[09:10] <Sakara> I just tried to install ubuntu 19.10 desktop to a mdraid mirror on a system with two disks. In the installer I used the terminal to `apt install mdadm` I created a mirror of two partitions then setup lvm using the md0 device that was created. When I rebooted after I pointed the installer at my root logical volume grub didn't find the volume group I'd setup inside md0 because the mirror wasn't there.
[09:11] <Sakara> I needed to chroot into my new install and install mdadm for my raid to assemble at boot. Does this sound like a bug?
[09:12] <Sakara> Should the installer be able to work out that it needs to install mdadm if its installing onto a md raid?
[09:12] <Sakara> I toook a quick look through the bugs on launchpad and doesnt look like the situation I hit has been reported.


[03:45] <laxonmind> I have tried to create an account on the ubuntu forum twice I never get a confirmation email
[03:46] <laxonmind> anyone on here
[09:05] <s-fox> Hello.


[00:00] <wildintellect> I'm looking for some pointers on how the default menus are put together and ways to programatically alter them via scripts
[00:30] <GridCube> wildintellect, probably ochosi is the one who can help you in that, he does all the theming things
[01:10] <ochosi> wildintellect: what menus are you referring to specifically and how would you like to alter them?
[16:33] <wildintellect> ochosi, I'm trying to add a 2nd menu next to the default applications menu - had it working on 10.04 but 11.04 seems to have changed a bunch
[16:34] <GridCube> jejeje i love how you talk once every 12 hours each
[16:36] <wildintellect> would have been back sooner, had I noticed the tab - too many tabs it ran off screen
[16:39] <wildintellect> lines 116-232 are the old code that worked on 10.04 http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/livedvd/gisvm/trunk/bin/install_desktop.sh


[12:29] <bac> hi gary_poster, i updated the machine image, as well as automating it though that isn't done yet, but CI is still failing.  i can't tell what is wrong from the console logs of the two runs i tried.  thoughts?
[13:03] <gary_poster> bac, hi, I am out today.
[13:03] <gary_poster> jujugui ^^^
[13:05] <bac> gary_poster: right, sorry
[13:09] <gary_poster> bac if I had to guess from output I would say image is wrong somehow, but yeah, output is not useful at all, and diff than before
[13:10] <bac> gary_poster: yep.  go away.  :)
[13:10] <gary_poster> :-)
[13:14] <hatch> morning
[13:32] <benji> hatch: I bet you're not quite in the office yet.
[13:38] <benji> rick_h_: I have a YUI event/subscriber question.  Do you have a minute to talk in the hangout?
[13:39] <hatch> benji, correct, should be in about 10 though
[13:40] <benji> hatch: cool; you and rick_h_ can race to see who gets to talk to me
[13:53] <hatch> lol ok I'm back
[13:53] <hatch> still need the hangout?
[13:54] <hatch> ^ benji
[13:55] <benji> hatch: I'll meet you in the regular place.
[13:55] <hatch> cool be there in a sec just gota grab my headset
[13:58] <Makyo> hatch, sorry I didn't get to QA last night, doing it now.
[14:00] <hatch> benji, we have a bad connection
[14:00] <hatch> trying to rejoin
[14:26] <hatch> benji, is it all of the attr change facades are sticking around?
[14:26] <hatch> or just one?
[14:26] <hatch>  /some
[14:27] <benji> hatch: I don't know about all, but many, many are
[14:27] <hatch> alright thats fine
[14:27] <hatch> thx
[14:28] <hatch> benji, are there any other attribute facades sticking around?
[14:28] <hatch> others besides change?
[14:28] <hatch> Makyo, thanks :)
[14:30] <abentley> sinzui: btw, the app-exception.log is tremendously useful.  Thanks for getting that working.
[14:31] <sinzui> yes it is isn't it. I ponder switching to oops tools instead of sending volleys of errors emails to me now
[14:32] <hatch> benji, sorry, did you see the previous message?
[14:33] <sinzui> abentley, do you want me to request a release of m.jc? I think this will be the first release of using the ES collection migration feature
[14:33] <abentley> sinzui: Please do.
