Minimal
phonic cues are intended only as a temporary aid to learning. It
is therefore necessary to consider how long they should be used
and in what way they should be discarded. Because there is no changeover
to another script, the way in which the cues are discarded depends
largely on the way in which they have been used.
This example is based on work which was tried in an Infant class of about thirty-five children with a range of five to seven years. Though set out in the form of a progression, individual children were at different points on the programme. Books were not marked but new words were on cued lists.
1. Pre-reading
work to develop language, visual and aural discrimination, interest
in stories, understanding the use of labels to convey meaning, etc.
2. Using means such as wall-stories, captions on the children’s
own pictures, class news books, the breakthrough stand and materials
(Long-man), to aid word matching and sentence matching and to give
the idea that print conveys meaning.
3. Writing begun, letter formation and learning of sounds.
4. Any other reading pursued intuitively by whole-word learning
until at least consonant sounds are known, when they should be used
as guide in conjunction with context clues. Phonic work as suggested
in Chapter 3.
5. After the sound concepts are well established, repetition and
some drilling on sound symbols for about five minutes daily until,
with the cue-card as an aid to memory, MPC can be used for decoding
new words. Children given individual cue-cards to learn and use.
Large wall cue-card provided.
6. MPC then used in one or more of the ways suggested in Chapter
2.
7. If new words are marked on books, children can ignore any marks
they don’t need. Once a vocabulary of about 150 words is known,
(usually by about the fourth book of a reading scheme), work could
begin on extracting the rules of spelling and pronunciation using
some system of word analysis. MPC dictionaries could still be used,
but group teaching using MPC Spelling Workbook will now speed the
process of internalising the sound-symbol relationships before children
go on to a Junior class.
In age-grouped classes the programme should be begun and proceed
as far as possible, with records kept on children’s progress
so that it can be continued without interruption according to individual
needs. An ideal form for such records is shown in Figure 8, using
squared paper. The stages may be groups of sounds learnt, books
read or any graded set of skills. It is then easy to group children
for practice by lookng down the record to see which are at the same
stage.
Figure 8
|
To achieve
the maximum benefit this programme should be agreed and co-ordinated
throughout an Infant department. If some teachers wish to use MPC,
while others do not, it should be used only incidentally to aid
understanding and not be relied on too heavily. Partial use in this
way is not confusing because no departure has been made from normal
spelling. No harm will be done if MPC is incompletely mastered by
the time of transfer to another school, provided that analysis was
not over-emphasised at a stage when it was only confusing rather
than helpful to a child who could have made some progress by whole
word learning and use of context. Slow-learning children are greatly
helped in later ‘remedial’ work (though this is a misnomer
for children properly taught) if they really know the sounds and
digraphs thoroughly, whether cues are to be used or not. If cues
are used in later teaching of slow-learners, a basic knowledge of
the sounds as shown on the cue-card will enable quick progress to
be made once the child has attained the mental maturity necessary
for satisfactory analysis and synthesis. Independent learning using
cues will then also be helped.
The transfer
consists of ‘internalising’ the cues; knowing that an
‘e’ at the end of a word is not sounded, that ‘gh’
is similar, but may modify the preceding vowel, that ‘-tion’
is sounded ‘shon’, etc.; the things which good readers
do unconsciously without cues. Cues aid this normal process and,
having made it more conscious, also help spelling.
The MPC spelling Workbook defines
the main spelling rules, using cues, and suggests children’s
activities for each rule. In this way, learning is reinforced. The
book’s contents are briefly listed below. Of course, these
are all rules which have to be learnt whether MPC is used or not.
The progression is designed to ensure that children who have used
MPC in the early stages are finally able to discard it while getting
as much value as possible from it. Each page of the MPC
Spelling Workbook could serve as the source material for
a group lesson or discussion.
Lesson
1
Unsounded letters: indicated by putting a cross above the letter.
Children find words with final e and copy them.
Double letters: explain how only one is sounded.
Lesson
2
e at the end of a word sometimes makes the preceding
vowel ‘hard’.
Lesson
3
The two main ways of spelling .
and ,
which sound the same and are regular.
Lesson
4
and ,
including the
sound in all, talk, for, more, door, etc. Adding the marks
will help to reinforce the sound-symbol correspondence or discrepancy.
Lesson
5
c sounded either as k or as s.
Help pupils, by looking at the words they have found, to deduce
that rule that e and i following
c make it produce the soft sound s.
Lesson
6
g and j sounds.
Lesson
7
gh usually unsounded, but modifying other symbols.
(It is better not to deal with gh as the sound
f here, but leave it to go with ph
as an alternative, later on.)
Lesson
8
ch when the h is unsounded.
Lesson
9
The er sound.
Lesson
10
Silent consonants: k, g, w. There is no harm in
doing some written-learning to try to help children remember the
spellings, but using the words in various meaningful ways should
also play a part.
Lesson
11
s sometimes sounding like z.
Lesson
12
The vowel sounds; a, e, i, o, u; a, e, i, o, u
and ah, er, oi, oo, oo, aw, ou. Point out that
these sounds vary much more than consonants in the ways they are
spelt, partly because speech has changed over the years and in different
places.
Lessons
14,15
Ways of spelling the ‘hard’ vowels, e.g. ai,
ay, a-e; ee, e-e, ea, ie, ei; i-e, y, igh, ei; ow, oa, o-e; ue,
eu, u-e; oo spelt in various ways. The teacher must, of
course, use professional judgement as to how much of this children
can do at a time, and when. If giving too many alternatives only
seems to confuse it may be better left until later.
Lessons
16, 18
mo sounding mu, ph
as f, f as v or changing to v,
and gh as f. Although these sounds
could be quite difficult and confusing without MPC, the marks make
them clear and more interesting.
Lessons
25, 26
Breaking words into syllables. As well as being able to sound out
c-a-t, etc., the reader must be able to sound c-a-f
or d-a-l, because these are syllables within words. Attention
to syllable-reading is often neglected and is a cause of some difficulties.
Obviously, this work is done as needed, and not otherwise.
Lessons
27,28
The various sounds and spellings of –tion, -sion and
–cian. These are mainly longer words and children
need to be advanced in their reading to cope with them.
Lessons
29, 30
Alphabetical order, needed for looking up words and for listing
things, is sometimes neglected. See that children can recite the
letters of the alphabet in order at some point, and also give practice
in thinking whether one letter comes before another, to help in
looking forward or back. Plenty of practice is needed in various
ways before children can use a dictionary quickly and, of course,
small wordbooks, followed by 500-word, 1000-word or 2000-word dictionaries
may help children to reach the stage of using a bigger one. The
MPC Word List will be found
very useful here. Exercises on finding a word its second or third
letter are also needed, e.g. because, before, behind.
Lesson
31
Check that all small letters and capital letters are known. For
bright and average children this should be so by the time they transfer
from Infant to Junior classes. Once children can read and write
with reasonable fluency it is better for them to use the letter-names
for spellings. For the less-able this should be postponed until
they can read without needing to build up sounds aloud, or they
will get confused. Eventually, both will be known. If MPC has been
used systematically, capital letters which differ from lower-case
will have been marked with substitutions.
Home - The Author - Teachers book - Materials and Resources - Forums - Testimonials
© 2005 Margaret Sanders. Page last modified: August 26, 2017.
Website design and development by www.odlogo.co.uk.


{% load static %}
Home
About
Contact
{% if user.is_authenticated %}
{{ user.first_name }}({{ user.username }})
Logout
{% else %}
{% csrf_token %}
Login
Sign Up
{% endif %}
{% csrf_token %}
Add a review about {{dealer_id}}
Enter the review content:
Has purchased the car from {{dealer_id}} ?
(select purchased car information below if checked)
Select your car (model-make-year):
{% for car in cars %}
{{car.carmake.name}}-{{car.name}}-{{car.year|date:"Y"}}
{% endfor %}
Select Your Purchase Date:
Submit


| Height | Age | Transactions | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for blocks... | |||
| {{b.height}} | {{humanSince(b.time)}} | {{b.txlength}} | {{b.size}} |
| Hash | Value Out | |
|---|---|---|
| Waiting for transactions... | ||
| {{tx.txid}} | {{$root.currency.getConvertion(tx.valueOut)}} |
Marmara Credit Loops (MCL) is the first and the only Decentralized Finance (DeFi) system in the World designed to run in real economy.
The system rewards buyers and sellers when shopping with credit loops instead of cash. It works as an independent smart chain with a 25% mineable and 75% stakeable coin integrated with two DeFi protocols. The system uses UTXO based Turing Complete Smart Contracting system powered by Komodo Platform.
Marmara Chain is protected against 51% attacks by means of Komodo dPoW technologies which recycle the hash power of Bitcoin by backing up independent blockhains on the Bitcoin network. Staking could only be done when users lock their coins in one of the two funds, namely; "Activated" and "Locked in Credit Loop" (LCL) funds. When coins are locked in LCL funds, both issuer and holder(s) of credit have the chance for 3x staking. The system has a unique solution for coins locked in credit loops unlike other staking systems. Locking coins into credit loops for staking does not make them static. Instead, they can be circulated while they are locked and doing 3x staking. The process of credit endorsement is designed to assure that it is only worth when shopping.
This explorer is currently showing the live Marmara network!


