Input: [ID] 521 [Entry Date] 04/26/2011 at 11:58:02 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: No. Many changes in the new "Guide" will increase paperwork and expense to investigators, but have no scientifically demonstrated enhancement of animal welfare. Comment 2: OLAW should require institutional compliance with the new Guide no sooner than March, 2015 to allow for the collection of relevant data.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 522 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 07:34:18 AM [Affiliation] Self [Organization Name] University of Maryland School of Medicine [Organization City and State] Baltimore Maryland [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: Adopting the Guide, will slow medical research and make advances in critical disease research prohibitive. Current grant funding is significantly low. In addition, NIH investigator grants are being cut and therefore budgets are going to be even tighter. The current rules are more than adeque at ensuring animal welfare and its is unclear how the new rules will improve them.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 523 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 10:37:42 AM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: The inhumane practice of some (not all) animal research laboratories is a well-kept secret in the scientific field. The fact that NIH recognizes the need for improvements in how research animals are treated is a step in the right direction. My colleagues and I in my clinical research laboratory applaud these NIH efforts and the team of investigators who are pushing for the reform of humane animal care. Please adopt the new guidelines to protect the innocent and valuable species contributing to the clinical care of our patient populations. To degrade their quality of life by providing inhumane living conditions is a degradation of our position as a humane society and a shame for all of research. Comment 2: Please adopt the new guidelines.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 524 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 11:00:48 AM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: The new guidelines should NOT be accepted. I am a psychopharmacologist and neurotoxicologist who has been working with the behavioral effects of drugs and toxic substances for 25 years. The new requirement that pharmaceutical grade drugs be used, even for rodents, will impose greater costs, less flexibility, and more paperwork. It will be all cost with no benefit. I have been preparing clean, but not sterile, drug solutions for rodents for over 25 years and have never had an infection due to drug administration. The costs of pharmaceutical grade drugs from vendors is exorbitant. Preparing them in house will require additional expense and time, which would be fine if it actually did some good but, with animals whose resistance to infection is high this is completely unnecessary. Comment 2: Second, I am concerned about the new rigid requirements for caloric restriction. My concerns are two fold. First, the paperwork requirements will impose additional burden on many investigators, especially those in small institutions. Their work is valuable and should not be discouraged. Second,however, is that food or caloric restriction should not be viewed as an exception but rather as the rule. As the new manual notes, rodents on ad lib diets become exceptionally obese, making them unhealthy and poor biomedical models. The guide should do all that it can to make control over caloric intake easy to do and should push for its becoming the norm.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 525 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 11:15:59 AM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: No--I recommend that NIH not adopt the New Guide. My rationale for this recommendation is based on multiple factors that include: -the financial and administrative cost of complying with new regulations and the resulting disruption in research -the burden of guidance to either use pharmaceutical grade chemicals or to justify not using them, despite a lack of evidence to suggest that pharmaceutical grade chemicals improve animal welfare or science -vague language subject to multiple interpretations on many issues such cage sizes, use of restraint, and use of food restriction Comment 2: Implementation should be delayed until at least March 2015. My rationale for this recommendation is based on my view of the extensive revisions promulgated by the New Guide and the extensive changes in research procedures, administrative procedures and infrastructure that will be required to comply with the New Guide.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 526 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 04:40:58 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: NO

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 527 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 05:37:09 PM [Affiliation] Organization [Organization Name] University of Hawaii, Laboratory Animal Service [Organization City and State] Honolulu, HI [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: The requirements for housing rat mothers with litter will impact our institution. New larger cages and racks to hold them will need to be purchased. The requirements for housing female mice with litters will also impact our researchers due to the limitations of the current floor space in the IVC cages. The mice and rats have been doing well under the current housing conditions, therefore these new requirements will have a detrimental economic effect if caging/racks need to be re-purchased.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 528 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 05:56:55 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: 1. Please allow harem breeding: At our institution we are only allowed one male and one female in a mating cage. This is highly inefficient and costly, limiting production of pups. There is no harm in having two moms and litters in a cage. 2. increase the maximum number of mice per cage to 6. It is extremely costly to do mouse work and the rising costs and limited space are pushing investigators away from this important work.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 529 [Entry Date] 04/27/2011 at 10:11:01 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: I urge you to vote against adopting the 2010 Guide as PHS policy, maintaining adherence to the 1996 Guide. The 2010 Guide can significantly increase the financial burden of animal research for small-scale animal research and teaching programs. These small programs are essential for promoting and providing a broader range of trainees access to basic bio-social research—especially with access to training in research methods in this area. If you feel compelled to adopt the guide because there currently are no guidelines for aquatic species, then identify the 2010 guide as the authority for aquatic species specifically, and exempt other species at this time. Comment 2: In the event the 2010 guide is adopted, provide researchers at least 4 years (e.g., 2015) to come into compliance given the expense of a variety of cage size and housing requirements at a time of great financial difficulty for research institutions. NIH should develop instrumentation grant programs to assist facilities in meeting any new guidelines. Of particular importance is funding to maintain teaching programs. It is impractical for educational institutions to charge students laboratory fees of sufficient magnitude to recoup the costs for upgrading equipment and related practices.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 530 [Entry Date] 04/28/2011 at 02:29:30 AM [Affiliation] Organization [Organization Name] Cascades Biosciences Consultants, Inc [Organization City and State] Sisters, Oregon [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: The eighth Guide adds unnecessary administrative burdens, regulatory compliances, and substantial capital costs for caging of rabbits, breeder rodents, and primates. The seventh edition of the Guide has proven well in advancing animal care, welfare, and support for animals in research. Edition 8 falls short on concrete evidence of improving animal welfare. It discourages investigators who are dedicated with improving animal welfare and advancement in science. An economic impact document is needed The Guide is a USA regulatory document since it is cited by the US Public Health Service Policy authorized by HHS Law. In this sense, a legitimate question is raised as why 4 of the 14 ILAR committee members were not US Citizens. Comment 2: The 8th edition must not be adopted. In essence, a new committee is needed if an 8th edition is deemed necessary by the Institutes of Medicine, NAS.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 531 [Entry Date] 04/28/2011 at 11:05:11 AM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: I think that revision of the guide is not necessary, and that implementation would add a great regulatory burden for IACUC and laboratory animal veterinary staff, when we are in a period of funding restriction. I am opposed to revision of the guide, and I believe that the new guide should NOT be adopted.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 532 [Entry Date] 04/28/2011 at 08:49:33 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: I am very much against the expanded space requirements for a mouse breeding trio plus progeny. THis added requirement will force us to remove one of the two males which will significantly prolong the period between new births and render the cost of breeding our mice much higher. I also do not approve of the prohibition on including space occupied by nesting material in the total space requirements for mice. This may be OK for pigs and dogs, but mice need the nesting material to keep warm and seclude themselves.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 533 [Entry Date] 04/28/2011 at 09:29:44 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: O.The new guide was originally supposed to be an "update" of the 1996 Guide, however the final product is twice as long and contains a great deal of new "policy." Compliance with these new "policy" statements may increase the expense to institutions (e.g., cage size) and expense to investigators (e.g., drugs). However, the scientific data justifying these expense changes is non-existent. Adherence to the 2011 Guide will require large increase in paperwork burden (all deviations from "should" statements contained in the new Guide will need to be justified). Adoption of the new guide may also negate the opportunity to diminish the burden resulting from over reactions to issues for which institutions already have "overregulated." Moreover, the new "Guide" policies Increased infringement on scientific decision-making by PHS grantees, contractors and IRGs. The policy changes implemented by the new Guide will result in significant additional expenses to the institution and the investigator with no real enhancement of animal welfare. Some specific examples include constraints on multiple procedures in animals, constraints on multiple surgeries (per se), new requirements for food- or fluid-restriction, naïve and constraining section on choices of "chemicals and other substances" to give animals and specific guidance on "post-approval" monitoring (e.g., observation of procedures). In addition the new "Guide" requires an increased level of intra and post-operative surgical procedures. Comment 2: OLAW should require institutional compliance with the new Guide no sooner than March, 2015 to allow for the collection of relevant data. It is the data that should guide policy decisions.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 534 [Entry Date] 04/29/2011 at 11:43:51 AM [Affiliation] Organization [Organization Name] Biotechnology Industry Organization [Organization City and State] Washington, DC [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: April 29, 2011 Dr. Francis Collins Director, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892 (submitted electronically) Dear Dr. Collins, The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the NIH's adoption of the eighth edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide) as a basis for evaluation of institutional programs receiving or proposing to receive Public Health Service (PHS) support for activities involving animals. BIO represents 1,100 member organizations that research, develop, and produce innovative health care, agricultural, industrial, and environmental technologies. Our members depend on accurate research as a part of the discovery and development of these technologies. In order to model diseases, find treatments, and perform translational research, many of our companies utilize animals in their research. The proper care and use of research animals is a high priority for our members. Though research with rodent models continues to provide useful information, grasping a more complete fundamental understanding of specific biological questions and translating the knowledge gained to improve both animal and human health and reproduction require the use of models that more closely resemble each other developmentally and physiologically or that exhibit similar susceptibility to common zoonotic pathogens. As treatments become closer to use in humans, even more complex models are necessary to test these hypotheses. The use of domestic agricultural species to address priority research areas of high impact to biomedicine and agriculture allows a more thorough characterization of research findings. The areas of investigation and experimental approaches may involve the generation of animals that model human diseases, elucidation of the etiology involved in disease or transmission of pathogens, a determination of environmental insults underlying developmental or epigenetic changes leading to pathophysiology, metabolic studies focused on obesity, or the identification of diagnostic tools (genetic markers, biomarkers, or antibodies). This research effort is expected to deepen the fundamental knowledge of biological mechanisms essential to both humans and farm animals, highlight the utility of domestic agricultural animals as more appropriate animal models for specific mechanistic studies, and encourage investigators with farm animal expertise to be involved in research benefiting both agriculture and biomedicine. The use of these more complex models requires animal care that expands beyond that which is required for rats and mice. Reviews of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (the "ILAR Guide") provided to us demonstrate the ILAR Guide needs to be enhanced in order to properly accommodate the use of these other species. The ILAR Guide currently contains few items related to farm animal care and treatment, and we are concerned the stringent use of the ILAR Guide as drafted could yield the unintended consequence of negatively impacting farm animal welfare. A review of the ILAR Guide recommendations by scientists trained specifically in farm animal welfare has revealed several examples of recommendations for space allotment, temperature control, and animal management that are not in line with scientifically reviewed literature in the area. A more thorough review of the literature would have allowed the ILAR Guide to recommend measures that more appropriately addressed the needs of the animals, which do not vary whether the animal is in a biomedical or an agricultural research study. In January 2010, the Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS) published an updated Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Teaching and Research (Ag Guide). This document was written by 64 professionals with expertise in farm animal care and contains a wealth of substantive technical information about the care of farm animals in teaching or research (agricultural or biomedical). The Ag Guide was originally developed to ensure a single science-based source for the most appropriate, tested, and pragmatic protocols for the care, treatment, handling, and housing of farm animals used in agricultural and biomedical research. It was written to ensure scientists in biomedical research would have the best available information. The Ag Guide utilizes scientific literature to identify care conditions for each individual farm animal species, while the ILAR Guide is deficient in these individual husbandry requirements. The use of animals in research from PHS grants can be enhanced through incorporation of the Ag Guide's recommendations and use of the Ag Guide as the primary, if not sole, reference, for farm animal care. Other associations have realized the value of utilizing experts in a species-specific field of animal welfare when providing guidelines for animal use and care. The Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) has decided to utilize multiple animal care and use guides as its standards. AAALAC states that, "During the Fall (September through November) 2011 trimester, AAALAC International's Council on Accreditation will begin to use three primary standards to evaluate animal care and use programs: the 8th Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide), NRC 2011; the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching (Ag Guide), FASS 2010; and the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, Council of Europe (ETS 123). The Council on Accreditation has used all three documents for several years and their adoption by AAALAC's Board of Trustees as primary standards signifies the importance of these performance based guidelines in the accreditation process." We recommend that the PHS not accept the ILAR Guide as the sole basis for evaluation of programs receiving Public Health Service funded support for agricultural animals in research. We support the use of animals in research, and want to ensure their proper care through the use of best techniques from scientifically-reviewed animal welfare expert research. Sincerely, Biotechnology Industry Organization Comment 2: no comment

