Input: [Task] Local Community Liaison [Responsible] Uditha Bandara Wijerathna [Description] Manage communication between local contributors and the event organizers. [Comments] - [Progress]

Output: in progress

Fedora Technical Seminar with F18 University of Rajarata - FedoraProject


Input: [Task] Budget Handling [Responsible] Uditha Bandara and Buddhika Kurera [Description] Manage the whole event budget [Comments] - [Progress]

Output: Planning

Fedora Technical Seminar with F18 University of Rajarata - FedoraProject


Input: [Key] Back, Ok, Stop [Function]

Output: Exit


Input: [Key] FastFwd [Function]

Output: Play faster


Input: [Key] FastRew [Function]

Output: Play slower


Input: [Key] Up, Next [Function]

Output: Next title


Input: [Key] Down, Prev [Function]

Output: Previous title


Input: [Key] Green [Function]

Output: One minute forward


Input: [Key] Yellow [Function]

Output: One minute back


Input: [Key] Blue [Function]

Output: Change between titel and detail view


Input: [-y] scaratchy [-ily] merrily [-ly]

Output: silently


Input: [-y] squirmy [-ily] greedily [-ly]

Output: secretly


Input: [-y] vevelty [-ily] hastily [-ly]

Output: rapidly


Input: [-y] squeaky [-ily] readily [-ly]

Output: fluently


Input: [-y] wealthy [-ly]

Output: eagerly


Input: [-y] skinny [-ly]

Output: generously


Input: [-y] swampy [-ly]

Output: seriously


Input: [-y] shaggy [-ly]

Output: politely


Input: [-y] silvery [-ly]

Output: briefly


Input: [-y] spotty [-ly]

Output: bravely


Input: [Document Name] UL Online Certification Directory [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Dampers [Product Groups]

Output: Combination Fire-Smoke Dampers Fire Dampers Smoke Dampers


Input: [Document Name] Universal Control - MS-1P [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Motor Starters [Product Groups]

Output: Motor Starters


Input: [Document Name] USCG Approval Certificate [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Dampers [Product Groups]

Output: Marine Dampers


Input: [Document Name] USCG Renewal Letter [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Dampers [Product Groups]

Output: Marine Dampers


Input: [Document Name] Vari-Green Fan Selections [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Roof Mounted Fans [Product Groups]

Output: Vari-Green


Input: [Document Name] Vari-Green Motor & Controls [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Inline and Ceiling Fans Roof Mounted Fans Sidewall Exhaust Fans Utility, Centrifugal, and Radial Blowers [Product Groups]

Output: Centrifugal Inline Fans Centrifugal Roof Exhaust Fans Centrifugal Upblast Exhaust Fans Utility Centrifugal Fans Wall Exhaust Fans Wall Fans


Input: [Document Name] Water Use Comparison [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Kitchen Ventilation Systems [Product Groups]

Output: Type I Wall Canopy Grease Exhaust Hoods


Input: [Document Name] Waterwash Arrangement Wiring Diagrams [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Kitchen Ventilation Systems [Product Groups]

Output: Type I Wall Canopy Grease Exhaust Hoods


Input: [Document Name] Will your dampers be up to standards?, published in The NEWS 12/01 [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Dampers [Product Groups]

Output: Combination Fire-Smoke Dampers Fire Dampers Smoke Dampers


Input: [Document Name] Wording for ARI Certified Wheels, Options, and Accessories [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Energy Recovery Ventilators [Product Groups]

Output: Control Options for Energy Recovery Ventilators Energy Recovery Modules Preconditioners With Cooling & Heating


Input: [Document Name] Zero Clearance Reduction System [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Kitchen Ventilation Systems [Product Groups]

Output: Energy Recovery Filter System Type I Wall Canopy Grease Exhaust Hoods


Input: [Document Name] Zone Defense [Type] Other Info [Product Category] Kitchen Ventilation Systems [Product Groups]

Output: Fire Suppression Systems


Input: [Code] BLM1x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Lightweight Men's Single Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BLM2- [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Lightweight Men's Pair

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BLM2x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Lightweight Men's Double Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BLM4- [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Lightweight Men's Four

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BLM4x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Lightweight Men's Quadruple Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM1x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Single Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM2- [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Pair

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM2x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Double Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM4- [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Four

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM4+ [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Coxed Four

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM4x [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Quadruple Sculls

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Code] BM8+ [2] See details [Boat Class]

Output: U23 Men's Eight

2014 World Rowing U23 Championships / Results - worldrowing.com


Input: [Value] 1 [Equipment]

Output: DDC glasses. The sync signal is sent to the glasses via the DDC signal to the monitor. These usually involve a passthrough cable between the monitor and the graphics card. This mode is not available on G8xGL and higher GPUs.


Input: [Value] 2 [Equipment]

Output: "Blueline" glasses. These usually involve a passthrough cable between the monitor and graphics card. The glasses know which eye to display based on the length of a blue line visible at the bottom of the screen. When in this mode, the root window dimensions are one pixel shorter in the Y dimension than requested. This mode does not work with virtual root window sizes larger than the visible root window size (desktop panning). This mode is not available on G8xGL and higher GPUs.