Public Member Functions | |
| BookSearchPanel (int headerType, boolean editable, Controller controller) | |
| void | setSearchTerm (String searchTerm) |
| String | getSearchTerm () |
| Book | getBook () |
| int | getState () |
| String | getGenre () |
| int | getOrder () |
| void | update (Observable sender, Object obj) |
Static Public Attributes | |
| static final int | WIDTH = 1020 |
| static final int | HEIGHT = 500 |
| static final int | GENERAL_SEARCH = 0 |
| static final int | ADD_EDIT_SEARCH = 1 |
Class : BookSearchPanel.java Author : Larry "Bucky" Kittinger Date : Dec 1, 2012 Desc : Panel to manage the book searches
| w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.BookSearchPanel | ( | int | headerType, |
| boolean | editable, | ||
| Controller | controller | ||
| ) |
Create the panel.
| Book w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.getBook | ( | ) |
method to get the from the book info panel
| String w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.getGenre | ( | ) |
method to get the selected genre for searching
| int w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.getOrder | ( | ) |
method to get the selected sort order
| String w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.getSearchTerm | ( | ) |
method to retrieve the search term from the form
| searchTerm | return |
| int w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.getState | ( | ) |
method to get the current state of the panel
| void w3se.View.Panels.BookSearchPanel.setSearchTerm | ( | String | searchTerm | ) |
method to retrieve the search term from the form
| searchTerm |


Uses of Class
com.mypurecloud.sdk.v2.model.PhoneCapabilities
-
Uses of PhoneCapabilities in com.mypurecloud.sdk.v2.model
Modifier and TypeMethodDescriptionPhoneCapabilities.allowReboot
(Boolean allowReboot) PhoneCapabilities.dualRegisters
(Boolean dualRegisters) Phone.getCapabilities()
PhoneBase.getCapabilities()
PhoneCapabilities.hardwareIdType
(String hardwareIdType) PhoneCapabilities.mediaCodecs
(List<PhoneCapabilities.MediaCodecsEnum> mediaCodecs) PhoneCapabilities.noCloudProvisioning
(Boolean noCloudProvisioning) PhoneCapabilities.noRebalance
(Boolean noRebalance) PhoneCapabilities.provisions
(Boolean provisions) Modifier and TypeMethodDescriptionPhone.capabilities
(PhoneCapabilities capabilities) PhoneBase.capabilities
(PhoneCapabilities capabilities) void
Phone.setCapabilities
(PhoneCapabilities capabilities) void
PhoneBase.setCapabilities
(PhoneCapabilities capabilities)


glink
Create short aliases for URLs
Type the alias in the address bar and hit the enter, then you will be redirected to the corresponding URL.
Go to luoos/glink for troubleshooting.
Add Rule
Rules


between 2018 and 2019 i recorded, mixed and co-produced Chilean artist Playa Fome's first EP, called Llamadas Telefónicas. since then i have collaborated with Playa Fome in further mixing and publishing of the artist's output, including Ssshh, his second EP. these releases and other music projects are done under my record label bandurria.
Aarón Montoya-Moraga:
Playa Fome:
the EP is available on Bandcamp and all other streaming platforms
Botella is the album's second single
the EP was recorded and mixed at the bandurria recording studio. here i house my instrument collection, that i play and research as a multi-instrumentalist, producer, and instrument maker, including:
all instruments, except a few exceptions were recorded by Playa Fome, with my assistance for MIDI and drum machine programming
Playa Fome's second EP was written and recorded during the pandemic, while he was based in France and i was in the USA, so i only did the mixing of this record, and we are currently working on his third EP


