HumanTracker / README.md
dairuliu's picture
Document the inlined tracker rollouts and the sharded layout
730ed32 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
10.5 kB
metadata
language:
  - en
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
  - robotics
  - reinforcement-learning
pretty_name: HumanTracker
size_categories:
  - 1K<n<10K
tags:
  - humanoid
  - motion-tracking
  - mocap
  - preference
  - reward-model
configs:
  - config_name: preference
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: preference_pair/train/train-*.parquet
      - split: test
        path: preference_pair/test/test-*.parquet

Dataset Card for HumanTracker

Project page · Paper · Code

HumanTracker is a humanoid motion-tracking benchmark. This release contains two complementary subsets:

  • motions/ — the evaluation test split: retargeted 29-DoF reference trajectories, grouped into four motion families.
  • preference_pair/ — 6,000 human preference pairs, each stored with the two tracker rollouts that were compared and the source-motion clip they track.

The evaluation harness and HumanScore reward model live in the HumanTracker repository. preference_pair/ is the reward model's training input as published: the rollouts are inline, so nothing has to be re-simulated to reproduce HumanScore.

Dataset Details

Humanoid tracking is often scored with per-frame kinematic error, which misses the physical artifacts people notice in video — unstable support, foot skating, mistimed contacts. HumanTracker pairs a large, family-labeled motion test set with a preference-aligned metric (HumanScore) trained on pairwise human comparisons.

Subset Role Size
motions/ Tracker evaluation references (test split) 2,500 clips
preference_pair/ Human preference labels + the compared tracker rollouts 6,000 pairs (4,800 / 1,200), 10 GB

Motions are retargeted to a 29-DoF Unitree G1-style humanoid with GMR and stored as qpos trajectories at 50 Hz. Preference pairs compare GMT, TWIST2, SONIC and Humanoid-GPT rollouts of the same reference window (typically 250 frames / 5 s). Labels are a strict preference, similar, or bad_traj (cannot compare). The pair split is grouped by motion_id, so every clip from one source motion stays in one partition.

Paper: HumanTracker: Towards Comprehensive and Human-Aligned Motion Tracking Benchmark (ECCV 2026).

License: Apache 2.0.

Dataset Structure

HumanTracker/
  README.md
  motions/
    test.json
    Daily/
    Ground/
    HighlyDynamic/
    Interaction/
  preference_pair/
    train.json
    test.json
    train/train-00000-of-00020.parquet ... train-00019-of-00020.parquet
    test/test-00000-of-00005.parquet  ... test-00004-of-00005.parquet

Filenames are anonymized for release. Dates, performer names, capture-system tags and sample-rate suffixes are removed. Family-level names (Daily, Interaction, HighlyDynamic) are numbered (Daily_1.npz). Action labels that are themselves the motion type are kept: Ground actions such as burpee and sit-lie, and Highly Dynamic actions such as Tennis or named martial-arts skills.

Motions (motions/)

motions/test.json is a list of

{"path": "Daily/Daily_1.npz", "category": "Daily", "frames": 1584}
Family Test clips What it stresses
Daily 974 steady locomotion, mild contacts
Interaction 1,094 hands–body coordination
HighlyDynamic 268 impacts, aerial phases, fast footwork
Ground 164 low posture, multi-contact transitions
Total 2,500

Each .npz contains:

Key Shape Description
qpos (T, 36) generalized positions (floating base + 29 DoF)
qvel (T, 35) generalized velocities
kpt2gv_pose (T, 14, 4, 4) 14 keypoint poses in the gravity-aligned frame
kpt_cvel_in_gv (T, 14, 6) keypoint spatial velocities
gv_vel (T, 3) root linear velocity in the gravity-aligned frame
gv2wrd_pose (T, 4, 4) gravity-aligned frame to world
foot_contact (T, 2) left / right foot contact

The evaluator in the code repository reads the same manifest:

from pathlib import Path
import json
import numpy as np

root = Path("motions")
items = json.loads((root / "test.json").read_text())
item = items[0]
traj = np.load(root / item["path"])
qpos = traj["qpos"]          # (frames, 36)
category = item["category"]  # Daily | Ground | HighlyDynamic | Interaction
python -m humantracker.eval.eval_parallel_tracker \
    --tracker sonic \
    --mocap_path /path/to/HumanTracker/motions \
    --test_json /path/to/HumanTracker/motions/test.json \
    --termination_metric whole_body

path is relative to motions/. The first path component must match category.