Input: [Value] 3 [Equipment]

Output: Onboard stereo support. This is usually only found on professional cards. The glasses connect via a DIN connector on the back of the graphics card.


Input: [Value] 4 [Equipment]

Output: TwinView clone mode stereo (aka "passive" stereo). On graphics cards that support TwinView, the left eye is displayed on the first display, and the right eye is displayed on the second display. This is normally used in conjunction with special projectors to produce 2 polarized images which are then viewed with polarized glasses. To use this stereo mode, you must also configure TwinView in clone mode with the same resolution, panning offset, and panning domains on each display.


Input: [Value] 5 [Equipment]

Output: Vertical interlaced stereo mode, for use with SeeReal Stereo Digital Flat Panels.


Input: [Value] 6 [Equipment]

Output: Color interleaved stereo mode, for use with Sharp3D Stereo Digital Flat Panels.


Input: [#] EM-3100 [Sender] lmcclure2@mac.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Linda McClure 6202 Friars Rd. #223 San Diego, CA 92108

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3101 [Sender] puggerspaniel@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Betty Kim 616 S. Parish Pl. Burbank, CA 91506

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3102 [Sender] moosinka@msn.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eva Sipos 18034 ne 138th place Redmond, WA 98052

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3103 [Sender] suzywitten@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Suzy Witten 855 N. Edinburgh Los Angeles, CA 90046

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3104 [Sender] alisalindsay@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, A. Lisa Lindsay 5724 rose loop n.e. Bainbridge Island, WA 98110

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3105 [Sender] ruthpick@juno.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ruth Pickering 33321 SE 76th St Fall City, WA 98024

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3106 [Sender] scrapadoo11@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carolyn Marshall 525 Leavenworth St. Apt. 21 San Francisco, CA 94109

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3107 [Sender] n0vathecat@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Charles Jonaitis 2027 N. Curson Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90046

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3108 [Sender] pjoyner@comcast.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Phil Joyner 8233 NE 163rd Pl Kenmore, WA 98028

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3109 [Sender] jaz@lmi.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, J. Zaitlin 297 Berkeley Park Blvd Kensington, CA 94707-1237

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3110 [Sender] gulmer@mcn.org [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gene Ulmer 360 N.McPherson Fort Bragg, CA 95437

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3111 [Sender] spookstysowski@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:17:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, amanda tysowski 2717 yew street Bellingham, WA 98226

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3112 [Sender] spacepony@sbcglobal.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Also there are other sources that would help to minimize the cutting of our forests. We need to grow crops that would save the forests from destruction. Industrial hemp has 25000 uses commercially. Why isn't it used for paper products? It was good enough for President Washington and our country way back then. It is grown as a industrial crop in Canada. Why is this plant only grown legally in North Dakota? There is no need to cut down those magnificent ancient forests. I am a laid off aerospace worker and have found other means of support because of the lack of work in that industry. I believe that the logging companies and loggers can limit their output of cutting down the forests and make the switch to growing and havesting industrial hemp. Like I said before it has 25000 uses. There are solutions out there, we just need to enforce the necessary changes for the betterment of our environment which ultimately affects our quality of life and the life of this planet. Sincerely, L. Thompson 1782 Nisson Rd. #74 Tustin, CA 92780

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3113 [Sender] luckywitch1@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. We must stop the Bush mentalety of drill it, cut it or kill it now...Don't allow this to happen. Sincerely, Sharon Cox 6416-97th Dr.N.E.#5 Lake Stevens, WA 98258-4014

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3114 [Sender] rutherfordmark@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mark Rutherford 110 W. 35th Pl. Eugene, OR 97405

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3115 [Sender] jdeeg@fhcrc.org [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, h j deeg 203 euclid avenue Seattle, WA 98122-6527

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3116 [Sender] herndon@ithaca.edu [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sandra L. Herndon 449 E. Pointes Dr. East Shelton, WA 98584

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3117 [Sender] sherrischiemer@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. We are the generation that needs to take care of our planet, not continue it's destruction! Sincerely, Sherri Schiemer 1414 S 324th Street B209 PMB #306 Federal Way, WA 98003

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3118 [Sender] kbeckel@peoplepc.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, ElvaKatheryn Beckel 81742 San Salvador St Indio, CA 92201-7744

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3119 [Sender] smithrick9@comcast.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Rick Smith 3561 Country way Rd Antioch, TN 37013

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3120 [Sender] peter_reppe@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:18:50 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Peter Reppe 882 E. 27th Ave Eugene, OR 97405

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3121 [Sender] jamacksey1100@sbcglobal.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Julie macksey 1100 Running Springs Rd. #5 Walnut Creek, CA 94595

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3122 [Sender] dleitzel@firstam.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Denise Leitzel 1845 Lehigh Drive Davis, CA 95616

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3123 [Sender] brentstockwell@gmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Brent Stockwell P.O. Box 4055 Manteca, CA 95337