The Supreme Court concluded: The application of SAFEMA to the relatives and associates [in clauses (c) and (d) of Section 2(2)] is equally valid and effective inasmuch as the purpose and object of bringing such persons within the net of SAFEMA is to reach the properties of the detenu or convict, as the case may be, wherever they are, howsoever they are held and by whomsoever they are held. They are not conceived with a view to forfeit the independent properties of such relatives and associates as explained in this judgment. SAFEMA targets for forfeiture 'illegally acquired property' of a person (defined as a convict or detenu under specified enactments and relative or associate of such convict or detenu (the expression relative or associate also defined)). This is a 1976 enactment that provides for forfeiture of illegally acquired properties of smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators. The Act, on the other hand, specifically targets the wider pathology of money-laundering in relation to a large number of scheduled offences enumerated from a variety of specified legislations. In the context of the objects sought to be achieved by the Act and the specificity of the definitions of the expressions "money- laundering" and "proceeds of crime"; the inherence of the burden of proof on a person accused of an offence under Section 3 (Section 24) and the presumptions in inter-connected transactions (Section 23), it is clear that what is targeted for confiscation is proceeds of crime in the ownership, control or possession of any person and not all property or proceeds of all crime in the ownership, control or possession of any person.
80 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Again, in Smt. Heena Kausar Vs. Competent
Authority 2008 (7) SCALE 331 the validity of the proviso to Section 68 - C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act, 1985, (NDPS Act, 1985), prior to its amendment by Central Act 9 of 2001 fell for the consideration of the Supreme Court. Dealing with the challenge the Supreme Court observed: "...The purported object for which such a statute has been enacted must be noticed in interpreting the provisions thereof. The nexus of huge amount of money generated by drug trafficking and the purpose for which they are spent is well known ... Necessity was felt for introduction of strict measures so that money earned from the drug trafficking by the persons concerned may not continue to be invested, inter alia, by purchasing moveable or immoveable properties not only in his own name but also in the names of his near relatives." In Heena Kausar (supra) interpreting similar provisions in Chapter VA of the NDPS Act, 1985, the Apex Court pointed out that the property sought to be forfeited must be one which has a direct nexus with the income, etc, derived by way of contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or any property acquired therefrom. The Court explained that the meaning of "identification of such property" (a phrase employed in Section 68 - E of Chapter VA), is that the property was derived from or used in the illicit traffic. The SAFEMA; The NDPS Act, 1985; The Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988; and The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 are illustrations of statutes that incorporate provisions for forfeiture, confiscation or acquisition without compensation, of property derived, acquired, possessed or dealt with in contravention of specified legislative prescriptions. The Act is a later statute to the aforementioned Acts and specifically 81 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch targets the perceived evil of money-laundering. The category of offences enumerated in Parts A, B and C of the Schedule of the Act elucidate the legislative intent that the several offences and the unlawful gains/wealth derived therefrom by malfeasant(s) are targeted and confiscated, including from others when the property being the derivative of criminal activity is laundered through one or more layered transactions and finds its way to the ownership, control or possession of non- offenders as well; but in respect of scheduled offences. The object of the Act is to prevent money - laundering and connected activities and confiscation of "proceeds of crime" and preventing legitimising of the money earned through illegal and criminal activities by investments in moveable and immoveable properties often involving layering of the money generated through illegal activities, i.e., by inducting and integrating the money with legitimate money and its species like moveable and immovable property. Therefore, it is that the Act defines the expression "proceeds of crime" expansively to sub- serve the broad objectives of the Act. We thus do not find any infirmity in the provisions of the Act.***************************** As we have observed earlier in this judgment in another context, the provisions of Sections 3, 5, 8, 23 and 24 are also inter-related provisions and must be considered as components of a statutory symphony that elucidate the true scope of the onus probandi and the burden of proof. **************** In Raghavanna v. Chenchamma AIR 1964 SC 136 , Subba Rao, J (as his Lordship then was) again explained the distinction between burden of proof and onus:...There is an essential distinction between burden of proof and onus of proof: burden of proof lies upon the person who has to prove a fact and it never shifts, but 82 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch the onus of proof shifts. The burden of proof in the present case, undoubtedly lies upon the plaintiff to establish the factum of adoption and that of partition. The said circumstances do not alter the incidence of the burden of proof. Such considerations, having regard to the circumstances of a particular case, may shift the onus of proof. Such a shifting of onus is a continuous process in the evaluation of evidence. *****************." Thus, but for Section 45(1)(ii) of the Act, where from the Public Prosecutor on notice once opposes the application for bail, bail cannot be granted to accused of the offence under Section 3 of the Act unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail, is struck down to the above extent by the Apex Court in Nikesh Tarachand Shah supra as per law as on date, all other provisions of the Act with amendments in 2005 and 2009 are held constitutionally valid. It is also made clear from the discussion supra that for the offence under Section 3 of the Act, mensrea is an essential component from attribution of knowledge and there from burden to prove his innocence and of acted in good faith and without knowledge."
9. From this now coming back to the specific provisions among all those of the Act relevant to answer the issue, in this regard Section 71 of the Act clearly speaks that the provisions of the Act shall have effect notwithstanding inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force. It has the overriding effect to the provisions of the Act over any other law for the time being in force provided it is shown that other law is inconsistent with the provisions of the Act. It is to be seen therefrom whether the Act not 83 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch covered any area and if so whether the Cr.P.C. provisions then applicable provided those are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, leave about other any law in force for the time being to consider any inconsistency from any provisions thereunder. From this now coming to the Section 46 of the Act at the cost of repetition it specifically speaks that Cr.P.C. provisions are applicable to the proceedings before the Special Court. From what Section 46 reproduced supra, Section 46(1) from the very wording supra of save as otherwise provided in this Act the provisions of the code in entirety which includes provisions as to bails or bonds shall apply to the proceedings before the special Court and for the purpose of said provisions the special Court shall be deemed to a Court of Session. Thus Cr.P.C. is applicable to the proceedings before the special Court save as otherwise specifically provided in the Act if not inconsistent therewith in the Act or anything inconsistent therewith to prevail to the extent the Act provisions specifically provided as special law taking away of the application of the Cr.P.C. provisions. Thus, the Act provisions are applicable in addition to and not in derogation to what is specially provided in the Act.
10. In this regard, the Apex Court in State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh7 on the scope of Sections 4 & 5 Cr.P.C. r/w Sections 41 to 43 & 51 of NDPS Act and Sections 100, 102 & 165 Cr.P.C. observed that NDPS Act is not a complete code 7 1994 3 SCC 299 84 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch incorporating all the provisions relating to search, seizure or arrest etc., and the words in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act are significant enough worded in the Section 51 of the Act say that the provisions of Cr.P.C. as per Section 4 of the code shall be applicable in so far as they are not inconsistent with the NDPS Act from the combined reading of the provisions for the reason Section 4(2) Cr.P.C. provides that all the offences under any other law shall be investigated and inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to the same provisions (of Cr.P.C.) but subject to any enactment for the time being in force regulating the manner or place of investigation, inquire into, or try or otherwise dealing with such offence. It is incorporated clearly particularly in the expression at Para 5 in use of the words otherwise deal with it is not necessarily mean something which is not included in the Act but for points out to the fact that the expression deal with is of comprehensive and that the investigation inquiry and trial some of the aspects dealing with offences. Consequently the provisions of Cr.P.C. shall be applicable in so far as they are not inconsistent with NDPS Act including to warrants, searches, seizure or arrest etc., made under this Act. Further with reference to the provisions of the SC & ST (POA) Act 1989 the Apex Court in Gangula Ashok Vs. State of AP8 by quoting with approval the expression of the Division 8 2000 (2) SCC 504 85 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Bench of this Court in Referring Officer represented State of AP Vs. Shekar Nair9 and by quoting the constitution bench expression of the Apex Court in AR Antulay supra and Director of Enforcement Vs. Deepak Mahajan10 among other particularly at Paras 12 to 15 referring to Section 4(2) Cr.P.C. and the provisions of the SC & ST (POA) Act that Section 4(2) makes it clear that subject to provisions of other enactment, all offences under other laws shall also be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with under the provisions of the code to mean if any enactment contained any provisions which is contrary to the code such other provision would apply in place of particular provisions of the code and if there is no such contrary provision in other laws then the provisions of the code would apply to the matters covered thereby as held in Para 16 by AR Antulay supra by the Constitution Bench of the Apex court and also as held in Para 128 of Deepak Mahajan supra by making clear that it only relates to the extent application of the code where there is no contrary provision in the special Act or any special provision excluding the application of the code by the special Act. Thus as referred supra of Section 71 of the Act is nothing new to Section 4(2) of the code and from the reading of the provisions of the Act there is nothing stated of to prosecute a public servant including to take cognizance by the special Court no sanction under the code or any other law 9 1999 (3) ALT 533 10 1994 (3) SCC 440 86 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch is required. It is nothing specifically stated excluding the application of the code in the PML Act from the provisions referred supra. It is only then to see any of the provisions of the Act are inconsistent to the code to apply with reference to Section 4(2) of the code, Section 197 Cr.P.C. as otherwise applicable from the expressions supra that what even the Constitution Bench expression in AR Antulay supra laid down as referred supra and quoted with approval in the expressions supra.
11. Before undertaking further discussion, coming back to the other provisions of the Act, Section 44(1)(b) speaks that notwithstanding anything contained in Cr.P.C. the special Court may upon complaint made by an authority authorized in this behalf by the Act take cognizance of the offence under Section 3 without accused is committed to it for trial. The special Court's power of taking cognizance without committal is provided thereby irrespective of what is contained in Cr.P.C. and nothing beyond, much less to construe other provisions of the code for taking cognizance no way applicable. In fact from the silence in the provisions for nothing in the Act provisions inconsistent to the code from the reading of Section 4(2) of the code with the provisions supra, Section 197 Cr.P.C. sanction for taking cognizance is a pre-requisite to proceed against a public servant. Thus it does not mean if at all sanction to prosecute otherwise is required to take cognizance, no way required because not 87 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch specifically provided by Section 44(1)(b) of the Act. Even from the very wording of Section 45 no need to reproduce herein supra only the non-absentee clause is in relation to cognizance making the offence cognizable and non-bailable to say Section 4(2) r/w schedule II of Cr.P.C. cannot be looked into because of the contrary specific provision herein. Even from Section 45(1)(a) of the amended Act the non-absentee clause is against police officers power to investigate under Cr.P.C. without authorization by special or general order of the Central Government.
12. Now from this coming to the contention of the learned counsel of the Directorate of Enforcement in this regard to answer concerned what they stated of cognizance is under Section 44 of the Act and not under Section 190 Cr.P.C. thereby bar under Section 197 Cr.P.C. to take cognizance would not apply is for the reason supra not at all tenable to appreciate.