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 535 [Entry Date] 04/29/2011 at 02:26:16 PM [Affiliation] Organization [Organization Name] University of Utah [Organization City and State] Salt Lake City, Utah [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: NO

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 536 [Entry Date] 04/29/2011 at 08:27:48 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: I am registering strong opposition against the proposed revision of the Guide, for the following reasons: 1. The revised Guide will have major negative impact upon the NIH-funded research by enormously increasing costs and administrative burdens and reducing availability of animal holding space across the U.S. WITHOUT ANY SCIENTIFICALLY BASED BENEFIT TO THE ANIMAL WELFARE. 2. The revised guide will reduce the efficacy of animal breeding and will potentially lead to deaths of many of the newborn mice because it prohibits duo and trio breeding, despite the fact that this arrangement, currently recommended in the 7th edition of the Guide, has been shown to be the most conducive to litter survival and animal welfare. 3. The new restrictive policy is inconsistent with data from multiple peer-reviewed publications evaluating the effects of cage density. Data in peer-reviewed papers published since the 7th edition show that a number of common mouse strains can be housed at twice the density recommended by 7th edition of the Guide, in some cases with apparent benefits to health. Therefore, it is troubling from both animal health and financial perspectives that maximum recommended caging densities were not relaxed to reflect this new information. 4. The new guide has not been vetted by the scientific community it is meant to serve. In too many cases changes have been mandated without scientific justification, and in many cases new scientific information has been ignored. And too often, the new Guide makes generalizations and creates ambiguities both in lines of responsibility and logical application to specific laboratory organisms. Comment 2: In concert with the above comments, neither the Guide nor the facility evaluation recommendations should be adopted.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 537 [Entry Date] 05/01/2011 at 09:03:39 PM [Affiliation] Self [Organization City and State] Chicago, IL [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: This letter is submitted in response to the National Institutes of Health's solicitation of comments concerning the Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide) that appeared in the Federal Register on February 24, 2011 ((78 Federal Register 10279-80. As a clinical veterinarian with 14 years of experience "in the trenches" and on the front line to improve animal welfare in biomedical research, I strongly encourage OLAW to reject the recommendations for mouse breeding cages outlined in the Eighth Edition of the Guide. The Guide recommends 51 square inches for a single female mouse and her litter. When factoring in the requirements for the male (15 square inches), the total space requirement would be 66 square inches. The floor of a standard micro isolator cage at our facility is 66 square inches. These recommendations, if endorsed by OLAW would commit PHS-funded institutions to follow a monogamous pair breeding scheme for mice. There are major reasons why OLAW should reject this recommendation. I am sure that OLAW has received numerous comments from directors and managers describing how adoption of these changes will impose insurmountable costs to already financially stressed animal care programs. For example, to move from our current occupancy guidelines for mouse breeding cages which alllows for trio (1 male: 2 females) to monogamous (1 male: 1 female) breeding, we would literally need to double the number of breeding cages to maintain the same number of mice. We, as well as other institutions, do not have the finances or space to support these changes. These changes will negatively impact investigators who must breed genetically engineered mice to support their PHS-funded research programs. The investigators I have communicated with are seriously concerned about the proposed changes. Their concerns are that their budgets will not allow for it and many of their mice will not breed well as monogamous pairs. As scientists, they want to know what the scientific justification is for such dramatic changes. Unfortunately, there is no scientific justification to support the change to monogamous breeding of mice. It should be noted that the Jackson Laboratory, the number one vendor of genetically engineered mice, recommends that investigators breed their genetically engineered mice as trios. One reason for this is that breeding is a social activity in mice, and their extensive data on mouse breeding shows optimal breeding indices when mice are bred as trios. Another reason Jackson recommends trio breeding is that many mutant mice do not lactate well. Finally, the majority of mutant mice have smaller litters than outbred and even inbred strains of mice. Not only is the number of mice per litter smaller, but the mice themselves are smaller, and therefore take less space. As a result, trio breeding of genetically engineered mice does not result in overcrowding or unsanitary cage conditions. I urge OLAW to consider the negative impact these changes will have on animal welfare. In the wild, mice breed in single male: multiple female arrangements. It would make sense for the Guide to provide to provide recommendations to breed mice in a way that most closely mimics their natural history within the confines of the laboratory mouse cage. OLAW must consider how adopting the recommendations for mouse breeding cages outlined in the Eighth of the Guide will negatively impact not only the ability of institutions to support and investigators to perform quality research, but also the breeding performance and welfare of the laboratory mouse.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [ID] 538 [Entry Date] 05/02/2011 at 11:04:12 AM [Affiliation] Self [Organization City and State] Grand Forks, ND 58201 [Comments]

Output: Comment 1: Please do NOT adopt the eighth addition of the Guide. The new guide ignores scientific literature on rodent behavior and group structure. The animals are 'happier' and display more normal behaviors when housed in larger groups than when housed with one or two other animals. Comment 2: No, the eighth edition of the guide should not be used for any of the program and facility evaluations conducted by institutions.