[14:35] <bac> hi hatch
[14:35] <bac> hatch: jenkins is running again but still unhappy.  can we chat a bit to go over the failures?
[14:36] <hatch> I think that failure you want to talk to frankban about
[14:37] <hatch> he was having some issues with the deploy test failing
[14:37] <benji> hatch: there aren't enough to show promenently in the heap snapshots, but there may be
[14:37] <bac> hatch: previously there was a failure sending results to saucelabs.  perhaps that one was transient.  have you seen it before?
[14:40] <bac> hatch: thanks.  i think frankban is gone today.
[14:40] <frankban> hatch, bac: the failures I was seeing last week are caused by firefox not being able to reconnect the websocket after switching from sandbox to staging.  I think that's unrelated to the current errors. However, I am changing my branch so that the selenium driver is started for each testcase (not once for all tests). This should make our suite more reliable, and slightly slower...
[14:41] <frankban> bac: I am here
[14:41] <bac> but i was wrong!
[14:41] <bac> frankban: is that landing soon?
[14:42] <frankban> bac: I'd like to propose it today. Coding is done, testing takes time
[14:42] <bac> ok
[14:44] <Makyo> For future reference: lightweight checkouts suck for QAing.
[14:45] <frankban> one cool thing about having a separate driver for each testcase is that we have many separate saucelabs videos
[14:47] <Makyo> hatch, LGTM on QA.
[14:47] <hatch> thanks Makyo - landing
[14:48] <hatch> bac, still want to chat?
[14:48] <bac> hatch: sure, briefly
[14:50] <bac> hatch: ready when you are
[14:50] <hatch> can you hear me?
[15:00] <hatch> benji, eric said that it's likely our app which is causing the issue
[15:00] <benji> hatch: that's easy for him to say ;)
[15:00] <benji> meanwhile I have a workaround that stops the leak (and might break the app, but you can't have everything)
[15:02] <abentley> sinzui: One thing I can't help noticing is that even minutes after restarting elasticsearch, it's still eating a lot of CPU although no one's hitting it AFAIK.
[15:03] <abentley> It's bouncing around between 10%-70% CPU use and load average is .96
[15:04] <hatch> benji, lol any luck with the repro?
[15:04] <benji> hatch: I haven't tried yet, I had the idea for the workaround and wanted to try it first, repro is next
[15:05] <hatch> gotcha - I can help with the repro if you want to pass me your testing code
[15:05] <sinzui> abentley, wow. what is in play? it starts the Java vm, the lucene proc, and a web proc
[15:06] <frankban> bac: I duped the 'service not deployed' error locally, investigating
[15:06] <bac> frankban: ok, thanks
[15:07] <abentley> sinzui: It appears to be the elasticsearch binary.  http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5667901/
[15:08] <hatch> oh awesome you can watch the uds videos live
[15:10] <abentley> sinzui: CPU is now reasonable and load average is dropping.
[15:14] <hatch> running the tests and streaming a uds video have put my laptop to a new high temperature!
[15:16] <hatch> 72.5C lol
[15:16] <sinzui> abentley, The current ES release has a number of fixes for hangs. It is probably worth us updating. Lp's imports failed though. I will kick, and if that fails, I will pull the source directly from github
[15:17] <abentley> sinzui: Great.
[15:19] <hatch> jujugui - new login/logout branch has been merged with trunk
[15:19] <hatch> let me know if you run into any issues
[15:24] <sinzui> abentley, m.jc is not r225. I an sadder note, I think I deleted your very important email that I was not to read until my head was clear. Please resend it...I will immediately move it a safe place so that it is not among the blueprint spam
[15:25] <abentley> sinzui: done.
[15:27] <sinzui> abentley, adeuring: I ponder the relationship between the short_url KeyError and promulgated charms. Every example I see is juju-gui, the only promulgated charm that is not owned by charmers.
[15:28] <adeuring> sinzui: thanks
[15:28] <abentley> sinzui: Yes, that could be it.  The short-form URL I'm using is one of those places where we're forced to assume ~charmers.