13. Now from this coming to the other important provision contained in the Act which provides to apply Cr.P.C. specifically in some areas viz., Section 65 which reads that the provisions of the code shall apply to mean must be applied as applicable automatically to the extent indicated that is in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the code, to arrest, search and seizure, attachment, confiscation, investigation, prosecution and all other proceedings under this Act. So far as taking of 88 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch cognizance by the special Court referred supra requirement or non-requirement of sanction is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act for there is no provision saying no sanction is required. In view of that even Section 65 of the Act made applicable for prosecution the provisions of the Code and prosecution includes particularly taking of cognizance thereby what Cr.P.C. provides of mandatory requirement of sanction to prosecute a public servant for the acts done in discharge of or in the purported discharge of official duties as the case may be. What Section 71 of the Act at the cost of repetition once again referred supra says is the Act provisions prevail over any other law in force to the extent of inconsistent and not other acts including the provisions of the code not at all applicable even there is no any inconsistency and from the above the Act is silent in that area and from this and reading of Sections 65, 71 of the Act in particular and with reference to Sections 43 to 46 of the Act in general with Section 4(2) of the Code and the expressions referred supra, the provisions of the Code is applicable to the investigation, prosecution and other proceedings under the Act save to the extent not specifically provided inconsistent therewith that what the expressions referred supra laid down right from the constitution bench expression in AR Antulay supra on the scope of law. The expression besides prosecution all other proceedings 89 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch under this Act in applying the Code where the Act is silent and not inconsistent with from its provisions is very clear that the Act is not a complete code and provisions of Cr.P.C. apply where the act is silent in the area from Section 46 and even otherwise so far as the prosecution and all other proceedings not specifically provided in the Act the provisions of the code specifically made applicable by virtue of this Section 65 of the Act. Thus once there is no procedure specifically provided for prosecution but for simply saying on the complaint to take cognizance under Section 44(1)(b) of the Act it cannot be contended no sanction to take cognizance is required if otherwise sanction is required from the provisions of the Code as taking of cognizance is part of prosecution for which by virtue of Section 65 also to read with otherwise even in the absence of Section 65 from the wording of Section 46 of the Act, Section 197 Cr.P.C. is applicable.
14. There is no quarrel on the proposition placed reliance by the learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement from the expression of the Apex Court in Rohtas supra with reference to Sections 4 & 5 of the code and Harayana Children Act 1974 as a special law that was in force even by the time the Code 1973 came into force and that special law provided procedure and that is saved by clearly as exception carved out by Section 5 of the Code.
90 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch
15. Coming to the other expression placed reliance by the learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement of the Apex Court in VC Chinnappa Goudar supra with reference to Sections 4(2), 5 & 197 Cr.P.C. and the provisions of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 particularly Sections 48, 49 & 60 of the Act and importance of the non- absentee clause in saying in that Act under Section 49 cognizance of offence provided which says to file the case against the accused by placing the complaint before the Court concerned and the prescription contained in the said Section are intended only for fulfilling said requirement and therefore going by the heading of the Section it cannot be held that the Magistrate can straightaway take cognizance of an offence dehors the non-compliance with the requirements under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is the contention of the learned counsel for the accused, whereas the contention of the prosecution agency (Pollution Control Board) is with reference to Section 48 which speaks there is rebuttal presumption so far as guilt of the offence concerned and Section 60 of the Act speaks of punishment therefrom to get it attracts and in view of this to read with Section 5 of the code there is no specific provision providing for sanction to be secured for proceeding against the public servant under the Act and if one can visualize the situation where Section 197 Cr.P.C. is made applicable in respect of prosecution under the Act and in that process sanction refused by the State that would virtually negate the 91 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch deemed fiction power provided by Section 48 to apply Section 60 of the Act to find guilty the head of the Department of Government concerned and as a consequence automatic coming to play of Section 60 of the Act with overriding effect over any other enactment other than the Act there is no scope for invoking Section 197 Cr.P.C. even if the appellants were the public servant was the conclusion. In fact that expression confined to its own facts and mainly by placing reliance upon Section 60 of the Act and the same cannot be equated with Sections 23 & 24 of PML Act. As per the expression in VC Chinnappa Goudar supra there is a legal fiction of committing the offence by the Head of the Department of the Government to punish by Section 60 of the Act and no such fiction but for only a rebuttal presumption with reverse onus clause at best that too on showing the accused got prima facie knowledge in money laundering to constitute an offence under Section 3 of the Act that to be established by prosecution and as such the proposition has no application to say by the learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement of no sanction of the public servant to prosecute under the PML Act is required to take cognizance or to proceed for post cognizance enquiry and trial for the offence under Section 3 & 4 of the Act. In fact the expression in VC Chinnappa supra did not refer any of the earlier binding expressions on the scope of the Section 4(2) of the Code including from the Constitution Bench expression of 92 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch the Apex Court in AR Antulay supra leave apart Section 65 of the PML Act clearly says the provisions of the Code are applicable for prosecution and so far as the prosecution concerned, there is no other provision and even for investigation the provisions of the Code made applicable save to some extent who are the authorities to investigate provided by the provisions of the Act.
16. Coming to the expression in B. Rama Raju Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, rep. By its Secretary (Revenue), New Delhi11 that is already discussed supra of the Act is observed as complete code by importing the provisions of the Code also into it to the extent not inconsistent and in the areas silence and not otherwise and the Act is thereby not in its own a complete code without reading the provisions of the code into it like under NDPS Act and SC & ST (POA) Act as held by the Apex Court in Balbir Singh supra, Gangula Ashok supra quoted with approval in AR Antulay supra.
17. Coming to the other expression they placed reliance on YS Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation12 in relation to multiple investigations involving many superiors in more than 7 matters on the grant or non- granting of bail and on the scope of Section 167 Cr.P.C. and Section 173 Cr.P.C. r/w 439 Cr.P.C. what was observed in Para 29 that placed reliance only on the submission of the 11 2011 (3) ALT 443 (DB) 12 2013 (7) SCC 439 93 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch counsel for the CBI that in the investigation relating to India Cements of amounts exchanged between the parties under illegal quid pro quo investments into group of companies of A.1 about Rs.140 crores and received benefits in the form of permission for additional quantity of water from Kagna and Krishna rivers and lease of lands and investigation is almost complete are at least more than half the way. That observation is only for the purpose of bail and not even final report finding much less other than to refer as contention no any way useful in deciding the case on hand including of Adityanath Das in the writ petition No.2253 of 2018 facing allegation regarding allocation of additional water from rivers Krishna and its tributary Kagna.
18. Coming to the single judge expression of the Sikkim High Court in Smt. Usha Agarwal Vs. Union of India13 placed reliance on Paras 58 to 61 of the judgment discussed therein particularly Sections 23, 24 & 45 of the Act r/w 101 & 102 of the Evidence Act and Sections 437 & 439 Cr.P.C. in relations to the grant of bail, it is categorically observed that the presumption envisaged for burden of proof in Section 24 of the Act is a rebuttal presumption to afford opportunity to the accused to establish that the property in his favour or the value of any such property acquired is by legal means and not by any illegal methods and it will not comprise any offence under Section 3 of the Act or to explain the source of the 13 2018 Crl.L.J. 691 94 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch property in his possession so that the burden shifts on the prosecution to rebut the said evidence and in view of that said provision no way can be called unconstitutional including making the special penal provision a non-bailable offence by Section 45 of the Act by referring to the provisions of the NDPS Act in this regard to that conclusion.
19. Coming to the other expression placed reliance by them of the Apex Court in Gautam Kundu Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), Government of India through Manoj Kumar, Assistant Director, Eastern Region14 it is in relation to grant of bail and questioning the fulfillment of conditions of Section 45 of the Act where Sections 44, 45, 24, 65 & 71 of the Act referred in saying the rebuttal burden put by Section 24 of the Act is with reverse onus on the accused and the riders provided under Section 45 of the Act are in addition to the riders provided in Sections 437 & 439 Cr.P.C. thereby held not entitled to the bail. Even from this the presumption is rebuttal with reverse onus clause and provisions of Cr.P.C. also applicable to consider as additional provisions to what is provided in Section 45 of the Act including to bail to an accused involved in Section 3 of the PML Act. Thus the decision is no way helpful to say the provisions of Cr.P.C. have no application to the PML Act or no sanction is required to prosecute a public servant.
14
2015 (16) SCC 1
95 Dr.SSRB,J
Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch
20. Coming to the other decision of the three Judge Bench expression of the Apex Court in PK Pradhan Vs. State of Sikkim represented by the Central Bureau of Investigation15 on the scope of Section 197 Cr.P.C. what is observed therein is question of requirement of sanction for prosecution even cognizance taken without sanction can be raised by accused at any time after cognizance of the offences taken including during trial and at conclusion of trial or even after conviction. There is no quarrel on the proposition of the unfettered and indefeasible right available to the accused once Section 197 Cr.P.C. requirement of sanction is there and if no sanction obtained and cognizance taken without such sanction, to question. For that matter the Apex Court even subsequently reiterating the same held in State of Karnataka through CBI Vs. C.Nagarajaswamy16 that once sanction is required under law by a statutory provision though the question to be dealt with at the stage of taking cognizance by the Court, even cognizance taken in ignorance of the same or erroneously the right of the accused no way ceases and once the same came to the notice of the Court at any later stage including even brought by accused a finding on the requirement of sanction or not has to be given by the Court and the accused is also entitled to take such pleas at any point of time including even in hearing the appeal before the appellate Court of requirement of sanction and without 15 2001 (6) SCC 704 16 2005 (8) SCC 370 96 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch which the cognizance taken is no way to survive. Same was the conclusion arrived by the Apex Court in State of Goa Vs. Babu Thomas that taking of cognizance by a Court against a public servant of the alleged offence connected with his duty without sanction is incompetent and the error was so fundamental that invalidates the proceedings right from the stage of cognizance and the Apex Court in State of Harayana Vs. Bhajan Lal17 at Paras 101 & 102 laid down the guidelines one of which includes quashing of the proceedings for want of sanction as bar of law.
21. Coming to the contention of learned counsel Sri Manmadharao by placing reliance on the three judge bench expression of the Apex Court in SS Dhanoa Vs. Municipal Corporation Delhi18, his contention on behalf of Directorate of Enforcement is that the APIIC Managing Director-cum- Chairman is not a public servant under Section 21 IPC. In the expression in SS Dhanoa, what was observed is that employee of super bazaar a cooperative society is not a public servant. In fact the Super bazaar at Connaught place on facts with 12 branches was a society registered under Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 and the employees therein are not public servants under Section 21 IPC to require sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. to prosecute them for the misdemeanor. It is observed that the super bazaar is not owned by any Government and not under the control of the 17 AIR 1992 SC 604=1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 18 AIR 1981 SC 1395 97 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Government and not connected with the affairs of the Union or the State but managing only by a private society and thereby sanction not required to prosecute employee of the super bazaar by invoking Section 197 Cr.P.C. In fact who is a public servant is enumerated in Section 21 IPC in deciding whether sanction is required or not to prosecute such public servant. Without any difficulty and without quarrel to the proposition placed reliance, it can be said that said decision has no application to the case on hand even that of BP Acharya the quash petitioner in the 2 quash petitions as Chairman and Managing Director of APIIC more particularly for the reason the APIIC is the Government owned corporation under the control of the Government from the very complaint averments in the complaint sought for quashing as discussed in the previous Paras supra as part of the pleadings.