Listing of Public Comments on Proposed Adoption and Implementation of the Eighth Edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals


Input: [Circumstance] Serious physical or emotional illness of student or immediate family member [Required Documentation]

Output: Attach medical documentation confirming onset and duration of illness or condition


Input: [Circumstance] Death in the family [Required Documentation]

Output: Attached copy of obituary, funeral notice, or Death Certificate


Input: [Circumstance] Accident or injury to student or immediate family member [Required Documentation]

Output: Attach medical and/or other documentation verifying the date and duration of the occurrence


Input: [Circumstance] Disasters affecting student's attendance [Required Documentation]

Output: Attach documentation of insurance claims or other 3rd party information verifying location and date and nature of disaster


Input: [Circumstance] Loss or change of employment [Required Documentation]

Output: Attach letter from the employer verifying the circumstances and dates of loss or change in employment


Input: [Circumstance] Student made significant improvement during Warning semester even though cumulative criteria do not meet SAP standards yet (e.g. enrolled at least 6 units, completed all units attempted with 2.0 or higher semester GPA, but Standards (GPA and Quantitative Pace) have not been met) [Required Documentation]

Output: Attach copy of course and grades for preceding semester. These will be verified by the Financial Aid Office


Input: [Circumstance] Change in academic major, or Exceeded Timeframe [Required Documentation]

Output: Detailed explanation disclosing reasons for change in major and reasons for exceeding the posted unit limitation.


Input: [Circumstance] Extenuating circumstances that were beyond the student's control [Required Documentation]

Output: Any documents that would help verify student's circumstances. Should include date and duration.


Input: [Word/Phrase] anus , arse , arsehole , asshole [Definition/Meaning]

Output: excretory opening at the end of the alimentary canal

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] biliary ductule [Definition/Meaning]

Output: excretory ducts of the liver; empty into the hepatic ducts

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] BM , dejection , faecal matter , faeces , fecal matter , feces , ordure , stool [Definition/Meaning]

Output: solid excretory product evacuated from the bowels

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] green gland [Definition/Meaning]

Output: one of a pair of glands (believed to have excretory functions) in some crustaceans near the base of the large antennae

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] kidney [Definition/Meaning]

Output: either of two bean-shaped excretory organs that filter wastes (especially urea) from the blood and excrete them and water in urine

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] nephron , uriniferous tubule [Definition/Meaning]

Output: any of the small tubules that are the excretory units of the vertebrate kidney

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] pee , piddle , piss , urine , water , weewee [Definition/Meaning]

Output: liquid excretory product

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Word/Phrase] scatology [Definition/Meaning]

Output: preoccupation with obscenity (especially that dealing with excrement or excretory functions)

Find definitions containing the word Excretory | Reverse Dictionary


Input: [Description] wakeup time in seconds for pbid to run its checks [Variable]

Output: PBID_REFRESH

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki

Table 7.47.4d: pbi_conf Variables [Tables 4]


Input: [Description] number of hours representing how often pbid refreshes the index and meta files from repos; default is every 24 hours [Variable]

Output: PBI_INDEXREFRESH

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Description] proxy server IP address [Variable]

Output: PBI_PROXYURL

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Description] proxy server port number [Variable]

Output: PBI_PROXYPORT

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Description] can be HTTP or SOCKS5 [Variable]

Output: PBI_PROXYTYPE

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Description] username used to authenticate with proxy server [Variable]

Output: PBI_PROXYUSER

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Description] password used to authenticate with proxy server [Variable]

Output: PBI_PROXYPASS

Difference between revisions of "PBI Manager/9.2" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [0] About [2] For [3] Over [1]

Output: Behind


Input: [0] Above [2] From [3] Past [1]

Output: Below


Input: [0] Across [2] In [3] Through [1]

Output: Beside


Input: [0] After [2] Inside [3] Throughout [1]

Output: Between


Input: [0] Against [2] Into [3] To [1]

Output: Beyond


Input: [0] Among [2] Near [3] Toward [1]

Output: By


Input: [0] Around [2] Of [3] Under [1]

Output: Down


Input: [0] At [2] Off [3] Up [1]

Output: During


Input: [0] Before [2] On [3] With [1]

Output: Except


Input: [0] Audience Size [Web Conferencing] Up to 300 attendees [Webcasting]

Output: Up to 8,000 attendees

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [0] Purpose [Web Conferencing] Collaborative meetings [Webcasting]

Output: Large events

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [0] Audio [Web Conferencing] Phone [Webcasting]

Output: Streaming audio

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [0] Downloads [Web Conferencing] Some platforms require plug-ins [Webcasting]

Output: No downloads required

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [0] Scheduling [Web Conferencing] On-demand or scheduled [Webcasting]

Output: Scheduled

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [0] Pricing [Web Conferencing] Pay-as-you-use or flat-rate [Webcasting]

Output: Per event

Web Conferencing Services, Webinar and Webcast Online Meeting | Conference Calls Unlimited


Input: [Section] 385.327 [Subject]

Output: May a new entrant request an administrative review of a determination of a failed safety audit?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.329 [Subject]

Output: May a new entrant that has had its USDOT new entrant registration revoked and its operations placed out of service reapply?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.331 [Subject]

Output: What happens if a new entrant operates a CMV after having been issued an order placing its interstate operations out of service?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.333 [Subject]

Output: What happens at the end of the 18-month safety monitoring period?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.335 [Subject]

Output: If the FMCSA conducts a compliance review on a new entrant, will the new entrant also be subject to a safety audit?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.337 [Subject]

Output: What happens if a new entrant refuses to permit a safety audit to be performed on its operations?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.401 [Subject]

Output: What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.402 [Subject]

Output: What definitions are used in this subpart?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.403 [Subject]

Output: Who must hold a safety permit?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Section] 385.405 [Subject]

Output: How does a motor carrier apply for a safety permit?

Regulations Sections | Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Input: [Data Type] Mode [Definition] Describes the configuration of the traffic sensor. The EIS RTMS traffic sensor supports three modes: Side-fired, Forward-fired In, Forward-fired Out. A permanent count station only supports the In Lane mode. Side-fired is configured to shoot across traffic lanes and can be configured to monitor up to eight different traffic lanes. Forward-fired In is configured to monitor a single traffic lane where traffic is traveling toward the sensor. Forward-fired Out is configured to monitor a single traffic lane where traffic is traveling away from the sensor. In Lane is specifies the mode for permanent count stations. [Abbr.]

Output: Mode

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Time Interval [Definition] Identifies the length of a single collection interval for the sensor in seconds. [Abbr.]

Output: TimInt

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Forward Average Speed [Definition] The average vehicle speed as a vehicle traveled through all traffic zones. Forward Average Speed is only collected in a Forward-fired configuration. [Abbr.]

Output: FwdAvgSpd

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Average Traffic Speed [Definition] The average vehicle speed calculated as a vehicles travel though each traffic zone. [Abbr.]

Output: TrfSpd

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Total Volume [Definition] Total number of vehicles that were detected passing through a traffic zone. [Abbr.]

Output: TotalVolume

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Normal Volume [Definition] Number of normal length vehicles that were detected passing through a traffic zone. For EIS sensors configured for foreward fire, the normal volume shown will represent all vehicles passing through the traffic zone since long volume will not be reported. [Abbr.]