[15:46] <frankban> may the ancient gods kill firefox because he's sick and suffering
[15:47] <hatch> frankban, lol
[15:48] <hatch> some things it does so well....others....not so much
[15:50] <frankban> bac, hatch: so it seems that in firefox the appflower deployment fails because the service block is not visible in the canvas at the default zoom level, and so, the corresponding element's text is just empty. :-O
[15:50] <Makyo> jujugui call in 10
[15:51] <hatch> frankban, possible issue from the layout changes Makyo did?
[15:51] <frankban> bac, hatch: fixing this in my branch and the fix will be... zooming out before checking for service names in the canvas.
[15:51] <hatch> lol
[15:51] <bac> frankban: thx
[15:51] <hatch> I suppose that's the best fix as any
[15:51] <Makyo> What :|
[15:52] <Makyo> Zoom levels just act as a viewport.  Things that are outside the viewport are still on the canvas.
[15:52] <frankban> hatch: yes, Makyo's changes are great, firefox is cursed, firefox is the new ie. ok I said that...
[15:53] <hatch> Makyo, ahh ok - I wasn't sure exactly how your layout code handled that
[15:53] <hatch> frankban, lol! at least it auto updates so it CAN be fixed :)
[15:53] <Makyo> hatch, exactly like scrolling.  Elements at the bottom of the page are still within the dom.
[15:53] <Makyo> SVG being just a part of the DOM.
[15:53] <hatch> I don't think the test knows that it's in the dom, just that it's visible
[15:54] <hatch> so I was wondering if your new layout stuff put the new service off the page
[15:54] <hatch> (in the soucelabs tests)
[15:55] <frankban> hatch, Makyo: it's just a firefox issue AFAICT. The service block is found in the DOM, and the tests knows both that it's in the DOM and that it's not visible by the user. The problem is that selenium/firefox is not able to retrieve the .name element text if the service block is not made visible. that's really odd
[15:56] <hatch> oh boy...lol sounds like a firefox selenium driver issue
[15:57] <hatch> so maybe it's seleniums fault not firefox
[15:57] <hatch> ;)
[15:57] <Makyo> frankban, ah.  Yeah, browsers treat SVG a little strangely (HTMLElements vs SVGElement), and some of the attributes/methods are different.  Hopefully it's not that...
[15:57] <hatch> firefox does have issues with svg attributes
[15:57] <frankban> zooming out fixes that, and let's say it's also not horrible, b/c it lets you see the deployed service in the videos
[15:57] <Makyo> If so, though, just means involving D3 in tests, since they've already solved the cross-browser compatibility problem there.
[15:58] <Makyo> Huh
[15:58] <Makyo> That's weird.
[15:58] <Makyo> jujugui call in 2
[15:58] <hatch> I'm ok with zooming out as a solution
[15:58] <hatch> :)
[15:58] <frankban> seeing things from a wider perspective is always a good idea
[16:03] <Makyo> https://ec2-54-243-27-37.compute-1.amazonaws.com/
[16:10] <benji> by the way, my laptop's wi-fi has been crazy flakey for the last week or so, so if I'm not on IRC, I'll probably be back soon.  You can always text or call me if need be.
[16:12] <Makyo> Doing a few quick config change on the ec2 site I just mentioned, just to see if that messes with things at all.
[16:14] <Makyo> Seems fine.
[16:41] <jcsackett> hatch: looks like your login/logout stuff might be eating urls.
[16:42] <jcsackett> if i go to /bws/sidebar, that gets removed as the page loads. i can make the behavior stop by reverting your revision. :-/
[16:43] <bac> umm, tasty urls
[16:44] <jcsackett> bac: :-P
[16:46] <hatch> jcsackett, so when you type that url in manually it is just removed?
[16:47] <jcsackett> hatch: right; if i put in $guiurl/bws/sidebar, rather than getting the sidebar loaded, i get just the canvas and the "/bws/sidebar" bit is gone.