22. Having regard to the above, the contention has no legs to stand in saying to prosecute the Chairman and Managing Director of APIIC sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not required or that he is though an IAS Officer not a public servant. In fact this Court in Crl.P.No.2345 of 2017 in LV Subrahmanyam Vs. State of Telangana19 where he was arrayed as A11 and the petitioner herein was A1, it is categorically observed that they are public servants and sanction is required under Section 197 Cr.P.C. and under Section 19 of PC Act respectively for the IPC offences and PC 19 2018 (1) ALT (Crl.) 322 98 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Act offences and also discussed the role of the Chairman and Managing Director of APIIC as limited.
23. Coming to the other decision placed reliance by the learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement in Subramanian Swamy Vs. Manmohan Singh20 in dealing with the sanction to prosecute a public servant on private complaint it was observed even a private party can apply for according sanction to prosecute a public servant and that must be decided as laid down in Vineet Narain within three months with any consultation outer limit of one month if at all to consult AG or other law officer of AG with reference to CVC guidelines 2005 and the private party seeking sanction must be informed of the decision on sanction application to enable him to avail appropriate remedy if not satisfied with the decision not according sanction. The person against whom the sanction is to be accorded need not be given any opportunity of hearing for according sanction but for to take a decision on the material placed by application of mind to the material. What is observed of when sanction under Section 19 of PC Act applies not in dispute, however the scope of Section 197 Cr.P.C. is different to Section 19 of PC Act undisputedly and also as referred therein. It was discussed in Para 64 of the judgment that from prosecution by taking of cognizance is barred from want of sanction proceeded without sanction. It is however observed that under the PC Act if a 20 2012 (3) SCC 64 99 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch special provision is made on a certain matter that matter is excluded from the general provisions in Cr.P.C. and the provisions of Section 19 PC Act will not have an overriding effect on general provision of Section 190 Cr.P.C. There is no dispute on that so far as taking of cognizance, but for what is discussed supra of mere private complaint to take cognizance directly by special Court does not mean from any such provision under the PML Act, exclusion of the requirement of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. that too Section 65 of the Act specifically says for prosecution the provisions of the code are applicable and as submitted supra prosecution including taking of cognizance subject to sanction and Section 197 Cr.P.C. requirement must be fulfilled. What is the contention referring to PK Pradhan supra of the sanction can be required or not to be considered during trial and there is nothing to find fault the cognizance taken by the special Court under PML Act is also untenable from what is discussed supra for not a case of any ambiguity on the requirement of sanction or not to consider after some factual aspects to be elicited from the evidence to be adduced.
24. In fact in State of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. Budhikota Subbarao21 it is categorically observed referring to the Code and requirement of sanction to prosecute a public servant under Section 197 Cr.P.C., to prosecute for the offence under 21 1993 (3) SCC 339 100 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Sections 24, 18 & 19 of Atomic Energy Act 1962 saying sanction is mandatory to take cognizance by the Court for the alleged offence under the Act are in discharge of official duty and from the non-compliance with the requirement of Section 197 Cr.P.C. to take cognizance, the order of discharge of accused passed by the High Court was upheld by the Apex Court.
25. Here before going further it is to consider what is meant by prosecution used in Section 65 of the Act for more clarity, for what the prosecution is not defined in the code or in the IPC r/w Section 2(y) of the Code or even in any provisions of the Act or even by the Constitution of India in dealing with the scope of Article 20 of the Constitution of India. In fact the five judge constitution bench of the Apex Court in Thomas Dana & Leo Roy Frey respectively Vs. State of Punjab22 considered the meaning and scope of prosecution particularly at Para 10 which reads as follows:
"To "prosecute", in the special sense of law, means, according to Webster's Dictionary, "(a) to seek to obtain, enforce, or the like, by legal process; as, to prosecute a right or a claim in a court of law. (b) to pursue (a person) by legal proceedings for redress or punishment; to proceed against judicially; espy., to accuse of some crime or breach of law, or to pursue for redress or punishment of a crime or violation of law, in due legal form before a legal tribunal; as, to prosecute a man for trespass, or for a riot." According to Wharton's Law Lexicon, 14th edn., p.810, 22 AIR 1959 SC 375 101 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch "prosecution" means "a proceeding either by way of indictment or information,, in the criminal courts, in order to put an offender upon his trial. In all criminal prosecutions the King is nominally the prosecutor." This very question was discussed by this Court in the case of Maqbool Hussain v. The State of Bombay(AIR 1953 SC 325), with reference to the context in which the word " prosecution " occurred in Art.20. In the course of the judgment, the following observations, which apply with full force to the present case, were made:-"....... and the prosecution in this context would mean an initiation or starting of proceedings of a criminal nature before a court of law or a judicial tribunal in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the statute which creates the offence and regulates the procedure."
26. Thus initiation of criminal proceedings under PML Act by the competent authority is by filing private complaint before special Court to take cognizance by the special Court and for that the accused once a public servant and his acts constitutes the offence alleged when in discharge of official duties, sanction must have been obtained and submitted by them with the complaint before the special court for taking cognizance of the offence under the act against said public servant by then the accused. Otherwise the starting of criminal proceedings under PML Act is from taking of cognizance on the private complaint filed before special court, for the offence under the act by the special court, for such taking of cognizance of any offence on the private complaint by the special court, it must be part of its duty to require 102 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch sanction of competent authority to prosecute the public servant. In Anil Kumar Vs. Ayyappa, the Apex Court in 2013 held in the case under PC Act on the requirement of sanction to file private complaint as follows:
"14. Further, this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 257 of 2011 in the case of General Officer, Commanding v. CBI and opined as follows: 'Thus, in view of the above, the law on the issue of sanction can be summarized to the effect that the question of sanction is of paramount importance for protecting a public servant who has acted in good faith while performing his duty. In order that the public servant may not be unnecessarily harassed on a complaint of an unscrupulous person, it is obligatory on the part of the executive authority to protect him........... If the law requires sanction, and the court proceeds against a public servant without sanction, the public servant has a right to raise the issue of jurisdiction as the entire action may be rendered void abinitio."
27. Apart from the above in State, CBI Vs. Sashi Balasubramanian23 referring to the offences under IPC, PC Act, Customs Act and Income Tax Act it was observed under Income Tax Act for the offence under Section 95 of the Finance Act No.2/1998 as to what is meant by prosecution has been instituted that it does not mean charge sheet filed and cognizance has been taken for the ordinary meaning of prosecution includes even institution or commencement of criminal proceeding, to say any enquiry or investigation. No 23 2006 (13) SCC 252 103 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch doubt Section 197 Cr.P.C. only bars taking of cognizance by the Court without previous sanction of any offence against a public servant as accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duty. Thus sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is pre- requisite to take cognizance of the offence under Section 3 of the PML Act against the public servant shown as accused of said offence in the private complaint filed by the competent authority before the special Court.
28. In Harshad S. Mehta Vs. State of Maharastra24 at Para 15 it is observed in interpretation of the provisions of the code and the special Court and Sections 9, 4, 6, 7 & 13 of Transactions in Securities Act, 1992 on the application or not of the procedure under Sections 306 & 307 Cr.P.C. to grant pardon to an accused of the Act offences at any stage of the proceedings. It is observed that as there is no inconsistency or repugnancy between the Act supra and code supra and there is no implead or express repeal of Sections 306 & 307 of the code and the Act provisions, the Code thereby harmoniously be construed to borrow the legs from the code to the Act to stand in saying neither Section 9 nor Section 13 of the Act in its wording not expressly excluded application of Section 306 & 307 Cr.P.C. to the proceedings before the special Court thereby those provisions are applicable and for that conclusion referred Section 4(2) of the code and the 24 2001 (8) SCC 257 104 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Constitution Bench expression of the Apex Court in AR Antulay supra. There Sections 8(2 & 3) of the Act referred saying special provision leaving no one is in doubt that all the provisions of the code shall so far as they are not inconsistent with the Act apply to the proceedings before the special Court and the same was discussed in Para 50 of the expression by referring to Para 27 of AR Antulay supra and at Para 51 by also referring to AR Antulay supra in saying the Special Court being a Court of original criminal jurisdiction has all the powers of such Court under the code so far as any exclusion specifically by the Act.
29. Coming to the other expression in General Officer Commanding, Rashtriya Rifles Vs. CBI25 on the scope of Cr.P.C. and Sections 6 & 7 of Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990 Section 7 and earlier Act 1958 Section 6 provided inter alia of criminal proceedings shall not be instituted except with previous sanction of Central Government. Now to consider what is meant by institution of criminal proceedings and observed at Para 26 that institution of prosecution is a stage prior to taking cognizance and therefore the filing of complaint is an institution and they referred several expressions including the constitution bench expression of the Apex Court in Devarapalll Lakshminarayana Reddy Vs. V.Narayana 25 2012 (6) SCC 228 105 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch Reddy26 where it was held that institution means presentation of complaint before a Magistrate for taking cognizance. Though mere presentation of complaint does not tantamounts to taking of cognizance in saying particularly at Para 44 of the expression referring to several other expressions that prosecution starts at least when cognizance of offence is taken by the Court though not from pendency of investigation.
30. In view of the above, it is crystal clear that for filing of a private complaint to take cognizance before the special court by the competent authority, obtaining and filing of the orders granting sanction by the competent authority to prosecute the public servant is mandatory and more particularly for the special court to take cognizance which is lacking in the case on hand and for want of sanction the cognizance orders respectively of the learned Special Judge are no way sustainable and are liable to be set aside.
31. On the scope of requirement of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. and it's marked difference with Section 19 of PC Act, this Court in LV Subrahmanyam supra dealt with in detail particularly at Paras 44 & 45 and negated as untenable the contention of the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI of validity or otherwise of sanction and requirement or not is a matter to be considered in trial, by answering the scope of law in this regard from Paras 47 to 49 26 1976 (3) SCC 352 106 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch in saying once it is noticed about the sanction is required and it is brought to the notice of the Court of the prosecution no way sustains for want of sanction the continuation of the proceedings is nothing but abuse of process and to sub serve the ends of justice the inherent power or writ jurisdiction has to be invoked in saying ends of justice are more important and Court cannot shut its size when brought to the notice of the Court any abuse of process leading to injustice, but for invoking the inherent power or writ jurisdiction which have no limitations but self imposed that too mainly to sub serve the ends of justice having its roots in necessity and its breadth thereby is co-extensive with necessity.
32. Accordingly and in the result, all the three criminal petitions are allowed by setting aside the respective cognizance orders of the learned Special Judge holding that sanction to prosecute the respective petitioners in the respective cases as public servants is mandatory and pre- requisite to take cognizance and from its lacking the learned Special Judge should not have been taken cognizance and the cognizance orders thereby are unsustainable, by directing further the learned Special Judge to return said complaints to the complainant/s if at all to submit with necessary sanction orders from the competent authority respectively. The other defence raised by the accused on merits that is discussed supra no way requires herein from the above to further dwell into to give any specific findings for the time being but for left 107 Dr.SSRB,J Crl.P.No.3988 of 2016 & batch open such defence if at all to consider at any proper stage in future upon any such necessity.
33. In consideration of the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel Sri PSP Suresh Kumar and Sri K. Manmadharao respectively, the operation of the common order herein is suspended only for four weeks from today.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Date: 21.01.2019 L.R. Copy to be marked (B/o) ska


