| All Classes
Packages
org.newdawn.slick
org.newdawn.slick.command
org.newdawn.slick.fills
org.newdawn.slick.font
org.newdawn.slick.font.effects
org.newdawn.slick.geom
org.newdawn.slick.gui
org.newdawn.slick.imageout
org.newdawn.slick.loading
org.newdawn.slick.muffin
org.newdawn.slick.openal
org.newdawn.slick.opengl
org.newdawn.slick.opengl.pbuffer
org.newdawn.slick.opengl.renderer
org.newdawn.slick.particles
org.newdawn.slick.particles.effects
org.newdawn.slick.state
org.newdawn.slick.state.transition
org.newdawn.slick.svg
org.newdawn.slick.svg.inkscape
org.newdawn.slick.tests
org.newdawn.slick.tests.states
org.newdawn.slick.tests.xml
org.newdawn.slick.tiled
org.newdawn.slick.util
org.newdawn.slick.util.pathfinding
org.newdawn.slick.util.pathfinding.heuristics
org.newdawn.slick.util.pathfinding.navmesh
org.newdawn.slick.util.xml
|


Ministerial inquiry into PHARMAC decision needed
by New Zealand National PartyDavid Clark should hold a ministerial inquiry into PHARMAC’s decision to switch to the generic form of epilepsy drug lamotrigine which may have resulted in four deaths, National’s Health spokesperson Michael Woodhouse says.
“PHARMAC’s decision to fund only one brand of lamotrigine and the subsequent reversal of that decision raises more questions than it answers.
“Given four people have died since the initial brand switch, the public and patients deserve to know whether or not those deaths were as a result of the compulsory switch to Logem, the generic form of lamotrigine.
“We know that Medsafe had raised concerns about the brand switch before it went ahead.
“What we need to know now is whether the Minister was involved in the decision-making around lamotrigine, which would call into question PHARMAC’s independence, or whether Medsafe raised further concerns about the number of adverse reactions they were seeing.
“A ministerial inquiry is the appropriate way of getting answers to these questions.
“Ultimately the question also needs to be asked about whether Dr Clark’s decision to increase PHARMAC funding by an amount which barely covers inflation is forcing risky drug-switches on the basis of making savings. By comparison, National increased PHARMAC funding by an average of $24 million each year we were in government.
“The public deserves answers to these questions so we can continue to have confidence in PHARMAC’s independence and decision-making.”


Reset
Flavour
Hawaii
Bacon Supreme
Fruits de mer
Add extra toppings
Add extra toppings
Extra toppings
Pineapple
Gorgonzola
Peanuts
Red onions
This pizza is bad for your health!
Bad, but
extremely
tasty!


Intro
Hello! This page is the portfolio page for awaterdrop.
Unfortunately, it is currently in development.
If you would like to visit the GitHub blog, please visit the GitHub blog via the link in the blog section.
Have a bug-free day today!
Portfolio
This is a Portfolio section.
Blog
Visit my Github Blog!
ContactMe
If you would like to contact me, please do one of the following:


Sense Excel combines the flexibility of Microsoft Excel with the power, speed and
governance
of the Qlik Sense Business Intelligence Platform. Sense Excel is easy to implement
and does not require any additional hardware.
PRICED FROM:
Sense Excel Reporting provides information tailored to the specific needs of groups and individual users in your organization. Easily create reports using the familiar MS Excel front-end and automatically schedule and distribute them to any number of recipients according to your existing Qlik authorization strategies.
PRICED FROM:


all in the same line.
First paragraph.
Second paragraph.
Third paragraph.
Fourth paragraph.
Fifth paragraph.