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3124 [Sender] hortenciamock@sbcglobal.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Hortencia Mock 920 Q Street Firebaugh, CA 93622

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3125 [Sender] jaleilaking@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, jaleila king P.O. Box 654 Ross, CA 94957

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3126 [Sender] ekaran2235@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Karan 4150 Webster St. Oakland, CA 94609

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3127 [Sender] anne674@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, ANNE LEWIS 11436 SE 208TH ST SPC 118 KENT, WA 98031

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3128 [Sender] bigdoganne@adelphia.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Anne Egbert 6863 W. Manchester Rathdrum, ID 83858

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3129 [Sender] knwbootman@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Robert Knowles 212 Bartonwood Dr. Lebanon, TN 37087

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3130 [Sender] newmoon@cwnet.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. How you can even consider this stupidity is beyond comprehension. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. logging as it is practiced currently is, AS YOU WELL KNOW, UNSUSTAINABLE. Still you persist in continuing, and even accellerating these destructive practices. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Remember global warming, you greedy imbaciles? Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Try thinking with something other than your bank accounts, you short-sighted, greedy bastards. Sincerely, Lari Evangelinos PO Box 719 Brownsville, CA 95919

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3131 [Sender] elvishspate@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:19:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Heather Pennington 546 shotwell st san francisco, CA 94110

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3132 [Sender] jenny.bee@verizon.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, jennifer bradley 1819 12th. St santa Monica, CA 90404

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3133 [Sender] indira_bela@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Desiree Rister 6105 NE 37th Street Vancouver, WA 98661

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3134 [Sender] smsatkinson@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Susan atkinson 1906 Voight St. "sumner,", WA 98390

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3135 [Sender] bgauba@socal.rr.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Blaise Gauba 4421 Pacific Coast Hwy. Unit # E-107 Unit # E-107 Torrance, CA 90505-5684

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3136 [Sender] dannyk13@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Danny Kleinman 5312 1/2 Village Green Los Angeles, CA 90016

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3137 [Sender] jen.johnson@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:20:54 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jennifer Johnson 4107 35th Ave SW Seattle, WA 98126

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3138 [Sender] jriches2@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Sincerely, Richard Johnson 896 Palouse Place La Conner, WA 98257

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3139 [Sender] reinberg@earthlink.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Don Reinberg 112 Peralta Ave Mill Valley, CA 94941

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3140 [Sender] nicoleperkins@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nicole Perkins 36112 potel common Fremont, CA 94536

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3141 [Sender] barbeau@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Clayton C. Barbeau, MA, MFT 1217 Roycott Way San Jose, CA 95125

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3142 [Sender] gigantesmike@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael Denton 829 Begonia Dr. San Leandro, CA 94578-3806

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3143 [Sender] sheshell2@comcast.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, edie bruce 1116 King Drive El Cerrito, CA 94530

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3144 [Sender] stevenaderhold@hotmail.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Steven Aderhold PO Box 1135 Fallbrook, CA 92088-1135

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3145 [Sender] pogsy@mindspring.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:21:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Dirk Meenen 2312 Teviot St Los Angeles, CA 90039

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3146 [Sender] gerryjim@sbcglobal.net [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:22:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gerald Orcholski 2400 Brigden Rd Pasadena, CA 91104

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3147 [Sender] Angela@harbornet.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:22:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. AS A RESIDENT OF THE NORTHWEST I AM ALL TO FAMILIAR WITH THE THE BEAUTY OF OUR NATURAL FORESTS, ESPECIALLY OLD GROWTH, AND WITH THE UGLY SCARS LEFT BY LOGGING. IN THIS TIME OF CONSERVATION AND SLOWING OF GLOBAL WARMING, WHEN SOME COUNTRIES ARE BEING PAID TO NOT LOG THEIR FORESTS, IT IS LUDICROUS TO BE LOGGING OUR OLD GROWTH FORESTS. I AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO THIS PROPOSAL. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Angela Sisney 8026 Goodman Dr. Gig Harbor, WA 98332

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3148 [Sender] Terry Blattler [Subject] BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision [Date] 1/7/2008 17:23:33 [Body]

Output: Terry Blattler p.o. box522 Randle, WA 98377 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Access should be maintained through BLM administered lands for private land access, fire suppression, as well as recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, boating and sightseeing. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Terry Blattler 360-497-0586

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3149 [Sender] jmeadusa@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:23:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, John Mead 211 Myrtle St Santa Cruz, CA 95060

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3150 [Sender] blueglass@wavecable.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:23:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, InaRae Ussack 93 S. Ridge View Drive Port Angeles, WA 98362

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3151 [Sender] psykopsykik@yahoo.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:23:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Tasker 21036 Shearer ave Carson, CA 90745

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR


Input: [#] EM-3152 [Sender] maatkra@aol.com [Subject] Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests [Date] 1/7/2008 17:23:57 [Body]

Output: Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Dixie Walter 140 Antonie Ave. N. Eatonville, WA 98328

OREGON/WASHINGTON| BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT|US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR