playing a major role in professional development in practical and technical computing. Since 1998 volunteers from Software Carpentry have been teaching researchers in science, engineering, medicine, and related disciplines the essential computing skills they need to get more done in less time, and with less pain.
The iPlant Collaborative, the Arizona Environmental Grid Infrastructure Service (AEGIS), and the BIO5 Institute are proud to present the second Software Carpentry Workshop on the UA campus. The workshop targets graduate students, postdocs, technicians, and faculty; undergraduate students can be admitted if space is available. It covers the foundational skills necessary to be productive in a small research teams, including:
Scripting your analyses with R (make your analyses reproducible and repeatable)
Efficient use of the Unix shell (how to automate repetitive tasks)
Git and GitHub (how to track and share work efficiently)
How to use all of these skills in the context of iPlant's powerful cloud computing infrastructure
Workshop participation is free; refreshments will be provided.
Register ASAP as Software Carpentry workshops fill fast!
Want to know more? Visit Software Carpentry's FAQ.
Please contact Uwe Hilgert at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>with any questions you may have.


What we can find about Present Perfect in official sources?
-
It's unspecified Time Before Now,
in meaning of:
- Experience
- Change Over Time
- Accomplishments
- An Uncompleted Action You Are Expecting
- Multiple Actions at Different Times
-
Duration From the Past Until Now (Non-Continuous Verbs)


--- layout: default title: Public Private Partnerships description: "Terracare Associates provides an extensive line of service elements that directly relate to the ever changing needs of cities and their residents." parent: Public Services sidebar: Municipal Landscape and Public Works class: infrastructure banner: public-private-partnership.jpg banner-heading: "City of Centennial, Colorado" banner-cta: "" relevant_links: - link: "/public%20works/industry%20information/2014/07/22/public-private-partnerships.html" title: "Public Private Partnerships" - link: "/employees/2014/07/22/effective-teams.html" title: "Effective Teams - 3 ways to grow a team" - link: "/employees/2014/07/22/effective-teams.html" title: "Let's talk about Greg Hayes" ---
We specialize in city landscape management and public infrastructure maintenance services. We strive for superior customer service and are a trusted partner with dedicated and professional staff, state-of-the-art technologies, and reliable equipment to get the job done. Effective communication with our customers is of utmost importance and this gives us the highest of ratings in customer confidence.
Experience matters. Our leadership team has an average of more than 20 years of experience in outdoor maintenance, landscape and construction industries. We bring you a wide range of experience and man power with 500 employees nationwide. Employees are cross-trained in multiple service lines to maximize your cost efficiency. Highly trained staff are also flexible in managing and maintaining physical infrastructure, parks, streetscapes, highways and roadways to successfully serve cities, counties, public highway authorities and metro districts.


Your comments, including but not limited to your opinion, name, phone number, email and mailing address, are collected by the Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development (the Ministry) under Section 26(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act for the purposes of collecting your thoughts on Crown Land applications. Your personal information may be used by the Ministry to contact you to follow up on your comments. Should you have any questions about the collection of personal information, please contact:
Providing contact information allows us to follow-up with you if we have questions or need more clarity on your comment.
All comments will be provided to the decision maker.


(
no frames
)
Class List
Method List
File List
Documentation by YARD <IP_ADDRESS>
Alphabetic Index
File Listing
README
Namespace Listing A-Z
B
Base
(Brauser::Definitions)
Brauser
Browser
(Brauser)
Browser
(Brauser::Definitions)
D
Definitions
(Brauser)
H
Hooks
(Brauser)
L
Language
(Brauser::Definitions)
P
Parser
(Brauser)
Platform
(Brauser::Definitions)
R
RubyOnRails
(Brauser::Hooks)
V
Value
(Brauser)
Version
(Brauser)


Keep your file up to date by pulling in changes from collaborators.
If you're working on something with someone else you need to stay up to date with the latest changes. So you'll want to pull in any changes that may have been pushed to the central GitHub repository.
See if Reporobot has made any changes to your branch by pulling in any changes from the remote named 'origin' on GitHub:
git pull <REMOTENAME> <BRANCHNAME>
If nothing's changed, it will tell you 'Already up-to-date'. If there are changes, Git will merge those changes into your local version.
Did Reporobot make changes? Git tells you where changes were made. You can open that file and see Reporobot's updates. Surprise, Reporobot is an artist!
git status
git pull <REMOTENAME> <REMOTEBRANCH>
git fetch --dry-run


Exporting¶
Warped data¶
Use the “Export” menu to export:
Warped data
Landmarks (“landmark” mode only)
All results (in MATLAB format). This file contains all warping information, and its contents are identical to the mwarp1d output file.
Screenshots¶
Use the “Screenshot” menu to generate screenshots of:
The entire window
or
Specific figures within the current window


Each skill has ten levels of proficiency. Available only 40 skill points, without race bonus, skill books and skill trainers
|
Available points: 0/40
|
|||
Basic |
Advanced |
Master |
|
| Alchemy |
M
M
|
M
|
M
|
| Blacksmithing |
M
M
M
M
|
M
M
|
M
|
| Detect hidden |
M
M
M
M
|
M
M
|
M
M
|
| Dispelling |
M
M
|
M
|
M
|
| Lockpicking |
M
|
M
|
M
M
|
| Mercantile |
M
|
M
|
M
|
| Persuasion |
M
M
|
M
|
M
|
| Sagecraft |
M
M
|
M
|
M
M
|
| Stealth |
M
M
|
M
M
|
M
M
|


Genes differentially expressed with an FDR of less than 20%, or top 100 lowest FDR.
Differential expression over time is calculated over time for each
cohort and sample type. Statistics are calculated using the
ebayes
method from the
limma
package, and implemented in the HIPCMatrix
package.


D-View 6Contact Us
D-View 7 allows hierarchical administration to manage convergent networks in multiple locations.
Manage both wired and wireless devices
Manage multiple sites with one NMS
Create a hierarchical administration team
Download D-View 7 and start your trial now !
Check out the resources to get a jump start on D-View 7.


Quiz: Which of these countries has the largest population?
Broadly speaking, most of us think we know more about the world than we do.
We all have vague impressions about how large different countries are – United States big; Luxembourg small – but without knowing the numbers, it’s tough to tell how close they are to the truth.
This quiz will put your preconceptions to the test. Do you know which of these well-known countries have the larger populations?


web designer
I’m a web designer with a background in contemporary art. Interaction has always been a key theme in my artistic career. It’s what compels me to create sculpture, and it greatly influences my design work. I love the idea of someone spending time with a space that I've created. That's what gives me the drive to create a great user experience with a beautiful interface.