Output: NormVol

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Long Volume [Definition] Number of large vehicles (such as eighteen wheel trucks) that were detected passing through a traffic zone. This value is only available in a side-fired configuration. A Side-fired configuration can only be configured to support Long Volume or Average Headway, but not both. [Abbr.]

Output: LongVol

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Unclassified Volume [Definition] Number of vehicles that were detected passing through a traffic zone where the speed or length of the vehicle could not be determined. [Abbr.]

Output: Unclass

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Occupancy [Definition] Percentage of time that a traffic zone is occupied. [Abbr.]

Output: Occup

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Average Headway [Definition] Time interval between vehicles. This value is only available in a side-fired configuration. A Side-fired configuration can only be configured to support Average Headway or Long Volume, but not both. [Abbr.]

Output: AvgHeadway

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Battery Voltage [Definition] Reports the remaining battery voltage. This value is only available for a permanent count station. [Abbr.]

Output: Battery

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Speed Count [Definition] Counts the number of vehicles for each speed range. This value is only available for a permanent count station. [Abbr.]

Output: Speed Bin Name

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [Data Type] Classification Count [Definition] Counts the number of vehicles for each classification range. This value is only available for a permanent count station. [Abbr.]

Output: Classification Bin Name

Traffic Data Definitions


Input: [2] Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 [Hardware]

Output: System chip System chip - Most modern handsets use an advanced chip that includes many of the device’s hardware modules like the processor, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and sometimes even the wireless radio. This field shows what particular system chip (or System-on-a-Chip) is used in the phone.

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [1] Single core, 680 MHz, ARM11 [2] Dual core, 1000 MHz, Krait [Hardware]

Output: Processor Processor - The processor is the main computing component of a phone and is a major factor when it comes to the overall speed of the device. Some more powerful smartphones use dual-core and quad-core processors designed to deliver greater performance.

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [1] Yes [2] Adreno 305 [Hardware]

Output: Graphics processor

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [1] 256 MB RAM / 1024 MB ROM [2] 512 MB RAM [Hardware]

Output: System memory System memory - System memory, or RAM memory is the type of memory that the device uses to temporarily store data from the OS or currently-running apps. The more RAM available to the device, the better the performance will be when multiple or heavier programs are running.

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [1] 0.35 GB [2] 8 GB [Hardware]

Output: Built-in storage

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [1] microSD, microSDHC up to 32 GB [2] microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC up to 64 GB [Hardware]

Output: Storage expansion

Nokia X7 vs Nokia Lumia 620 - Phone specs comparison


Input: [Shortcut] N or K or → [Command]

Output: Next page

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] P or J or ← [Command]

Output: Previous page

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] Ctrl + +command + + [Command]

Output: Zoom in

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] Ctrl + -command + - [Command]

Output: Zoom out

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] Ctrl + 0command + 0 [Command]

Output: Automatic Zoom

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] R [Command]

Output: Rotate the document clockwise

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [Shortcut] Shift + R [Command]

Output: Rotate counterclockwise

View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them | Firefox Help


Input: [PAST] fell [PRESENT]

Output: fall

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] felt [PRESENT]

Output: feel

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] found [PRESENT]

Output: find

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] forgave [PRESENT]

Output: forgive

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] got [PRESENT]

Output: get

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] went [PRESENT]

Output: go

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] hanged / hung [PRESENT]

Output: hang

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] heard [PRESENT]

Output: hear

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] hit [PRESENT]

Output: hit

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] hurt [PRESENT]

Output: hurt

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] knew [PRESENT]

Output: know

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [PAST] laid [PRESENT]

Output: lay

Past – Completed Events — English Exercises & Practice | Grammar Quizzes


Input: [0] Name [2] Description [1]

Output: Type

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] HIP [2] This is the HIP identificator for the star. Used for referenced to the main star catalogue. [1]

Output: int

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] GCVS [2] This is the GCVS designation for the variable star. [1]

Output: string

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Type [2] Type of variability. [1]

Output: string

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Max [2] Magnitude at maximum brightness. [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] MFlag [2] Magnitude flag code (0=No flag; 1="(" if max. magnitude is an amplitude; 2="<" if max. magnitude is a bright limit; 3=">" is max. magnitude is a faint limit). [1]

Output: int

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Min I [2] First minimum magnitude or amplitude. [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Min II [2] Second minimum magnitude. [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] V [2] The photometric system for magnitudes. [1]

Output: char

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Epoch [2] Epoch for maximum or minimum light (in Julian days). [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Period [2] Period for the variable star (in days). [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] M-m [2] Rising time or duration of the eclipse (in percent). [1]

Output: float

Variable Star Data


Input: [0] Spectrum [2] Spectral class of the variable star. [1]

Output: string

Variable Star Data


Input: [Feature] Dependencies [Transaction Layer Security] Authentication mechanism defined by TLS which clients must implement [Payload Security]

Output: Authentication defined by XKMS specification, client does not need to implement a comprehensive framework

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Use of XML Signature [Transaction Layer Security] Not required [Payload Security]

Output: Uses XML Signature in Enveloped Mode requiring slightly more complex processing

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Support for Routing [Transaction Layer Security] None [Payload Security]

Output: Specification describes bi-lateral authentication only, multi-hop message routing and multi-party transactions are not supported

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Support for Confidentiality [Transaction Layer Security] Supported [Payload Security]

Output: None, although applications may employ TLS to establish a secure channel

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Non-Repudiation [Transaction Layer Security] Requires additional payload security [Payload Security]

Output: Supported

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Unspecified Party Authentication [Transaction Layer Security] Requires additional payload security [Payload Security]

Output: Supported

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Feature] Client Authentication [Transaction Layer Security] Supported through certificate client authentication or through use of payload security [Payload Security]

Output: Supported

XML Key Management Specification (XKMS 2.0) Bindings


Input: [Type] Garden Entry (Visit the Gardens) [Non-Members] £4.00 (inc. VAT) [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: FREE


Input: [Type] Gallery Entry [Non-Members] Included with Garden Entry [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: FREE


Input: [Type] Room Hire [Non-Members] Full Price [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: Education rates


Input: [Type] Education Resource Centre [Non-Members] No Access [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: Access


Input: [Type] Curator Tour [Non-Members] £30 (inc. VAT) [Members]

Output: FREE


Input: [Type] Adventure & Outdoor Pursuit Courses [Non-Members] Full Price [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: 10% off


Input: [Type] Nature & Wildlife Courses [Non-Members] Full Price [More Information] Click Here [Members]

Output: 10% off


Input: [Part of Speech] Noun [Definition] A student at a military school who is training to be an officer [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: cadet


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To ward off an attacker [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: defend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To protect one's assets, or allies [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: defend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To hang in suspense; to be pending; to be undetermined or undecided [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: depend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To rely on for support, maintenance, help, etc. [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: depend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To trust; to rely; to be certain [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: depend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To put off [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: repel


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To unattract; to act with a force that drives or keeps away something such as mosquitoes [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: repel


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To push back or away by a force, as one body acting upon another [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: repel


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To be at an event [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: attend


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To pay attention to; to commit oneself to; to give thought and care to [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: attend


Input: [Part of Speech] Noun [Definition] Voluntary agreement or permission [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: consent


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To express willingness, to give permission [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: consent


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To force or coerce [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: compel


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To exact or produce by force [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: compel


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To overpower; to subdue [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: compel


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] At the back of [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: behind


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] To the back of [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: behind


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] after, time-wise or motion-wise [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: behind


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] In support of [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: behind


Input: [Part of Speech] Noun [Definition] The rear; bottom; the buttocks [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: behind


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] Next to; at the side of [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: beside


Input: [Part of Speech] Preposition [Definition] Not relevant to [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: beside


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To obtain or receive something from something else [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: derive


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To find the origin or descent of a word or phrase [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: derive


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To originate from [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: derive


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To repeat aloud some passage, poem, or other text previously memorized, often before an audience [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: recite


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To list or determine the amount of something [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: recite


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To deliver a recitation [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: recite


