PerCuriam
JOSEPH E. CORCORAN
v.
MARK LEVENHAGEN,
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON
Per Curiam .
An Indiana jury convicted Joseph Corcoran of four counts of murder. Corcoran was sentenced to death. After Corcorans challenges to his sentence in the Indiana courts failed, he sought federal habeas relief. Corcoran argued in his federal habeas petition that: (1) the Indiana trial court committed various errors at the sentencing phase; (2) his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment; (3) Indianas capital sentencing statute was unconstitutional; (4) the prosecution committed misconduct at sentencing; and (5) he should not be executed because he suffers from a mental illness. See Corcoran v. Buss , 483 F. Supp. 2d 709, 719, 726 (ND Ind. 2007). The District Court granted habeas relief on Corcorans claim of a Sixth Amendment violation, and ordered the state courts to resentence Corcoran to a penalty other than death. Id. , at 725726. The District Court did not address Corcorans other arguments relating to his sentence, noting that they were rendered moot by the order that Corcoran be resentenced because of the Sixth Amendment violation. Id. , at 734.
The Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts Sixth Amendment ruling. Corcoran v. Buss , 551 F. 3d 703, 712, 714 (2008). Then, without mentioning Corcorans other sentencing claims, the Seventh Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the writ, stating that Indiana is at liberty to reinstate the death penalty. Id. , at 714. Corcoran sought rehearing, arguing that the Court of Appeals should have allowed the District Court to consider his additional attacks on his sentence. But the Court of Appeals denied rehearing, again without referring to Corcorans undecided claims.
We now grant certiorari and hold that the Seventh Circuit erred in disposing of Corcorans other claims without explanation of any sort. The Seventh Circuit should have permitted the District Court to consider Corcorans unresolved challenges to his death sentence on remand, or should have itself explained why such consideration was unnecessary.
In its brief in opposition, the State argues that Corcorans claims were waived, and that they were in any event frivolous, so that a remand would be wasteful. Brief in Opposition 910. Nothing in the Seventh Circuits opinion, however, suggests that this was the basis for that courts order that the writ be denied.
The petition for certiorari and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PerCuriam
JOSEPH E. CORCORAN
v.
MARK LEVENHAGEN,
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON
Per Curiam .
An Indiana jury convicted Joseph Corcoran of four counts of murder. Corcoran was sentenced to death. After Corcorans challenges to his sentence in the Indiana courts failed, he sought federal habeas relief. Corcoran argued in his federal habeas petition that: (1) the Indiana trial court committed various errors at the sentencing phase; (2) his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment; (3) Indianas capital sentencing statute was unconstitutional; (4) the prosecution committed misconduct at sentencing; and (5) he should not be executed because he suffers from a mental illness. See Corcoran v. Buss , 483 F. Supp. 2d 709, 719, 726 (ND Ind. 2007). The District Court granted habeas relief on Corcorans claim of a Sixth Amendment violation, and ordered the state courts to resentence Corcoran to a penalty other than death. Id. , at 725726. The District Court did not address Corcorans other arguments relating to his sentence, noting that they were rendered moot by the order that Corcoran be resentenced because of the Sixth Amendment violation. Id. , at 734.
The Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts Sixth Amendment ruling. Corcoran v. Buss , 551 F. 3d 703, 712, 714 (2008). Then, without mentioning Corcorans other sentencing claims, the Seventh Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the writ, stating that Indiana is at liberty to reinstate the death penalty. Id. , at 714. Corcoran sought rehearing, arguing that the Court of Appeals should have allowed the District Court to consider his additional attacks on his sentence. But the Court of Appeals denied rehearing, again without referring to Corcorans undecided claims.
We now grant certiorari and hold that the Seventh Circuit erred in disposing of Corcorans other claims without explanation of any sort. The Seventh Circuit should have permitted the District Court to consider Corcorans unresolved challenges to his death sentence on remand, or should have itself explained why such consideration was unnecessary.
In its brief in opposition, the State argues that Corcorans claims were waived, and that they were in any event frivolous, so that a remand would be wasteful. Brief in Opposition 910. Nothing in the Seventh Circuits opinion, however, suggests that this was the basis for that courts order that the writ be denied.
The petition for certiorari and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PerCuriam
JOSEPH E. CORCORAN
v.
MARK LEVENHAGEN,
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON
Per Curiam .