[16:47] <hatch> ok let me look into that thanks
[16:48] <jcsackett> hatch: not sure you should be thanking me, but thank you for looking into it. :-)
[16:54] <hatch> jcsackett, ok I can reproduce - the sidebar shows up still but the url is gone
[16:56] <jcsackett> ccccccbljtrvbcvtkeunclicukrirgefcjfkjcbtkcll
[16:56] <jcsackett> dammit.
[16:56] <hatch> lol
[16:57] <jcsackett> hatch: i don't reliably get the sidebar. sometimes it shows, sometimes it doesn't. the url is always eaten though.
[17:00] <hatch> ok it strips urls no matter what
[17:00] <hatch> I'll have to investigate this
[17:01] <hatch> it's not just on browser
[17:02] <jcsackett> dig.
[18:22] <hatch> jcsackett, just wanted to let you know I have found the issue and working on a proper workaround
[18:29] <hatch> Makyo, are you around?
[18:43] <Makyo> hatch, just got back.  What's up?
[18:45] <hatch> In order to fix the bug that jc found, to do a proper fix I should implement the redirect
[18:45] <hatch> after logging in
[18:45] <hatch> so.... localstorage or hash?
[18:45] <hatch> I am thinking local
[18:45] <hatch> or another 'clean' experience I'm happy with too
[18:46] <hatch> storing with some other type of local var
[18:46] <Makyo> I say a var, or maybe local storage.  I think the full story has logging in as a step in a process, so we shouldn't need anything as complex as a storage mechanism.
[18:47] <hatch> sounds like a plan
[18:47] <hatch> alright I'll implement it with this fix
[18:51] <Makyo> hatch, cool.  Sounds good.  Want to just convert the discussion card to a task?
[18:52] <hatch> sure thing
[18:52] <hatch> doesn't look like I can
[18:52] <hatch> I can re-make one though
[19:03] <Makyo> Sure.
[19:30] <benji> why is the gui using jquery?  I didn't know we had that in there.
[20:34] <Makyo> Out for the afternoon, stuff fromn earlier turned into migraine.  Back 100% tomorrow
[20:37] <hatch> get better Makyo|out ! C U tommorow
[20:49] <bac> hatch: my ci branch is up for review if you'd like a diversion for your afternoon
[20:50] <hatch> certainly
[20:50] <bac> ✈✈✈
[20:50] <bac> i'm going to try to walk the dog between storms
[21:51] <hatch> bac, review has been completed, sorry I forgot to click 'submit' :)


[00:28] <jose> BobJonkman: why is that question?
[00:29] <BobJonkman> Not sure. Seven_Six_Two isn't online right now
[00:29] <BobJonkman> But I'm curious too.
[00:30] <BobJonkman> Although it's probably a question better asked of Canonical administration
[00:31] <BobJonkman> (I'm curious which company does the fulfillment, not if that one company specifically does it)
[22:25] <belkinsa> jose, I will be e-mailing the Ubuntu Manual Mailing-list of my book idea should I CC it to you?


[18:40] <pavlushka> Hello Kilos :)
[18:40] <Kilos> hi pavlushka
[18:49] <pavlushka> Kilos: So you do the cooking! huh :0
[18:49] <pavlushka> :)
[18:50] <Kilos> sometimes ian does or his girlfriend or we eat take aways when they lazy
[18:50] <Kilos> or bread haha
[18:50] <Kilos> at ubuntu-za meeting now
[18:51] <pavlushka> cool


[11:25] <doko> Laney, cjwatson: can the ocaml installabilities in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ocaml.html be trusted? curious about the llvm-toolchain-* packages
[11:27] <cjwatson> doko: IIRC there are some false positives there but I don't remember the details
[11:27] <cjwatson> Let me see if I can get more details
[11:29] <cjwatson> doko: I think at least some of this is because clang-modernize-3.8 Depends: clang-tidy-3.8 but clang-tidy-3.8 Breaks: clang-modernize-3.8 (unversioned), so the transitional package is uninstallable
[11:30] <cjwatson> doko: Could you make the Breaks/Replaces there be versioned to before clang-modernize-3.8 was a transitional package?