Input: [Part of Speech] Noun [Definition] The act of retiring, or the state of being retired; also, a place to which one retires, such as a bedroom to sleep [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To withdraw; to take away [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To withdraw from circulation, or from the market [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To cause to retire, specifically, to designate as no longer qualified for active service; to place on the retired list [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To go back or return; to withdraw or retreat; to go into privacy [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To retreat from action or danger; to withdraw for safety or pleasure; [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To withdraw from a public station, from working, or from business [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [Part of Speech] Verb [Definition] To go to bed [Audio Available?] Yes [Word *]

Output: retire


Input: [0] Attribute [2] The HTTP method from the request line, e.g. GET [1]

Output: method

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Attribute [2] The raw URI from the request line. May or may not include host. [1]

Output: uri

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Attribute [2] Protocol from the request line, e.g. HTTP/1.1 [1]

Output: clientproto

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Attribute [2] A http_headers.Headers instance of incoming headers. [1]

Output: headers

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Attribute [2] A stream.IByteStream of incoming data. [1]

Output: stream

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Method [2] Write an IResponse object to the client [1]

Output: writeResponse

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [0] Attribute [2] The ChannelRequest. I wonder if this is public really? [1]

Output: chanRequest

twisted.web2.iweb.IRequest : API documentation


Input: [Filtering Options] Min. Reviews [Select Option] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [Description]

Output: Shows only sites with at least X user reviews.


Input: [Filtering Options] Date Range [Select Option] All-Time | Last 90 Days [Description]

Output: Option to view only recent site rankings.


Input: [Filtering Options] By Niche [Select Option] No Preference Amateur Anal Asian Ass To Mouth Balloons BBW BDSM Bi-Sexual Big Cocks Bizarre Blondes Blowjobs Boobs Brunettes Bukkake Butts Celebs Cheerleaders Communities Cream Pies Cum Shots Dating Deep Throat Double Penetration DVDs Ebony European Extreme Feet Femdom Fetish Fisting Foot Jobs For Women Games Gangbangs Gay General Glamour Glasses Goth Group Sex Hairy Hand Jobs Hardcore Hentai High Def Indian Insertions Interracial Latex Latina Legs N Nylons Lesbian Machines Magazines Mature Middle East Midgets MILF Mobile Nerds Non-Nude Old N Young Panties Parties Petite Photography Piercings Pissing Porn Stars Pregnant Public Nudity Reality Red Heads Shaved Shoes Small Tits Smoking Smother Softcore Solo Models Spanking Specialty Sports Squirting Stories Swingers Tit Jobs Toys Trample Tranny Uniforms Upskirt Videos Vintage VOD Voyeur Webcams Wet N Messy Young Adults [Description]

Output: View only sites in the selected niche.


Input: [Filtering Options] 2nd Niche [Select Option] No Preference Amateur Anal Asian Ass To Mouth Balloons BBW BDSM Bi-Sexual Big Cocks Bizarre Blondes Blowjobs Boobs Brunettes Bukkake Butts Celebs Cheerleaders Communities Cream Pies Cum Shots Dating Deep Throat Double Penetration DVDs Ebony European Extreme Feet Femdom Fetish Fisting Foot Jobs For Women Games Gangbangs Gay General Glamour Glasses Goth Group Sex Hairy Hand Jobs Hardcore Hentai High Def Indian Insertions Interracial Latex Latina Legs N Nylons Lesbian Machines Magazines Mature Middle East Midgets MILF Mobile Nerds Non-Nude Old N Young Panties Parties Petite Photography Piercings Pissing Porn Stars Pregnant Public Nudity Reality Red Heads Shaved Shoes Small Tits Smoking Smother Softcore Solo Models Spanking Specialty Sports Squirting Stories Swingers Tit Jobs Toys Trample Tranny Uniforms Upskirt Videos Vintage VOD Voyeur Webcams Wet N Messy Young Adults [Description]

Output: An additional niche selection if desired.


Input: [Filtering Options] By Site Type [Select Option] No Preference AVS Services Networks Pay Per View Pay Sites Private Cams [Description]

Output: View only sites in the selected site type.


Input: [Filtering Options] Sort by [Select Option] Reviews (Descending) [Description]

Output: Use the column header links to change.


Input: [Positive] good [Comparative] better [Superlative]

Output: best

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] well [Comparative] better [Superlative]

Output: best

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] bad [Comparative] worse [Superlative]

Output: worst

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] badly [Comparative] worse [Superlative]

Output: worst

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] far [Comparative] farther [Superlative]

Output: farthest

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] far [Comparative] further [Superlative]

Output: furthest

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] late [Comparative] later [Superlative]

Output: later or latest

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] little (amount) [Comparative] less [Superlative]

Output: least

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] many [Comparative] more [Superlative]

Output: most

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] much [Comparative] more [Superlative]

Output: most

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Positive] some [Comparative] more [Superlative]

Output: most

Adjectives Versus Adverbs: Three Degrees of Separation

Inconsiderate Adjectives and Adverbs


Input: [Description] Gtk [Kind]

Output: Required to build


Input: [Description] Libsigc++ [Kind]

Output: Required to build


Input: [Description] GTS [Kind]

Output: Weak prerequisite


Input: [Description] NetPBM [Kind]

Output: Weak prerequisite


Input: [Description] ImageMagick [Kind]

Output: Weak prerequisite


Input: [Description] Aqsis [Kind]

Output: Weak prerequisite


Input: [Column] ASSOC_DEF_NAME [Datatype] VARCHAR2(64) [Description]

Output: Name of the association definition.


Input: [Column] SOURCE_TARGET_NAME [Datatype] VARCHAR2(256) [Description]

Output: Target name of the target to which the association is being defined.


Input: [Column] SOURCE_TARGET_TYPE [Datatype] VARCHAR2(64) [Description]

Output: The target type of the target for which the association is being defined. ÒANYÓ can be used to specify that any target type be used.


Input: [Column] ASSOC_TARGET_NAME [Datatype] VARCHAR2(256) [Description]

Output: Target Name of the target which is being associated with the source target.


Input: [Column] ASSOC_TARGET_TYPE [Datatype] VARCHAR2(64) [Description]

Output: The target type of the associated target. ÒANYÓ can be used to specify that any target type be used.


Input: [Column] SCOPE_TARGET_NAME [Datatype] VARCHAR2(256) [Description]

Output: The target under whose scope the association is valid. This applies to non-global associations only. For example: A database may be part of a composite target only for a particular service.


Input: [Column] SCOPE_TARGET_TYPE [Datatype] VARCHAR2(64) [Description]

Output: The target type for which the association is valid. This applies to non-global associations only.


Input: [Column] ASSOCIATION_TYPE [Datatype] VARCHAR2(64) [Description]

Output: The type of association.


Input: [Content] Money spent on buying drinks and chips [Column]

Output: Goods

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Content] Money spent on paying employees of the organisation, mandated by load (unverified) [Column]

Output: Salary

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Content] Investments, goods and services not to be sold on to members or third parties, e.g. light bulbs, chairs, etc... [Column]

Output: Div. Goods & Services

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Content] The amount of money spent for other type of expenses [Column]

Output: Others Amount

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Content] The description of the amount classified under other, e.g. Gift for new space [Column]

Output: Others Description

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Content] Money that was transferred to another account. When the books are balanced, and no money is in transfer (on its way to the bank e.g.) there will be a matching record in the IN journal for this amount. [Column]

Output: Transfers

Difference between revisions of "Books" - Whitespace (Hackerspace Gent)


Input: [Command Line] cronsnap [GUI] Customize the backup configuration ➜ Local Snapshots [Description]

Output: schedule when snapshots occur and how long to keep them; the "stop" option can be used to disable snapshot creation

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] get [Description]

Output: list Life Preserver options

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] listcron [GUI] main screen of Life Preserver [Description]

Output: list which ZFS pools have a scheduled snapshot

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] listsnap [GUI] Browse a snapshot [Description]

Output: list snapshots of specified dataset

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] mksnap [GUI] Make a new snapshot [Description]

Output: create and replicate a new ZFS snapshot; by default, snapshots are recursive, meaning that a snapshot is taken of every dataset within a pool

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] replicate [GUI] Customize the backup configuration ➜ Replication [Description]

Output: used to list, add, and remove backup server; read the help for this command for examples

