Papers
arxiv:2605.25604

DVAO: Dynamic Variance-adaptive Advantage Optimization for Multi-reward Reinforcement Learning

Published on May 25
· Submitted by
JGC
on May 26
#1 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,

Abstract

Dynamic Variance-adaptive Advantage Optimization (DVAO) addresses training instability in multi-reward reinforcement learning by adaptively weighting objectives based on empirical reward variance, maintaining bounded advantage magnitudes and improving multi-objective performance.

AI-generated summary

Reinforcement Learning has become a standard paradigm for aligning Large Language Models with human intent and task requirements. While Group Relative Policy Optimization offers an efficient, value-model-free alternative to Proximal Policy Optimization, adapting it to real-world multi-reward settings remains challenging. Standard scalarization practices, such as Reward Combination and Advantage Combination, suffer from significant drawbacks: Reward Combination frequently generates advantages with excessively large squared magnitudes that lead to training instability, while Advantage Combination relies on static hyperparameters and ignores cross-objective correlations. To address these limitations, we propose Dynamic Variance-adaptive Advantage Optimization (DVAO), which dynamically adjusts combination weights based on the empirical reward variance of each objective within a rollout group, effectively up-weighting objectives with a stronger learning signal while suppressing noisy ones. We mathematically prove that DVAO maintains bounded advantage magnitudes for stable training and introduces a self-adaptive cross-objective regularization mechanism. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and tool-use benchmarks using Qwen3 and Qwen2.5 models demonstrate that DVAO significantly outperforms baseline methods, achieving a superior multi-objective Pareto frontier and robust training stability.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

We propose Dynamic Variance-adaptive Advantage Optimization (DVAO), which dynamically adjusts combination weights based on the empirical reward variance of each objective within a rollout group, effectively up-weighting objectives with a stronger learning signal while suppressing noisy ones.

i really like the idea of turning multi-reward rl into a dynamic, variance-aware game instead of brittle fixed weights. the core move — weighting per-objective signal by its rollout variance to upweight stronger learning signals while dampening noise — feels like a practical fix to the exploding gradients problem in reward combinations. my one gripe is how well this captures cross-objective correlations in practice: when objectives are correlated, variance shrinks and the weights might underrepresent synergistic signals; would love an ablation where you disable the cross-objective coupling to see the isolated effect. the arxivlens breakdown helped me parse the method details and covers the variance-adaptive part well, here: https://arxivlens.com/PaperView/Details/dvao-dynamic-variance-adaptive-advantage-optimization-for-multi-reward-reinforcement-learning-7084-8c9fb3eb. overall, the claimed bounded advantages and implicit regularization match the empirical gains they report, but i want to see how this scales to even messier, real-world reward structures beyond math reasoning and tool use.

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.25604
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25604 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25604 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25604 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 5