[11:31] <doko> ok
[11:34] <cjwatson> there are also some things like lldb-*-dev being Architecture: all but depending on liblldb-*-dev which isn't and is only available on some architectures; proposed-migration lets that slide as long as it's good on amd64, but the transition tracker is pickier
[11:36] <doko> removing the breaks, there never was a clang-modernize-3.8
[11:36] <doko> LocutusOfBorg, ^^^
[11:37] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[11:37] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure why it was there
[14:06] <bregma> hey folks I'm trying to expedite my "libertine-scope' package into universe through the NEW queue where it's been languashing -- is this the right place to wheedle some attention?
[15:06] <coreycb> hello, can an archive admin please promote python3-automaton to main? this will help get some openstack packages out of proposed.
[17:24] <davmor2> infinity: how we looking iso wise for Monday?
[17:26] <infinity> davmor2: I'll be pushing a bunch of stuff to -updates today and seeing if we can build something RCish over the weekend.
[17:27] <davmor2> infinity: awesome
[19:40] <doko> so the following migrations are coupled: netcdf, openmpi, libjsoncpp, python-numpy, if somebody wants to have a look. not to mention false positive autopkg tests which get triggered with packages from the release pocket instead of proposed
[19:43] <doko> add scalapack, petsc, slepc
[20:20] <cjwatson> doko: I've poked enough autopkgtests to hopefully make the picture a bit clearer at least


[00:12] <IdleOne> +r set
[00:12] <jrib> pfft, they can't even use ubottu right
[00:14] <IdleOne> heh
[00:51] <lhavelund> Pici: Happy birthday from the future.
[00:51] <lhavelund> *wobbles*
[03:29] <nhandler> ubottu: !requirements =~ s/$/ or !Lubuntu/
[03:37]  * persia gets new inspiration to get Lubuntu to be an official flavour
[09:11] <ikonia> myriam_rs: can we help ?
[09:16] <Tm_T> ikonia: mamarok she is
[09:18] <ikonia> I didn't know she was in .ch
[09:18] <ikonia> ahhhh .ch, not .cn
[09:18] <ikonia> I was reading it wrong in my head
[09:19] <knome> ha
[10:59] <ikonia> $10 says tomasz_ is a troll
[10:59] <ikonia> too close to tomaw
[11:00] <Tm_T> I have seen that nick before, and not as pretending to be tomaw
[11:00] <ikonia> then I'm wrong
[11:00] <Tm_T> ikonia: can I get that $10 next time we meet? (;
[11:01] <ikonia> sure
[11:01] <ikonia> make a note and bank it for later
[12:56] <bazhang> hi Sterist how can we help you
[12:58] <Sterist> its complicated... idk if its worth bringing up. mental debating atm =/
[12:58] <bazhang> Sterist, you dont appear to be banned in any of the core ubuntu channels
[12:58] <Sterist> nope
[12:59] <bazhang> Sterist, that is what this channel largely addresses
[12:59] <Tm_T> Sterist: if it's worth debating mentally, it's worth bringin up
[12:59] <Tm_T> bazhang: but not only
[12:59] <Sterist> do you have any spies in the off topic room?
[12:59] <bazhang> Tm_T, thus the *largely*
[12:59] <Sterist> anyone
[13:00] <Tm_T> Sterist: no, we do not have spies on there, although most of us are there
[13:00] <bazhang> spies for whom?
[13:00] <Sterist> the room
[13:00] <Tm_T> as active members of #ubuntu-offtopic (if that is the channel we are talking about)
[13:00] <bazhang> on whose behalf
[13:01] <Sterist> the community i guess
[13:01] <Tm_T> Sterist: that channel is part of community
[13:01] <bazhang> no idea where this is coming from
[13:02] <Sterist> if alright i'm going for a cig and i'll upload the chat log when i get back
[13:02] <Sterist> -if
[13:02] <Tm_T> Sterist: err, no need to, what is it?