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] revertsnap [GUI] Revert an entire data subset [Description]

Output: revert dataset to the specified snapshot version

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] rmsnap [GUI] Remove selected dataset from automatic backup [Description]

Output: deletes specified snapshot; by default, all datasets within the snapshot are deleted

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] set [Description]

Output: configures Life Preserver options; read help for the list of configurable options

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] status [GUI] main screen of Life Preserver [Description]

Output: lists the last snapshot name and replication status

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [Command Line] zpool [Description]

Output: used to attach/detach drives from the pool; read help for examples

Difference between revisions of "Life Preserver/9.2/en" - PC-BSD Wiki


Input: [TID] 3 [Name] Ratio Potency (uM) [Description] The concentration of sample yielding half-maximal inhibition in the ratio readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

Output: μM

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 4 [Name] Ratio Efficacy (%) [Description] Percent inhibition in the ratio readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 6 [Name] 530 nm Potency (uM) [Description] The concentration of sample yielding half-maximal inhibition in the 530 nm readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

Output: μM

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 7 [Name] 530 nm Efficacy (%) [Description] Percent inhibition in the 530 nm readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 9 [Name] 460 nm Potency (uM) [Description] The concentration of sample yielding half-maximal inhibition in the 460 nm readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

Output: μM

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 10 [Name] 460 nm Efficacy (%) [Description] Percent inhibition in the 460 nm readout of the FXR antagonist mode screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 12 [Name] Viability Potency (uM) [Description] The concentration of sample yielding half-maximal inhibition in the cell viability counter screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

Output: μM

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [TID] 13 [Name] Viability Efficacy (%) [Description] Percent inhibition in the cell viability counter screen. [Type] Float [Unit]

AID 743240 - qHTS assay to identify small molecule antagonists of the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) signaling pathway: Summary - PubChem BioAssay Summary


Input: [0] Shorts [2] Complete [1]

Output: High

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Shirt [2] Complete [1]

Output: High

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Arm Band [2] Complete [1]

Output: High

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Accesories - Braces, Belt, Gloves, Tie, Pouch [2] Complete [1]

Output: Medium

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Bow in Hair [2] Complete [1]

Output: Medium

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Headphones [2] Complete [1]

Output: Low

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [0] Megaphone [2] Complete [1]

Output: Low

Cosplay Island | View Costume | Nachtangel - Rin Kagamine


Input: [Issue] The Group competes for clients in a highly competitive industry and client loss may reduce market share and decrease profits. [How it is managed] Operating companies seek to establish reputations in the industry that attract and retain clients, including by improving the quality of their creative output. The Group’s different agency networks limit potential conflicts of interest and the Group’s cross- discipline team approach seeks to retain clients. Brand Check at every Board meeting. [Potential impact]

Output: Competitors include large multinational advertising and marketing communication companies and regional and national marketing services companies. New market participants include database marketing and modelling companies, telemarketers and internet companies. Service agreements with clients are generally terminated by the client on 90 days’ notice and many clients put their advertising and communications business up for competitive review from time to time. The ability to attract new clients and to retain existing clients may also in some cases be limited by clients’ policies about conflicts of interest.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group receives a significant portion of its revenues from a limited number of large clients and the loss of these clients could adversely impact the Group’s prospects, business, financial condition and results of operations. [How it is managed] Global client account managers seek to ensure the Group maintains partnership relationship with major clients. Operating companies seek to establish reputations in the industry that attract and retain clients and key talent. Brand Check at every Board meeting and regular dialogue between directors of the Company and directors of the Group’s largest clients. [Potential impact]

Output: A relatively small number of clients contribute a significant percentage of the Group’s consolidated revenues. The Group’s 10 largest clients accounted for almost 18% of revenues in the year ended 31 December 2010. Clients generally are able to reduce advertising and marketing spend or cancel projects on short notice. The loss of one or more of the Group’s largest clients, if not replaced by new client accounts or an increase in business from existing clients, would adversely affect the Group’s financial condition.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The social and environmental impact of our work for clients. [How it is managed] Opportunities to advise clients on marketing with a social or environmental dimension are identified by our companies. [Potential impact]

Output: The operating companies across 107 countries may not always consider the social and environmental impact of their work.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Damage to WPP’s reputation from undertaking controversial client work. [How it is managed] Upward referral within operating companies and consideration at WPP ethical review meetings and WPP Business Code of Conduct. [Potential impact]

Output: The operating companies may undertake controversial client accounts and may not always consider the impact on the Group.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Marketing ethics, compliance with marketing standards, and increasing transparency about our marketing practices. [How it is managed] Managed by our companies with referral to WPP Business Code of Conduct and WPP directors as necessary to improve standards and measurement in marketing practices. [Potential impact]

Output: Our work may not always comply with all laws and industry codes governing marketing material.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Compliance with privacy and data protection regulations. [How it is managed] The Group assists our companies in developing principles on privacy and compliance with local laws. Our key digital marketing and research companies have nominated senior executives to provide leadership on privacy and to work with other companies in the Group. [Potential impact]

Output: Increased regulation unless the operating companies meet best practice standards, contribute to the debate on privacy, increase transparency for consumers on how their data are obtained and used.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Employment, including diversity and equal opportunities, business ethics, employee development, remuneration, communication and health and safety. [How it is managed] Human resources policies are set and implemented at operating company level. WPP’s chief talent officer assists the companies in attracting, developing and retaining our talent. [Potential impact]

Output: Failing to meet standards on diversity and gender would impact the perception of the group and quality of work.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Climate change, including the emissions from energy used in our offices and during business travel. [How it is managed] Cross-functional, Group-wide Energy Action Teams and a network of company Climate Champions help implement our climate change strategy. Some companies have appointed environmental managers. [Potential impact]

Output: Negative cost and reputational impact if the Group failed to meet target to reduce per head carbon intensity to 1.2 tonnes by 2020 (from 3.3 tonnes in 2006).

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group’s businesses are subject to economic and political cycles. Many of the economies in which the Group operates have significant economic challenges. [How it is managed] Reduction in headcount and overhead. Ensuring that variable staff costs are a significant proportion of total staff costs and revenue. Increased controls over capital expenditure and working capital. Strategic focus on BRICs, the Next 11, new media and consumer insight. Brand Check at every Board meeting. [Potential impact]

Output: Reduction in client spending or postponing spending on the services offered by the Group or switching of client expenditure to non-traditional media and renegotiation of contract terms leading to reduced profitability and cash flow.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely impact the Group’s consolidated results. [How it is managed] The balance sheet and cash flows of the Company are hedged by borrowing in the currency of those cash flows. The Company publishes and explains its results in constant currency terms, as well as in sterling and on an actual dollar basis. [Potential impact]

Output: The Company’s reporting currency is pounds sterling. Given the Group’s significant international operations, changes in exchange rates cause fluctuations in the Company’s results when measured in pounds sterling.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Changes to the Group’s debt issue ratings by the rating agencies Moody’s Investor Services and Standard and Poor’s Rating Service may affect the Group’s access to debt capital. [How it is managed] Active dialogue with the rating agencies to ensure they are fully apprised of any actions that may affect the Company’s debt ratings. The Company also seeks to manage its financial ratios and to pursue policies so as to maintain its investment grade ratings. [Potential impact]