|
Lucid
|
#include <renderer.h>
Public Member Functions | |
| Renderer (Registry *registry) | |
| ~Renderer () | |
| void | DrawMesh (Mesh &mesh, Shader &shader) |
| void | DrawModel (Model &model, Shader &shader) |
| void | DrawCube (Cube &cube, Shader &shader) |
| void | DrawCubeIndexed (const PrimitiveBatchIds primitiveBatchIds) |
| void | DrawSphere (Sphere &sphere, Shader &shader) |
| void | DrawSphereIndexed (const PrimitiveBatchIds) |
| void | DrawLineIndexed (const PrimitiveBatchIds primitiveBatchIds) |
| void | DrawBoundingBox (const BoundingBox bb) |
| void | ClearRendererStats () |
| void | StartBatch () |
| void | FlushBatch (PrimitiveBatchIds primitiveBatchIds, const DrawType drawType) |
| void | PushLineBuffer (const glm::mat4 modelMatrix, const Line line) |
| void | PushSphereBuffer (const glm::mat4 modelMatrix, const Sphere sphere) |
| void | PushCubeBuffer (const glm::mat4 modelMatrix, const Cube cube) |
| void | PushModelBuffer (const glm::mat4 modelMatrix, const Model model) |
| void | PushGenericBufferWithColor (const glm::mat4 modelMatrix, const glm::vec3 color, const DrawType drawType) |
Definition at line 19 of file renderer.h.
| Renderer::Renderer | ( | Registry * | registry | ) |
Definition at line 3 of file renderer.cc.
|
default |
| void Renderer::ClearRendererStats | ( | ) |
Definition at line 299 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::DrawBoundingBox | ( | const BoundingBox | bb | ) |
Definition at line 218 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::DrawCubeIndexed | ( | const PrimitiveBatchIds | primitiveBatchIds | ) |
Definition at line 77 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::DrawLineIndexed | ( | const PrimitiveBatchIds | primitiveBatchIds | ) |
Definition at line 200 of file renderer.cc.
Definition at line 14 of file renderer.cc.
Definition at line 56 of file renderer.cc.
Definition at line 128 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::DrawSphereIndexed | ( | const PrimitiveBatchIds | primitiveBatchIds | ) |
Definition at line 138 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::FlushBatch | ( | PrimitiveBatchIds | primitiveBatchIds, |
| const DrawType | drawType | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 392 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::PushCubeBuffer | ( | const glm::mat4 | modelMatrix, |
| const Cube | cube | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 334 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::PushGenericBufferWithColor | ( | const glm::mat4 | modelMatrix, |
| const glm::vec3 | color, | ||
| const DrawType | drawType | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 352 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::PushLineBuffer | ( | const glm::mat4 | modelMatrix, |
| const Line | line | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 306 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::PushModelBuffer | ( | const glm::mat4 | modelMatrix, |
| const Model | model | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 348 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::PushSphereBuffer | ( | const glm::mat4 | modelMatrix, |
| const Sphere | sphere | ||
| ) |
Definition at line 320 of file renderer.cc.
| void Renderer::StartBatch | ( | ) |
Definition at line 293 of file renderer.cc.


The Rodriquezes
Pete Rodriquez was born June 29th, 1946 in Albuquerque, New Mexico to a poor family. His big journey started when he was drafted into the Army at age 18 to fight in the Vietnam War. He answered his country's call and served for two years before finishing his duty and retiring from the military. However, fitting back into civilian life after two years of violence and bloodshed was when the real hardship truly began. He met Yvonne when he was still recovering from his trauma from the military, and she has helped him to fit back into society and keep him sane ever since.
HAPPY
50TH
ANNIVERSARY!!!


Overview¶
The utils3
library is a collection of commonly used Python 3.5+
utilities. These utilities include (but are certainly not limit to)
database connection classes, colourmaps, JSON config file loading,
program event logging, error reporting, console user interface, etc.
utils3
is a Python 3.5+ continuation of the discontinued Python 2.7
utils
package, which ended with v6.1.5.
Change log information can be viewed on the Change Log page, using the link below.


--- layout: default title: Donate class: donate parent: Donate ---
100% of all donations to the Michael Goffredo Foundation (MGF) are donated to charities which are listed in the MGF NEWS section. All MGF administrative expenses are paid by his loving father in Michael’s memory.


gdalbuildvrt
Build Virtual Datasets from a list of existing datasets.
More information: home page
- Make a virtual mosaic from all TIFF files contained in a directory:
gdalbuildvrt path/to/output.vrt path/to/input_directory/*.tif
- Make a virtual mosaic from files whose name is specified in a text file:
gdalbuildvrt -input_file_list path/to/list.txt path/to/output.vrt
- Make an RGB virtual mosaic from 3 single-band input files:
gdalbuildvrt -separate path/to/rgb.vrt path/to/red.tif path/to/green.tif path/to/blue.tif
- Make a virtual mosaic with blue background color (RGB: 0 0 255):
gdalbuildvrt -hidenodata -vrtnodata "0 0 255" path/to/output.vrt path/to/input_directory/*.tif


"Coding is not difficult" Bill Gates
Bill was a voracious reader as a child, spending many hours poring over reference books such as the encyclopedia. Around the age of 11 or 12, Bill's parents began to have concerns about his behavior. He was doing well in school.
At Lakeside School Gates met Paul Allen, who was two years his senior. The pair became fast friends, bonding over their common enthusiasm for computers, even though they were very different people. Allen was more reserved and shy. Bill was feisty and at times combative.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), also known as the Gates Foundation, is a private foundation founded by Bill and Melinda Gates. It was launched in 2000, and is said to be the largest private foundation in the US, holding $38 billion in assets. The primary aims of the foundation are, globally, to enhance healthcare and reduce extreme poverty, and in America, to expand educational opportunities and access to information technology. The foundation, based in Seattle, Washington, is controlled by its three trustees: Bill and Melinda Gates, and Warren Buffett. Other principal officers include Co-Chair William H. Gates, Sr. and Chief Executive Officer Susan Hellmann.


Knud Möller
From semanticweb.org
| vCard Knud Moeller | |
|---|---|
| Homepage: | www.deri.ie |
PC member of: SemanticDesktopWS2006
| |
| See also: | FOAF |
This person attended ESWC2006.
| vCard Knud Moeller | |
|---|---|
| Homepage: | www.deri.ie |
PC member of: SemanticDesktopWS2006
| |
| See also: | FOAF |
This person attended ESWC2006.


Chiabing Lee
ABOUT
EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION
SKILLS
INTERESTS
About Me
Experience
Firmware Engineer
BMC firmware
August 2012 -


Courses
The list of all the courses which had submissions on this homepage:
CS300A: Technical Communication
CS671A: Introduction to Natural Language Processing
CS498A: Under-Graduate Project
CS654A: Software Architecture
CS676: Computer Vision and Image Processing


Hi I'm Eva! I am a makeup artist based in Washington, D.C. and I take passion in spreading glam through our nation's capital.
In fifth grade, I was introduced to the world of glamour. I started off learning the basics from my mom, watching endless tutorials and practicing on all my friends.
When I'm not reaching towards my brushes, I'm usually singing along in the passenger seat enjoying spontaneous road trips or finding the best places to eat wherever I go!
Feel the best on your special day.
Dance the night away, while looking fab!
Watch out! Model coming through!
I care what you think and your satisfaction is my top priority!
Ready to look and feel amazing? Give me a call or send me an email. I look forward to speaking with you!
(703) 501-2798
Icons made by SmashIcons and Freepik from www.flaticon.com


8 minutes
Keep it simple stupid, lessons learned
We as humans are always changing and evolving, sometimes for the best and sometimes not. In our professional life this is expected, one gains experience, learns new tools, knowns different people with different background, etc.
Back when I was working for a consultancy company in 2016 I met a wonderful person who at that time was an architect, and right now one of my best friends. Our main topic of conversation was technology, and we always dug deeper and deeper into it. Since we were both working on .NET a lot of the following words appeared at least once in every conversation: patterns
, reflection
, expressions
.
At that time, we were enjoying a lot doing green-field projects as we could decide the foundations for each one. Deciding how to architecture your project based on architectural patterns never fails, or does it?
Well, the projects we did never really failed, but there was one red flag that we did not put a lot of attention at that time. The code was complex. Engineers did not fully understand what we have done or why we have done it that way. For sure, one can explain certain topics, but at some point you have to draw the line.
Don’t get me wrong, complex applications are not necessarily bad, one might need to do some things preemptively in order to avoid seeing their system become a big ball of mud in a couple of months. But there is one concept that at that time I did not keep close to my heart: KISS
and YAGNI
.
 This applies to a lot of concepts, such as the creation of interfaces just because. And it also avoids premature optimization.
I remember one of the parts on which engineers working with us had the most problems with, the tests. Well, this might sound common as every company I have been spent at least a dozen of hours defining what should tests be, what should be tested and the difference between different types of testing.
This is not the case, the problems here came by misusing a framework named AutoFixture
. This cool framework claims the following:
AutoFixture makes it easier for developers to do Test-Driven Development by automating non-relevant Test Fixture Setup, allowing the Test Developer to focus on the essentials of each test case.
In other words, for each test you have, it will supply random data to fill your entities so no parameter is null. Then, you can add customizations in order to provide certain value to certain parameters, so instead of having:
[Theory]
[InlineData(2, 2, 4)]
public void TestSum(int value1, int value2, int expected)
{
var result = Calculator.Add(value1, value2);
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
With AutoFixture you could have the following to have random data generated:
[Theory, AutoData]
public void TestSum(int value1, int value2, int expected)
{
var result = Calculator.Add(value1, value2);
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
Or with customizations to indicate exactly which type of data you want for the specified fields (the others will get random data).
[Theory]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(Value1Is4))]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(Value2Is10))]
public void TestSum(int value1, int value2, int expected)
{
var result = Calculator.Add(value1, value2);
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
public class Value1Is4 : ICustomization
{
public void Customize(IFixture fixture)
{
fixture.Customizations.Add(
new FilteringSpecimenBuilder(
new FixedBuilder(4),
new ParameterSpecification(typeof(int), "value1")));
}
}
public class Value2Is10 : ICustomization
{
public void Customize(IFixture fixture)
{
fixture.Customizations.Add(
new FilteringSpecimenBuilder(
new FixedBuilder(10),
new ParameterSpecification(typeof(int), "value2")));
}
}
Do you start seeing the complexity? While this example is not fair for AutoFixture as it really comes handier when the parameters are more than just a couple of integers, there is a problem that you have probably already noticed:
[Theory, AutoData]
public void TestSum(int value1, int value2, int expected)
This means that the expected
value will also be a random value. So now we cannot test this function the same way we did before and we have to do something like:
[Theory, AutoData]
public void TestSum(int value1, int value2)
{
var result = Calculator.Add(value1, value2);
Assert.Equal(value1, result - value2);
Assert.Equal(value2, result - value1);
}
As we cannot predict what value1
and value2
are going to be, we cannot predict beforehand what the result
is going to be. So we need to implement a way of checking that the operation we wanted to test actually worked at runtime. This is problematic as we end up adding complexity on something that should not be.
There are probably some use cases on which AutoFixture can be useful, but the problem is that back then we used it for everything. So for those functions that should map A
to B
, we ended up implementing a way to map from B
to A
in the test and comparing the original A
with the actual A
that we got from the B
result.