Preference pairs (preference_pair/)

Load with 🤗 Datasets:

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("GalaxyGeneralRobotics/HumanTracker", name="preference")
row = ds["train"][0]
print(row["choice_type"], row["tracker_pair_key"], row["motion_id"])

Or read the parquet shards directly, which is what the reward-model trainer does:

import io
import json
import numpy as np
import pyarrow.parquet as pq

table = pq.read_table("preference_pair/test/test-00000-of-00005.parquet")
row = table.slice(0, 1).to_pylist()[0]

annotation = json.loads(row["annotation_json"])
reference = np.load(io.BytesIO(row["motion_npz"]))        # same keys as motions/*.npz
candidate_0 = np.load(io.BytesIO(row["candidate_0_npz"]))
candidate_1 = np.load(io.BytesIO(row["candidate_1_npz"]))
print(row["choice_type"], row["preferred_candidate_idx"], row["candidate_0_tracker"])
print(candidate_0["joint_pos"].shape)                     # (num_frames, 29)
Column Description
record_id / pair_id anonymous pair id
motion_id anonymized source-motion id (Daily_12, burpee_3, Tennis_8, …)
category motion family
tracker_pair_key unordered tracker pair, e.g. gmt|twist2
candidate_0_tracker / candidate_1_tracker which tracker occupies each candidate slot
choice_type preference / similar / bad_traj
preferred_candidate_idx 0 or 1 when choice_type == preference, else null
source_start_frame / source_end_frame clip range in the original capture
num_frames / fps clip length and 50 Hz
candidate_0_npz / candidate_1_npz the two tracker rollouts (bytes, np.savez_compressed)
motion_npz source-motion clip (bytes, np.savez_compressed)
annotation_json full cleaned record (candidates, preference, flags, annotator alias)

Candidate slots are stable identities, not display positions: preferred_candidate_idx indexes them, and the order the annotator saw is recorded separately in annotation_json. motion_npz carries the same keys as motions/*.npz, already sliced to [source_start_frame, source_end_frame). Most windows are 250 frames (5 s at 50 Hz); shorter tail windows are kept and right-padded at training time.

Each candidate NPZ is one tracker's closed-loop rollout of that window, frame-aligned with the reference, float32, num_frames rows per array:

Block Arrays Dims
Reference the tracker was following ref_pose, ref_root_navi_vel, ref_joint_pos, ref_joint_vel, ref_foot_contact 70
Simulated rollout sensor_pose, imu_pose, action, motor_target, joint_pos, joint_vel, foot_contact, foot_force, foot_vel, foot_acc, linvel_pelvis, root_navi_vel, acu_root2gv_lin_vel, acu_root2gv_ang_vel, acu_kpt2gv_pose, acu_kpt_cvel_in_gv 469
Future-reference residuals next_ref2acu_gv_vel, next_ref2acu_kpt_pose, next_ref2acu_kpt_cvel 311
Rendering qpos, qvel 71

The reported HumanScore model concatenates the first two blocks into a 539-d per-frame token; the residual block is shipped for the paper's appendix ablation and is unused by default. qpos / qvel are the MuJoCo generalized state, for replaying a rollout in the viewer.

train.json and test.json list the record_ids of each split, grouped by motion_id. train.json also carries model_selection, the 461 records held out for epoch selection, so a rerun selects the same checkpoint as the published one. bad_traj pairs are excluded from the fit, leaving 5,757 trained pairs; preference uses a Bradley–Terry loss and similar a symmetric 0.5 target.

Split Pairs Source motions preference / similar / bad_traj
train 4,800 4,486 3,850 / 759 / 191
test 1,200 812 958 / 190 / 52
total 6,000 5,298 4,808 / 949 / 243

The six unordered tracker pairs (gmt|hgpt, gmt|sonic, gmt|twist2, hgpt|sonic, hgpt|twist2, sonic|twist2) are balanced at 1,000 pairs each.

Training HumanScore from this directory:

python -m humantracker.reward_model.train.trainer \
    --data_dir /path/to/HumanTracker/preference_pair \
    --cache_dir /path/to/feature_cache \
    --output_dir storage/checkpoints/reward_model

Uses

  • Tracker evaluation. Run a policy on motions/ with the published evaluator and report Succ / MPJPE / HumanScore per family.
  • Reward-model / HumanScore research. Reproduce or extend HumanScore directly from preference_pair/; the code repository reads this directory as its --data_dir.
  • Diagnostics. Family labels and retained action names (burpee, Tennis, …) support fine-grained error breakdowns.

This release is not a full training-motion dump. The 2,500 evaluation clips are the official test split; preference clips are the labeled 5 s windows, not the complete source takes.

Citation

@misc{liu2026humantrackercomprehensivehumanalignedmotion,
      title={HumanTracker: Towards Comprehensive and Human-Aligned Motion Tracking Benchmark},
      author={Dairu Liu and Zekun Qi and Jiayu Zeng and Ruixi Yu and Yu Guan and Yintianrun Zhang and Xuchuan Chen and Sikai Liang and Zekai Li and Chenghuai Lin and Xinqiang Yu and Wenyao Zhang and He Wang and Li Yi},
      year={2026},
      eprint={2608.13555},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.RO},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13555},
}