An Indiana jury convicted Joseph Corcoran of four counts of murder. Corcoran was sentenced to death. After Corcorans challenges to his sentence in the Indiana courts failed, he sought federal habeas relief. Corcoran argued in his federal habeas petition that: (1) the Indiana trial court committed various errors at the sentencing phase; (2) his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment; (3) Indianas capital sentencing statute was unconstitutional; (4) the prosecution committed misconduct at sentencing; and (5) he should not be executed because he suffers from a mental illness. See Corcoran v. Buss , 483 F. Supp. 2d 709, 719, 726 (ND Ind. 2007). The District Court granted habeas relief on Corcorans claim of a Sixth Amendment violation, and ordered the state courts to resentence Corcoran to a penalty other than death. Id. , at 725726. The District Court did not address Corcorans other arguments relating to his sentence, noting that they were rendered moot by the order that Corcoran be resentenced because of the Sixth Amendment violation. Id. , at 734.
The Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts Sixth Amendment ruling. Corcoran v. Buss , 551 F. 3d 703, 712, 714 (2008). Then, without mentioning Corcorans other sentencing claims, the Seventh Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the writ, stating that Indiana is at liberty to reinstate the death penalty. Id. , at 714. Corcoran sought rehearing, arguing that the Court of Appeals should have allowed the District Court to consider his additional attacks on his sentence. But the Court of Appeals denied rehearing, again without referring to Corcorans undecided claims.
We now grant certiorari and hold that the Seventh Circuit erred in disposing of Corcorans other claims without explanation of any sort. The Seventh Circuit should have permitted the District Court to consider Corcorans unresolved challenges to his death sentence on remand, or should have itself explained why such consideration was unnecessary.
In its brief in opposition, the State argues that Corcorans claims were waived, and that they were in any event frivolous, so that a remand would be wasteful. Brief in Opposition 910. Nothing in the Seventh Circuits opinion, however, suggests that this was the basis for that courts order that the writ be denied.
The petition for certiorari and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PerCuriam
JOSEPH E. CORCORAN
v.
MARK LEVENHAGEN,
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON
Per Curiam .
An Indiana jury convicted Joseph Corcoran of four counts of murder. Corcoran was sentenced to death. After Corcorans challenges to his sentence in the Indiana courts failed, he sought federal habeas relief. Corcoran argued in his federal habeas petition that: (1) the Indiana trial court committed various errors at the sentencing phase; (2) his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment; (3) Indianas capital sentencing statute was unconstitutional; (4) the prosecution committed misconduct at sentencing; and (5) he should not be executed because he suffers from a mental illness. See Corcoran v. Buss , 483 F. Supp. 2d 709, 719, 726 (ND Ind. 2007). The District Court granted habeas relief on Corcorans claim of a Sixth Amendment violation, and ordered the state courts to resentence Corcoran to a penalty other than death. Id. , at 725726. The District Court did not address Corcorans other arguments relating to his sentence, noting that they were rendered moot by the order that Corcoran be resentenced because of the Sixth Amendment violation. Id. , at 734.
The Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts Sixth Amendment ruling. Corcoran v. Buss , 551 F. 3d 703, 712, 714 (2008). Then, without mentioning Corcorans other sentencing claims, the Seventh Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the writ, stating that Indiana is at liberty to reinstate the death penalty. Id. , at 714. Corcoran sought rehearing, arguing that the Court of Appeals should have allowed the District Court to consider his additional attacks on his sentence. But the Court of Appeals denied rehearing, again without referring to Corcorans undecided claims.
We now grant certiorari and hold that the Seventh Circuit erred in disposing of Corcorans other claims without explanation of any sort. The Seventh Circuit should have permitted the District Court to consider Corcorans unresolved challenges to his death sentence on remand, or should have itself explained why such consideration was unnecessary.
In its brief in opposition, the State argues that Corcorans claims were waived, and that they were in any event frivolous, so that a remand would be wasteful. Brief in Opposition 910. Nothing in the Seventh Circuits opinion, however, suggests that this was the basis for that courts order that the writ be denied.
The petition for certiorari and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PerCuriam
JOSEPH E. CORCORAN
v.
MARK LEVENHAGEN,
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON
Per Curiam .