How to Become a Ninja
Learn the Art of Moving Stealthily
How to Hide in Plain Sight
How to Climb a Wall
Learn the Art of Battle
How to Strengthen your Body
How to Fight like a Ninja
Learn the Art of Living with Honor
How to Breathe Properly
How to Simplify your Life


Saudi military training under review after US shooting
by AFPIn Summary
- Mohammed Alshamrani opened fire in a classroom on Friday, killing three sailors and wounding eight other people before being shot dead by police.
- US lawmakers called Sunday for a halt to a Saudi military training program and a review of the training's vetting procedures.
- Investigations into the incident are underway to determine if it was a terrorist attack.
- Saudi Arabia's King Salman had previously denounced the shooting and the gunman.
Washington,
Key US lawmakers called Sunday for a halt to a Saudi military training program after a shooting rampage at a naval base in Florida in which a Saudi officer killed three American sailors.
US Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he has ordered a review of vetting procedures while defending the training program that brought Mohammed Alshamrani to Pensacola Naval Air Station.

Alshamrani, who was armed with a lawfully purchased Glock 9mm handgun, was reported to have posted a manifesto on Twitter before the shooting denouncing America as "a nation of evil."
TERRORISM
The FBI said Sunday they were investigating with the "presumption" it was an act of terrorism, as in most active shooter probes, but had yet to make a final determination.
White House National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien went further, however, saying: "To me, it appears to be a terrorist attack."
"We'll have to see what the FBI investigation shows," O'Brien added, on CBS's "Face the Nation."
The FBI's main goal, special agent-in-charge Rachel Rojas told a news conference, is to confirm whether Alshamrani "acted alone or was he a part of a larger network."
"We currently assess there was one gunman who perpetrated this attack and no arrests have been made in this case," she said.
SUSPENDING
US lawmakers, meanwhile, called for the Saudi training program to be halted pending the investigation's outcome.
"We need to suspend the Saudi program until we find out what happened here," Senator Lindsey Graham, an influential Republican, said on Fox News.
In a pre-taped interview that aired on "Fox News Sunday," Esper confirmed several Saudis had been detained, including "one or two" who filmed the shooting on their cell phones.
US media also reported that Alshamrani had shown mass shooting videos at a dinner party the night before the attack.
Rojas said a number of Saudi students who were close to Alshamrani were cooperating with investigators, and the Saudi government had pledged to "fully cooperate" with the investigation.
CLOSE ALLIES
The attack has struck a nerve in the United States with its echoes of the September 11, 2001 attacks, in which Saudi citizens accounted for 15 of the 19 hijackers that flew airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Saudi Arabia remains one of the closest US allies in the Middle East, and President Donald Trump has cultivated its controversial de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Sunday evening, deputy press secretary Judd Deere announced that Trump had spoken with the crown prince, who "reiterated Saudi Arabia's commitment to working with the United States to prevent a horrific attack like the Pensacola shooting from ever happening again."
SAUDI RESPONSE
Saudi Arabia's King Salman had previously denounced the shooting as a "heinous crime" and said the gunman "does not represent the Saudi people."
But Representative Matt Gaetz, a Republican whose Florida district includes the Pensacola base, warned the shooting "has to inform on our ongoing relationship with Saudi Arabia."
Speaking on ABC's "This Week," he called for the military training program to be halted "until we are absolutely confident in our vetting program."
He said he told the Saudi ambassador "as clearly as I possibly could that we want no interference from the kingdom as it relates to Saudis that we have.
"And if there are Saudis that we do not have that may have been involved in any way in the planning, inspiration, financing or execution of this, that we expect Saudi intelligence to work with our government to find the people accountable and hold them responsible."
"And I was given every assurance from the ambassador that that would occur," he said.
US-SAUDI RELATIONS
Democrats questioned the broader security relationship under the Saudi crown prince, citing Riyadh's role in the brutal war in Yemen and the 2018 assassination of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi, a columnist for The Washington Post.
Saudi Arabia has yet to account for Khashoggi's murder at its consulate in Istanbul, said Representative Zoe Lofgren. "So yes, there are a lot of questions about Saudi Arabia," she said on ABC.
"This is a relationship that has serious problems," said Cory Booker, a senator and presidential candidate.
Adam Schiff, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, said it was too early to say the shooting was an act of terrorism but that Congress would press for a full investigation by the Saudis.
"And I wish the president of the United States, rather than trying to speak for the Saudi government, were pressing the Saudi government for answers," he added on "Face the Nation."


But because graphs appear to show objective truth, some people try to abuse that trust people have in graphed data to make things appear differently than they are. As a simple image, such graphs are easily shared online, sometimes with a caption indicating what the viewer is expected to believe as a result. There is a variety of ways to manipulate graphs, we’ll look at two. First, we’ll talk about truncating the y-axis. How wide of a range should you show on the y-axis? What should be the lowest value and what should be the highest? The question is: the y-axis range should go from what to what? In the case of counting things, you might expect the y-axis to range from zero to some plausible number for the most extreme case. But if you wanted to make something look like it was changing more over time you might include a smaller range in the y-axis, which we call truncating the y-axis.
in-context


Incompatible SketchUp Version
Solid Inspector² require SketchUp 2014 or newer.
For older SketchUp versions please use
version 1
.


While many individuals have contributed to Velocity in past and present, the following are the currently active committers for the project.
Listed alphabetically:
| Name | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Will Glass-Husain |<EMAIL_ADDRESS>| Forio Business Simulations |
| Geir Magnusson Jr. |<EMAIL_ADDRESS>| Independent |
| Daniel L. Rall |<EMAIL_ADDRESS>| CollabNet |
| Henning Schmiedehausen |<EMAIL_ADDRESS>| INTERMETA - Gesellschaft für Mehrwertdienste mbH |
| Nathan Bubna |<EMAIL_ADDRESS>| ESHA Research |


At the end of December it happened last event of the year in the European Union.
Italy's referendum was aimed at strengthening the power of the executive and avoiding the ungovernability of the country that has ruled for years.
In Italy the parliament is too fragmented and is not enough with half of the parliament to change certain laws sometimes happens in Spain.
This mixture of parties and contrasts often means that there are measures that can not be executed by the number of currents within the party.
In my opinion it is a good idea that suppressed the senate, but rather that the first party need the majority should be necessary to have a second round to choose the president between two or three candidates ..
Mateo Renzi, a young social-democratic politician, played this way to follow his mandate.
A mandate in which he was not even elected and is that the average years of presidents in Italy is 1 year.
Renzi in this case had everything to lose even though it is one of the few that generates less rejection by the population .
He is among the politicians who carry in his program continue with old Italy as Berlusconi or the Northern League, or those who want to destroy everything built for years as the Anti-European Five-Star Movement.
In addition, his plan was also rejected by a large number of left-wing parties that see in the measures proposed by the referendum in order to have a role in the hinge parliament that has done so much damage in many countries.
So after the resounding failure of the referendum, supported mostly by people with a stable life as the largest population, and some social-democrats or some young people who want to give a chance to change.
Renzi resigned as he had promised and left Italy as it was, but with a banking and economic problem difficult to solve.
As soon as he left office he was replaced and elections are expected next year.
Elections no matter what happens they will not be able to end the problem that Italy suffers.
In the markets there was a tenuous answer to the downfall after knowing the results and is that already was deducted the defeat of the Renzi.
But what nobody expected was that after the failure to two days the main European indexes rose strongly.
This was largely due to the conciliatory and hopeful words of ECB President Mario Draghi.
He promised to inject money to the affected banks for their possible bailout, and to imply that whatever happened in the referendum would not have a great weight in case of not forging.
If you look at the following chart we can see how the negative result of the referendum was discounted from the markets, although the euro the previous day rose in the hope that it could make a sudden change.
This is because in that case the euro would have skyrocketed since there is no positive news of the euro zone of any event for a long time.
Once finished it was seen as the Italian MIB index continued with the bullish path that already had begun the two days before.
Italian market had hardly risen against other indices after the victory of Trump by the uncertainty surrounding the referendum.
Italian market had hardly risen against other indices after the victory of Trump by the uncertainty surrounding the referendum.
Italian elections are expected in Italy in 2017 , where a victory of the 5 Star Movement could adversely affect the euro and the markets and political instability could stop the hikes that occur.
That added to the already known elections of France and Germany and the possible Greek elections makes 2017 also a very volatile year in European equity .
© 2016 - All Rights Reserved - Diseñada por Sergio López Martínez
El sitio se mantiene gracias a la publicidad, por favor Desactiva Adblock para seguir navegando
He desactivado Adblock


Provides a '%dopar%' adaptor such that any type of futures can be used as backends for the 'foreach' framework.
| Version: | 0.6.0 |
| Depends: | future (≥ 1.6.2), foreach (≥ 1.4.3), iterators (≥ 1.0.8), parallel, utils |
| Suggests: | doRNG (≥ 1.6.6), markdown, R.rsp |
| Published: | 2017-10-20 |
| Author: | Henrik Bengtsson [aut, cre, cph] |
| Maintainer: | Henrik Bengtsson <henrikb at braju.com> |
| BugReports: | https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/doFuture/issues |
| License: | LGPL-2.1 | LGPL-3 [expanded from: LGPL (≥ 2.1)] |
| URL: | https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/doFuture |
| NeedsCompilation: | no |
| Materials: | NEWS |
| In views: | HighPerformanceComputing |
| CRAN checks: | doFuture results |
| Reference manual: | doFuture.pdf |
| Vignettes: |
A Foreach Parallel Adaptor using Futures |
| Package source: | doFuture_0.6.0.tar.gz |
| Windows binaries: | r-devel: doFuture_0.6.0.zip, r-release: doFuture_0.6.0.zip, r-oldrel: doFuture_0.6.0.zip |
| OS X binaries: | r-release: doFuture_0.6.0.tgz, r-oldrel: doFuture_0.6.0.tgz |
| Old sources: | doFuture archive |
| Reverse imports: | drtmle, kergp, sperrorest |
Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=doFuture to link to this page.