[13:02] <Tm_T> Sterist: as I for example am in the channel and do see what has been talking there
[13:03] <Sterist> lol its one of those things that is plain silly to make a report out of, chat log is best
[13:03] <Sterist> i'll be back in a few
[13:03] <bazhang> ?
[13:04] <bazhang> hirens boot cd to fix ubuntu?
[13:04] <bazhang> sounds like a windows issue, and even they dont allow discussion of it in ##windows
[13:20] <Sterist> http://www.sendspace.com/file/e7bfbk
[13:29] <Sterist> tm_t did you get that?
[13:30] <Tm_T> yes
[13:31] <Tm_T> Sterist: what's the issue?
[13:31] <Sterist> did you read it?
[13:31] <Tm_T> yes
[13:32] <Sterist> i guess that's why i was debating on bringing it up in the first place lol
[13:32] <Tm_T> I'm not sure what you're after, so it would help if you state it (:
[13:34] <Sterist> pretty petty so i'd have to go with disruption of chat or some kind of double standard being played
[13:36] <Tm_T> Sterist: are you complaining on someone particular's behaviour or the channel in general?
[13:37] <Sterist> well starting with rww targeting me over nonsense while allowing the very same from other people
[13:37] <Sterist> derailing the topic
[13:37] <Sterist> meanwhile other ops jump in with him and ignore his whack at me
[13:37] <bazhang> dont see that
[13:38] <Sterist> two of which i see in this room
[13:38] <bazhang> its a legitimate point about no cursing allowed
[13:38] <Tm_T> Sterist: because they are ops in -offtopic, they have to be here (:
[13:39]  * Sterist sighs
[13:39] <Tm_T> Sterist: why sigh?
[13:39] <Sterist> this is why tonight's my last night as a regular in the ubuntu rooms
[13:39] <bazhang> you're not banned in there, best to just move on.
[13:39] <Sterist> nothing personal
[13:39] <bazhang> okay.
[13:39] <Sterist> exactly
[13:40] <Tm_T> Sterist: how this has to do with other ubuntu rooms/channels?
[13:40] <Sterist> rww has been pestering me a bit in the main room as well
[13:41] <Tm_T> if he crosses the line, call the ops
[13:41] <Sterist> seeing as ops will collude with him i have no desire to be around here anymore
[13:41] <Sterist> that's that.
[13:41] <bazhang> not sure what you mean by pestering; care to give an example
[13:41] <Tm_T> I'm not colluding with anyone
[13:41] <Sterist> i should have been more specific -- some ops
[13:43] <Sterist> sorry about the trouble. take care guys
[13:43] <bazhang> previously dilberto ?
[13:43] <Sterist> 5:45am, me needs sleep
[13:44] <bazhang> Sterist, please dont idle here, thanks
[13:44] <bazhang> same range as 'dilberto'
[13:44] <Tm_T> bazhang: why you need to chase people away from here so fast?
[13:45] <bazhang> Tm_T, I don't?
[13:46] <Tm_T> bazhang: you please "dont idle here, thanks" in less than 30 seconds (:
[13:46] <Tm_T> bah, misplaced quotemarks
[13:46] <bazhang> that was pretty clearly 'dilberto'
[13:46] <Tm_T> and?
[13:47] <Tm_T> he is not banned, he is not currently making trouble (:
[13:47] <bazhang> he is banned, but using a different IP address now
[13:48] <Tm_T> ah, if he is banned, then makes sense
[13:49] <bazhang> he's well known for promoting GNAA
[13:50] <bazhang> so complaints about collusion between 'certain ops' and rww are a bit hard to believe, considering the source.
[17:25] <Seveas> hi
[17:25] <IdleOne> hey
[17:26] <Seveas> is +r on #ubuntu still needed or was it simply forgotten?
[17:26] <IdleOne> prolly forgotten
[17:26] <IdleOne> removed, thanks
[17:26] <Seveas> thanks! :)
[17:27] <jpds> It's good to have.
[17:27] <IdleOne> I agree
[17:28] <IdleOne> but 237 users in unregged can't seem to figure out how to register or answer a question from the bot
[17:30] <jpds> Nice.
[18:08] <jrib> floodbot overreacting...