An Indiana jury convicted Joseph Corcoran of four counts of murder. Corcoran was sentenced to death. After Corcorans challenges to his sentence in the Indiana courts failed, he sought federal habeas relief. Corcoran argued in his federal habeas petition that: (1) the Indiana trial court committed various errors at the sentencing phase; (2) his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment; (3) Indianas capital sentencing statute was unconstitutional; (4) the prosecution committed misconduct at sentencing; and (5) he should not be executed because he suffers from a mental illness. See Corcoran v. Buss , 483 F. Supp. 2d 709, 719, 726 (ND Ind. 2007). The District Court granted habeas relief on Corcorans claim of a Sixth Amendment violation, and ordered the state courts to resentence Corcoran to a penalty other than death. Id. , at 725726. The District Court did not address Corcorans other arguments relating to his sentence, noting that they were rendered moot by the order that Corcoran be resentenced because of the Sixth Amendment violation. Id. , at 734.
The Seventh Circuit reversed the District Courts Sixth Amendment ruling. Corcoran v. Buss , 551 F. 3d 703, 712, 714 (2008). Then, without mentioning Corcorans other sentencing claims, the Seventh Circuit remanded with instructions to deny the writ, stating that Indiana is at liberty to reinstate the death penalty. Id. , at 714. Corcoran sought rehearing, arguing that the Court of Appeals should have allowed the District Court to consider his additional attacks on his sentence. But the Court of Appeals denied rehearing, again without referring to Corcorans undecided claims.
We now grant certiorari and hold that the Seventh Circuit erred in disposing of Corcorans other claims without explanation of any sort. The Seventh Circuit should have permitted the District Court to consider Corcorans unresolved challenges to his death sentence on remand, or should have itself explained why such consideration was unnecessary.
In its brief in opposition, the State argues that Corcorans claims were waived, and that they were in any event frivolous, so that a remand would be wasteful. Brief in Opposition 910. Nothing in the Seventh Circuits opinion, however, suggests that this was the basis for that courts order that the writ be denied.
The petition for certiorari and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.


This is info dialog.
It's the second dialog.
It's bigger than error dialog.
So it should be visible under error dialog when opened.


Ok… so. it’s meme the news time.  I suggest you read it, relax, re-read, go for a walk, sit under a tree and contemplate these memes. Let your body relax into the meme. Feel the meme enter you gently. let it massage your brain. Come back for more tomorrow. Just be careful with these. Meme the News may cause cognitive dissonance, nipple distortion, and rectal enlightenment.
Brennan vs Trump
Obama spied on Trump
Just guessing he’s corrupt here
that’s the knights of Malta…
Queen isn’t happy
Timelines and stories don’t add up here
obviously the gun control people pop up here
is he a nazi or a communist… kinda hard to know… either way he’s s statist!
incitement isn’t protected free speech.
See the woman on the table?  BURN HIM ALIVE!!!
Mom, where does cocaine come from?
 THE USG LITERALLY TRAFFICKS KIDS!
They are human and don’t deserve death by israeli snipers
Can’t confirm this
Podesta and the Chinese
AP knows what they are doing. They just get busted.
Iran deal
Shooters are controlled
can you guess?
I’m down for the royal beheading tho
Public schools are a weapon of mass destruction
THey are literally coming for your guns
know the difference. What we have now sucks
Free thinking and free people
I’d add peaceful to that
But I’m not a pacisfist
TROLOLOLOLOL
Don’t get mixed up with the state
I support our troops. I support ending the war. I support people world over that are the victims of extreme US violence
Whatever… Just get high
Yep…


Luxiren Is a powerful, beautiful and pixel-perfect landing page and portfolio collection. Built with React, Next Js, Material UI, and Sketch files included. It's suitable for Corporate, Startup, Saas company, Agencies, Cloud business, Architect company, Freelancers, Personal portfolios, eCommerce shop, and any type of business to introduce and promote their profile, products, or services.
Luxiren provides you clean modern design along with dark mode to make it easy on your eyes. Beside that multi color scheme is the one of the best feature, so you will easly to adjust the theme with your brand identity. Not stop until that, this template also has RTL support and translation ready with 6 languages.
What's Inside?
This template contain 14 templates + starter-project. Designed for multipurpose industries
including Agency, Architect, Cryptocurrency, Fashion, Hosting, Mobile, 4 Portfolio and Saas.
Those extraordinary things is supported by more than 100 components based on material-ui designs.
That all for you to boost your web app development process. Luxiren is the template you will love to work on.


Gina McKeown
My Work
Home
1 / 3
Caption Text
2 / 3
Caption Two
3 / 3
Caption Three
❮
❯
About
This is Gina McKeown's Adv Programming Workshop website.
This is my personal webiste