Just for the sake of wanting to use new and cool frameworks, we ended up complicating things when we did not have a good statement to justify it. Fortunately, as time passed, we both ended up moving away from the automatic and auto-magic way of doing things.
When I started working with Go, everything changed for me, as the way of working was quite different. People had a mindset of not adding frameworks just because, and trying to get around with the super good standard library that the language provides. Coming from .NET it was very weird, as back then we did not even have a native JSON library and all the projects had Newtonsoft.Json
just to begin with. This ended up in developers using a lot of frameworks most of the time. And I am not even looking at JS developers which take this to a whole other level.
The first time I’ve read a Go test, I did not understand a thing. It was a test of like 100 lines of code, but the actual testing logic was very small, instead it had a lot of lines inside a list defining different test cases. This is what they call table driven test. Basically:
| Value1 | Value2 | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 4 |
| -3 | 3 | 0 |
| 0 | 10 | 10 |
| -5 | -7 | -12 |
In code:
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
value1 int
value2 int
want int
}{
{
name: "two positives",
value1: 2,
value2: 2,
want: 4,
},
{
name: "negative and positive",
value1: -3,
value2: 3,
want: 0,
},
{
name: "zero and positive",
value1: 0,
value2: 10,
want: 10,
},
{
name: "negative and negative",
value1: -5,
value2: -7,
want: -12,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
if got := Add(tt.value1, tt.value2); got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Add() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
When I got around it, I decided this was the way I wanted to do testing from now on. This way of testing does not limit you in terms of parameter types or assertions and you can even define mocks as values if you require something like that.
Fast forward yesterday, I went into an old repository that I’ve created on .NET for doing SOAP calls. And for some reason I went into the test class, and saw them… I was furious. The tests were using AutoFixture, and they were not understandable at all.
[Theory(DisplayName = "Post should do expected HTTP call")]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(ActionIsNullCustomization))]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(SoapVersion12Customization))]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(HeadersAreNullCustomization))]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(HeadersAreEmptyCustomization))]
[InlineDefaultData(typeof(OnlyOneHeaderAndOneBodyCustomization))]
public async void PostAsync_ShouldDoExpectedHttpCall(
Uri endpoint,
string action,
SoapVersion soapVersion,
List<XElement> bodies,
List<XElement> headers)
{ ... }
And I am omitting the 15 lines of code that each customization took. How could I, at some point of my career, thought that this was a good way of testing things? But the good part here is learn from your own mistakes.
Tests are living documentation of your code, as long as you enforce them on your pipeline and don’t disable them when you have to do a quick fix that ends up breaking everything. With that being said, tests should be easy to understand, and on .NET you can also keep it simple stupid.
public static IEnumerable<object[]> PostAsyncTestsData =>
new List<object[]>
{
// Action is null
new object[] {
new Uri("https://test.com"),
SoapVersion.Soap11,
new[] { new XElement("body1"), new XElement("body2") },
new[] { new XElement("header1") },
null
},
// Soap 12
new object[] {
new Uri("https://test.com"),
SoapVersion.Soap12,
new[] { new XElement("body1") },
new[] { new XElement("header1"), new XElement("header2") },
"action"
},
// Headers are null
new object[] {
new Uri("https://test.com"),
SoapVersion.Soap12,
new[] { new XElement("body1") },
null,
"action"
},
// Headers are empty
new object[] {
new Uri("https://test.com"),
SoapVersion.Soap12,
new[] { new XElement("body1") },
new XElement[] {},
"action"
},
// One header and one body
new object[] {
new Uri("https://test.com"),
SoapVersion.Soap11,
new[] { new XElement("body1") },
new[] { new XElement("header1") },
"action"
},
};
[Theory]
[MemberData(nameof(PostAsyncTestsData))]
public async void PostAsyncTests(
Uri endpoint,
SoapVersion version,
IEnumerable<XElement> bodies,
IEnumerable<XElement> headers,
string action)
{ ... }
The snippet above is relying in the parameter order, which is not necessarily intuitive, but there are some things that can make this better which I am not going to cover here.
The point I am trying to make here is don’t over-engineer things just for the sake of trying a new cool framework or new tool, at least on your work environment. Your code should not be clever but be clear for your code inhabitants, in other words, your colleagues.
You are likely to get more engagement in testing and maintaining a healthy codebase when your tests are clear than when your colleagues don’t understand what you are trying to do.