Output: The Company’s long-term debt is currently rated Baa3 and BBB by the rating agencies respectively and the Company’s short-term debt obligations P3 and A2 respectively. If the Company’s financial performance and outlook materially deteriorate, a ratings downgrade could occur and the interest rates and fees payable on certain of the Company’s revolving credit facilities could be increased.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group may be unable to collect balances due from any client that files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent. [How it is managed] Evaluating and monitoring clients’ ongoing creditworthiness and in some cases requiring credit insurance or payments in advance. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group is generally paid in arrears for its services. Invoices are typically payable within 30 to 60 days. The Group commits to media and production purchases on behalf of some of its clients as principal or agent depending on the client and market circumstances. If a client is unable to pay sums due, media and production companies may look to the Group to pay such amounts to which it committed as an agent on behalf of those clients.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group may be unsuccessful in evaluating material risks involved in completed and future acquisitions and may be unsuccessful in integrating any acquired operations with its existing businesses. [How it is managed] Business, legal, tax and financial due diligence carried out prior to acquisition to seek to identify and evaluate material risks and plan the integration process. Warranties and indemnities included in purchase agreements. Audit Committee oversight of acquisition and Board oversight of material acquisitions and review of the integration and performance of recent and prior acquisitions. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group regularly reviews potential acquisitions of businesses that are complementary to its operations and clients needs. If material risks are not identified prior to acquisition or the Group experiences difficulties in integrating an acquired business, it may not realise the expected benefits from such acquisition and the Group’s financial condition could be adversely affected.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] Goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on the Group’s balance sheet with respect to acquired companies may become impaired. [How it is managed] Regular impairment testing which is a recurring agenda item for the Audit Committee. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group has a significant amount of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on its balance sheet with respect to acquired companies. The Group annually tests the carrying value of goodwill and other intangibles for impairment. The estimates and assumptions about results of operations and cash flows made in connection with impairment testing could differ from future results of operations and cash flows. Future events could cause the Group to conclude that the asset values associated with a given operation have become impaired which could have a material impact on the Group’s financial condition.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group operates in 107 countries and is exposed to the risks of doing business internationally. [How it is managed] Affiliate, associate and joint venture structures with local partners used in developing markets. Brand Check at every Board meeting. Uniform approach to internal controls to seek to ensure best practice employed in all jurisdictions. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group’s international operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations, restrictions and/or taxation on repatriations of earnings, social, political and economic instability, conflicts of laws and interpretation of contracts.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group’s performance could be adversely affected if it were unable to attract and retain key talent or had inadequate talent management and succession planning for key management roles. [How it is managed] The Group’s incentive plans are structured to provide retention value for example by paying part of annual incentives in shares that vest two years after grant and having a five-year performance period for LEAP. Operating companies seek to establish reputations in the industry that attract and retain key personnel, including by improving the quality of their creative output. Succession planning of key executives is a recurring agenda item of the Board and Nomination Committee. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group is highly dependent on the talent, creative abilities and technical skills of our personnel as well as their relationships with clients. The Group is vulnerable to the loss of personnel to competitors and clients leading to disruption to the business.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group may be subject to regulations affecting its activities. [How it is managed] The Group actively monitors any proposed regulatory or statutory changes and consults with government agencies and regulatory bodies where possible on such proposed changes. Regular briefings to the Audit Committee of significant regulatory or statutory changes. Group representation on a number of industry advisory bodies. [Potential impact]

Output: Governments, government agencies and industry self-regulatory bodies from time to time adopt statutes and regulations that directly or indirectly affect the form, content and scheduling of advertising, public relations and public affairs and market research or otherwise limit the scope of the activities of the Group and its clients which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position. Changes in tax laws or their application may also adversely affect the Group’s reported results.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group may be exposed to liabilities from allegations that certain of its clients’ advertising claims may be false or misleading or that its clients products may be defective. [How it is managed] The Group seeks to comply with all laws and industry codes governing marketing material. Upward referral procedure within operating companies and to WPP ethical review meetings. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group may be, or may be joined as a defendant, in litigation brought against its clients in respect of services provided by the Group.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Issue] The Group operates in 107 countries and is subject to increased anti-corruption legislation and enforcement not only in the US and UK. [How it is managed] On-line and in country ethics and anti-bribery and corruption training on a Group-wide basis to raise awareness and seek compliance with the WPP Code of Conduct. Confidential help-line for WPP staff to raise any concerns which are investigated and reported to the Audit Committee on a regular basis. Due diligence on selecting and appointing suppliers and acquisitions. Gift and hospitality register and approvals process. [Potential impact]

Output: The Group may be exposed to liabilities in the event of breaches of anti-corruption legislation.

WPP Annual Report 2010 - The Board of Directors


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_texture3D [Addition]

Output: 3D textures


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_bgra [Addition]

Output: BGRA pixel formats


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_packed_pixels [Addition]

Output: Packed pixel formats


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_rescale_normal [Addition]

Output: Normal rescaling


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_separate_specular_color [Addition]

Output: Separate specular color


Input: [Promoted from] SGIS_texture_edge_clamp [Addition]

Output: Texture coordinate edge clamping


Input: [Promoted from] SGIS_texture_lod [Addition]

Output: Texture LOD control


Input: [Promoted from] EXT_draw_range_elements [Addition]

Output: Vertex array draw element range


Input: [Program Name] Accounting [Degree]

Output: Associate


Input: [Program Name] Business [Degree]

Output: Associate


Input: [Program Name] Dental Assistant [Degree]

Output: Diploma


Input: [Program Name] Medical Administrative Assistant [Degree]

Output: Diploma


Input: [Program Name] Medical Assistant [Degree]

Output: Diploma


Input: [Program Name] Medical Insurance Billing and Coding [Degree]

Output: Diploma


Input: [Program Name] Pharmacy Technician [Degree]

Output: Diploma


Input: [0] Second-injury fund [2]

Output: The employer of an injured, impaired worker is responsible only for the workers' compensation benefit for the most recent injury; the second-injury fund would cover the cost of any additional benefits for aggravation of a prior condition. The cost is shared by the insurance industry and self-insureds, funded through assessments to insurance companies and self-insureds based on either premiums or losses.


Input: [0] Self-insured retentions [2]

Output: That portion of the risk retained by a person for its own account.


Input: [0] Servicing carrier [2]

Output: An insurance company that provides, for a fee, various services including policy issuance, claims adjusting and customer service for insureds in a reinsurance pool.


Input: [0] Statutory accounting practices (SAP) [2]

Output: The practices and procedures prescribed or permitted by domiciliary state insurance regulatory authorities in the United States for recording transactions and preparing financial statements. Statutory accounting practices generally reflect a modified going concern basis of accounting.


Input: [0] Statutory surplus [2]

Output: As determined under SAP, the amount remaining after all liabilities, including loss reserves, are subtracted from all admitted assets. Admitted assets are assets of an insurer prescribed or permitted by a state to be recognized on the statutory balance sheet. Statutory surplus is also referred to as "surplus" or "surplus as regards policyholders" for statutory accounting purposes.


Input: [0] Structured settlements [2]

Output: Periodic payments to an injured person or survivor for a determined number of years or for life, typically in settlement of a claim under a liability policy, usually funded through the purchase of an annuity.


Input: [0] Subrogation [2]

Output: A principle of law incorporated in insurance policies, which enables an insurance company, after paying a claim under a policy, to recover the amount of the loss from another person or entity who is legally liable for it.


Input: [0] Third-party liability [2]

Output: A liability owed to a claimant (third party) who is not one of the two parties to the insurance contract. Insured liability claims are referred to as third-party claims.


Input: [0] Treaty reinsurance [2]

Output: The reinsurance of a specified type or category of risks defined in a reinsurance agreement (a "treaty") between a primary insurer or other reinsured and a reinsurer. Typically, in treaty reinsurance, the primary insurer or reinsured is obligated to offer and the reinsurer is obligated to accept a specified portion of all that type or category of risks originally written by the primary insurer or reinsured.


Input: [0] Umbrella coverage [2]

Output: A form of insurance protection against losses in excess of amounts covered by other liability insurance policies or amounts not covered by the usual liability policies.


Input: [0] Unassigned surplus [2]

Output: The undistributed and unappropriated amount of statutory surplus.