[18:42] <IdleOne> +r set again
[18:44] <IdleOne> little over an hour of peace
[18:45] <st__> who is the responsible person for this channel and how I can contact him?
[18:45] <hoober> i just ordered papa johns. but sadly i can't enter ubuntu-offtopic. so now i can't tell them. :( why am i still banned
[18:46] <st__> (ubuntu channels on freenode)
[18:47] <LucidOne> st__: How can we help you?
[18:48] <st__> who is the responsible person for ubuntu channels on freenode and how I can contact him?
[18:48] <LucidOne> it is not one single person
[18:48]  * maco tries to remember whether they're all "him"s
[18:49] <LucidOne> the Ubuntu ops team is
[18:49] <maco> i was referring to the IRCC
[18:49] <st__> does it have some contact outside IRC?
[18:49] <maco> are they all hims?
[18:49] <LucidOne> st__: So how can we help you?
[18:49] <hoober> brb changing my clothes for the pizza delivery person
[18:49] <hoober> don't drop my position plz
[18:50] <LucidOne> st__: if you tell us what you need assistance with I might be able to direct you accordingly
[18:51] <LucidOne> or not
[18:51] <LucidOne> he wanted to argue that the N word was not insulting because it is mainly used in the US
[18:51] <LucidOne> and I told him to drop the subject in #u or I would ban him also
[18:56] <hoober> back
[18:56] <IdleOne> How can I help you hoober ?
[18:56] <hoober> yeah i am unbanned in the offtopic forum
[18:56] <hoober> banne/D*
[18:56] <IdleOne> you are banned in #ubuntu-offtopic?
[18:56] <hoober> yesw
[18:57] <hoober> [INFO]	You are banned from this channel.
[18:57] <IdleOne> yup, since Aug 7
[18:58] <hoober> fix?
[18:59] <IdleOne> you are going to have to wait for either Flannel (who set the ban) or another #ubuntu-offtopic op
[18:59] <IdleOne> Do you remember why you were banned?
[19:00] <hoober> someone accused me of being a troll at the time
[19:00] <hoober> and was saying things like my life isn't bad
[19:00] <IdleOne> not exactly
[19:00] <IdleOne> you used the N word several times.
[19:01] <IdleOne> that is absolutely not acceptable in any Ubuntu irc channel
[19:01] <hoober> i don't wanna say the n word
[19:03] <IdleOne> hoober: doesn't seem like there are any -offtopic ops active at the moment. I am going to ask you to return later on (4-5 hours) and hopefully one of them will be around to help you with this.
[19:03] <IdleOne> hoober: have you read the !guidelines and the !codeofconduct ?
[19:04] <hoober> i signed the coc
[19:04] <hoober> why can't you make chat logs of the positive things i do..
[19:05] <IdleOne> well um, I don't even know how to answer that
[19:05] <IdleOne> fact is that you will have to come back later.
[19:06] <hoober> ok/
[19:06] <hoober> part
[19:06] <IdleOne> that went fairly well
[19:07] <charlie-tca> Can we have the topic in #ubuntu+1 updated to reflect the RC is out, please?
[19:31] <jrib> charlie-tca: sure, one sec
[19:49] <charlie-tca> thank you , jrib
[21:03] <nhandler> ubottu: !no 10.10 is <reply> Maverick Meerkat is the codename for Ubuntu 10.10, due October, 10, 2010 - Maverick Release Candidate at http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1010 , discussion and support in #ubuntu+1
[21:04] <nhandler> IdleOne: ^^^
[21:42] <ikonia> whois ryaxnb ?
[21:47] <topyli> ikonia: offtopic regular, annoying but mostly harmless
[22:06] <ikonia> ah, he keeps joining/parting here
[22:07] <topyli> the parting half is nice so it's not all bad!
[22:07] <ikonia> not at all, just wondered if there was something wrong/issue
[23:27] <ikonia> st__'s attitude an manners to people is getting old
[23:27] <ikonia> he's had quite a few warnings now
[23:59] <ikonia> please keep an eye on st___ I'm going to bed