Electric Scooter Ride Sharing in Louisville, KY
Day of the Week (Sun - Sat)
Hour of the Day
Display pedestrian crash data involving vehicles (2009–2018)


Throttle a stream -> Very useful for throttle HttpWebRequest uploads / downloads.
More...
|
| | ThrottledStream (Stream parentStream, MainForm mainForm, int fileBytes, int maxBytesPerSecond=int.MaxValue) |
| | Creates a new Stream with Data bandwith cap More...
|
| |
| override void | Close () |
| |
| override void | Flush () |
| |
| override int | Read (byte[] buffer, int offset, int count) |
| |
| override long | Seek (long offset, SeekOrigin origin) |
| |
| override void | SetLength (long value) |
| |
| override void | Write (byte[] buffer, int offset, int count) |
| |
Throttle a stream -> Very useful for throttle HttpWebRequest uploads / downloads.
Thanks to: 0xDEADBEEF: https://stackoverflow.com/users/909365/0xdeadbeef
Usage:
var stream = request.GetRequestStream(); var throttledStream = new ThrottledStream(new MemoryStream(fileBytes), uploadSpeedInBytesPerSecond); throttledStream.CopyTo(stream); stream.Close();
◆ ThrottledStream()
| JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.ThrottledStream |
( |
Stream |
parentStream, |
|
|
MainForm |
mainForm, |
|
|
int |
fileBytes, |
|
|
int |
maxBytesPerSecond = int.MaxValue |
|
) |
| |
Creates a new Stream with Data bandwith cap
- Parameters
-
| parentStream | The original stream in which to throttle |
| maxBytesPerSecond | The maximum bytes per second allowed |
◆ Close()
| override void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Close |
( |
| ) |
|
◆ Dispose()
| override void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Dispose |
( |
bool |
disposing | ) |
|
|
protected |
◆ Flush()
| override void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Flush |
( |
| ) |
|
◆ Read()
| override int JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Read |
( |
byte[] |
buffer, |
|
|
int |
offset, |
|
|
int |
count |
|
) |
| |
◆ Seek()
| override long JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Seek |
( |
long |
offset, |
|
|
SeekOrigin |
origin |
|
) |
| |
◆ SetLength()
| override void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.SetLength |
( |
long |
value | ) |
|
◆ Throttle()
| void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Throttle |
( |
int |
bytes | ) |
|
|
protected |
◆ Write()
| override void JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Write |
( |
byte[] |
buffer, |
|
|
int |
offset, |
|
|
int |
count |
|
) |
| |
◆ CanRead
| override bool JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.CanRead |
|
get |
◆ CanSeek
| override bool JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.CanSeek |
|
get |
◆ CanWrite
| override bool JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.CanWrite |
|
get |
◆ Length
| override long JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Length |
|
get |
◆ MaxBytesPerSecond
| int JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.MaxBytesPerSecond |
|
getset |
Number of Bytes that are allowed per second
◆ Position
| override long JBToolkit.StreamHelpers.ThrottledStream.Position |
|
getset |
The documentation for this class was generated from the following file:
- D:/OneDrive/Documents/Work/Repositories/YTMusicUploader/YTMusicUploader/Helpers/ThrottleStream.cs


'No plans to shift IND-WI T20I match out of Mumbai': MCA sources
The source also said that the association is currently waiting for the clearance from Mumbai police and the final call will be taken later.
by ANINew Delhi: With growing uncertainty over the upcoming T20I match between India and West Indies on December 6, sources within the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) on Thursday revealed that as of now, there is no plan to shift the match out of the city.
The source also said that the association is currently waiting for the clearance from Mumbai police and the final call can be taken once it comes in.
"We are meeting with the police in this regard and we are waiting for the clearance from their side. As of now, there is no change in plan. Everything is per schedule," an MCA source told ANI.
Earlier, various media reports suggested that the Mumbai police had asked the MCA to shift the match out of the city, expressing their inability to deploy adequate police force for the game.
The scheduled match on December 6 would be clashing with the death anniversary of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar and many people would come out in big numbers to celebrate the 'Mahaparinirvan Divas'.
India and West Indies are slated to play three T20Is and three ODIs against each other and the squad of the Men in Blue is slated to be announced later today.
The first T20I would be played on December 6 at the Wankhede Stadium.


Typescript template for npm packages with testing and automatic documentation.
Start by cloning the template repository to desired directory.
git clone https://github.com/equinor/videx-npm-template.git
Fields that need to be modified are:
Install all dev dependencies defined in package.json using node.
npm install
The entry point for the actual npm package is defined as 'src/index.ts'. This can be changed within 'rollup.config.js'. Any public variables, functions and classes should be exported within this file.
npm run docs
Three part process:
The copying of images makes it possible to refer to local images within the README!
The empty .nojekyll file makes it possible to upload html pages starting wth underscore to GitHub pages.
All tests are defined within the test-folder. Jest naming convention is to place tests for SOMESCRIPT.ts in a single file SOMESCRIPT.test.ts.
npm run test
Executes all tests defined within the test folder.
npm run test:watch
Executes all tests, but does not return immediately. Makes it possible to re-run failed tests quickly.
npm run build
Compiles the code found within the src-folder. Build is outputted to a new dist-folder.
npm run pub
Attemps to publish the package to npm. As part of the publishing process, the source code is re-compiled.
GitHub pages is used to show documentation. To set up GitHub pages, start by navigating to the settings tab within the GitHub repository.
Scroll down and set GitHub pages source to the docs-folder of the master branch.
Publishing the documentation will produce a link. This link can be included in the README for easy navigation.
Sample documentation can be found here.
| hello |
Generated using TypeDoc