Input: [Device] Processor [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Screen [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] HDD [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Optical Drive [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Graphics [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Sound [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Ethernet [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Wireless [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Bluetooth [Compatibility]

Output: Not Tested


Input: [Device] Modem [Compatibility]

Output: Not Tested


Input: [Device] USB [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Device] Firewire [Compatibility]

Output: Not Tested


Input: [Device] Card Reader [Compatibility]

Output: Not Tested


Input: [Device] ExpressCard Slot [Compatibility]

Output: Not Tested


Input: [Device] Webcam [Compatibility]

Output: Works


Input: [Country] Bahrain [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] Yes [Rape] Yes [Fetal Defects] Yes [Socio-economic factors] Yes [On Demand] Yes [Physical Health]

Output: Yes


Input: [Country] Iran [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] Iraq [To Protect Woman's Life] Restricted [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] Restricted [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] Israel [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] Yes [Rape] Yes [Fetal Defects] Yes [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: Yes


Input: [Country] Jordan [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] Yes [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: Yes


Input: [Country] Kuwait [To Protect Woman's Life] Restricted [Mental Health] Restricted [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] Restricted [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: Restricted


Input: [Country] Lebanon [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] Oman [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] Qatar [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] Yes [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] Restricted [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: Yes


Input: [Country] Saudi Arabia [To Protect Woman's Life] * [Mental Health] Restricted [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: Restricted


Input: [Country] Syria [To Protect Woman's Life] Restricted [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] United Arab Emirates [To Protect Woman's Life] Restricted [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [Country] Yemen [To Protect Woman's Life] Yes [Mental Health] No [Rape] No [Fetal Defects] No [Socio-economic factors] No [On Demand] No [Physical Health]

Output: No


Input: [1] All ages [2] May not be suitable for children under the age of 13 [3] May not be suitable for children under the age of 17 [4] Content that is generally recognized as appropriate only for or that is legally restricted to persons at least the age of majority in their region. [0]

Output: Overview


Input: [1] Minimal cartoon or fantasy violence [2] Mild to moderate cartoon, fantasy, or realistic violence [3] Frequent, intense or graphic cartoon, fantasy, or realistic violence [4] Extreme depictions of graphic violence appropriate only for or legally restricted to persons at least 18 years of age. [0]

Output: Violence


Input: [1] Little or no sexual content, situations, or themes [2] Infrequent/Mild sexual content, situations, or themes [3] Intense/Frequent sexual content, situations, or themes [4] BlackBerry World will not accept apps with graphic nudity [0]

Output: Sexual Content


Input: [1] No strong or coarse language [2] Infrequent/Mild profanity or crude humor [3] Intense or graphic profanity/crude humor [4] BlackBerry World will not accept Hate Speech [0]

Output: Language


Input: [1] None [2] Infrequent/Mild [3] Intense/Frequent drug/alcohol use or reference [4] Content designed to encourage/promote drug or alcohol abuse, or content appropriate only for or that is legally restricted to persons at least 18 years of age [0]

Output: Alcohol, Tobacco, Drug Use


Input: [1] None [2] Simulated [3] Simulated [4] As permitted by law for persons at least 18 years of age [0]

Output: Gambling


Input: [Event] prepared [Target] controller [Sequencing] one-of: prepared, notPrepared [Description]

Output: positive response to prepare (activeGrammars or activeVoiceModel prepared)

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0

Table 7: Events sent by recognition resource


Input: [Event] notPrepared [Target] controller [Sequencing] one-of: prepared, notPrepared [Description]

Output: negative response to prepare (no activeGrammars or activeVoiceModel defined)

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [Event] inputStarted [Target] controller [Description]

Output: notification that onset of input has been detected

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [Event] inputFinished [Target] controller [Description]

Output: notification that the end of input has been detected

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [Event] partialResult [Target] controller [Payload] results (M), listener (O) [Description]

Output: notification of a partial recognition result

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [Event] recoResult [Target] controller [Payload] results (M), listener (O) [Description]

Output: notification of complete recognition result, including the results structure and a listener

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [Event] error [Target] controller [Payload] error status (M) [Description]

Output: notification that an error has occurred

Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 3.0


Input: [1] All ages [2] May not be suitable for children under the age of 13 [3] May not be suitable for children under the age of 17 [4] Content that is generally recognized as appropriate only for or that is legally restricted to persons at least the age of majority in their region. [0]

Output: Overview


Input: [1] Minimal cartoon or fantasy violence [2] Mild to moderate cartoon, fantasy, or realistic violence [3] Frequent, intense or graphic cartoon, fantasy, or realistic violence [4] Extreme depictions of graphic violence appropriate only for or legally restricted to persons at least 18 years of age. [0]

Output: Violence


Input: [1] Little or no sexual content, situations, or themes [2] Infrequent/Mild sexual content, situations, or themes [3] Intense/Frequent sexual content, situations, or themes [4] BlackBerry World will not accept apps with graphic nudity [0]

Output: Sexual Content


Input: [1] No strong or coarse language [2] Infrequent/Mild profanity or crude humor [3] Intense or graphic profanity/crude humor [4] BlackBerry World will not accept Hate Speech [0]

Output: Language


Input: [1] None [2] Infrequent/Mild [3] Intense/Frequent drug/alcohol use or reference [4] Content designed to encourage/promote drug or alcohol abuse, or content appropriate only for or that is legally restricted to persons at least 18 years of age [0]

Output: Alcohol, Tobacco, Drug Use


Input: [1] None [2] Simulated [3] Simulated [4] As permitted by law for persons at least 18 years of age [0]

Output: Gambling


Input: [Features] Storage virtualization [Benefits]

Output: Reduce storage costs by consolidating and simplifying your existing infrastructure with virtualization.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Unified architecture [Benefits]

Output: Share resources for different applications with a unified platform to lower capital investment and lower operation cost.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Ease of management [Benefits]

Output: Reduce the time required to administer storage and deliver storage service levels when, where, and how you need them.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Flash acceleration [Benefits]

Output: Flash-accelerated applications drive faster information access, faster business decisions, and customer satisfaction.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Capacity efficiency [Benefits]

Output: Reclaim capacity instead of purchasing new equipment.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Automated data tiering [Benefits]

Output: Maximize performance, minimize cost, meet storage service levels, and minimize storage costs.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Dynamic provisioning [Benefits]

Output: To support growth of file systems simplify management and improve utilization by dynamically growing and shrinking volumes.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Data deduplication [Benefits]

Output: Greater usable network-attached-storage capacity.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Object-based file system [Benefits]

Output: Better organize and accelerate searches for stored files.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Server virtualization integration [Benefits]

Output: Simplify data protection from a virtualization administrator's point of view.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Single namespace [Benefits]

Output: Simplify management by viewing all files and file systems from a single console.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Large volumes and file systems [Benefits]

Output: Decrease time to manage growth with large volumes that support large file systems and millions of files.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Higher scalable capacity [Benefits]

Output: Save on power, cooling, and space costs.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Point-in-time snapshots [Benefits]

Output: Have a fast, easy, and space-efficient data protection alternative.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Writable snapshots [Benefits]

Output: Save storage capacity and decrease time to make copies of data for test and development environments.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Universal data replication [Benefits]

Output: Deploy locally and remotely for disaster recovery with no interruption in service.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Storage cluster [Benefits]

Output: Continuous local or metro data availability.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Multitenant partitioning [Benefits]

Output: Securely protect data for separate applications, departments or customers.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Features] Encryption [Benefits]

Output: Secure protection of data at rest.

HDS: Flash Storage | Enterprise Virtualization - Hitachi Unified Storage (HUS) VM


Input: [Message] 21. Posted: Tue 26th Mar 2013 05:21 GMT What if all the Mario references in Lego City Undercover mean there is going to be a new Mario game? [Author]

Output: K964

Nintendo Foreshadowing Easter Eggs? - Wii U Forum - Page 2


Input: [Message] Message [Author]

Output: Author

Nintendo Foreshadowing Easter Eggs? - Wii U Forum - Page 2


Input: [Message] 22. Posted: Tue 26th Mar 2013 05:49 GMT DudeSean wrote: Wow. That's insulting that you think I don't know that Nintendo plans ahead. And you were wrong about the Animal Crossing thing, so, your point has been negated. DudeSean wrote: I didn't mean any offense. You shouldn't take offense. By taking offense yourself, you caused offense. Try to give a little thought to your viewer/listener and be more respectful with your comments. Edited on Tue 26th March, 2013 @ 05:49 by OptometristLime [Author]

Output: OptometristLime

Nintendo Foreshadowing Easter Eggs? - Wii U Forum - Page 2


Input: [Message] 23. Posted: Tue 26th Mar 2013 06:27 GMT Well, I'm sure we can all agree that we have no clue what zoroarkrules25 is even talking about. Seriously, what do you mean by those 'creepers' in Animal Crossing? We can't read your mind, so please make your thoughts clear. [Author]

Output: willobee

Nintendo Foreshadowing Easter Eggs? - Wii U Forum - Page 2