Personal information
Your Name & Contact
Information
Employment Details
Your Professional Work
History
Important Links
Valid links only
TalentQL sources, hires and manages best in class remote technical talent for leading companies. We are currently accepting applications for Fullstack Developers, Frontend Developers, Backend Developers, DevOps Engineers, QA Specialists and Engineering Managers.
If accepted into our pool, you will recieve
Your Name & Contact
Information
Your Professional Work
History
Valid links only


Name: Nancy Duran
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Profession: University Professor
Personality: Friendly, active, artistic, down to earth, animal lover, gentle, kind, impulsive.
Technology: Iphone 8 Plus (iOS 11.3.1) and MacBook Pro (macOS High Sierra 10.13.4).
Proficiency: She has basic computer skills. Familiar with Microsoft office suite, and types 50WPM.
Likes/Dislikes: Slow traffic, rude people, long hours at work, likes working out, outdoor activities, helping people.
Attitudes and Needs: To find a site where she can easily login with the ease of a gmail or other already established account. Along with being able to leave reviews/comments, and vote for the best trails, and or parks.
Why choose this site over other options: Trails narrowed down for her surrounding area.
Usage Preconditions: Nancy needs a user friendly site that is easily accessible by mobile.
Usage Postconditions: She will be able to search for trail locations near and around the Albuquerque area.
Frequency of Use: Two times a week
As a user of ABQOutside I’d like to find some outdoor trails for my son and I to explore sometimes.


---
layout: post
title: DG Trade
date: '2013-12-23T07:30:00+01:00'
categories:
- Illustration
- Klare Lijn — Ligne Claire
youtube-id: IiOC5XG2I5Y
picture_url: https://film-Storyboards.tumblr.com/post/70892957461/dg-trade
---
EU Trade Policy explained in animated drawings. Watch the animation here. Production: Benuts Agency: ESN


Arwaj Interview Tracker
Login to Account
Welcome
Annonymous
!
Add
Logout
Applicant Records
Name
Scheduled Time
Score
Recommendation
Comment
Key
No data
×
Name
Schedule
Score
Recommendation
Comment
Add
Update


How to deploy a static web page on Uberspace
This posts follows on my tutorial “How to deploy a Django application on Uberspace”. To deploy a static web page, like an Angular project is very easy.
Steps
Setup your project
This is an example for a Angular project, where you can build you static page with the cli.
1
ng build --prod --output-path ./dist
Routing with .htaccess
Because you want that Angular handles the routes, you have to tell the webserver to route every request to the index.html, where your Angular project lives. You can do this by creating a .htaccess file in your DocumentRoot.
1
2
cd ~/html
nano .htaccess
Then paste this text. The last line adds optionally compression.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^index\.html$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.html [L]
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml text/css application/javascript text/javascript application/json
For more information, visit the Uberspace manual


Preparation time
overnight
Cooking time
less than 10 mins
Serves
Serves 4
For the marinade, in a bowl, mix together the plain yoghurt, the juice of one lime, the garlic, ginger, cumin, coriander, garam masala, paprika and salt until well combined.
Add the trout fillets and coat them in the marinade mixture. Cover and chill in the fridge overnight, or for at least for two hours.
When the trout has marinated, preheat the grill to its highest setting. In a bowl, mix together the melted butter and the juice of the remaining lime until well combined.
When the grill is hot, place the marinated trout fillets under it and grill for 2-3 minutes. Baste the grilled trout fillets with the lime juice and butter mixture.
Turn the trout fillets over and grill for a further 2-3 minutes, basting with the lime juice and butter mixture halfway through cooking.
For the salad, mix the curry paste with the boiling water until dissolved. In a separate bowl, mix together the onion, mixed beans, lime juice, malt vinegar, olive oil, coriander and chopped red chilli until well combined.
To serve, divide the salad equally among four serving plates. Place one tandoori trout fillet on top of each portion. Serve the naan bread alongside.