Preferences Dialog¶
Use options on the Preferences dialog to customize the behavior of the client. To open the Preferences dialog, select Preferences from the File menu. The left pane of the Preferences dialog displays a tree control; each node of the tree control provides access to options that are related to the node under which they are displayed.
Use the plus sign (+) to the left of a node name to expand a segment of the tree control.
Use the minus sign (-) to the left of a node name to close that node.
The Browser Node¶
Use preferences found in the Browser node of the tree control to personalize your workspace.
Use the fields on the Display panel to specify general display preferences:
When the Auto-expand sole children switch is set to True, child nodes will be automatically expanded if a treeview node is expanded and has only a single child.
Use the Browser tree state saving interval field to set the treeview state saving interval. A value of -1 will disable the treeview state saving functionality.
When the Confirm before closing properties with unsaved changes switch is set to True, pgAdmin will warn you before closing the properties dialog of an object if there are any unsaved changes. On user confirmation, the properties dialog will close.
When the Confirm on close or refresh switch is set to True, pgAdmin will attempt to catch browser close or refresh events and prompt before allowing them to continue.
When the Enable browser tree animation? switch is set to True, the client will display the animated tree control otherwise it will be unanimated.
When the Enable dialogue/notification animation? switch is set to True, the client will display the animated dialogues/notifications otherwise it will be unanimated.
When the Hide shared servers? switch is set to True, the client will hide all the shared servers from the browser tree.
Use the Lock layout field to lock the UI layout at different levels. This can also be changed from File menu on the menu bar
Option |
Action |
|---|---|
None |
No locking. Every panel is resizable and dockable. |
Prevent docking |
This will disable the docking/undocking of the panels |
Full |
This will disable resizing, docking/undocking of the panels |
When the Show system objects? switch is set to True, the client will display system objects such as system schemas (for example, pg_temp) or system columns (for example, xmin or ctid) in the tree control.
Use the fields on the Keyboard shortcuts panel to configure shortcuts for the main window navigation:
The panel displays a list of keyboard shortcuts available for the main window; select the combination of the modifier keys along with the key to configure each shortcut.
Use the fields on the Nodes panel to select the object types that will be displayed in the Browser tree control:
The panel displays a list of database objects; slide the switch located next to each object to Show or Hide the database object. When querying system catalogs, you can reduce the number of object types displayed to increase speed.
Use fields on the Properties panel to specify browser properties:
Include a value in the Count rows if estimated less than field to perform a SELECT count(*) if the estimated number of rows in a table (as read from the table statistics) is below the specified limit. After performing the SELECT count(*), pgAdmin will display the row count. The default is 2000.
Provide a value in the Maximum job history rows field to limit the number of rows to show on the statistics tab for pgAgent jobs. The default is 250.
Use field on Tab settings panel to specify the tab related properties.
Use Debugger tab title placeholder field to customize the Debugger tab title.
When the Dynamic tab size If set to True, the tabs will take full size as per the title, it will also applicable for already opened tabs
When the Open in new browser tab filed is selected for Query tool, Schema Diff or Debugger, it will open in a new browser tab when invoked.
Use the Query tool tab title placeholder field to customize the query tool tab title.
Use View/Edit tab title placeholder field to customize the View/Edit Data tab title.
The Dashboards Node¶
Expand the Dashboards node to specify your dashboard display preferences.
Use the fields on the Graphs panel to specify your display preferences for the graphs on the Dashboard tab:
Use the Block I/O statistics refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between block I/O statistic samples displayed in graphs.
Use the Session statistics refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between session statistic samples displayed in graphs.
Use the Transaction throughput refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between transaction throughput samples displayed in graphs.
Use the Tuples in refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between tuples-in samples displayed in graphs.
Use the Tuples out refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between tuples-out samples displayed in graphs.
When the Show activity? switch is set to True, activity tables will be displayed on dashboards.
When the Show graph data points? switch is set to True, data points will be visible on graph lines.
When the Show graphs? switch is set to True, graphs will be displayed on dashboards.
When the Show mouse hover tooltip? switch is set to True, a tooltip will appear on mouse hover on the graph lines giving the data point details.
The Debugger Node¶
Expand the Debugger node to specify your debugger display preferences.
Use the fields on the Keyboard shortcuts panel to configure shortcuts for the debugger window navigation:
The Miscellaneous Node¶
Expand the Miscellaneous node to specify miscellaneous display preferences.
Use the User language drop-down listbox to select the display language for the client.
Use the Themes drop-down listbox to select the theme for pgAdmin. You’ll also get a preview just below the drop down. Note that, to apply the theme you need to refresh the pgAdmin page. You can also submit your own themes, check here how. Currently we support Standard, Dark and High Contrast theme.
The Paths Node¶
Expand the Paths node to specify the locations of supporting utility and help files.
Use the fields on the Binary paths panel to specify the path to the directory that contains the utility programs (pg_dump, pg_restore, and pg_dumpall) for monitored databases:
Use the EDB Advanced Server Binary Path field to specify the location of the EDB Postgres Advanced Server utility programs. If this path is not set, pgAdmin will attempt to find the utilities in standard locations used by EnterpriseDB.
Use the Greenplum Database Binary Path field to specify the location of the Greenplum database utility programs. If this path is not set, pgAdmin will attempt to find the utilities in standard locations used by Greenplum.
- Use the PostgreSQL Binary Path field to specify the location of the
PostgreSQL utility programs. If this path is not set, pgAdmin will attempt to find the utilities in standard locations used by PostgreSQL.
Use the fields on the Help panel to specify the location of help files.
Use the EDB Advanced Server Help Path to specify the path to EDB Postgres Advanced Server documentation.
Use the PostgreSQL Help Path to specify the path to PostgreSQL documentation.
Please note: the default help paths include the VERSION placeholder; the $VERSION$ placeholder will be replaced by the current database version.
The Query Tool Node¶
Expand the Query Tool node to access panels that allow you to specify your preferences for the Query Editor tool.
Use the fields on the Auto Completion panel to set the auto completion options.
When the Keywords in uppercase switch is set to True then keywords are shown in upper case.
Use the fields on the CSV/TXT Output panel to control the CSV/TXT output.
Use the CSV field separator drop-down listbox to specify the separator character that will be used in CSV/TXT output.
Use the CSV quote character drop-down listbox to specify the quote character that will be used in CSV/TXT output.
Use the CSV quoting drop-down listbox to select the fields that will be quoted in the CSV/TXT output; select Strings, All, or None.
Use the Replace null values with option to replace null values with specified string in the output file. Default is set to ‘NULL’.
Use the fields on the Display panel to specify your preferences for the Query Tool display.
When the Connection status switch is set to True, each new instance of the Query Tool will display connection and transaction status.
Use the Connection status refresh rate field to specify the number of seconds between connection/transaction status updates.
Use the Query info notifier timeout field to control the behaviour of the notifier that is displayed when query execution completes. A value of -1 will disable the notifier, and a value of 0 will display it until clicked. If a positive value above zero is specified, the notifier will be displayed for the specified number of seconds. The default is 5.
Use the fields on the Editor panel to change settings of the query editor.
When the Brace matching? switch is set to True, the editor will highlight pairs of matched braces.
When the Code folding? switch is set to False, the editor will disable code folding. Disabling will improve editor performance with large files.
Use the Font size field to specify the font size that will be used in text boxes and editors.
When the Insert bracket pairs? switch is set to True, the editor will automatically insert paired brackets.
When the Line wrapping switch is set to True, the editor will implement line-wrapping behavior.
When the Plain text mode? switch is set to True, the editor mode will be changed to text/plain. Keyword highlighting and code folding will be disabled. This will improve editor performance with large files.
Use the fields on the Explain panel to specify the level of detail included in a graphical EXPLAIN.
When the Show Buffers? switch is set to True, graphical explain details will include information about buffer usage.
When the Show Costs? switch is set to True, graphical explain details will include information about the estimated startup and total cost of each plan, as well as the estimated number of rows and the estimated width of each row.
When the Show Timing? switch is set to True, graphical explain details will include the startup time and time spent in each node in the output.
When the Verbose output? switch is set to True, graphical explain details will include extended information about the query execution plan.
Use the fields on the Options panel to manage editor preferences.
When the Auto-Commit? switch is set to True, each successful query is committed after execution.
When the Auto-Rollback? switch is set to True, failed queries are rolled back.
When the Prompt to save unsaved data changes? switch is set to True, the editor will prompt the user to saved unsaved data when exiting the data editor.
When the Prompt to save unsaved query changes? switch is set to True, the editor will prompt the user to saved unsaved query modifications when exiting the Query Tool.
When the Prompt to commit/rollback active transactions? switch is set to True, the editor will prompt the user to commit or rollback changes when exiting the Query Tool while the current transaction is not committed.
When the Sort View Data results by primary key columns? If set to True, data returned when using the View/Edit Data - All Rows option will be sorted by the Primary Key columns by default. When using the First/Last 100 Rows options, data is always sorted.
Use the fields on the Results grid panel to specify your formatting preferences for copied data.
Use the Result copy field separator drop-down listbox to select the field separator for copied data.
Use the Result copy quote character drop-down listbox to select the quote character for copied data.
Use the Result copy quoting drop-down listbox to select which type of fields require quoting; select All, None, or Strings.
Use the fields on the Keyboard shortcuts panel to configure shortcuts for the Query Tool window navigation:
Use the fields on the SQL formatting panel to specify your preferences for reformatting of SQL.
Use the Command-first notation option to specify whether to place commas before or after column names.
Use the Identifier case option to specify whether to change identifiers (object names) into upper, lower, or capitalized case.
Use the Keyword case option to specify whether to change keywords into upper, lower, or capitalized case.
Use the Re-indent aligned? option to specify that indentations of statements should be changed, aligned by keywords.
Use the Re-indent? option to specify that indentations of statements should be changed.
Use the Spaces around operators? option to specify whether or not to include spaces on either side of operators.
Use the Strip comments? option to specify whether or not comments should be removed.
Use the Tab size option to specify the number of spaces per tab or indent.
Use the Use spaces? option to select whether to use spaces or tabs when indenting.
Use the Wrap after N characters option to specify the column limit for wrapping column separated lists (e.g. of column names in a table). If set to 0 (zero), each item will be on it’s own line.
The Schema Diff Node¶
Expand the Schema Diff node to specify your display preferences.
Use the Ignore owner switch to ignores the owner while comparing the objects.
Use the Ignore whitespaces switch to ignores the whitespaces while comparing the string objects. Whitespace includes space, tabs, and CRLF.
The Storage Node¶
Expand the Storage node to specify your storage preferences.
Use the fields on the Options panel to specify storage preferences.
Use the File dialog view drop-down listbox to select the style of icons and display format that will be displayed when you open the file manager; select List to display a list view, or Grid to display folder icons.
Use the Last directory visited field to specify the name of the folder in which the file manager will open.
Use the Maximum file upload size(MB) field on the Options panel of the Storage node to specify the maximum file size for an upload.
When the Show hidden files and folders? switch is set to True, the file manager will display hidden files and folders.


Web Development Full Course - Description
This course covers how to write syntactically correct HTML5 and CSS3, and how to create interactive web experiences with JavaScript. Mastering this range of technologies will allow you to develop high quality web sites that, work seamlessly on mobile, tablet, and large screen browsers accessible. During the capstone you will develop a professional-quality web portfolio demonstrating your growth as a web developer and your knowledge of accessible web design. This will include your ability to design and implement a responsive site that utilizes tools to create a site that is accessible to a wide audience, including those with visual, audial, physical, and cognitive impairments.
Trainer
Course Fee
499 INR
Available Seats
30
Online Schedule
5.00 pm - 7.00 pm
YouTube Schedule
Mon, Web, Sat
What will you learn
This course is designed to start you on a path toward future studies in web development and design, no matter how little experience or technical knowledge you currently have.
By the end of this course you’ll be able to describe the structure and functionality of the world wide web, create dynamic web pages using a combination of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, apply essential programming language concepts when creating HTML forms, select an appropriate web hosting service, and publish your webpages for the world to see. Finally, you’ll be able to develop a working model for creating your own personal or business websites in the future and be fully prepared to take the next step in a more advanced web development or design course or specialization.
Approx. 25 hours to complete
You have two options either go for the live classes or at a weekly pace
Very easy to follow along with how the course has been divided into small topics. The summary pages at the end of each topic are very useful to review if you have to take a break from the course, allowing you to pick up right where you left off.
Community support with many other perks
Our instructors and members are always avalable to assist you during the course and also thereafter
A friendly, informal community to support you every step of the way
Personal contact with me, the course tutor
Ebooks that will show you how to start earning before you’ve even finished
Lifetime access to course materials
Hands-on learning to lock that knowledge in
A deep understanding of how to code, design and build powerful websites
FREE UNLIMITED WEB HOSTING FOR ONE YEAR (worth $199) *Limited to one year per student not per course*
Freelancing, Build Websites and many more
Become a freelancer with the best skills in the market
Anyone who wants to learn to code
Anyone who wants to generate new income streams
Anyone who wants to build websites
Anyone who wants to become financially independent
Anyone who wants to start their own business or become freelance
Get started today and join millions of my happy students,
Most have changed careers, created second incomes or added critical new skills to their tool kits.
FREE unlimited hosting for one year? Sign up for the Course today and revolutionise your learning. Effortlessly embed the fundamentals. Refresh your groundwork. Dig deeper than ever. Start building powerful apps and cash-earning websites today—and enjoy bigger, brighter opportunities. “Excellent course gives you everything you need to know for doing awesome websites!” - Steven De Jesús